折面螺旋折流板换热器的流动传热性能

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20170641

化工学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 68 ›› Issue (12): 4537-4544.DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20170641

折面螺旋折流板换热器的流动传热性能

王斯民¹, 肖娟¹, 王家瑞¹, 简冠平¹, 文键²

1 西安交通大学化学工程与技术学院, 陕西西安 710049;
2 西安交通大学能源与动力学院, 陕西西安 710049

收稿日期:2017-05-18 修回日期:2017-06-25 出版日期:2017-12-05 发布日期:2017-12-05
通讯作者: 文键
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（51676146）。

Flow and heat transfer performance of shell-and-tube heat exchangers with fold helical baffles

WANG Simin¹, XIAO Juan¹, WANG Jiarui¹, JIAN Guanping¹, WEN Jian²

1 School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049, Shaanxi, China;
2 School of Energy and Power Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049, Shaanxi, China

Received:2017-05-18 Revised:2017-06-25 Online:2017-12-05 Published:2017-12-05
Supported by:
supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51676146).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

针对现有平面螺旋折流板换热器的相邻折流板与壳体间存在的三角漏流区，提出了一种折面螺旋折流板换热器。基于实验研究分析了折面螺旋折流板换热器的螺旋角和搭接度对流动传热性能的影响，并拟合了壳程对流传热和阻力系数的实验关联式。结果表明，当壳程体积流量相同时，随着螺旋角的减小，折面螺旋折流板换热器的壳程总压降增加，壳程管束压降增加，壳程膜传热系数提升，综合性能增强；相同壳程体积流量下，随着搭接度的增加，壳程总压降也增加，壳程膜传热系数增加，综合性能提高。实验研究表明螺旋角18°、搭接度50%的折面螺旋折流板换热器流动传热性能最佳。将折面螺旋折流板换热器的螺旋角和搭接度作为修正因子拟合到了实验关联式中，对比发现实验值与Nu实验关联式计算值的平均相对误差为1.13%，与f实验关联式的平均相对误差为6.84%，说明了拟合的正确性和可靠性。研究结果为折面螺旋折流板换热器的设计提供了理论指导。

关键词: 折面螺旋折流板换热器, 流动, 传热, 三角漏流区, 实验验证, 实验关联式

Abstract:

A kind of shell-and-tube heat exchangers with fold helical baffles was proposed to eliminate the triangular leakage zones between adjacent baffles and shell. The effect of helical angle and overlapped degree on flow and heat transfer for shell-and-tube heat exchanger with fold helical baffles was studied based on investigation. The experimental correlations of convection heat transfer coefficient and resistance coefficient in shell side were obtained. The results show that the shell-side total pressure drop, shell-side tube bundle pressure drop, shell-side heat transfer coefficient and comprehensive performance all increase with the decrease of helical angle and the increase of overlapped degree under same shell-side volume flow rate. The flow and heat transfer performance of shell-and-tube heat exchanger with helical baffles is the best when helical angle is 18° and overlapped degree is 50%. The helical angle and overlapped degree as correction factor are added into experimental correlations. It is found that the average relative error between experimental values and experimental correlation of Nusselt number is 1.13%, the average relative error is 6.84% between experimental values and experimental correlation of resistance coefficient, which illustrates the fitting is correct and reliable. The results have a degree of theoretical guidance for design of shell-and-tube heat exchangers with fold helical baffles.

Key words: shell-and-tube heat exchangers with fold helical baffles, flow, heat transfer, triangular leakage zones, experimental validation, experimental correlation

中图分类号:

TK124

王斯民, 肖娟, 王家瑞, 简冠平, 文键. 折面螺旋折流板换热器的流动传热性能[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(12): 4537-4544.

WANG Simin, XIAO Juan, WANG Jiarui, JIAN Guanping, WEN Jian. Flow and heat transfer performance of shell-and-tube heat exchangers with fold helical baffles[J]. CIESC Journal, 2017, 68(12): 4537-4544.

参考文献 26

[1]	HUMINIC G, HUMINIC A. Application of nanofluids in heat exchangers:a review[J]. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2012, 16(8):5625-5638.
[2]	MASTER B I, CHUNANGAD K S, BOXMA A J, et al. Most frequently used heat exchangers from pioneering research to worldwide applications[J]. Heat Transfer Engineering, 2007, 27(27):4-11.
[3]	BHUTTA M M A, HAYAT N, BASHIR M H, et al. CFD applications in various heat exchangers design:a review[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2012, 32(1):1-12.
[4]	GAWANDE S H, KESTE A A, NAVALE L G, et al. Design optimization of shell and tube heat exchanger by vibration analysis[J]. Modern Mechanical Engineering, 2011, 1(1):6-11.
[5]	MAAKOUL A E, LAKNIZI A, SAADEDDINE S, et al. Numerical comparison of shell-side performance for shell and tube heat exchangers with trefoil-hole, helical and segmental baffles[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2016, 109:175-185.
[6]	MOVASSAG S Z, TAHER F N, RAZMI K, et al. Tube bundle replacement for segmental and helical shell and tube heat exchangers:performance comparison and fouling investigation on the shell side[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2013, 51(1/2):1162-1169.
[7]	LUTCHA J, NEMCANSKY J. Performance improvement of tubular heat exchangers by helical baffles[J]. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 1990, 68(3):263-270.
[8]	PENG B, WANG Q W, ZHANG C, et al. An experimental study of shell-and-tube heat exchangers with continuous helical baffles[J]. Journal of Heat Transfer, 2007, 129(10):1425-1431.
[9]	WANG Q W, CHEN G D, XU J, et al. Second-law thermodynamic comparison and maximal velocity ratio design of shell-and-tube heat exchangers with continuous helical baffles[J]. Journal of Heat Tansfer-Transactions of the ASME, 2010, 132(10):369-380.
[10]	杜文静, 王红福, 曹兴, 等. 新型六分扇形螺旋折流板换热器壳程传热及流动特性[J]. 化工学报, 2013, 64(9):3123-3129. DU W J, WANG H F, CAO X, et al. Heat transfer and fluid flow on shell side heat exchangers with novel sextant sector helical baffles[J]. CIESC Journal, 2013, 64(9):3123-3129.
[11]	文键, 杨辉著, 王斯民, 等. 梯式螺旋折流板换热器换热结构优化的数值模拟[J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2014, 48(11):8-14. WEN J, YANG H Z, WANG S M, et al. Numerical simulation for configuration optimization of heat exchanger with helical baffles[J]. Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 2014, 48(11):8-14.
[12]	WEN J, YANG H Z, WANG S M, et al. Numerical investigation on baffle configuration improvement of the heat exchanger with helical baffles[J]. Energy Conversion & Management, 2015, 89:438-448.
[13]	王斯民, 张卫华, 张早校, 等. 螺旋折流板换热器用折面折流板:201876185U[P]. 2011-06-22. WANG S M, ZHANG W H, ZHANG Z X, et al. Shell-and-tube heat exchangers with fold helical baffles:201876185U[P]. 2011-06-22.
[14]	WANG S M, WEN J, YANG H Z, et al. Experimental investigation on heat transfer enhancement of a heat exchanger with helical baffles through blockage of triangle leakage zones[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2014, 67(1/2):122-130.
[15]	徐国想, 邓先和, 许兴友, 等. 换热器传热强化性能评价方法分析[J]. 淮海工学院学报(自然科学版), 2005, 14(2):42-44. XU G X, DENG X H, XU X Y, et al. Analysis on heat transfer enhancement performance evaluation[J]. Journal of Huaihai Institute of Technology (Natural Science Editions), 2005, 14(2):42-44.
[16]	WEBB R L. Performance evaluation criteria for use of enhanced heat transfer surfaces in heat exchanger design[J]. International Journal of Heat & Mass Transfer, 1981, 24(4):715-726.
[17]	BELL K J, SHAH R K, SUBBARAO E C, et al. Delaware Method for Shell Side Design:Heat Transfer Equipment Design[M]. Washington D C:Hemisphere, 1988:145-166.
[18]	ZHANG J F, GUO S L, LI Z Z, et al. Experimental performance comparison of shell-and-tube oil coolers with overlapped helical baffles and segmental baffles[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2013, 58(58):336-343.
[19]	KLINE S J, MCCLINTOCK F A. Describing uncertainties in single-sample experiment[J]. Mechanical Engineering, 1953, 75(1):3-8.
[20]	MOFFAT R J. Describing the uncertainties in experimental results[J]. Experimental Thermal & Fluid Science, 1988, 1(1):3-17.
[21]	杨世铭, 陶文铨. 传热学[M]. 4版. 北京:高等教育出版社, 2006:237-239. YANG S M, TAO W Q. Heat Transfer[M]. 4th ed. Beijing:Higher Education Press, 2006:237-239.
[22]	CHURCHILL S W, BERNSTEIN M. A correlating equation for forced convection from gases and liquids to a circular cylinder in crossflow[J]. Journal of Heat Transfer, 1977, 99(2):300-306.
[23]	CENGEL Y A. Heat Transfer:Approach[M]. McGraw-Hill, 2007.
[24]	MIQUEL J, CASTELLS F. Curve fitting made easy[J]. Hydrocarbon Processing, 1986, 65(11) 121-124.
[25]	戚佩珊. 非线性回归分析中衡量拟合曲线优劣的依据[J]. 安徽科技学院学报, 1990, (1):31-33. QI P S. Basis of goodness of fit curves in nonlinear regression analysis[J]. Journal of Anhui Science and Technology University, 1990, (1):31-33.
[26]	ZHANG J F, LI B, HUANG W J, et al. Experimental performance comparison of shell-side heat transfer for shell-and-tube heat exchangers with middle-overlapped helical baffles and segmental baffles[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2009, 64(8):1643-1653.

折面螺旋折流板换热器的流动传热性能

Flow and heat transfer performance of shell-and-tube heat exchangers with fold helical baffles

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 26

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	晁京伟, 许嘉兴, 李廷贤. 基于无管束蒸发换热强化策略的吸附热池的供热性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 302-310.
[2]	程成, 段钟弟, 孙浩然, 胡海涛, 薛鸿祥. 表面微结构对析晶沉积特性影响的格子Boltzmann模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 74-86.
[3]	宋瑞涛, 王派, 王云鹏, 李敏霞, 党超镔, 陈振国, 童欢, 周佳琦. 二氧化碳直接蒸发冰场排管内流动沸腾换热数值模拟分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 96-103.
[4]	周绍华, 詹飞龙, 丁国良, 张浩, 邵艳坡, 刘艳涛, 郜哲明. 短管节流阀内流动噪声的实验研究及降噪措施[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 113-121.
[5]	张双星, 刘舫辰, 张义飞, 杜文静. R-134a脉动热管相变蓄放热实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 165-171.
[6]	张义飞, 刘舫辰, 张双星, 杜文静. 超临界二氧化碳用印刷电路板式换热器性能分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 183-190.
[7]	陈爱强, 代艳奇, 刘悦, 刘斌, 吴翰铭. 基板温度对HFE7100液滴蒸发过程的影响研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 191-197.
[8]	刘明栖, 吴延鹏. 导光管直径和长度对传热影响的模拟分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 206-212.
[9]	王志国, 薛孟, 董芋双, 张田震, 秦晓凯, 韩强. 基于裂隙粗糙性表征方法的地热岩体热流耦合数值模拟与分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 223-234.
[10]	齐聪, 丁子, 余杰, 汤茂清, 梁林. 基于选择吸收纳米薄膜的太阳能温差发电特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3921-3930.
[11]	李艺彤, 郭航, 陈浩, 叶芳. 催化剂非均匀分布的质子交换膜燃料电池操作条件研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3831-3840.
[12]	王玉兵, 李杰, 詹宏波, 朱光亚, 张大林. R134a在菱形离散肋微小通道内的流动沸腾换热实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3797-3806.
[13]	李科, 文键, 忻碧平. 耦合蒸气冷却屏的真空多层绝热结构对液氢储罐自增压过程的影响机制研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3786-3796.
[14]	陈天华, 刘兆轩, 韩群, 张程宾, 李文明. 喷雾冷却换热强化研究进展及影响因素[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3149-3170.
[15]	洪瑞, 袁宝强, 杜文静. 垂直上升管内超临界二氧化碳传热恶化机理分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3309-3319.