高温煤焦气化反应的Langmuir-Hinshelwood动力学模型

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0438-1157.2014.10.022

化工学报 ›› 2014, Vol. 65 ›› Issue (10): 3906-3915.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0438-1157.2014.10.022

• 催化、动力学与反应器 • 上一篇下一篇

高温煤焦气化反应的Langmuir-Hinshelwood动力学模型

任轶舟, 王亦飞, 朱龙雏, 金渭龙, 王辅臣, 于广锁

华东理工大学煤气化及能源化工教育部重点实验室, 上海煤气化工程技术研究中心, 上海 200237

收稿日期:2014-03-17 修回日期:2014-05-19 出版日期:2014-10-05 发布日期:2014-10-05
通讯作者: 王亦飞
基金资助:
国家重点基础研究发展计划项目（2010CB227000）。

Langmuir-Hinshelwood kinetic model of high temperature coal char gasification reaction

REN Yizhou, WANG Yifei, ZHU Longchu, JIN Weilong, WANG Fuchen, YU Guangsuo

Key Laboratory of Coal Gasification and Energy Chemical Engineering of Ministry of Education, Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Coal Gasification, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China

Received:2014-03-17 Revised:2014-05-19 Online:2014-10-05 Published:2014-10-05
Supported by:
supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (2010CB227000).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 应用基于吸附和脱附原理的Langmuir-Hinshelwood （L-H）动力学模型来描述煤焦在H₂O和CO₂混合气氛下的气化反应时，存在单独活性位和相同活性位两个相互矛盾的假设。在管式炉实验装置内考察了在不同气化温度和气化剂分压的条件下，内蒙煤焦（NMJ）与H₂O和CO₂的气化反应特性，获得了NMJ-H₂O 和NMJ-CO₂反应的L-H动力学模型，同时考察了H₂、CO对煤焦气化反应的抑制作用，并探究了NMJ在H₂O和CO₂混合气氛下的气化反应机理。研究结果表明：NMJ-H₂O以及NMJ-CO₂反应的活化能分别为214.78 kJ·mol^-1和145.96 kJ·mol^-1。H₂对NMJ-H₂O以及CO对NMJ-CO₂的反应存在明显的抑制作用，且CO的抑制作用随反应温度的降低而愈加明显。基于L-H动力学模型计算得到的反应速率曲线与实验结果十分吻合。对于NMJ在H₂O和CO₂混合气氛下的气化反应，基于相同活性位假设的L-H模型的反应速率预测值与实验结果吻合，更加适用于NMJ在混合气氛下的气化反应机理。

关键词: L-H模型, 煤焦气化, 动力学, 固定床

Abstract: When the Langmuir-Hinshelwood (L-H) kinetic model based on the theory of adsorption and desorption is used to describe the gasification reaction of coal char in the mixtures of H₂O and CO₂, there exist two controversial assumptions of separate active sites and common active sites. The gasification reaction characteristics of the Inner Mongolia coal char (NMJ) in the mixtures of H₂O and CO₂ were investigated using a tubular furnace experimental system at various reactant gas partial pressures and temperatures. The gasification reaction mechanisms of NMJ in the mixtures of H₂O and CO₂were also investigated. The activation energies of NMJ-H₂O and NMJ-CO₂ were 214.78 kJ·mol^-1 and 145.96 kJ·mol^-1, respectively. H₂ and CO had obvious inhibition effects on the reaction of NMJ-H₂O and NMJ-CO₂, and the inhibition effects of CO increased with the decrease of reaction temperature. The reaction rate curves calculated by the L-H kinetic model fitted the experimental results very well. For the gasification reaction of NMJ in the mixtures of H₂O and CO₂, the L-H model based on the common active sites assumption fitted the experimental results very well under atmospheric pressure, indicating that common active sites assumption was more applicable to the gasification mechanisms of NMJ in the mixtures of H₂O and CO₂.

Key words: L-H model, char gasification, kinetics, fixed-bed

中图分类号:

TQ530.2

任轶舟, 王亦飞, 朱龙雏, 金渭龙, 王辅臣, 于广锁. 高温煤焦气化反应的Langmuir-Hinshelwood动力学模型[J]. 化工学报, 2014, 65(10): 3906-3915.

REN Yizhou, WANG Yifei, ZHU Longchu, JIN Weilong, WANG Fuchen, YU Guangsuo. Langmuir-Hinshelwood kinetic model of high temperature coal char gasification reaction[J]. CIESC Journal, 2014, 65(10): 3906-3915.

参考文献 28

[1]	Xu Jianliang(许建良), Dai Zhenghua(代正华), Li Qiaohong(李巧红), Li Weifeng(李伟锋), Liu Haifeng(刘海峰), Wang Fuchen(王辅臣), Yu Zunhong(于遵宏). Particle residence time distributions in entrained-flow gasifier [J]. Journal of Chemical Industry and Engineering (China) (化工学报), 2008, 59(1): 53-57
[2]	Jin Weilong(金渭龙), Wang Yifei(王亦飞), Su Pan(苏攀), Peng Kang(彭康), Guo Qinghua(郭庆华). Pressure drop and velocity distribution in two-stage gasifier [J]. CIESC Journal (化工学报), 2012, 63(3): 705-712
[3]	Roberts D G, Harris D J. A kinetic analysis of coal char gasification reactions at high pressures [J]. Energy & Fuels, 2006, 20(6): 2314-2320
[4]	Fermoso J, Gil M V, Garcia S, Pevida C, Pis J J, Rubiera F. Kinetic parameters and reactivity for the steam gasification of coal chars obtained under different pyrolysis temperatures and pressures [J]. Energy & Fuels, 2011, 25(8): 3574-3580
[5]	Roberts D G, Harris D J. Char gasification with O2, CO2, and H2O: effects of pressure on intrinsic reaction kinetics [J]. Energy & Fuels, 2000, 14(2): 483-489
[6]	Ye D P, Agnew J B, Zhang D K. Gasification of a south Australian low-rank coal with carbon dioxide and steam: kinetics and reactivity studies [J]. Fuel, 1998, 77(11):1209-1219
[7]	Zeng Xi(曾玺), Wang Fang(王芳), Han Jiangze(韩江则), Zhang Juwei(张聚伟), Liu Yunyi(刘云义), Wang Yin(汪印), Yu Jian(余剑), Xu Guangwen(许光文). Micro fluidized bed reaction analysis and its application to coal char gasification kinetics [J]. CIESC Journal (化工学报), 2013, 64(1): 289-296
[8]	Nozaki T, Adschiri T, Fujimoto K. Comparison of steam gasification rate and CO2 gasification rate through the surface oxide complexes [J]. Energy & Fuels, 1991, 5(4): 610-611
[9]	Huang Z M, Zhang J S, Zhao Y, Zhang H, Yue G X, Suda T, Narukawa M. Kinetic studies of char gasification by steam and CO2 in the presence of H2 and CO [J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2010, 91(8): 843-847
[10]	Tay H L, Kajitani S, Zhang S, Li C Z. Effects of gasifying agent on the evolution of char structure during the gasification of Victorian brown coal [J]. Fuel, 2013, 103: 22-28
[11]	Ollero P, Serrera A, Arjona R, Alcantarilla S. Diffusional effects in TGA gasification experiments for kinetic determination [J]. Fuel, 2002, 81: 1989-2000
[12]	Tseng H P, Edgar T F. Combustion behavior of bituminous and anthracite coal char between 425 and 900 ℃ [J]. Fuel, 1985, 64: 373-379
[13]	Kajitani S, Suzuki N, Ashizawa M, Hara S. CO2 gasification rate analysis of coal char in entrained flow coal gasifier [J]. Fuel, 2006, 85(7/8): 163-169
[14]	Everson R C, Neomagus H W J P, Kasaini H, Njapha D. Reaction kinetics of pulverized coal-chars derived from inertinite-rich coal discards: gasification with carbon dioxide and steam [J]. Fuel, 2006, 85(7/8): 1076-1082
[15]	Umemoto S, Kajitani S, Hara S. Modeling of coal char gasification in coexistence of CO2 and H2O considering sharing of active sites [J]. Fuel, 2013, 103:14-21
[16]	Roberts D G, Harris D J. Char gasification in the mixtures of CO2 and H2O: competition and inhibition [J]. Fuel, 2007, 86(17/18): 2672-2678
[[1]	7] Chen C, Wang J, Liu W, Zhang S, Yin J S, Luo G Q, Y H. Effect of pyrolysis conditions on the char gasification with the mixtures of CO2 and H2O [J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2013, 34(2): 2453-2460
[18]	Wu Shiyong (吴诗勇). Studies on physical and chemical property and gasification reaction characteristic of different coal chars at elevated temperatures[D]. Shanghai: East China University of Science and Technology, 2007
[19]	Shin Y, Choi S, Ahn D H. Pressurized drop tube furnace tests of global coal gasification characteristics [J]. International Journal of Energy Research, 2000, 24(9): 749-758
[20]	Takarada T, Tamai Y, Tomita A. Reactivities of 34 coals under steam gasification [J]. Fuel, 1985, 64(10): 1438-1442
[21]	Li P, Yu Q B, Qin Q, Lei W. Kinetics of CO2/coal gasification in molten blast furnace slag [J]. Industrial Engineering Chemical Research, 2012, 51: 15872-15883
[22]	Zhang Linxian(张林仙), Huang Jiejie(黄戒介), Fang Yitian(房倚天), Wang Yang(王洋). Study on reactivity of Chinese anthracite chars gasification-comparison of reactivity between steam and CO2 gasification [J]. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology(燃料化学学报), 2006, 34(3): 265-269
[23]	Yang Fan (杨帆). Studies on gasification characteristics, mechanism and kinetics model of coal char at different reaction atmospheres[D]. Shanghai: East China University of Science and Technology, 2008
[24]	Adanez J, Miranda J, Miranda J L, Gavilan J M. Kinetics of a lignite-char gasification by CO2 [J]. Fuel, 1985, 64(6): 801-804
[25]	Meijer R, Kapteijn F, Moulijn J A. Kinetics of the alkali-carbonate catalysed gasification of carbon(Ⅲ): H2O gasification [J]. Fuel, 1994, 73(5): 723-730
[26]	Muhlen H J, Heek K H, Juntgen H. Kinetic studies of steam gasification of char in the presence of H2, CO2, and CO [J]. Fuel, 1985, 64: 944-949
[27]	Bliek A. Mathematical modeling of a concurrent fixed bed coal gasifier [D]. Eindhoven:Eindhoven University, 1984
[28]	Zhang R, Wang Q H, Luo Z Y, Fang M X, Cen K F. Competition and inhibition effects during coal char gasification in the mixture of H2O and CO2 [J]. Energy & Fuels, 2013, 27(9): 5107-5115

高温煤焦气化反应的Langmuir-Hinshelwood动力学模型

Langmuir-Hinshelwood kinetic model of high temperature coal char gasification reaction

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 28

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	毕丽森, 刘斌, 胡恒祥, 曾涛, 李卓睿, 宋健飞, 吴翰铭. 粗糙界面上纳米液滴蒸发模式的分子动力学研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 172-178.
[2]	于宏鑫, 邵双全. 水结晶过程的分子动力学模拟分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 250-258.
[3]	金正浩, 封立杰, 李舒宏. 氨水溶液交叉型再吸收式热泵的能量及分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 53-63.
[4]	程成, 段钟弟, 孙浩然, 胡海涛, 薛鸿祥. 表面微结构对析晶沉积特性影响的格子Boltzmann模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 74-86.
[5]	肖明堃, 杨光, 黄永华, 吴静怡. 浸没孔液氧气泡动力学数值研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 87-95.
[6]	范孝雄, 郝丽芳, 范垂钢, 李松庚. LaMnO₃/生物炭催化剂低温NH₃-SCR催化脱硝性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3821-3830.
[7]	郑佳丽, 李志会, 赵新强, 王延吉. 离子液体催化合成2-氰基呋喃反应动力学研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3708-3715.
[8]	汪林正, 陆俞冰, 张睿智, 罗永浩. 基于分子动力学模拟的VOCs热氧化特性分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3242-3255.
[9]	杨越, 张丹, 郑巨淦, 涂茂萍, 杨庆忠. NaCl水溶液喷射闪蒸-掺混蒸发的实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3279-3291.
[10]	曾如宾, 沈中杰, 梁钦锋, 许建良, 代正华, 刘海峰. 基于分子动力学模拟的Fe₂O₃纳米颗粒烧结机制研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3353-3365.
[11]	李锦潼, 邱顺, 孙文寿. 煤浆法烟气脱硫中草酸和紫外线强化煤砷浸出过程[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3522-3532.
[12]	盛冰纯, 于建国, 林森. 铝基锂吸附剂分离高钠型地下卤水锂资源过程研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3375-3385.
[13]	李凯旋, 谭伟, 张曼玉, 徐志豪, 王旭裕, 纪红兵. 富含零价钴活性位点的钴氮碳/活性炭设计及甲醛催化氧化应用研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3342-3352.
[14]	张蒙蒙, 颜冬, 沈永峰, 李文翠. 电解液类型对双离子电池阴阳离子储存行为的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 3116-3126.
[15]	何宣志, 何永清, 闻桂叶, 焦凤. 磁液液滴颈部自相似破裂行为[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2889-2897.