介质阻挡放电等离子体防除冰实验研究

doi:10.11949/0438-1157.20190304

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

在无风环境下分别进行了交流介质阻挡放电（AC-DBD）、纳秒脉冲介质阻挡放电（NS-DBD）及射频介质阻挡放电（RF-DBD）等离子体除冰实验研究，采用高速成像技术与红外测温成像技术分别记录除冰过程中介质层表面相变及温度动态变化过程，对比分析了三者的优缺点及传热机理。结果表明，在功率相同的条件下，AC-DBD等离子体激励的温升迅速，加热范围广，除冰实验效果最佳；对于NS-DBD等离子体激励，低压高频的除冰性能明显优于高压低频；RF-DBD等离子体激励放电主要集中在电极条边缘，放电剧烈，但电极间的区域温度较低，导致整体除冰效果不佳。最后，选择除冰效果最好的AC-DBD等离子体激励，在结冰风洞中进行了防冰实验研究。结果表明，AC-DBD等离子体激励整体防冰效果较好，但在防冰过程中，前缘会出现局部结冰，需进一步优化激励器构型及能量，提高AC-DBD等离子体激励防冰效果。

关键词: 介质阻挡放电, 等离子体防除冰, 成像, 相变, 传热

Abstract:

In this paper, AC dielectric barrier discharge (AC-DBD), nanosecond pulse dielectric barrier discharge (NS-DBD) and radio frequency dielectric barrier discharge (RF-DBD) plasma de-icing experiments were carried out in a windless environment. Using high-speed imaging technology and infrared temperature imaging technology to record the dynamic process of the phase transition of the dielectric layer, systematically analyze the advantages and disadvantages of the three and the heat transfer mechanism. The results show that when the power output of the static experiment is the same, the temperature rise of the AC-DBD plasma is rapid, and the de-icing experiment is the best. For the NS-DBD plasma, the low-pressure high-frequency de-icing performance is obviously better than the high-voltage low-frequency; For RF-DBD, the discharge of the plasma is mainly concentrated at the edge of the electrode strip, and the discharge is severe, but the temperature between the electrodes is low, resulting in poor overall deicing effect. Finally, experimental verification of AC-DBD plasma anti-icing was carried out in the icing wind tunnel. In the wind tunnel test, the AC-DBD plasma has a good anti-icing effect in the downstream of the airfoil, but the anti-icing effect is not good at the leading edge position. In the next step, it is necessary to optimize the leading edge actuator configuration and improve the airfoil leading edge anti-icing effect.

Key words: dielectric barrier discharge, plasma anti-icing or de-icing, imaging, phase change, heat transfer

中图分类号:

V 244.15

田苗, 宋慧敏, 梁华, 魏彪, 谢理科, 陈杰, 苏志. 介质阻挡放电等离子体防除冰实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(11): 4247-4256.

Miao TIAN, Huimin SONG, Hua LIANG, Biao WEI, Like XIE, Jie CHEN, Zhi SU. Experimental study on DBD discharge plasma for anti-icing and de-icing[J]. CIESC Journal, 2019, 70(11): 4247-4256.

图/表 15

图1 实验系统示意图

Fig.1 Experimental system schematic

图2 介质阻挡放电等离子体激励器

Fig.2 Dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuator

图3 AC-DBD等离子体的电压-电流波形

Fig.3 AC-DBD plasma excitation loading voltage and current waveform

图4 AC-DBD不同时刻的表面温度分布及除冰图像

Fig.4 Surface temperature distribution and de-icing image at different time under AC-DBD

图5 两种不同激励参数条件下NS-DBD等离子体的电压-电流波形

Fig.5 NS-DBD plasma excitation loading voltage and current waveform

图6 NS-DBD低压高频激励下不同时刻激励器的表面温度分布及除冰图像

Fig.6 Surface temperature distribution and de-icing image at different time under NS-DBD low voltage high frequency

图7 NS-DBD高压低频激励下不同时刻的激励器表面温度分布及除冰图像

Fig.7 Surface temperature distribution and de-icing image at different time under NS-DBD high voltage low frequency

图8 RF-DBD等离子体的电压-电流波形

Fig.8 RF-DBD plasma excitation loading voltage and current waveform

图9 RF-DBD不同时刻的表面温度分布及除冰图像

Fig.9 Surface temperature distribution and de-icing image at different times under RF-DBD

图10 结冰风洞结构简图 1—实验段；2—风机；3—制冷机组；4—喷洒装置

Fig.10 Schematic diagram of icing wind tunnel structure

图11 实验模型及激励器布置示意图

Fig.11 Experimental model and schematic diagram of actuator arrangement

图12 红外测温范围

Fig.12 Infrared temperature range

图13 AC-DBD等离子体激励防冰过程

Fig.13 AC-DBD plasma excitation anti-icing process

图14 防冰过程中表面温度分布变化

Fig.14 Surface temperature distribution change during ice protection

图15 标记处表面温度随时间的变化

Fig.15 Surface temperature change at the mark

参考文献 31

1	Lynch F , Khodadoust A . Erratum to “Effects of ice accretions on aircraft aerodynamics”[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2002, 38(3): 273-274.
2	Bragg M B , Broeren A P , Blumenthal L A . Iced-airfoil aerodynamics[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2005, 41(5): 323-362.
3	AOPA Air Satety Foundation Online Computer Library Center, Inc . Aircraft icing[EB/OL]. [2009-09-04]. http: //.
4	Thomas S K , Cassoni R P , Macarthur C D . Aircraft anti-icing and de-icing techniques and modeling[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2012, 33(5): 841-854.
5	Papadakis M , Wong S H , Yeong H W , et al . Icing tunnel experiments with a hot air anti-icing system[C]// 46th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reno, Nevada, USA: AIAA, 2008: 444-448.
6	彭宇泰, 陆文华, 李宝磊 . 石墨烯在飞机电热防除冰技术的应用[J]. 化工设计通讯, 2018, (4): 66-67
	Peng Y T , Lu W H , Li B L . Graphene application in the electro-thermal anti-icing or deicing technology of aircrafts[J]. Chemical Design Communication, 2018, (4): 66-67
7	马辉, 张大林, 孟繁鑫, 等 . 复合材料部件电加热防冰性能试验[J]. 航空学报, 2013, 34(8): 1846-1853.
	Ma H , Zhang D L , Meng F X , et al . Electric heating and anti-icing performance test of composite parts[J]. Journal of Aviation, 2013, 34(8): 1846-1853.
8	郭涛 . 机翼电脉冲除冰系统电磁力及其除冰过程仿真研究[D]. 南京: 南京航空航天大学, 2017.
	Guo T . Simulation study on electromagnetic force and deicing process of airfoil electric pulse deicing system[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Aerospace University, 2017.
9	袁赫 . 飞机电排斥除冰系统研究[D]. 武汉: 华中科技大学, 2010.
	Yuan H . Research on aircraft electric rejection deicing system[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 2010.
10	苗波 . 翼型压电振动除冰理论和实验研究[D]. 南京: 南京航空航天大学, 2016.
	Miao B . Theoretical and experimental study on airfoil piezoelectric vibration deicing[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Aerospace University, 2016.
11	Cao L , Jones A K , Sikka V K , et al . Anti-icing super hydrophobic coatings[J]. Langmuir, 2009, 25(21): 12444-12448.
12	陈凯, 王强, 夏祖西 . 飞机超疏水表面的防冰性能研究进展[J]. 应用化工, 2016, 45(10): 1969-1973.
	Chen K , Wang Q , Xia Z X . Research progress on anti-icing performance of aircraft super-hydrophobic surface[J]. Applied Chemical Industry, 2016, 45(10): 1969-1973.
13	赵安家, 孟哲理 . 飞机结冰及预防控制措施研究[J]. 飞机设计, 2018, 38(3): 55-59+64.
	Zhao A J , Meng Z L . Research on aircraft icing and preventive control measures[J]. Aircraft Design, 2018, 38(3): 55-59+64.
14	李艳春 . 适于飞机防/除冰的超疏水微结构的制备研究[D]. 上海: 上海交通大学, 2013.
	Li Y C . Preparation of superhydrophobic microstructure suitable for aircraft anti-icing or deicing[D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2013.
15	Joussot R , Leroy A , Weber R , et al . Plasma morphology and induced airflow characterization of a DBD actuator with serrated electrode[J]. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 2013, 46(12): 125204-125216.
16	Joussot R , Boucinha V , Weber R , et al . Thermal characterization of a DBD plasma actuator: dielectric temperature measurements using infrared thermography[C]// 40th Fluid Dynamics Conference or Exhibit. Chicago, Illinois, USA: AIAA, 2010: 389-401.
17	Cai J , Tian Y , Meng X , et al . An experimental study of icing control using DBD plasma actuator[J]. Experiments in Fluids, 2017, 58(8): 102.
18	Tian Y , Zhang Z , Cai J , et al . Experimental study of an anti-icing method over an airfoil based on pulsed dielectric barrier discharge plasma[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2018, (7): 1449-1460.
19	Zhou W , Liu Y , Hu H , et al . Utilization of thermal effect induced by plasma generation for aircraft icing mitigation[J]. AIAA Journal, 2018, 56(3): 1-8.
20	Kolbakir C , Liu Y , Hu H , et al . An experimental investigation on the thermal effects of NS-DBD and AC-DBD plasma actuators for aircraft icing mitigation[C]// 2018 AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting. Kissimmee, Florida, USA: AIAA, 2018: 345-357.
21	Liu Y , Kolbakir C , Hu H . A comparison study on the thermal effects in DBD plasma actuation and electrical heating for aircraft icing mitigation[J]. Heat Mass Trans. ,2018, 124: 319–330.
22	Leonov S B , Petrishchev V , Adamovich I V . Dynamics of energy coupling and thermalization in barrier discharges over dielectric and weakly conducting surfaces on μs to ms time scales[J]. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 2014, 47(47): 46.
23	贺履平 . 金属材料的热辐射及其测量法[J]. 激光与红外, 1982, 4: 64-67.
	He L P . Thermal radiation of metal materials and its measurement method[J]. Laser and Infrared, 1982, 4: 64-67.
24	王涛 . 具有高红外辐射率的绝缘导热复合材料的制备与性能研究[D]. 天津: 河北工业大学, 2017.
	Wang T . Preparation and properties of insulation and thermal conductive composites with high infrared emissivity[D]. Tianjin: Hebei University of Technology, 2017.
25	Shu S B , Li X , Zhang Y Z , et al . Surface temperature measurement of EAST divertor between 20 and 200°C using the emissivity model prior[J]. Infrared Physics and Technology, 2019, 98: 1-16.
26	Chen J , Hua L , Wu Y , et al . Experimental study on anti-icing performance of NS-DBD plasma actuator[J]. Applied Sciences, 2018, 8: 1889-1904.
27	Jia Y , Sang W , Cai Y . Numerical analysis of anti-icing property of NSDBD plasma actuator on airfoil[C]//9th AIAA Atmospheric and Space Environments Conference. Denver, USA: AIAA, 2017: 97-113.
28	赵光银, 李应红, 梁华, 等 . 纳秒脉冲表面介质阻挡等离子体激励唯象学仿真[J]. 物理学报, 2015, 64(1): 166-176.
	Zhao G Y , Li Y H , Liang H , et al . Nanosecond pulse surface dielectric barrier plasma excitation phenomenological simulation[J]. Journal of Physics, 2015, 64(1): 166-176.
29	Zhu Y , Wu Y , Cui W , et al . Modelling of plasma aerodynamic actuation driven by nanosecond SDBD discharge[J]. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 2013, 46(35): 355205.
30	Civil Aviation Authority . Aircraft Icing Handbook Version 1: FAA FED AC 150/5220-20—1992[S]. New Zealand: Safety Education and Publishing Unit, 2000.
31	邵元培, 车竞, 丁娣 . 大飞机机翼结冰对飞行动力学特性影响研究[J]. 飞行力学, 2018, 36(1): 12-15+19.
	Shao Y P , Che J , Ding D . Study on the influence of aircraft aircraft wings on flight dynamics[J]. Flight Mechanics, 2018, 36(1): 12-15+19.

[1]	张双星, 刘舫辰, 张义飞, 杜文静. R-134a脉动热管相变蓄放热实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 165-171.
[2]	张义飞, 刘舫辰, 张双星, 杜文静. 超临界二氧化碳用印刷电路板式换热器性能分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 183-190.
[3]	陈爱强, 代艳奇, 刘悦, 刘斌, 吴翰铭. 基板温度对HFE7100液滴蒸发过程的影响研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 191-197.
[4]	刘明栖, 吴延鹏. 导光管直径和长度对传热影响的模拟分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 206-212.
[5]	王志国, 薛孟, 董芋双, 张田震, 秦晓凯, 韩强. 基于裂隙粗糙性表征方法的地热岩体热流耦合数值模拟与分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 223-234.
[6]	江河, 袁俊飞, 王林, 邢谷雨. 均流腔结构对微细通道内相变流动特性影响的实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 235-244.
[7]	吴延鹏, 刘乾隆, 田东民, 陈凤君. 相变材料与热管耦合的电子器件热管理研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 25-31.
[8]	晁京伟, 许嘉兴, 李廷贤. 基于无管束蒸发换热强化策略的吸附热池的供热性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 302-310.
[9]	金伟其, 吴月荣, 王霞, 李力, 裘溯, 袁盼, 王铭赫. 化工园区工业气体泄漏气云红外成像检测技术与国产化装备进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 32-44.
[10]	程成, 段钟弟, 孙浩然, 胡海涛, 薛鸿祥. 表面微结构对析晶沉积特性影响的格子Boltzmann模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 74-86.
[11]	李艺彤, 郭航, 陈浩, 叶芳. 催化剂非均匀分布的质子交换膜燃料电池操作条件研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3831-3840.
[12]	王玉兵, 李杰, 詹宏波, 朱光亚, 张大林. R134a在菱形离散肋微小通道内的流动沸腾换热实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3797-3806.
[13]	齐聪, 丁子, 余杰, 汤茂清, 梁林. 基于选择吸收纳米薄膜的太阳能温差发电特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3921-3930.
[14]	李科, 文键, 忻碧平. 耦合蒸气冷却屏的真空多层绝热结构对液氢储罐自增压过程的影响机制研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3786-3796.
[15]	陈天华, 刘兆轩, 韩群, 张程宾, 李文明. 喷雾冷却换热强化研究进展及影响因素[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3149-3170.