国际正渗透膜技术研讨会IFOS2016回顾：正渗透可行吗?

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20170836

化工学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 69 ›› Issue (4): 1255-1260.DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20170836

国际正渗透膜技术研讨会IFOS2016回顾：正渗透可行吗?

赵书威^1,2, 何涛², 李雪梅², 高从堦³, Ho Kyong Shon⁴, Long D Nghiem⁵, Menachem Elimelech⁶

1. 上海大学环境与化学工程学院, 上海 200444;
2. 中国科学院上海高等研究院, 膜材料与分离技术实验室, 上海 201210;
3. 浙江工业大学海洋学院, 浙江杭州 310014;
4. Centre for Technology in Water and Wastewater, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Technology Sydney (UTS), P. O. Box 123, 15 Broadway, NSW 2007, Australia;
5. Strategic Water Infrastructure Laboratory, School of Civil, Mining and Environmental Engineering, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia;
6. Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8286, United States

收稿日期:2017-06-29 修回日期:2017-07-17 出版日期:2018-04-05 发布日期:2018-04-05
通讯作者: 何涛

Highlights of international forward osmosis technology symposium (IFOS2016): is forward osmosis feasible?

ZHAO Shuwei^1,2, HE Tao², LI Xuemei², GAO Congjie³, HO Kyong Shon⁴, NGHIEM Long D⁵, ELIMELECH Menachem⁶

1. School of Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China;
2. Laboratory for Membrane Materials and Separation Technology, Shanghai Advanced Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201210, China;
3. School of Ocean College, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310014, Zhejiang, China;
4. Centre for Technology in Water and Wastewater, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Technology Sydney(UTS), P. O. Box 123, 15 Broadway, NSW 2007, Australia;
5. Strategic Water Infrastructure Laboratory, School of Civil, Mining and Environmental Engineering, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia;
6. Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8286, United States

Received:2017-06-29 Revised:2017-07-17 Online:2018-04-05 Published:2018-04-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

回顾了2016年底在悉尼召开的国际正渗透研讨会的主要内容，概括了近年来正渗透技术研究和应用的最新进展。在膜材料方面，提高水通量应着重于降低支撑层结构参数，而不是提高分离层的渗透性能。提高分离层的截留率和耐污染性是提高膜性能的关键。对于各种类型的驱动溶质而言，无机盐很可能是最为现实可靠的驱动溶质。正渗透技术在渗透稀释和与其他分离技术的耦合过程处理高含盐污染水源中有潜在应用，然而渗透能发电在短期很难成为主流的新兴能源。

关键词: 正渗透, 驱动液, 渗透稀释, 结构参数, 高含盐废水, 膜, 选择性, 分离

Abstract:

The research highlights on forward osmosis (FO) technology at the International Forward Osmosis Symposium (IFOS2016) in Sydney by the end of 2016 are summarized. For FO membrane materials, reduction in the structure parameter of the support layer, rather than the increase of the permeability of the active separation layer, is the key to improve the FO flux. Overall, the improvement in the rejection and antifouling properties is the key factor for high performance membrane. For draw solutes, inorganic salts appear to be the most promising candidates. Osmotic dilution and hybrid processes with other separation technologies for treating high salinity wastewater remain the main potential application. Unfortunately, in a short term, FO based salinity power generation is not competitive to other new energy alternatives.

Key words: forward osmosis, draw solution, osmotic dilution, structure parameter, highly saline wastewater, membranes, selectivity, separation

中图分类号:

TQ202

赵书威, 何涛, 李雪梅, 高从堦, Ho Kyong Shon, Long D Nghiem, Menachem Elimelech. 国际正渗透膜技术研讨会IFOS2016回顾：正渗透可行吗?[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(4): 1255-1260.

ZHAO Shuwei, HE Tao, LI Xuemei, GAO Congjie, HO Kyong Shon, NGHIEM Long D, ELIMELECH Menachem. Highlights of international forward osmosis technology symposium (IFOS2016): is forward osmosis feasible?[J]. CIESC Journal, 2018, 69(4): 1255-1260.

参考文献 74

[1]	SIDNEY L, SRINIVASA S. High flow porous membranes for separating water from saline solutions:US3133132[P].1964.
[2]	HICKENBOTTOM K L, VANNESTE J, ELIMELECH M, et al. Assessing the current state of commercially available membranes and spacers for energy production with pressure retarded osmosis[J]. Desalination, 2016, 389:108-118.
[3]	LOEB S, NORMAN R S. Osmotic power plants[J]. Science, 1975, 189(4203):654.
[4]	YIP N Y, ELIMELECH M. Comparison of energy efficiency and power density in pressure retarded osmosis and reverse electrodialysis[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2014, 48(18):11002-11012.
[5]	THORSEN T, HOLT T. The potential for power production from salinity gradients by pressure retarded osmosis[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2009, 335(1/2):103-110.
[6]	MCGINNIS R L, ELIMELECH M. Energy requirements of ammonia-carbon dioxide forward osmosis desalination[J]. Desalination, 2007, 207(1/2/3):370-382.
[7]	SHAFFER D L, WERBER J R, JARAMILLO H, et al. Forward osmosis:Where are we now?[J]. Desalination, 2015, 356:271-284.
[8]	CATH T Y, CHILDRESS A E, ELIMELECH M. Forward osmosis:principles, applications, and recent developments[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2006, 281(1/2):70-87.
[9]	CHEN G, WANG Z, LONG D N, et al. Treatment of shale gas drilling flowback fluids (SGDFs) by forward osmosis:membrane fouling and mitigation[J]. Desalination, 2015, 366:113-120.
[10]	LI X M, ZHAO B, WANG Z, et al. Water reclamation from shale gas drilling flow-back fluid using a novel forward osmosis-vacuum membrane distillation hybrid system[J]. Water Sci. Technol., 2014, 69(5):1036-1044.
[11]	SHAFFER D L, ARIAS CHAVEZ L H, BEN-SASSON M, et al. Desalination and reuse of high-salinity shale gas produced water:drivers, technologies, and future directions[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2013, 47(17):9569-9583.
[12]	VIDIC R D, BRANTLEY S L, VANDENBOSSCHE J M, et al. Impact of shale gas development on regional water quality[J]. Science, 2013, 340(6134):1235009.
[13]	LI X, HE T, DOU P, et al. Forward osmosis and forward osmosis membranes[M]//Comprehensive Membrane Science and Engineering. 2nd ed. Oxford:Elsevier, 2017:95-123.
[14]	YIP N Y, TIRAFERRI A, PHILLIP W A, et al. High performance thin-film composite forward osmosis membrane[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2010, 44(10):3812-3818.
[15]	WERBER J R, DESHMUKH A, ELIMELECH M. The critical need for increased selectivity, not increased water permeability, for desalination membranes[J]. Environmental Science & Technology Letters, 2016, 3(4):112-120.
[16]	XIAO P, LI J, REN Y W, et al. A comprehensive study of factors affecting fouling behavior in forward osmosis[J]. Colloids and Surfaces A-Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2016, 499:163-172.
[17]	CHEN G, LIU R, SHON H K, et al. Open porous hydrophilic supported thin-film composite forward osmosis membrane via co-casting for treatment of high-salinity wastewater[J]. Desalination, 2017, 405:76-84.
[18]	SOLOMON M F J, BHOLE Y, LIVINGSTON A G. High flux membranes for organic solvent nanofiltration (OSN)-interfacial polymerization with solvent activation[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2012, 423:371-382.
[19]	SOLOMON M F J, BHOLE Y, LIVINGSTON A G. High flux hydrophobic membranes for organic solvent nanofiltration (OSN)-interfacial polymerization, surface modification and solvent activation[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2013, 434(434):193-203.
[20]	PARK M J, PHUNTSHO S, HE T, et al. Graphene oxide incorporated polysulfone substrate for the fabrication of flat-sheet thin-film composite forward osmosis membranes[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2015, 493:496-507.
[21]	QIN D, LIU Z, SUN D D, et al. A new nanocomposite forward osmosis membrane custom-designed for treating shale gas wastewater[J]. Scientific Reports, 2015, 5:14530.
[22]	WIDJOJO N, CHUNG T S, WEBER M, et al. A sulfonated polyphenylenesulfone (sPPSU) as the supporting substrate in thin film composite (TFC) membranes with enhanced performance for forward osmosis (FO)[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2013, 220:15-23.
[23]	WEI J, LI Y, SETIAWAN L, et al. Influence of macromolecular additive on reinforced flat-sheet thin film composite pressure-retarded osmosis membranes[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2016, 511:54-64.
[24]	WERBER J R, OSUJI C O, ELIMELECH M. Materials for next-generation desalination and water purification membranes[J]. Nature Reviews Materials, 2016, 1(5):16018.
[25]	GAI J G, GONG X L. Zero internal concentration polarization FO membrane:functionalized graphene[J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2014, 2(2):425-429.
[26]	TIRAFERRI A, KANG Y, GIANNELIS E P, et al. Highly hydrophilic thin-film composite forward osmosis membranes functionalized with surface-tailored nanoparticles[J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2012, 4(9):5044-5053.
[27]	HEGAB H M, ELMEKAWY A, BARCLAY T G, et al. Fine-tuning the surface of forward osmosis membranes via grafting graphene oxide:performance patterns and biofouling propensity[J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2015, 7(32):18004-18016.
[28]	PERREAULT F, JARAMILLO H, XIE M, et al. Biofouling mitigation in forward osmosis using graphene oxide functionalized thin-film composite membranes[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2016, 50(11):5840-5848.
[29]	SOROUSH A, MA W, SILVINO Y, et al. Surface modification of thin film composite forward osmosis membrane by silver-decorated graphene-oxide nanosheets[J]. Environmental Science-Nano, 2015, 2(4):395-405.
[30]	AZARI S, ZOU L. Fouling resistant zwitterionic surface modification of reverse osmosis membranes using amino acid L-cysteine[J]. Desalination, 2013, 324:79-86.
[31]	LU X, ROMERO-VARGAS C S, SHAFFER D L, et al. In situ surface chemical modification of thin-film composite forward osmosis membranes for enhanced organic fouling resistance[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2013, 47(21):12219.
[32]	SHAFFER D L, JARAMILLO H, LU X, et al. Post-fabrication modification of forward osmosis membranes with a poly(ethylene glycol) block copolymer for improved organic fouling resistance[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2015, 490:209-219.
[33]	LIU C, LEE J, MA J, et al. Antifouling thin-film composite membranes by controlled architecture of zwitterionic polymer brush layer[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2017, 51(4):2161.
[34]	PHUNTSHO S, HONG S, ELIMELECH M, et al. Forward osmosis desalination of brackish groundwater:meeting water quality requirements for fertigation by integrating nanofiltration[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2013, 436:1-15.
[35]	PHUNTSHO S, HONG S, ELIMELECH M, et al. Forward osmosis desalination of brackish groundwater[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2013, 436(4):1-15.
[36]	KIM J E, PHUNTSHO S, SHON H K. Pilot-scale nanofiltration system as post-treatment for fertilizer-drawn forward osmosis desalination for direct fertigation[J]. Desalination & Water Treatment, 2013, 51(31/32/33):6265-6273.
[37]	PHUNTSHO S, SHON H K, MAJEED T, et al. Blended fertilizers as draw solutions for fertilizer-drawn forward osmosis desalination[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2012, 46(8):4567.
[38]	KIM Y, CHEKLI L, SHIM W G, et al. Selection of suitable fertilizer draw solute for a novel fertilizer-drawn forward osmosis-anaerobic membrane bioreactor hybrid system[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2016, 210:26-34.
[39]	PHUNTSHO S, KIM J E, JOHIR M A H, et al. Fertiliser drawn forward osmosis process:pilot-scale desalination of mine impaired water for fertigation[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2016, 508:22-31.
[40]	PHUNTSHO S, SHON H K, HONG S, et al. Fertiliser drawn forward osmosis desalination:the concept, performance and limitations for fertigation[J]. Reviews in Environmental Science & Bio/technology, 2012, 11(2):147-168.
[41]	MCCUTCHEON J R, ELIMELECH M. Influence of concentrative and dilutive internal concentration polarization on flux behavior in forward osmosis[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2006, 284(1/2):237-247.
[42]	MCGINNIS R L, HANCOCK N T, NOWOSIELSKI-SLEPOWRON M S, et al. Pilot demonstration of the NH3/CO2 forward osmosis desalination process on high salinity brines[J]. Desalination, 2013, 312:67-74.
[43]	LI X M, XU G, LIU Y, et al. Magnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles:synthesis and application in water treatment[J]. Nanoscience & Nanotechnology-Asia, 2011, 1:14-24.
[44]	LING M M, CHUNG T S, LU X. Facile synthesis of thermosensitive magnetic nanoparticles as "smart" draw solutes in forward osmosis[J]. Chemical Communications, 2011, 47(38):10788-10790.
[45]	ZHOU A J, LUO H Y, WANG Q, et al. Magnetic thermoresponsive ionic nanogels as novel draw agents in forward osmosis[J]. RSC Advances, 2015, 5(20):15359-15365.
[46]	DEY P, IZAKE E L. Magnetic nanoparticles boosting the osmotic efficiency of a polymeric FO draw agent:effect of polymer conformation[J]. Desalination, 2015, 373:79-85.
[47]	YANG H M, SEO B K, LEE K W, et al. Hyperbranched polyglycerol-coated magnetic nanoparticles as draw solute in forward osmosis[J]. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 2014, 26(13):4031-4034.
[48]	LI D, ZHANG X, SIMON G P, et al. Forward osmosis desalination using polymer hydrogels as a draw agent:influence of draw agent, feed solution and membrane on process performance[J]. Water Research, 2013, 47(1):209-215.
[49]	RAZMJOU A, SIMON G P, WANG H. Effect of particle size on the performance of forward osmosis desalination by stimuli-responsive polymer hydrogels as a draw agent[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2013, 215/216:913-920.
[50]	GE Q, SU J, AMY G L, et al. Exploration of polyelectrolytes as draw solutes in forward osmosis processes[J]. Water Research, 2012, 46(4):1318-1326.
[51]	OU R W, WANG Y Q, WANG H T, et al. Thermo-sensitive polyelectrolytes as draw solutions in forward osmosis process[J]. Desalination, 2013, 318:48-55.
[52]	TIAN E L, HU C B, QIN Y, et al. A study of poly (sodium 4-styrenesulfonate) as draw solute in forward osmosis[J]. Desalination, 2015, 360:130-137.
[53]	QI S R, LI Y, WANG R, et al. Towards improved separation performance using porous FO membranes:the critical roles of membrane separation properties and draw solution[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2016, 498:67-74.
[54]	NGUYEN H T, NGUYEN N C, CHEN S S, et al. Innovation in draw solute for practical zero salt reverse in forward osmosis desalination[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2015, 54(23):6067-6074.
[55]	ZHAO D L, WANG P, ZHAO Q P, et al. Thermoresponsive copolymer-based draw solution for seawater desalination in a combined process of forward osmosis and membrane distillation[J]. Desalination, 2014, 348:26-32.
[56]	STONE M L, RAE C, STEWART F F, et al. Switchable polarity solvents as draw solutes for forward osmosis[J]. Desalination, 2013, 312:124-129.
[57]	MELCHELS F P, FEHR I, REITZ A S, et al. Initial design and physical characterization of a polymeric device for osmosis-driven delayed burst delivery of vaccines[J]. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 2015, 112(9):1927-1935.
[58]	CHEN G, WANG Z, LI X M, et al. Concentrating underground brine by FO process:influence of membrane types and spacer on membrane scaling[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2016, 285:92-100.
[59]	WANG W D, ZHANG Y T, ESPARRA-ALVARADO M, et al. Effects of pH and temperature on forward osmosis membrane flux using rainwater as the makeup for cooling water dilution[J]. Desalination, 2014, 351:70-76.
[60]	ZHAO S, ZOU L. Effects of working temperature on separation performance, membrane scaling and cleaning in forward osmosis desalination[J]. Desalination, 2011, 278(1):157-164.
[61]	BOO C, ELIMELECH M, HONG S. Fouling control in a forward osmosis process integrating seawater desalination and wastewater reclamation[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2013, 444:148-156.
[62]	YANGALI-QUINTANILLA V, LI Z, VALLADARES R, et al. Indirect desalination of Red Sea water with forward osmosis and low pressure reverse osmosis for water reuse[J]. Desalination, 2011, 280:160-166.
[63]	BERKELAAR R P, DIETRICH E, KIP G A M, et al. Exposing nanobubble-like objects to a degassed environment[J]. Soft Matter, 2014, 10(27):4947-4955.
[64]	CATH T Y. Osmotically and thermally driven membrane processes for enhancement of water recovery in desalination processes[J]. Desalination and Water Treatment 2010, 15: 279-286.
[65]	WANG X H, CHANG V W C, TANG C Y. Osmotic membrane bioreactor (OMBR) technology for wastewater treatment and reclamation:advances, challenges, and prospects for the future[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2016, 504:113-132.
[66]	HEY T, ZAREBSKA A, BAJRAKTARI N, et al. Influences of mechanical pretreatment on the non-biological treatment of municipal wastewater by forward osmosis[J]. Environ. Technol., 2017, 38(18):2295-2304.
[67]	CHRISTOVA-BOAL D, EDEN R E, MCFARLANE S. An investigation into greywater reuse for urban residential properties[J]. Desalination, 1996, 106(1):391-397.
[68]	LUO W, HAI F I, PRICE W E, et al. Evaluating ionic organic draw solutes in osmotic membrane bioreactors for water reuse[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2016, 514:636-645.
[69]	LUO W, PHAN H V, XIE M, et al. Osmotic versus conventional membrane bioreactors integrated with reverse osmosis for water reuse:Biological stability, membrane fouling, and contaminant removal[J]. Water Research, 2017, 109:122-134.
[70]	ANSARI A J, HAI F I, PRICE W E, et al. Phosphorus recovery from digested sludge centrate using seawater-driven forward osmosis[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2016, 163:1-7.
[71]	ANSARI A J, HAI F I, PRICE W E, et al. Forward osmosis as a platform for resource recovery from municipal wastewater-a critical assessment of the literature[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2017, 529:195-206.
[72]	DESJARDINS J. All U.S. energy consumption in a giant diagram[EB/OL].[2017-08-28]. http://www.visualcapitalist.com/u-s-energy-consumption-one-giant-diagram/.
[73]	STRAUB A P, DESHMUKH A, ELIMELECH M. Pressure-retarded osmosis for power generation from salinity gradients:is it viable?[J]. Energy & Environmental Science, 2016, 9(1):31-48.
[74]	LOGAN B E, ELIMELECH M. Membrane-based processes for sustainable power generation using water[J]. Nature, 2012, 488(7411):313-319.

国际正渗透膜技术研讨会IFOS2016回顾：正渗透可行吗?

Highlights of international forward osmosis technology symposium (IFOS2016): is forward osmosis feasible?

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 74

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	邵苛苛, 宋孟杰, 江正勇, 张旋, 张龙, 高润淼, 甄泽康. 水平方向上冰中受陷气泡形成和分布实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 161-164.
[2]	吴延鹏, 李晓宇, 钟乔洋. 静电纺丝纳米纤维双疏膜油性细颗粒物过滤性能实验分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 259-264.
[3]	范孝雄, 郝丽芳, 范垂钢, 李松庚. LaMnO₃/生物炭催化剂低温NH₃-SCR催化脱硝性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3821-3830.
[4]	赵亚欣, 张雪芹, 王荣柱, 孙国, 姚善泾, 林东强. 流穿模式离子交换层析去除单抗聚集体[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3879-3887.
[5]	胡建波, 刘洪超, 胡齐, 黄美英, 宋先雨, 赵双良. 有机笼跨细胞膜易位行为的分子动力学模拟研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3756-3765.
[6]	齐聪, 丁子, 余杰, 汤茂清, 梁林. 基于选择吸收纳米薄膜的太阳能温差发电特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3921-3930.
[7]	李艺彤, 郭航, 陈浩, 叶芳. 催化剂非均匀分布的质子交换膜燃料电池操作条件研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3831-3840.
[8]	何松, 刘乔迈, 谢广烁, 王斯民, 肖娟. 高浓度水煤浆管道气膜减阻两相流模拟及代理辅助优化[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3766-3774.
[9]	邢雷, 苗春雨, 蒋明虎, 赵立新, 李新亚. 井下微型气液旋流分离器优化设计与性能分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3394-3406.
[10]	张佳怡, 何佳莉, 谢江鹏, 王健, 赵鹬, 张栋强. 渗透汽化技术用于锂电池生产中N-甲基吡咯烷酮回收的研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3203-3215.
[11]	张瑞航, 曹潘, 杨锋, 李昆, 肖朋, 邓春, 刘蓓, 孙长宇, 陈光进. ZIF-8纳米流体天然气乙烷回收工艺的产品纯度关键影响因素分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3386-3393.
[12]	刘爽, 张霖宙, 许志明, 赵锁奇. 渣油及其组分黏度的分子层次组成关联研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3226-3241.
[13]	胡亚丽, 胡军勇, 马素霞, 孙禹坤, 谭学诣, 黄佳欣, 杨奉源. 逆电渗析热机新型工质开发及电化学特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3513-3521.
[14]	张贲, 王松柏, 魏子亚, 郝婷婷, 马学虎, 温荣福. 超亲水多孔金属结构驱动的毛细液膜冷凝及传热强化[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2824-2835.
[15]	文兆伦, 李沛睿, 张忠林, 杜晓, 侯起旺, 刘叶刚, 郝晓刚, 官国清. 基于自热再生的隔壁塔深冷空分工艺设计及优化[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2988-2998.