过渡金属氧化物催化析氧反应研究进展

doi:10.11949/0438-1157.20200573

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

利用可再生能源电解水制氢，是实现绿色氢能经济的必由之路。现阶段，电解水过程的阳极析氧反应过电位较高，催化剂性能不稳定，制约着该技术的工业化应用。使用经济高效的催化剂，可显著降低析氧过电位，提高电解水制氢过程的经济性和电能转化效率。在各类析氧催化剂材料中，过渡金属氧化物（TMOs）由于晶体结构多样、储量丰富、环境友好、易于制备以及活性较高等优点，受到了越来越多的关注。本文从活性和稳定性出发，总结分析了近年来过渡金属氧化物催化析氧反应的研究进展，并对其未来的发展提出了建议与展望。

关键词: 过渡金属氧化物, 析氧反应, 活性, 稳定性, 策略, 电化学

Abstract:

Using renewable energy to electrolyze water to produce hydrogen is the only way to realize a green hydrogen economy. At present, the large-scale application of this technology is encumbered by the relatively low activity and stability of oxygen evolution reaction (OER) electrocatalysts. The use of cost-effective catalysts can significantly reduce the overpotential of oxygen evolution and improve the economics and power conversion efficiency of the hydrogen production process from electrolysis of water. Among the various candidates, the transition metal oxide-based (TMOs) materials show great prospects and receive ever-increasing research interests because of their diversified surface/bulk structures, natural enrichment, easy accessibility and environmental friendliness. In this review, the latest tactics aiming at enhancing activity via increasing the accessible active sites and promoting intrinsic activity have been summarized. In addition, with special emphasis on the long-term stability, the up-to-data strategies for elevating the stability are introduced. Finally, conclusions and perspectives are also presented.

Key words: transition metal oxides, oxygen evolution reaction, activity, stability, strategy, electrochemistry

中图分类号:

TQ 028.8

张伶, 陈红梅, 魏子栋. 过渡金属氧化物催化析氧反应研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(9): 3876-3904.

Ling ZHANG, Hongmei CHEN, Zidong WEI. Recent advance in transition metal oxide-based materials for oxygen evolution reaction electrocatalysts[J]. CIESC Journal, 2020, 71(9): 3876-3904.

图/表 6

参考文献 163

1	Penner S S. Steps toward the hydrogen economy [J]. Energy, 2006, 31(1): 33-43.
2	Zhuang L P. N-doped carbon as an efficient anti-poisoning catalyst against SO_x, NO_x and PO_x during oxygen reduction in acidic media[J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2019, 35(7): 659-660.
3	Najam T, Shah S S A, Ding W, et al. An efficient anti-poisoning catalyst against SO_x, NO_x, and PO_x: P, N-doped carbon for oxygen reduction in acidic media [J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2018, 57(46): 15101-15106.
4	Barreto L, Makihira A, Riahi K. The hydrogen economy in the 21st century: a sustainable development scenario [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2003, 28(3): 267-284.
5	Bockris J O M. The hydrogen economy: its history [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2013, 38(6): 2579-2588.
6	Cook T R, Dogutan D K, Reece S Y, et al. Solar energy supply and storage for the legacy and nonlegacy worlds [J]. Chemical Reviews, 2010, 110(11): 6474-6502.
7	Walter M G, Warren E L, McKone J R, et al. Solar water splitting cells [J]. Chemical Reviews, 2010, 110(11): 6446-6473.
8	Du H, Kong R M, Guo X, et al. Recent progress in transition metal phosphides with enhanced electrocatalysis for hydrogen evolution [J]. Nanoscale, 2018, 10(46): 21617-21624.
9	Liu T, Liu D, Qu F, et al. Enhanced electrocatalysis for energy-efficient hydrogen production over CoP catalyst with nonelectroactive Zn as a promoter [J]. Advanced Energy Materials, 2017, 7(15): 1700020-1700028.
10	Tang C, Zhang R, Lu W, et al. Fe-doped CoP nanoarray: a monolithic multifunctional catalyst for highly efficient hydrogen generation [J]. Advanced Materials, 2017, 29(2): 201602441- 201602446.
11	Tang C, Gan L, Zhang R, et al. Ternary Fe_xCo_1-_xP nanowire array as a robust hydrogen evolution reaction electrocatalyst with Pt-like activity: experimental and theoretical insight [J]. Nano Letter, 2016, 16(10): 6617-6621.
12	Liu T, Ma X, Liu D, et al. Mn doping of CoP nanosheets array: an efficient electrocatalyst for hydrogen evolution reaction with enhanced activity at all pH values [J]. ACS Catalysis, 2016, 7(1): 98-102.
13	Shi Q, Zhu C, Du D, et al. Robust noble metal-based electrocatalysts for oxygen evolution reaction [J]. Chemical Society Reviews, 2019, 48(12): 3181-3192.
14	Kanan M W, Nocera D G. In situ formation of an oxygen-evolving catalyst in neutral water containing phosphate and Co²⁺ [J]. Science, 2008, 321(5892): 1072-1075.
15	Li B Q, Tang C, Wang H F, et al. An aqueous preoxidation method for monolithic perovskite electrocatalysts with enhanced water oxidation performance [J]. Science Advances, 2016, 2(10): 1600495-1600501.
16	Wang X, Pan Z, Chu X, et al. Atomic-scale insights into surface lattice oxygen activation at the spinel/perovskite interface of Co₃O₄/La_0.3Sr_0.7CoO₃ [J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2019, 58(34): 11720-11725.
17	Zhang R, Dubouis N, Ben Osman M, et al. A dissolution/precipitation equilibrium on the surface of iridium-based perovskites controls their activity as oxygen evolution reaction catalysts in acidic media [J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2019, 58(14): 4571-4575.
18	Wang H, Wang J, Pi Y, et al. Double perovskite LaFe_xNi_1-_xO₃ nanorods enable efficient oxygen evolution electrocatalysis [J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2019, 58(8): 2316-2320.
19	Kim B J, Fabbri E, Abbott D F, et al. Functional role of Fe-doping in Co-based perovskite oxide catalysts for oxygen evolution reaction [J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2019, 141(13): 5231-5240.
20	Lee J G, Hwang J, Hwang H J, et al. A new family of perovskite catalysts for oxygen-evolution reaction in alkaline media: BaNiO₃ and BaNi_0.83O_2.5 [J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2016, 138(10): 3541-3547.
21	Vojvodic A, Nørskov J K. Optimizing perovskites for the water-splitting reaction [J]. Science, 2011, 334(6061): 1355-1356.
22	Xu X, Chen Y, Zhou W, et al. A perovskite electrocatalyst for efficient hydrogen evolution reaction [J]. Advanced Materials, 2016, 28(30): 6442-6448.
23	Chen D, Qiao M, Lu Y R, et al. Preferential cation vacancies in perovskite hydroxide for the oxygen evolution reaction [J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2018, 57(28): 8691-8696.
24	Zhu Y, Zhou W, Chen Z G, et al. SrNb_0.1Co_0.7Fe_0.2O_3-_δ perovskite as a next-generation electrocatalyst for oxygen evolution in alkaline solution [J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2015, 54(13): 3897-3901.
25	Tong Y, Wu J, Chen P, et al. Vibronic superexchange in double perovskite electrocatalyst for efficient electrocatalytic oxygen evolution [J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2018, 140(36): 11165-11169.
26	Kuznetsov D A, Naeem M A, Kumar P V, et al. Tailoring lattice oxygen binding in ruthenium pyrochlores to enhance oxygen evolution activity [J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2020, 142(17): 7883-7888.
27	Yu L, Yang J F, Guan B Y, et al. Hierarchical hollow nanoprisms based on ultrathin Ni-Fe layered double hydroxide nanosheets with enhanced electrocatalytic activity towards oxygen evolution [J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2018, 57(1): 172-176.
28	Chen X, Wang H, Xia B, et al. Noncovalent phosphorylation of CoCr layered double hydroxide nanosheets with improved electrocatalytic activity for the oxygen evolution reaction [J]. Chemical Communication, 2019, 55(80): 12076-12079.
29	Liang C, Zou P, Nairan A, et al. Exceptional performance of hierarchical Ni–Fe oxyhydroxide@NiFe alloy nanowire array electrocatalysts for large current density water splitting [J]. Energy & Environmental Science, 2020, 13(1): 86-95.
30	Wang Y, Qiao M, Li Y, et al. Tuning surface electronic configuration of NiFe LDHs nanosheets by introducing cation vacancies (Fe or Ni) as highly efficient electrocatalysts for oxygen evolution reaction [J]. Small, 2018, 14(17): 1800136-1800141.
31	Zheng Z, Lin L, Mo S, et al. Economizing production of diverse 2D layered metal hydroxides for efficient overall water splitting [J]. Small, 2018, 14(24): 1800759-1800766.
32	Favaro M, Drisdell W S, Marcus M A, et al. An operando investigation of (Ni-Fe-Co-Ce)O_x system as highly efficient electrocatalyst for oxygen evolution reaction [J]. ACS Catalysis, 2017, 7(2): 1248-1258.
33	Lyu F, Bai Y, Li Z, et al. Self-templated fabrication of CoO-MoO₂nanocages for enhanced oxygen evolution [J]. Advanced Functional Materials, 2017, 27(34): 1702324-1702331.
34	Cherevko S, Geiger S, Kasian O, et al. Oxygen and hydrogen evolution reactions on Ru, RuO₂, Ir, and IrO₂ thin film electrodes in acidic and alkaline electrolytes: a comparative study on activity and stability [J]. Catalysis Today, 2016, 262(1): 170-180.
35	Ghadge S D, Velikokhatnyi O I, Datta M K, et al. Experimental and theoretical validation of high efficiency and robust electrocatalytic response of one-dimensional (1D) (Mn, Ir)O₂: 10F nanorods for the oxygen evolution reaction in PEM-based water electrolysis [J]. ACS Catalysis, 2019, 9(3): 2134-2157.
36	Menezes P W, Walter C, Hausmann J N, et al. Boosting water oxidation through in situ electroconversion of manganese gallide: an intermetallic precursor approach [J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2019, 58(46): 16569-16574.
37	Tesch M F, Bonke S A, Jones T E, et al. Evolution of oxygen-metal electron transfer and metal electronic states during manganese oxide catalyzed water oxidation revealed with in situ soft X-ray spectroscopy [J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2019, 58(11): 3426-3432.
38	Chen Z, Wang Z, Cai R, et al. NiMn compound nanosheets for electrocatalytic water oxidation: effects of atomic structures and oxidation states [J]. Nanoscale, 2020, 12(4): 2472-2478.
39	Chen R R, Sun Y, Ong S J H, et al. Antiferromagnetic inverse spinel oxide LiCoVO₄ with spin-polarized channels for water oxidation [J]. Advanced Materials, 2020, 32(10): 1907976-1907983.
40	Mu C, Mao J, Guo J, et al. Rational design of spinel cobalt vanadate oxide Co₂VO₄ for superior electrocatalysis [J]. Advanced Materials, 2020, 32(10): 1907168-1907175.
41	Zhang J, Shang X, Ren H, et al. Modulation of inverse spinel Fe₃O₄ by phosphorus doping as an industrially promising electrocatalyst for hydrogen evolution [J]. Advanced Materials, 2019, 31(52): 1905107-1905116.
42	Zhou Y, Sun S, Song J, et al. Enlarged CoO covalency in octahedral sites leading to highly efficient spinel oxides for oxygen evolution reaction [J]. Advanced Materials, 2018, 30(32): 1802912-1802918.
43	Liu Z, Wang G, Zhu X, et al. Optimal geometrical configuration of cobalt cations in spinel oxides to promote oxygen evolution reaction [J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2020, 59(12): 4736-4742.
44	Li Y F, Liu Z P. Active site revealed for water oxidation on electrochemically induced delta-MnO₂: role of spinel-to-layer phase transition [J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2018, 140(5): 1783-1792.
45	Peng S, Gong F, Li L, et al. Necklace-like multishelled hollow spinel oxides with oxygen vacancies for efficient water electrolysis [J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2018, 140(42): 13644-13653.
46	Wang H Y, Hung S F, Chen H Y, et al. In operando identification of geometrical-site-dependent water oxidation activity of spinel Co₃O₄ [J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2016, 138(1): 36-39.
47	Kim T W, Woo M A, Regis M, et al. Electrochemical synthesis of spinel type ZnCo₂O₄ electrodes for use as oxygen evolution reaction catalysts [J]. Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 2014, 5(13): 2370-2374.
48	Liu Y, Ying Y, Fei L, et al. Valence engineering via selective atomic substitution on tetrahedral sites in spinel oxide for highly enhanced oxygen evolution catalysis [J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2019, 141(20): 8136-8145
49	Liu D, Zhang C, Yu Y, et al. Hydrogen evolution activity enhancement by tuning the oxygen vacancies in self-supported mesoporous spinel oxide nanowire arrays [J]. Nano Research, 2017, 11(2): 603-613.
50	Sun M, Liu H, Liu Y, et al. Graphene-based transition metal oxide nanocomposites for the oxygen reduction reaction [J]. Nanoscale, 2015, 7(4): 1250-1269.
51	Rossmeisl J, Logadottir A, Nørskov J K. Electrolysis of water on (oxidized) metal surfaces [J]. Chemical Physics, 2005, 319(1/2/3): 178-184.
52	Fabbri E, Habereder A, Waltar K, et al. Developments and perspectives of oxide-based catalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction [J]. Catalysis Science & Technology, 2014, 4(11): 3800-3821.
53	Yin Q, Tan J M, Besson C, et al. A fast soluble carbon-free molecular water oxidation catalyst based on abundant metals [J]. Science, 2010, 328(5976): 342-345.
54	Song Q, Xue Z, Liu C, et al. General strategy to optimize gas evolution reaction via assembled striped-pattern superlattices [J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2020, 142(4): 1857-1863.
55	Man I C, Su H Y, Calle-Vallejo F, et al. Universality in oxygen evolution electrocatalysis on oxide surfaces [J]. ChemCatChem, 2011, 3(7): 1159-1165.
56	Voiry D, Chhowalla M, Gogotsi Y, et al. Best practices for reporting electrocatalytic performance of nanomaterials [J]. ACS Nano, 2018, 12(10): 9635-9638.
57	Zhang L, Wang X, Zheng X, et al. Oxygen-incorporated NiMoP₂ nanowire arrays for enhanced hydrogen evolution activity in alkaline solution [J]. ACS Applied Energy Materials, 2018, 1(10): 5482-5489.
58	Zhang L, Wang X, Li A, et al. Rational construction of macroporous CoFeP triangular plate arrays from bimetal–organic frameworks as high-performance overall water-splitting catalysts [J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2019, 7(29): 17529-17535.
59	Bard A J, Faulkner L R. Fundamentals and applications[J]. Electrochemical Methods, 2001, 2(482): 580-632.
60	Wei C, Sun S, Mandler D, et al. Approaches for measuring the surface areas of metal oxide electrocatalysts for determining their intrinsic electrocatalytic activity [J]. Chemical Society Reviews, 2019, 48(9): 2518-2534.
61	Herrero E, Buller L J, Abruña H D. Underpotential deposition at single crystal surfaces of Au, Pt, Ag and other materials [J]. Chemical Reviews, 2001, 101(7): 1897-1930.
62	Green C L, Kucernak A. Determination of the platinum and ruthenium surface areas in platinum- ruthenium alloy electrocatalysts by underpotential deposition of copper(I): Unsupported catalysts [J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2002, 106(5): 1036-1047.
63	Zhou Y, Xi S, Wang J, et al. Revealing the dominant chemistry for oxygen reduction reaction on small oxide nanoparticles [J]. ACS Catalysis, 2017, 8(1): 673-677.
64	Gerken J B, Shaner S E, Massé R C, et al. A survey of diverse earth abundant oxygen evolution electrocatalysts showing enhanced activity from Ni–Fe oxides containing a third metal [J]. Energy & Environmental Science, 2014, 7(7): 2376-2382.
65	Zhang L, Li L, Chen H, et al. Recent progress in precious metal-free carbon-based materials towards the oxygen reduction reaction: activity, stability, and anti-poisoning [J]. Chemistry–A European Journal, 2020, 18(1): 3973-3990.
66	Lu Z, Xu W, Ma J, et al. Superaerophilic carbon-nanotube-array electrode for high-performance oxygen reduction reaction [J]. Advanced Materials, 2016, 28(33): 7155-7161.
67	Nørskov J K, Abild-Pedersen F, Studt F, et al. Density functional theory in surface chemistry and catalysis [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2011, 108(3): 937-943.
68	Suntivich J, May K J, Gasteiger H A, et al. A perovskite oxide optimized for oxygen evolution catalysis from molecular orbital principles [J]. Science, 2011, 334(6061): 1383-1385.
69	Ng J W D, García-Melchor M, Bajdich M, et al. Gold-supported cerium-doped NiO_x catalysts for water oxidation [J]. Nature Energy, 2016, 1(5): 1-8.
70	Haber J A, Cai Y, Jung S, et al. Discovering Ce-rich oxygen evolution catalysts, from high throughput screening to water electrolysis [J]. Energy & Environmental Science, 2014, 7(2): 682-688.
71	Liardet L, Hu X. Amorphous cobalt vanadium oxide as a highly active electrocatalyst for oxygen evolution [J]. ACS Catalysis, 2018, 8(1): 644-650.
72	Tang T, Jiang W J, Niu S, et al. Electronic and morphological dual modulation of cobalt carbonate hydroxides by Mn doping toward highly efficient and stable bifunctional electrocatalysts for overall water splitting [J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2017, 139(24): 8320-8328.
73	Wang X, Sun P, Lu H, et al. Aluminum-tailored energy level and morphology of Co_3-_xAl_xO₄ porous nanosheets toward highly efficient electrocatalysts for water oxidation [J]. Small, 2019, 15(11): 1804886-1804893.
74	Chen J Y, Dang L, Liang H, et al. Operando analysis of NiFe and Fe oxyhydroxide electrocatalysts for water oxidation: detection of Fe⁴⁺ by mossbauer spectroscopy [J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2015, 137(48): 15090-15093.
75	Stevens M B, Trang C D M, Enman L J, et al. Reactive Fe-sites in Ni/Fe (oxy)hydroxide are responsible for exceptional oxygen electrocatalysis activity [J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2017, 139(33): 11361-11364.
76	Liu H, Gao X, Yao X, et al. Manganese(Ⅱ) phosphate nanosheet assembly with native out-of-plane Mn centres for electrocatalytic water oxidation [J]. Chemical Science, 2019, 10(1): 191-197.
77	Jiang J, Sun F, Zhou S, et al. Atomic-level insight into super-efficient electrocatalytic oxygen evolution on iron and vanadium co-doped nickel (oxy)hydroxide [J]. Nature Communication, 2018, 9(1): 2885.
78	Shen F C, Wang Y, Tang Y J, et al. CoV₂O₆-V₂O₅ coupled with porous N-doped reduced graphene oxide composite as a highly efficient electrocatalyst for oxygen evolution [J]. ACS Energy Letters, 2017, 2(6): 1327-1333.
79	Fan K, Ji Y, Zou H, et al. Hollow iron-vanadium composite spheres: a highly efficient iron-based water oxidation electrocatalyst without the need for nickel or cobalt [J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2017, 56(12): 3289-3293.
80	Liu J, Ji Y, Nai J, et al. Ultrathin amorphous cobalt–vanadium hydr(oxy)oxide catalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction [J]. Energy & Environmental Science, 2018, 11(7): 1736-1741.
81	Fan K, Chen H, Ji Y, et al. Nickel-vanadium monolayer double hydroxide for efficient electrochemical water oxidation [J]. Nature Communication, 2016, 7(1): 1-9.
82	Li P, Duan X, Kuang Y, et al. Tuning electronic structure of NiFe layered double hydroxides with vanadium doping toward high efficient electrocatalytic water oxidation [J]. Advanced Energy Materials, 2018, 8(15): 1-8.
83	Yang Y, Dang L, Shearer M J, et al. Highly active trimetallic NiFeCr layered double hydroxide electrocatalysts for oxygen evolution reaction [J]. Advanced Energy Materials, 2018, 8(15): 1-9.
84	Gerken J B, Shaner S E, Massé R C, et al. A survey of diverse earth abundant oxygen evolution electrocatalysts showing enhanced activity from Ni–Fe oxides containing a third metal [J]. Energy & Environmental Science, 2014, 7(7): 2376-2382.
85	Zhao Y, Jia X, Chen G, et al. Ultrafine NiO nanosheets stabilized by TiO₂ from monolayer NiTi-LDH precursors: an active water oxidation electrocatalyst [J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2016, 138(20): 6517-6524.
86	Huynh M, Ozel T, Liu C, et al. Design of template-stabilized active and earth-abundant oxygen evolution catalysts in acid [J]. Chemical Science, 2017, 8(7): 4779-4794.
87	Moreno-Hernandez I A, MacFarland C A, Read C G, et al. Crystalline nickel manganese antimonate as a stable water-oxidation catalyst in aqueous 1.0 M H₂SO₄ [J]. Energy & Environmental Science, 2017, 10(10): 2103-2108.
88	He H, Chen J, Zhang D, et al. Modulating the electrocatalytic performance of palladium with the electronic metal-support interaction: a case study on oxygen evolution reaction [J]. ACS Catalysis, 2018, 8(7): 6617-6626.
89	Wang X, Xiao H, Li A, et al. Constructing NiCo/Fe₃O₄ heteroparticles within MOF-74 for efficient oxygen evolution reactions [J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2018, 140(45): 15336-15341.
90	Zhao D, Pi Y, Shao Q, et al. Enhancing oxygen evolution electrocatalysis via the intimate hydroxide-oxide interface [J]. ACS Nano, 2018, 12(6): 6245-6251.
91	Feng J X, Ye S H, Xu H, et al. Design and synthesis of FeOOH/CeO₂ heterolayered nanotube electrocatalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction [J]. Advanced Materials, 2016, 28(23): 4698-4703.
92	Xu H, Cao J, Shan C, et al. MOF-derived hollow CoS decorated with CeO_x nanoparticles for boosting oxygen evolution reaction electrocatalysis [J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2018, 57(28): 8654-8658.
93	Zheng Y R, Gao M R, Gao Q, et al. An efficient CeO₂/CoSe₂ nanobelt composite for electrochemical water oxidation [J]. Small, 2015, 11(2): 182-188.
94	Zhao Y, Chang C, Teng F, et al. Defect-engineered ultrathin δ-MnO₂ nanosheet arrays as bifunctional electrodes for efficient overall water splitting [J]. Advanced Energy Materials, 2017, 7(18): 1-7.
95	Li L, Feng X, Nie Y, et al. Insight into the effect of oxygen vacancy concentration on the catalytic performance of MnO₂ [J]. ACS Catalysis, 2015, 5(8): 4825-4832.
96	Xu L, Jiang Q, Xiao Z, et al. Plasma-engraved Co₃O₄ nanosheets with oxygen vacancies and high surface area for the oxygen evolution reaction [J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2016, 55(17): 5277-5281.
97	Xu W, Lyu F, Bai Y, et al. Porous cobalt oxide nanoplates enriched with oxygen vacancies for oxygen evolution reaction [J]. Nano Energy, 2018, 43(1): 110-116.
98	Zhuang L, Ge L, Yang Y, et al. Ultrathin iron-cobalt oxide nanosheets with abundant oxygen vacancies for the oxygen evolution reaction [J]. Advanced Materials, 2017, 29(17): 1-7.
99	Seitz L C, Dickens C F, Nishio K, et al. A highly active and stable IrO_x/SrIrO₃ catalyst for the oxygen evolution reaction [J]. Science, 2016, 353(6303): 1011-1014.
100	Li B Q, Xia Z J, Zhang B, et al. Regulating p-block metals in perovskite nanodots for efficient electrocatalytic water oxidation [J]. Nature Communication, 2017, 8(1): 934-941.
101	Llordes A, Wang Y, Fernandez-Martinez A, et al. Linear topology in amorphous metal oxide electrochromic networks obtained via low-temperature solution processing [J]. Nature Materials, 2016, 15(12): 1267-1273.
102	Zhang C, Zhang X, Daly K, et al. Water oxidation catalysis: tuning the electrocatalytic properties of amorphous lanthanum cobaltite through calcium doping [J]. ACS Catalysis, 2017, 7(9): 6385-6391.
103	Chen G, Zhou W, Guan D, et al. Two orders of magnitude enhancement in oxygen evolution reactivity on amorphous Ba_0.5Sr_0.5Co_0.8Fe_0.2O_3-_δ nanofilms with tunable oxidation state [J]. Science Advances, 2017, 3(6): 1-9.
104	Salvatore D A, Dettelbach K E, Hudkins J R, et al. Near-infrared-driven decomposition of metal precursors yields amorphous electrocatalytic films [J]. Science Advances, 2015, 1(2): 1-7.
105	Liu J, Nai J, You T, et al. The flexibility of an amorphous cobalt hydroxide nanomaterial promotes the electrocatalysis of oxygen evolution reaction [J]. Small, 2018, 14(17): 1-8.
106	Grimaud A, Diaz-Morales O, Han B, et al. Activating lattice oxygen redox reactions in metal oxides to catalyse oxygen evolution [J]. Nature Chemistry, 2017, 9(5): 457-465.
107	Smith R D, Prevot M S, Fagan R D, et al. Photochemical route for accessing amorphous metal oxide materials for water oxidation catalysis [J]. Science, 2013, 340(6128): 60-63.
108	Smith R D, Prevot M S, Fagan R D, et al. Water oxidation catalysis: electrocatalytic response to metal stoichiometry in amorphous metal oxide films containing iron, cobalt, and nickel [J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2013, 135(31): 11580-11586.
109	Zhang B, Zheng X, Voznyy O, et al. Homogeneously dispersed multimetal oxygen-evolving catalysts [J]. Science, 2016, 352(6283): 333-337.
110	Cai Z, Li L, Zhang Y, et al. Amorphous nanocages of Cu-Ni-Fe hydr(oxy)oxide prepared by photocorrosion for highly efficient oxygen evolution [J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2019, 58(13): 4189-4194.
111	Chen G, Zhu Y, Chen H M, et al. An amorphous nickel-iron-based electrocatalyst with unusual local structures for ultrafast oxygen evolution reaction [J]. Advanced Materials, 2019, 31(28): 1-7.
112	Cho K H, Seo H, Park S, et al. Uniform, assembled 4 nm Mn₃O₄ nanoparticles as efficient water oxidation electrocatalysts at neutral pH [J]. Advanced Functional Materials, 2020, 30(10): 1910424.
113	Feng J X, Xu H, Dong Y T, et al. FeOOH/Co/FeOOH hybrid nanotube arrays as high-performance electrocatalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction [J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2016, 55(11): 3694-3698.
114	Dong C, Kou T, Gao H, et al. Eutectic-derived mesoporous Ni-Fe-O nanowire network catalyzing oxygen evolution and overall water splitting [J]. Advanced Energy Materials, 2018, 8(5): 1-9.
115	Lee W, Liu Y, Lee Y, et al. Two-dimensional materials in functional three-dimensional architectures with applications in photodetection and imaging [J]. Nature Communication, 2018, 9(1): 1417-1425.
116	Li S, Wang Y, Peng S, et al. Co-Ni-based nanotubes/nanosheets as efficient water splitting electrocatalysts [J]. Advanced Energy Materials, 2016, 6(3): 1-7.
117	Wu G, Chen W, Zheng X, et al. Hierarchical Fe-doped NiO_x nanotubes assembled from ultrathin nanosheets containing trivalent nickel for oxygen evolution reaction [J]. Nano Energy, 2017, 38(1): 167-174.
118	Xia J, Zhao H, Huang B, et al. Efficient optimization of electron/oxygen pathway by constructing ceria/hydroxide interface for highly active oxygen evolution reaction [J]. Advanced Functional Materials, 2020, 30(9): 1-9.
119	Ma T Y, Dai S, Jaroniec M, et al. Metal-organic framework derived hybrid Co₃O₄-carbon porous nanowire arrays as reversible oxygen evolution electrodes [J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2014, 136(39): 13925-13931.
120	Wang X, Li Z, Wu D Y, et al. Porous cobalt-nickel hydroxide nanosheets with active cobalt ions for overall water splitting [J]. Small, 2019, 15(8): 1804832-1804840.
121	Qi J, Zhang W, Xiang R, et al. Porous nickel-iron oxide as a highly efficient electrocatalyst for oxygen evolution reaction [J]. Advance Science, 2015, 2(10): 1500199-1500206.
122	Ping J, Wang Y, Lu Q, et al. Self-assembly of single-layer CoAl-layered double hydroxide nanosheets on 3D graphene network used as highly efficient electrocatalyst for oxygen evolution reaction [J]. Advanced Materials, 2016, 28(35): 7640-7645.
123	Li B Q, Zhang S Y, Tang C, et al. Anionic regulated NiFe (oxy)sulfide electrocatalysts for water oxidation [J]. Small, 2017, 13(25): 1700610-1700615.
124	Shi H, Liang H, Ming F, et al. Efficient overall water-splitting electrocatalysis using lepidocrocite VOOH hollow nanospheres [J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2017, 56(2): 573-577.
125	Zhang R, Russo P A, Buzanich A G, et al. Hybrid organic-inorganic transition-metal phosphonates as precursors for water oxidation electrocatalysts [J]. Advanced Functional Materials, 2017, 27(40): 1703158-1703168.
126	Zhou P, Wang Y, Xie C, et al. Acid-etched layered double hydroxides with rich defects for enhancing the oxygen evolution reaction [J]. Chemical Communication, 2017, 53(86): 11778-11781.
127	Guan J, Duan Z, Zhang F, et al. Water oxidation on a mononuclear manganese heterogeneous catalyst [J]. Nature Catalysis, 2018, 1(11): 870-877.
128	Huang J, Han J, Wang R, et al. Improving electrocatalysts for oxygen evolution using Ni_xFe_3–_xO₄/Ni hybrid nanostructures formed by solvothermal synthesis [J]. ACS Energy Letters, 2018, 3(7): 1698-1707.
129	Indra A, Paik U, Song T. Boosting electrochemical water oxidation with metal hydroxide carbonate templated prussian blue analogues [J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2018, 57(5): 1241-1245.
130	Luo X, Shao Q, Pi Y, et al. Trimetallic molybdate nanobelts as active and stable electrocatalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction [J]. ACS Catalysis, 2018, 9(2): 1013-1018.
131	Park S A, Kim K S, Kim Y T. Electrochemically activated iridium oxide black as promising electrocatalyst having high activity and stability for oxygen evolution reaction [J]. ACS Energy Letters, 2018, 3(5): 1110-1115.
132	Wang X, Yu L, Guan B Y, et al. Metal-organic framework hybrid-assisted formation of Co₃O₄/Co-Fe oxide double-shelled nanoboxes for enhanced oxygen evolution [J]. Advanced Materials, 2018, 30(29): 1801211-1801215.
133	Zhang K, Zhang G, Qu J, et al. Disordering the atomic structure of Co(II) oxide via B-doping: an efficient oxygen vacancy introduction approach for high oxygen evolution reaction electrocatalysts [J]. Small, 2018, 14(41): 1802760-1802768.
134	Zhou Q, Chen Y, Zhao G, et al. Active-site-enriched iron-doped nickel/cobalt hydroxide nanosheets for enhanced oxygen evolution reaction [J]. ACS Catalysis, 2018, 8(6): 5382-5390.
135	Huang Z F, Song J, Du Y, et al. Chemical and structural origin of lattice oxygen oxidation in Co–Zn oxyhydroxide oxygen evolution electrocatalysts [J]. Nature Energy, 2019, 4(4): 329-338.
136	Lemoine K, Lhoste J, Hemon-Ribaud A, et al. Investigation of mixed-metal (oxy)fluorides as a new class of water oxidation electrocatalysts [J]. Chemical Science, 2019, 10(40): 9209-9218.
137	Shan J, Guo C, Zhu Y, et al. Charge-redistribution-enhanced nanocrystalline Ru@IrO_x electrocatalysts for oxygen evolution in acidic media [J]. Chemistry, 2019, 5(2): 445-459.
138	Dong C, Zhang X, Xu J, et al. Ruthenium-doped cobalt-chromium layered double hydroxides for enhancing oxygen evolution through regulating charge transfer [J]. Small, 2020, 16(5): 1905328-1905334.
139	Kou Z, Yu Y, Liu X, et al. Potential-dependent phase transition and Mo-enriched surface reconstruction of γ-CoOOH in a heterostructured Co-Mo₂C precatalyst enable water oxidation [J]. ACS Catalysis, 2020, 10(7): 4411-4419.
140	Ouyang T, Wang X T, Mai X Q, et al. Coupling magnetic single-crystal Co₂Mo₃O₈ with ultrathin nitrogen-rich carbon layer for oxygen evolution reaction [J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2020, 59(29): 11948-11957.
141	Saha J, Verma S, Ball R, et al. Compositional control as the key for achieving highly efficient OER electrocatalysis with cobalt phosphates decorated nanocarbon florets [J]. Small, 2020, 16(12): 1903334-1903341.
142	Wang X P, Wu H J, Xi S B, et al. Strain stabilized nickel hydroxide nanoribbons for efficient water splitting [J]. Energy & Environmental Science, 2020, 13(1): 229-237.
143	Zhu Y, Tahini H A, Hu Z, et al. Boosting oxygen evolution reaction by creating both metal ion and lattice-oxygen active sites in a complex oxide [J]. Advanced Materials, 2020, 32(1): 1905025-1905032.
144	Lu X F, Gu L F, Wang J W, et al. Bimetal-organic framework derived CoFe₂O₄/C porous hybrid nanorod arrays as high-performance electrocatalysts for oxygen evolution reaction [J]. Advanced Materials, 2017, 29(3): 1604437-1604443.
145	Zhao Q, Yang J, Liu M, et al. Tuning electronic push/pull of Ni-based hydroxides to enhance hydrogen and oxygen evolution reactions for water splitting [J]. ACS Catalysis, 2018, 8(6): 5621-5629.
146	Jin Y, Huang S, Yue X, et al. Mo- and Fe-modified Ni(OH)₂/NiOOH nanosheets as highly active and stable electrocatalysts for oxygen evolution reaction [J]. ACS Catalysis, 2018, 8(3): 2359-2363.
147	Chi K, Tian X, Wang Q, et al. Oxygen vacancies engineered CoMoO₄ nanosheet arrays as efficient bifunctional electrocatalysts for overall water splitting [J]. Journal of Catalysis, 2020, 381: 44-52.
148	Chen P, Zhou T, Wang S, et al. Dynamic migration of surface fluorine anions on cobalt‐based materials to achieve enhanced oxygen evolution catalysis [J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2018, 57(47): 15471-15475.
149	Gou Y, Liu Q, Shi X, et al. CaMoO₄ nanosheet arrays for efficient and durable water oxidation electrocatalysis under alkaline conditions [J]. Chemical Communications, 2018, 54(40): 5066-5069.
150	Gu W, Hu L, Zhu X, et al. Rapid synthesis of Co₃O₄ nanosheet arrays on Ni foam by in situ electrochemical oxidization of air-plasma engraved Co(OH)₂ for efficient oxygen evolution [J]. Chemical Communication, 2018, 54(90): 12698-12701.
151	Liu J, Zheng Y, Wang Z, et al. Free-standing single-crystalline NiFe-hydroxide nanoflake arrays: a self-activated and robust electrocatalyst for oxygen evolution [J]. Chemical Communication, 2018, 54(5): 463-466.
152	Zhang B, Jiang K, Wang H, et al. Fluoride-induced dynamic surface self-reconstruction produces unexpectedly efficient oxygen-evolution catalyst [J]. Nano Letter, 2019, 19(1): 530-537.
153	Ye Z, Li T, Ma G, et al. Metal-ion (Fe, V, Co, and Ni)-doped MnO₂ ultrathin nanosheets supported on carbon fiber paper for the oxygen evolution reaction [J]. Advanced Functional Materials, 2017, 27(44): 1704083-1704090.
154	Ge R, Li L, Su J, et al. Ultrafine defective RuO₂electrocatayst integrated on carbon cloth for robust water oxidation in acidic media [J]. Advanced Energy Materials, 2019, 9(35): 1901313-1901321.
155	Yu L, Zhou H, Sun J, et al. Cu nanowires shelled with NiFe layered double hydroxide nanosheets as bifunctional electrocatalysts for overall water splitting [J]. Energy & Environmental Science, 2017, 10(8): 1820-1827.
156	Han X B, Tang X Y, Lin Y, et al. Ultrasmall abundant metal-based clusters as oxygen-evolving catalysts [J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2019, 141(1): 232-239.
157	Niu S, Jiang W J, Wei Z, et al. Se-doping activates FeOOH for cost-effective and efficient electrochemical water oxidation [J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2019, 141(17): 7005-7013.
158	Xie L, Li X, Wang B, et al. Molecular engineering of a 3D self-supported electrode for oxygen electrocatalysis in neutral media [J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2019, 58(52): 18883-18887.
159	Kasian O, Grote J P, Geiger S, et al. The common intermediates of oxygen evolution and dissolution reactions during water electrolysis on iridium [J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2018, 57(9): 2488-2491.
160	Geiger S, Kasian O, Ledendecker M, et al. The stability number as a metric for electrocatalyst stability benchmarking [J]. Nature Catalysis, 2018, 1(7): 508-515.
161	Speck F D, Dettelbach K E, Sherbo R S, et al. On the electrolytic stability of iron-nickel oxides [J]. Chemistry, 2017, 2(4): 590-597.
162	Chung D Y, Lopes P P, Farinazzo Bergamo Dias Martins P, et al. Dynamic stability of active sites in hydr(oxy)oxides for the oxygen evolution reaction [J]. Nature Energy, 2020, 5(3): 222-230.
163	Obata K, Takanabe K. A permselective CeO_x coating to improve the stability of oxygen evolution electrocatalysts [J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2018, 57(6): 1616-1620.

[1]	江河, 袁俊飞, 王林, 邢谷雨. 均流腔结构对微细通道内相变流动特性影响的实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 235-244.
[2]	程业品, 胡达清, 徐奕莎, 刘华彦, 卢晗锋, 崔国凯. 离子液体基低共熔溶剂在转化CO₂中的应用[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3640-3653.
[3]	郑玉圆, 葛志伟, 韩翔宇, 王亮, 陈海生. 中高温钙基材料热化学储热的研究进展与展望[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3171-3192.
[4]	胡亚丽, 胡军勇, 马素霞, 孙禹坤, 谭学诣, 黄佳欣, 杨奉源. 逆电渗析热机新型工质开发及电化学特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3513-3521.
[5]	孟令玎, 崇汝青, 孙菲雪, 孟子晖, 刘文芳. 改性聚乙烯膜和氧化硅固定化碳酸酐酶[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3472-3484.
[6]	杨欣, 彭啸, 薛凯茹, 苏梦威, 吴燕. 分子印迹-TiO₂光电催化降解增溶PHE废水性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3564-3571.
[7]	吕龙义, 及文博, 韩沐达, 李伟光, 高文芳, 刘晓阳, 孙丽, 王鹏飞, 任芝军, 张光明. 铁基导电材料强化厌氧去除卤代有机污染物：研究进展及未来展望[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3193-3202.
[8]	张蒙蒙, 颜冬, 沈永峰, 李文翠. 电解液类型对双离子电池阴阳离子储存行为的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 3116-3126.
[9]	葛加丽, 管图祥, 邱新民, 吴健, 沈丽明, 暴宁钟. 垂直多孔碳包覆的FeF₃正极的构筑及储锂性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 3058-3067.
[10]	屈园浩, 邓文义, 谢晓丹, 苏亚欣. 活性炭/石墨辅助污泥电渗脱水研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 3038-3050.
[11]	王杰, 丘晓琳, 赵烨, 刘鑫洋, 韩忠强, 许雍, 蒋文瀚. 聚电解质静电沉积改性PHBV抗氧化膜的制备与性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 3068-3078.
[12]	张琦钰, 高利军, 苏宇航, 马晓博, 王翊丞, 张亚婷, 胡超. 碳基催化材料在电化学还原二氧化碳中的研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2753-2772.
[13]	张谭, 刘光, 李晋平, 孙予罕. Ru基氮还原电催化剂性能调控策略[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2264-2280.
[14]	蔡斌, 张效林, 罗倩, 党江涛, 左栗源, 刘欣梅. 导电薄膜材料的研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2308-2321.
[15]	毛磊, 刘冠章, 袁航, 张光亚. 可捕集CO₂的纳米碳酸酐酶粒子的高效制备及性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2589-2598.