不同错列角三角形转子作用下的分布混合数值模拟

doi:10.11949/0438-1157.20200040

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

以高黏度牛顿流体为研究对象，采用数值模拟方法研究了不同错列角的三角形转子搅拌作用下的腔内的混合过程。根据运动转子的对称性和周期性，用瞬态有限元法（FEM）结合网格叠加技术（MST）计算了三分之一的周期。提出了一种基于周期速度场的四阶Runge-Kutta算法。采用Poincaré截面、拉格朗日相干结构和混合方差指数等对混合进行表征。结果表明，不同错列角对混合和能耗的影响不明显，所有的混合情况都接近于相同的混合方差指数的渐近值，并具有相似的混合机制，属于部分混沌混合，贴近转子各边嵌入了规则的层流KAM（Komogorov-Arnold-Moser）岛。

关键词: 计算流体力学, 层流混合, 拉格朗日相干结构, 混沌, 三角形转子

Abstract:

The mixing process of a highly viscous Newtonian fluid in a cavity stirred by a pair of triangular cams with different staggered angles was investigated numerically. Owing to the symmetry and period of the moving cams, only one-third of the period was calculated by a transient finite element method (FEM) combined with the mesh superposition technique (MST). A fourth-order Runge-Kutta scheme was developed to execute particle tracking based on periodic velocity fields. Mixing was characterized in terms of Poincaré sections, a Lagragian coherent structure (LCS), and a variance index of mixing. The results showed that mixing and energy consumption were insensitive to the different staggered angles. All cases approached the same asymptotical value of the variance index of mixing and shared a similar mixing mechanism where partially chaotic mixing was embedded with regular laminar Komogorov-Arnold-Moser (KAM) islands.

Key words: computational fluid dynamics, laminar mixing, Lagragian coherent structure, chaos, triangular cams

中图分类号:

O 315.2

徐百平, 刘彪, 刘尧, 谭寿再, 杜遥雪, 刘春太. 不同错列角三角形转子作用下的分布混合数值模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(8): 3545-3555.

Baiping XU, Biao LIU, Yao LIU, Shouzai TAN, Yaoxue DU, Chuntai LIU. Numerical simulation of distributive mixing under a pair of triangular cams[J]. CIESC Journal, 2020, 71(8): 3545-3555.

图/表 11

图1 不同错列角的三角形转子搅动的空腔几何模型

Fig.1 Basic geometry of a cavity stirred by a pair of triangular cams with different staggered angles

图2 错列角为0时计算模型在t = 0处的网格划分

Fig.2 Meshing for the computational model at t = 0 for a zero staggered angle

图3 在t=0时刻不同错列角的速度矢量分布/(m/s)

Fig.3 The velocity vector distribution of different error angles at time t=0

图4 不同错列角速度矢量分布/(m/s)

Fig.4 Different staggered angular velocity vector profiles

图5 不同错列角的Poincaré截面

Fig.5 Poincaré cross sections of different staggered angles

图6 p3点的FTLE对不同的时间间隔、初始圆半径和分布点数的敏感性

Fig.6 Sensitivity of FTLE of p3 using different values of time interval, initial circle radius and point number

图7 t =T/3时不同错啮角的FTLE值分布

Fig.7 The distribution of FTLE value of different staggered angles at t = T / 3

图8 起始于p3的示踪剂经过2 T演化图像

Fig.8 Two-period evolution picture of tracer released from p3

图9 p1为中心的粒子群经过t = 9T(1080 s)演化图像及混合方差指数分析

Fig.9 Particle evolutions and mixing variance indices until t = 9T (1080s) initially released from the clusters centered at p1

图10 以p4为中心的粒子群演化

Fig.10 Particle group evolutions initially released from the clusters centered at p4

图11 不同错列角的功耗

Fig.11 Power consumptions for different staggered angles

参考文献 30

1	Avalosse T, Crochet M J. Finite element simulation of mixing(Ⅰ): Two-dimensional flow in periodic geometry[J]. AIChE J., 1997, 43(3): 577-587.
2	Bertrand F, Thibault F, Delamare L, et al. Adaptive finite element simulations of fluid flow in twin-screw extruders[J]. Comput. Chem. Eng., 2003, 27(4): 491-500.
3	Fard A S, Hulsen M A, Meijer H E H, et al. Tools to simulate distributive mixing in twin-screw extruders[J]. Theory Simul., 2012, 21(4): 217-240.
4	Robinson M, Cleary P W. Flow and mixing performance in helical ribbon mixers[J]. Chem. Eng. Sci., 2012, 84: 382-398.
5	Eitzlmayr A, Matic J, Khinast J. Analysis of flow and mixing in screw elements of co-rotating twin-screw extruders via SPH[J]. AIChE J., 2017, 63(6): 2451-2463.
6	Eitzlmayr A, Khinast J. Co-rotating twin-screw extruders: detailed analysis of conveying elements based on smoothed particle hydrodynamics（Ⅰ）: Hydrodynamics[J]. Chem. Eng. Sci., 2015, 134: 861-879.
7	Wittek P, Pereira G G, Emin M A, et al. Accuracy analysis of SPH for flow in a model extruder with a kneading element[J]. Chem. Eng. Sci., 2018, 187: 256-268.
8	Cheng W, Ye Y, Jiang S, et al. Mixing intensification in a horizontal self-cleaning twin-shaft kneader with a highly viscous Newtonian fluid[J]. Chem. Eng. Sci., 2019, 201: 437-447.
9	Chen J J, Manas-Zloczower I. Flow field characterization in a Banbury mixer[J]. International Polymer Processing, 1990, 5(3): 178-183.
10	Kalyon D M, Lawal A, Yazici R, et al. Mathematical modeling and experimental studies of twin-screw extrusion of filled polymers[J]. Polym. Eng. Sci., 1999, 39(6): 1139-1151.
11	Bravo V L, Hrymak A N, Wright J D. Numerical simulation of pressure and velocity profiles in kneading elements of a co-rotating twin screw extruder[J]. Polym. Eng. Sci., 2000, 40(2): 525-541.
12	Ishikawa T, Amono T, Kihara S I, et al. Flow patterns and mixing mechanisms in the screw mixing element of a co-rotating twin-screw extruder[J]. Polym. Eng. Sci., 2002, 42(5): 925-949.
13	Connely R K, Kokini J L. The effect of shear thinning and differential viscoelasticity on mixing in a model 2D mixer as determined using FEM with particle tracking[J]. J. Non-Newton. Fluid., 2004, 123(1): 1-17.
14	Prakash S, Karwe M, Kokini J L. Measurement of velocity distribution in the Brabender Farinograph as a model mixer using laser-Doppler anemometry[J]. J. Food Process Eng., 1999, 22(6): 435-454.
15	Rathod M L, Ashokan B K, Fanning L M, et al. Non-Newtonian fluid mixing in a twin-screw mixer geometry: three-dimensional mesh development, effect of fluid model and operating conditions[J]. J. Food Process Eng., 2015, 38(3): 207-224.
16	Connely R K, Kokini J L. Examination of the mixing ability of single and twin screw mixers using 2D finite element method simulation with particle tracking[J]. J. Food Process Eng., 2007, 79(3): 956-969.
17	Ottino J M, Muzzio F J, Tjahjadi M, et al. Chaos, symmetry, and self-similarity: exploiting order and disorder in mixing processes[J]. Science, 1992, 257(5071): 754-760.
18	Ottino J M, Wiggins S. Designing optimal micromixers[J]. Science, 2004, 305(5683): 485-486.
19	Rathod M L, Kokini J L. Extension rate distribution and impact on bubble size distribution in Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluid in a twin screw co-rotating mixer[J]. J. Food Eng., 2016, 169: 214-227.
20	Xu B, Liu Y, He L, et al. Effect of centerline distance on mixing of a non-Newtonian fluid in a cavity with asymmetric rotors[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2019, 31(2): 021205-1-18.
21	Xu B, Liu Y, He L, et al. Distributive mixing in a corotating twin screw channel using Lagrangian particle calculations[J]. Advances in Polymer Technology, 2018, 37(6): 2215-2229.
22	Xu B, Liu Y, Yu H. A numerical simulation of enhanced mixing of a non-Newtonian fluid in a cavity with asymmetric non-twin rotors [J]. Macromolecular Theory and Simulations, 2018, 27(6): 1800021.
23	Xu B, Liu Y, He L. Numerical study of mixing dynamics inside the novel elements of a co-rotating non-twin screw extruder [J]. Advances in Polymer Technology, 2018, 37(7): 2478-2496.
24	Xu B, Kuang T, Yu H, et al. Enhancement of mixing by different baffle arrays in cavity flows [J]. Chem. Eng. Sci., 2015, 137: 837-851.
25	Liu J, Zhu X. Chaotic mixing analysis of a novel single-screw extruder with a perturbation baffle by the finite-time Lyapunov exponent method [J]. Journal of Polymer Engineering, 2019, 39(3): 287-299.
26	Haller G. Lagrangian coherent structures from approximate velocity data[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2002, 14(6): 1851-1861.
27	Haller G. An objective definition of a vortex[J]. J. Fluid Mech., 2005, 525: 1-26.
28	Haller G. Lagrangian coherent structure[J]. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 2015, 47: 137-162.
29	Danckwerts P V. The definition and measurement of some characteristics of mixtures[J]. Appl. Sci. Res., 1952, A3: 279-296.
30	Phelps J H, Tucker C L. Lagrangian particle calculations of distributive mixing: limitations and applications[J]. Chem. Eng. Sci., 2006, 61(20): 6826-6836.

[1]	张思雨, 殷勇高, 贾鹏琦, 叶威. 双U型地埋管群跨季节蓄热特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 295-301.
[2]	肖明堃, 杨光, 黄永华, 吴静怡. 浸没孔液氧气泡动力学数值研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 87-95.
[3]	温凯杰, 郭力, 夏诏杰, 陈建华. 一种耦合CFD与深度学习的气固快速模拟方法[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3775-3785.
[4]	岳林静, 廖艺涵, 薛源, 李雪洁, 李玉星, 刘翠伟. 凹坑缺陷对厚孔板喉部空化流动特性影响研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3292-3308.
[5]	汪林正, 陆俞冰, 张睿智, 罗永浩. 基于分子动力学模拟的VOCs热氧化特性分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3242-3255.
[6]	邢雷, 苗春雨, 蒋明虎, 赵立新, 李新亚. 井下微型气液旋流分离器优化设计与性能分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3394-3406.
[7]	何晓崐, 刘锐, 薛园, 左然. MOCVD生长AlN单晶薄膜的气相和表面化学反应综述[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2800-2813.
[8]	牛超, 沈胜强, 杨艳, 潘泊年, 李熠桥. 甲烷BOG喷射器流动过程计算与性能分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2858-2868.
[9]	刘道银, 陈柄岐, 张祖扬, 吴琰. 颗粒聚团结构对曳力特性影响的数值模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2351-2362.
[10]	李晨曦, 刘永峰, 张璐, 刘海峰, 宋金瓯, 何旭. O₂/CO₂氛围下正庚烷的燃烧机理研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 2157-2169.
[11]	董鑫, 单永瑞, 刘易诺, 冯颖, 张建伟. 非牛顿流体气泡羽流涡特性数值模拟研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 1950-1964.
[12]	李正涛, 袁志杰, 贺高红, 姜晓滨. 疏水界面上的NaCl液滴蒸发过程内环流调控机制研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 1904-1913.
[13]	周艾然, 陆平, 夏建辉, 李冬勤, 郭杰, 杜明, 董立春. 氯化钛白氧化反应器结疤问题分析及数值模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1499-1508.
[14]	李亚飞, 邓建强, 何阳. 跨临界CO₂快速膨胀过程中非平衡冷凝和闪蒸机理的数值研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(7): 2912-2923.
[15]	刘怡琳, 李钰, 余亚雄, 黄哲庆, 周强. 基于重置温度方法的双参数介尺度气固传热模型构建[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(6): 2612-2621.