二维氧化石墨烯膜离子选择性传递调控的研究进展

doi:10.11949/0438-1157.20221074

化工学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 74 ›› Issue (1): 303-312.DOI: 10.11949/0438-1157.20221074

二维氧化石墨烯膜离子选择性传递调控的研究进展

余后川¹^,²(), 任腾¹^,², 张宁¹^,²(), 姜晓滨¹, 代岩³, 张晓鹏¹^,², 鲍军江¹^,², 贺高红¹()

^1.大连理工大学精细化工国家重点实验室，辽宁大连 116023
^2.大连理工大学化工学院，辽宁盘锦 124221
^3.大连理工大学盘锦产业技术研究院，辽宁盘锦 124221

收稿日期:2022-07-09 修回日期:2022-10-11 出版日期:2023-01-05 发布日期:2023-03-20
通讯作者: 张宁,贺高红
作者简介:余后川（1997—），男，硕士研究生，yuhouchuan9@163.com
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目(2021YFC2901300);辽宁省自然科学基金项目(2021-MS-120);国家自然科学基金创新研究群体项目(22021005);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(DUT22QN209)

Advances in two-dimensional graphene oxide membrane for ion selective transport

Houchuan YU¹^,²(), Teng REN¹^,², Ning ZHANG¹^,²(), Xiaobin JIANG¹, Yan DAI³, Xiaopeng ZHANG¹^,², Junjiang BAO¹^,², Gaohong HE¹()

^1.State Key Laboratory of Fine Chemicals, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116023, Liaoning, China
^2.School of Chemical Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Panjin 124221, Liaoning, China
^3.Panjin Institute of Industrial Technology, Dalian University of Technology, Panjin 124221, Liaoning, China

Received:2022-07-09 Revised:2022-10-11 Online:2023-01-05 Published:2023-03-20
Contact: Ning ZHANG, Gaohong HE

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

膜分离技术具有低能耗和高选择性的优势，已成为离子分离的重要手段。氧化石墨烯（GO）具有单原子厚度，表面富含多种含氧基团，利用其构筑的层叠膜展现出精确的离子筛分性能。本文系统地介绍了GO膜在离子选择性传递调控方面取得的研究进展，从层叠通道调控和电荷修饰两个角度对GO膜的离子选择性传递性能进行阐述。对于层叠通道，可采用部分还原法、物理插层法、化学交联法进行精确调控，实现GO膜对离子筛分性能的强化。对于电荷修饰，常采用正/负电荷改性策略对GO膜与离子间的长程静电作用进行调控。本文将深化对GO层叠膜离子选择性传递机制的认识，同时提出该领域的发展方向，以期促进GO膜在离子分离领域的进一步发展。

关键词: 氧化石墨烯, 二维层叠结构, 膜, 分离, 选择性, 离子传递

Abstract:

Membrane separation technology has become an important method for ion separation due to its advantages of low energy consumption and high selectivity. Graphene oxide (GO) exhibits single-atom thickness with fruitful oxygen-containing groups. The GO laminar membrane shows precise ion-sieving selectivity. This review systematically presents the progress of GO membranes for selective transport of ions. The performance of GO membranes is optimized by laminar structure regulation and charge modification. For laminar structure regulation, the methods of partial reduction, physical intercalation and chemical crosslinking are mainly used to enhance the size-sieving ability of GO membranes for selective ion transport. As for the charge modification method, the strategies of positive/negative-charge modifications are usually employed to tune the long-range electrostatic interaction between GO membranes and the guest ions. This review will deepen the understanding on the mechanism of the ion selectivity of GO membranes, and put forward to the research direction in order to promote the development of GO membrane in the application of ion separation.

Key words: graphene oxide, two-dimensional laminates, membranes, separation, selectivity, ion transport

中图分类号:

TQ 028.3

余后川, 任腾, 张宁, 姜晓滨, 代岩, 张晓鹏, 鲍军江, 贺高红. 二维氧化石墨烯膜离子选择性传递调控的研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(1): 303-312.

Houchuan YU, Teng REN, Ning ZHANG, Xiaobin JIANG, Yan DAI, Xiaopeng ZHANG, Junjiang BAO, Gaohong HE. Advances in two-dimensional graphene oxide membrane for ion selective transport[J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(1): 303-312.

图/表 10

图1 GO堆叠结构中的传输途径[18]

Fig.1 The transfer paths in the GO stack structure[18]

图2 GO堆叠结构的离子分离机理

Fig.2 Ion separation mechanisms of the GO stack structure

图3 堆叠态GO膜的筛分性能[35]

Fig.3 Screening performance of the stacked GO membrane[35]

图4 rGO堆叠结构的选择性传递示意图[38]

Fig.4 Schematic diagram of the perm-selectivity of rGO laminates[38]

图5 还原氧化石墨烯的合成路线[41]

Fig.5 Synthesis route of reduced graphene oxide [41]

图6 GO、MoS2与多种阳离子间的相互作用[56]

Fig.6 Interactions between GO, MoS2 and various cations[56]

图7 GO层间酰胺化交联的反应机理[61]

Fig.7 Mechanism of the amidation reaction for cross-linking the GO laminates[61]

图8 GO膜表面正电荷调控示意图[17]

Fig.8 Schematic diagram of the GO membrane with positively-charged surface[17]

图9 氨基功能化GO膜及其离子筛分机制示意图[69]

Fig.9 Schematic diagram of the amino-functionalized GO membrane and the ion screening mechanism[69]

图10 GO膜表面负电荷调控示意图[17]

Fig.10 Schematic diagram of the GO membrane with negatively-charged surface [17]

参考文献 74

1	Wang Z Z, Ma C, Xu C Y, et al. Graphene oxide nanofiltration membranes for desalination under realistic conditions[J]. Nature Sustainability, 2021, 4(5): 402-408.
2	Ordoñez J, Gago E J, Girard A. Processes and technologies for the recycling and recovery of spent lithium-ion batteries[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, 60: 195-205.
3	O’Connell D W, Birkinshaw C, O’Dwyer T F. Heavy metal adsorbents prepared from the modification of cellulose: a review[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2008, 99(15): 6709-6724.
4	Wang J L, Zhuang S T. Removal of cesium ions from aqueous solutions using various separation technologies[J]. Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology, 2019, 18(2): 231-269.
5	Xiao J L, Sun S Y, Song X F, et al. Lithium ion recovery from brine using granulated polyacrylamide-MnO₂ion-sieve[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2015, 279: 659-666.
6	Zante G, Boltoeva M, Masmoudi A, et al. Lithium extraction from complex aqueous solutions using supported ionic liquid membranes[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2019, 580: 62-76.
7	Huang Q B, Liu S, Guo Y A, et al. Separation of mono-/di-valent ions via charged interlayer channels of graphene oxide membranes[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2022, 645: 120212.
8	Razmjou A, Asadnia M, Hosseini E, et al. Design principles of ion selective nanostructured membranes for the extraction of lithium ions[J]. Nature Communications, 2019, 10(1): 5793.
9	Chui S S Y, Lo S M F, Charmant J P H, et al. A chemically functionalizable nanoporous material [Cu₃(TMA)₂(H₂O)₃] _n [J]. Science, 1999, 283(5405): 1148-1150.
10	Liu X H, Guan C Z, Ding S Y, et al. On-surface synthesis of single-layered two-dimensional covalent organic frameworks via solid-vapor interface reactions[J]. Journal of American Chemistry Society, 2013, 135(28): 10470-10474.
11	Das S, Heasman P, Ben T, et al. Porous organic materials: strategic design and structure-function correlation[J]. Chemical Reveiw, 2017, 117(3): 1515-1563.
12	Toda K, Furue R, Hayami S. Recent progress in applications of graphene oxide for gas sensing: a review[J]. Analytica Chimica Acta, 2015, 878: 43-53.
13	Yang R, Wu S, Wang D M, et al. Fabrication of high-quality all-graphene devices with low contact resistances[J]. Nano Research, 2014, 7(10): 1449-1456.
14	Lin Y, Waston K A, Kim J W. Bulk preparation of holey graphene via controlled catalytic oxidation[J]. Nanoscale, 2013, 5(17): 7814-7824.
15	Liu X P, Zhang L, Cui X W, et al. 2D material nanofiltration membranes: from fundamental understandings to rational design[J]. Advanced Science, 2021, 8(23): e2102493.
16	Wei Y B, Pastuovic Z, Murphy T, et al. Precise tuning chemistry and tailoring defects of graphene oxide films by low energy ion beam irradiation[J]. Applied Surface Science, 2020, 505: 144651.
17	Zhang M C, Guan K C, Ji Y F, et al. Controllable ion transport by surface-charged graphene oxide membrane[J]. Nature Communications, 2019, 10(1): 1253.
18	Deng J X, You Y, Bustamante H, et al. Mechanism of water transport in graphene oxide laminates[J]. Chemical Science, 2017, 8(3): 1701-1704.
19	Lee C G, Wei X D, Kysar J W, et al. Measurement of the elastic properties and intrinsic strength of monolayer graphene[J]. Science, 2008, 321(5887): 385-388.
20	Esfandiar A, Radha B, Wang F C, et al. Size effect in ion transport through angstrom-scale slits[J]. Science, 2017, 358(6362): 511-513.
21	Hu M, Mi B X. Layer-by-layer assembly of graphene oxide membranes via electrostatic interaction[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2014, 469: 80-87.
22	Liang S S, Wang S, Chen L, et al. Controlling interlayer spacings of graphene oxide membranes with cationic for precise sieving of mono-/multi-valent ions[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2020, 241: 116738.
23	Cho Y H, Kim H W, Lee H D, et al. Water and ion sorption, diffusion, and transport in graphene oxide membranes revisited[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2017, 544: 425-435.
24	Oh Y, Armstrong D L, Finnerty C, et al. Understanding the pH-responsive behavior of graphene oxide membrane in removing ions and organic micropollulants[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 541: 235-243.
25	Cheng C, Yaroshchuk A, Bruening M L. Fundamentals of selective ion transport through multilayer polyelectrolyte membranes[J]. Langmuir, 2013, 29(6): 1885-1892.
26	Hong S, Constans C, Martins M V S, et al. Scalable graphene-based membranes for ionicsieving with ultrahigh charge selectivity[J]. Nano Letters, 2017, 17(2): 728-732.
27	Hu P Z, Huang B C, Miao Q D, et al. Ion transport behavior through thermally reduced graphene oxide membrane for precise ion separation[J]. Crystals, 2019, 9(4): 214.
28	Hung W S, An Q F, Guzman M D, et al. Pressure-assisted self-assembly technique for fabricating composite membranes consisting of highly ordered selective laminate layers of amphiphilic graphene oxide[J]. Carbon, 2014, 68: 670-677.
29	Sun P Z, Zhu M, Wang K L, et al. Selective ion penetration of graphene oxide membranes[J]. ACS Nano, 2013, 7(1): 428-437.
30	Raidongia K, Huang J X. Nanofluidic ion transport through reconstructed layered materials[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2012, 134(40): 16528-16531.
31	Asghar F, Shakoor B, Fatima S, et al. Fabrication and prospective applications of graphene oxide-modified nanocomposites for wastewater remediation[J]. RSC Advances, 2022, 12(19): 11750-11768.
32	Kulkarni H B, Tambe P, Joshi G M. Influence of covalent and non-covalent modification of graphene on the mechanical, thermal and electrical properties of epoxy/graphene nanocomposites: a review[J]. Composite Interfaces, 2017, 25(5/6/7): 381-414.
33	Li X F, Liu T, Wang D H, et al. Superlight adsorbent sponges based on graphene oxide cross-linked with poly(vinyl alcohol) for continuous flow adsorption[J]. Acs Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2018, 10(25): 21672-21680.
34	Xi Y H, Liu Z, Ji J Y, et al. Graphene-based membranes with uniform 2D nanochannels for precise sieving of mono-/multi-valent metal ions[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2018, 550: 208-218.
35	Joshi R K, Carbone P, Wang F C, et al. Precise and ultrafast molecular sieving through graphene oxide membranes[J]. Science, 2014, 343: 752-754.
36	Kumar P V, Bardhan N M, Tongay S, et al. Scalable enhancement of graphene oxide properties by thermally driven phase transformation[J]. Nature Chemistry, 2013, 6(2): 151-158.
37	Liu Y C, Yu Z X, Wang Q X, et al. Application of sodium dodecyl sulfate intercalated Co-Al LDH composite materials (RGO/PDA/SDS-LDH) in membrane separation[J]. Applied Clay Science, 2021, 209: 106138.
38	Rajaura R S, Singhal I, SharmaK N, et al. Efficient chemical vapour deposition and arc discharge system for production of carbon nano-tubes on a gram scale[J]. The Review of Scientific Instruments, 2019, 90: 123903-123915.
39	Zhang P, Gong J L, Zeng G M, et al. Enhanced permeability of rGO/S-GO layered membranes with tunable inter-structure for effective rejection of salts and dyes[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2019, 220: 309-319.
40	Huang H H, Joshi R K, De Silva K K H, et al. Fabrication of reduced graphene oxide membranes for water desalination[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2019, 572: 12-19.
41	Buesseler K, Aoyama M, Fukasawa M. Impacts of the Fukushima nuclear power plants on marine radioactivity[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2011, 45(23): 9931-9935.
42	Jiang J, Mu L H, Qiang Y, et al. Unexpected selective absorption of lithium in thermally reduced graphene oxide membranes[J]. Chinese Physics Letters, 2021, 38(11): 116802.
43	Liu X H, Zhong M L, Chen X Y, et al. Separating lithium and magnesium in brine by aluminum-based materials[J]. Hydrometallurgy, 2018, 176: 73-77.
44	Jiang L L, Luo D, Lu X, et al. Comparative study on chemical reduction of free-standing flexible GO films and their cyclic voltammetry performance[J]. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2018, 555: 630-637.
45	Zhang Z S, Zou L, Aubry C, et al. Chemically crosslinked rGO laminate film as an ion selective barrier of composite membrane[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2016, 515: 204-211.
46	Ye S B, Liu Y, Feng J C. Low-density, mechanical compressible, water-induced self-recoverable graphene aerogels for water treatment[J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2017, 9(27): 22456-22464.
47	Huang L L, Li Z Y, Luo Y, et al. Low-pressure loose GO composite membrane intercalated by CNT for effective dye/salt separation[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2021, 256: 117839.
48	Huang C C, Bai H, Li C, et al. A graphene oxide/hemoglobin composite hydrogel for enzymatic catalysis in organic solvents[J]. Chemical Communications, 2011, 47(17): 4962-4964.
49	Xu Y X, Wu Q, Sun Y Q, et al. Three-dimensional self-assembly of graphene oxide and DNA into multifunctional hydrogels[J]. ACS Nano, 2010, 4(12): 7358-7362.
50	Hu H, Zhao Z B, Wan W B, et al. Ultralight and highly compressible graphene aerogels[J]. Advanced Materials, 2013, 25(15): 2219-2223.
51	Wang Y, Wei Z D, Nie Y, et al. Generation of three dimensional pore controlled nitrogen-doped graphene hydrogels for high-performance supercapacitors by employing formamide as the modulator[J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2017, 5(4): 1442-1445.
52	Han Z Y, Huang L J, Qu H J, et al. A review of performance improvement strategies for graphene oxide-based and graphene-based membranes in water treatment[J]. Journal of Materials Science, 2021, 56(16): 9545-9574.
53	Xu C, Cui A J, Xu Y L, et al. Graphene oxide-TiO₂ composite filtration membranes and their potential application for water purification[J]. Carbon, 2013, 62: 465-471.
54	Guan K C, Zhao D, Zhang M C, et al. 3D nanoporous crystals enabled 2D channels in graphene membrane with enhanced water purification performance[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2017, 542: 41-51.
55	Sun J Q, Chen Y, Hu C Z, et al. Modulation of cation trans-membrane transport in GO-MoS₂ membranes through simultaneous control of interlayer spacing and ion-nanochannel interactions[J]. Chemosphere, 2019, 222: 156-164.
56	Huang X M, Pan M. The highly efficient adsorption of Pb(Ⅱ) on graphene oxides: a process combined by batch experiments and modeling techniques[J]. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 2016, 215: 410-416.
57	Wang L, Guo X H, Cao K C, et al. Effective charge-discriminated group separation of metal ions under highly acidic conditions using nanodiamond-pillared graphene oxide membrane[J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2017, 5(17): 8051-8061.
58	Chen L, Shi G S, Shen J, et al. Ion sieving in graphene oxide membranes via cationic control of interlayer spacing[J]. Nature, 2017, 550(7676): 380-383.
59	Lu D, Yao Z K, Jiao L, et al. Separation mechanism, selectivity enhancement strategies and advanced materials for mono-/multivalent ion-selective nanofiltration membrane[J]. Advanced Membranes, 2022, 2: 100032.
60	Hu J Q, Liu Z, Deng K, et al. A novel membrane with ion-recognizable copolymers in graphene-based nanochannels for facilitated transport of potassium ions[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2019, 591: 117345.
61	Jia Z Q, Wang Y, Shi W X, et al. Diamines cross-linked graphene oxide free-standing membranes for ion dialysis separation[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2016, 520: 139-144.
62	Meng N, Zhao W, Shamsaei E, et al. A low-pressure GO nanofiltration membrane crosslinked via ethylenediamine[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2018, 548: 363-371.
63	Zhang N, Qi W X, Huang L L, et al. A composite membrane of cross-linked GO network semi-interpenetrating in polysulfone substrate for dye removal from water[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2020, 613: 118456.
64	Leong Z Y, Han Z J, Wang G Z, et al. Electric field modulated ion-sieving effects of graphene oxide membranes[J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2021, 9(1): 244-253.
65	Jia Z Q, Shi W X. Tailoring permeation channels of graphene oxide membranes for precise ion separation[J]. Carbon, 2016, 101: 290-295.
66	Sun P Z, Zhu M, Wang K L, et al. Selective ion penetration of graphene oxide membranes[J]. ACS Nano, 2013, 7(1): 428-437.
67	Jia Z Q, Wang Y. Covalently crosslinked graphene oxide membranes by esterification reactions for ions separation[J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2015, 3(8): 4405-4412.
68	White R L, White C M, Turgut H, et al. Comparative studies on copper adsorption by graphene oxide and functionalized graphene oxide nanoparticles[J]. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, 2018, 85: 18-28.
69	Qian Y J, Shang J, Liu D, et al. Enhanced ion sieving of graphene oxide membranes via surface amine functionalization[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2021, 143(13): 5080-5090.
70	Wu X N, Yang L, Shao W L, et al. Fabrication of high performance TFN membrane incorporated with graphene oxide via support-free interfacial polymerization[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 793:148503.
71	Zhao Y, Shi W H, der Bruggen V, et al. Tunable nanoscale interlayer of graphene with symmetrical polyelectrolyte multilayer architecture for lithium extraction[J]. Advanced Materials Interfaces, 2018, 5(6): 1701449.
72	Tan S, Zhang D F, Nguyen M T, et al. Tuning the charge and hydrophobicity of graphene oxide membranes by functionalization with ionic liquids at epoxide sites[J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2022, 14(16): 19031-19042.
73	Ahmad S Z N, Salleh W N W, Ismail A F, et al. Adsorptive removal of heavy metal ions using graphene-based nanomaterials: toxicity, roles of functional groups and mechanisms[J]. Chemosphere, 2020, 248: 126008.
74	Xue Y H, Xia Y, Yang S, et al. Atomic-scale ion transistor with ultrahigh diffusivity[J]. Science, 2021, 372: 501-503.

[1]	邵苛苛, 宋孟杰, 江正勇, 张旋, 张龙, 高润淼, 甄泽康. 水平方向上冰中受陷气泡形成和分布实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 161-164.
[2]	吴延鹏, 李晓宇, 钟乔洋. 静电纺丝纳米纤维双疏膜油性细颗粒物过滤性能实验分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 259-264.
[3]	范孝雄, 郝丽芳, 范垂钢, 李松庚. LaMnO₃/生物炭催化剂低温NH₃-SCR催化脱硝性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3821-3830.
[4]	赵亚欣, 张雪芹, 王荣柱, 孙国, 姚善泾, 林东强. 流穿模式离子交换层析去除单抗聚集体[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3879-3887.
[5]	胡建波, 刘洪超, 胡齐, 黄美英, 宋先雨, 赵双良. 有机笼跨细胞膜易位行为的分子动力学模拟研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3756-3765.
[6]	齐聪, 丁子, 余杰, 汤茂清, 梁林. 基于选择吸收纳米薄膜的太阳能温差发电特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3921-3930.
[7]	何松, 刘乔迈, 谢广烁, 王斯民, 肖娟. 高浓度水煤浆管道气膜减阻两相流模拟及代理辅助优化[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3766-3774.
[8]	李艺彤, 郭航, 陈浩, 叶芳. 催化剂非均匀分布的质子交换膜燃料电池操作条件研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3831-3840.
[9]	张佳怡, 何佳莉, 谢江鹏, 王健, 赵鹬, 张栋强. 渗透汽化技术用于锂电池生产中N-甲基吡咯烷酮回收的研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3203-3215.
[10]	张瑞航, 曹潘, 杨锋, 李昆, 肖朋, 邓春, 刘蓓, 孙长宇, 陈光进. ZIF-8纳米流体天然气乙烷回收工艺的产品纯度关键影响因素分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3386-3393.
[11]	邢雷, 苗春雨, 蒋明虎, 赵立新, 李新亚. 井下微型气液旋流分离器优化设计与性能分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3394-3406.
[12]	刘爽, 张霖宙, 许志明, 赵锁奇. 渣油及其组分黏度的分子层次组成关联研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3226-3241.
[13]	胡亚丽, 胡军勇, 马素霞, 孙禹坤, 谭学诣, 黄佳欣, 杨奉源. 逆电渗析热机新型工质开发及电化学特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3513-3521.
[14]	葛加丽, 管图祥, 邱新民, 吴健, 沈丽明, 暴宁钟. 垂直多孔碳包覆的FeF₃正极的构筑及储锂性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 3058-3067.
[15]	张贲, 王松柏, 魏子亚, 郝婷婷, 马学虎, 温荣福. 超亲水多孔金属结构驱动的毛细液膜冷凝及传热强化[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2824-2835.

二维氧化石墨烯膜离子选择性传递调控的研究进展

Advances in two-dimensional graphene oxide membrane for ion selective transport

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 10

参考文献 74

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价