硫化焙烧锡铁矿脱锡

化工进展

硫化焙烧锡铁矿脱锡

廖彬，李磊，王华，胡建杭，邱在军，桑秀丽

昆明理工大学冶金与能源工程学院，冶金节能减排教育部工程研究中心，云南昆明 650093

出版日期:2013-05-05 发布日期:2013-05-25

Tin removal from tin-bearing iron ore with sulfidation roasting

LIAO Bin，LI Lei，WANG Hua，HU Jianhang，QIU Zaijun，SANG Xiuli

Engineering Research Center of Metallurgical Energy Conservation and Emission Reduction of Ministry of Education， School of Metallurgical and Engineering，Kunming University of Science and Technology，Kunming 650093，Yunnan，China

Online:2013-05-05 Published:2013-05-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为实现锡铁矿的资源化利用，采用硫化焙烧法对其进行处理。以热力学分析为基础，结合实验研究对锡铁矿的硫化焙烧反应特征进行了探索。结果表明，较高焙烧温度下，锡硫化挥发物相主要是SnS和SnO，Sn和SnO2的挥发作用相对较小，同等条件下SnO比SnO2和Sn硫化反应趋势大。焙烧过程控制CO浓度低于22%且温度高于873 K时，SnO2可选择性还原成SnO；过程中，FeS2可分解为FeS和S2，S2的硫化作用大于FeS。锡铁矿硫化反应受S2、SO2及SnS的扩散速率控制，界面化学反应不起决定性作用。焙烧后铁物相由赤铁矿相转变成磁铁矿相，可采用磁选法回收其中铁资源，为高效回收锡铁矿中铁资源提供了一种新思路。

关键词: 含锡铁矿, 硫化焙烧, 脱锡, 挥发

Abstract: Sulfidation roasting process was used to treat tin-bearing iron ore for resource utilization. According to the results of thermodynamics analysis，the sulfidation roasting reaction of tin-bearing iron ore was studied with experiment. The results showed main volatilization phases of tin as SnS and SnO and less volatilization of Sn and SnO2. The sulfidation reaction of SnO was stronger than SnO2 and Sn under the same reaction conditions. When the concentration of CO was lower than 22% and temperature was higher than 873 K in the roasting process，SnO2 could be reduced to SnO selectively. FeS2 would be decomposed into FeS and S2 during the roasting process，and the sulfidation of S2 was stronger than FeS. The sulfidation reaction rate of tin-bearing iron ore was controlled by the diffusion of S2，SO2 and SnS，and interfacial chemical reaction did not play a decisive role. After roasting，the iron phases of raw ore changed into magnetite，and then the iron could be recovered through magnetic separation. It provides a new method for the recovery of iron from tin-bearing iron ore.

Key words: tin-bearing iron ore, sulfidation roasting, tin removal, volatilization

廖彬，李磊，王华，胡建杭，邱在军，桑秀丽. 硫化焙烧锡铁矿脱锡[J]. 化工进展.

LIAO Bin，LI Lei，WANG Hua，HU Jianhang，QIU Zaijun，SANG Xiuli. Tin removal from tin-bearing iron ore with sulfidation roasting[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progree.

[1]	宋明昊, 赵霏, 刘淑晴, 李国选, 杨声, 雷志刚. 离子液体脱除模拟油中挥发酚的多尺度模拟与研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3654-3664.
[2]	汪林正, 陆俞冰, 张睿智, 罗永浩. 基于分子动力学模拟的VOCs热氧化特性分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3242-3255.
[3]	黄玉龙, 吕凡, 仇俊杰, 章骅, 何品晶. 易腐垃圾厌氧消化沼液理化性质及VOCs分子特征[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1275-1285.
[4]	李治东, 万佳琪, 刘莹, 唐艺溪, 刘威, 宋忠贤, 张学军. 一步法合成α-MnO₂/β-MnO₂催化剂及其对甲苯催化氧化的性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(8): 3615-3624.
[5]	郑默, 李晓霞. ReaxFF MD模拟揭示的煤热解挥发分自由基反应的竞争与协调[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(6): 2732-2741.
[6]	马萌, 白永辉, 卫俊涛, 闫伦靖, 吕鹏, 王焦飞, 宋旭东, 苏暐光, 于广锁. 生物质与煤（共）热解/气化过程中挥发分-半焦交互作用研究与进展[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(11): 5186-5200.
[7]	裴蓓, 徐梦娇, 韦双明, 郭佳琪, 李世梁, 胡紫维. 甲烷/石墨粉与甲烷/煤粉爆炸特性对比研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(10): 4769-4779.
[8]	刘洁妤, 龚岩, 吴晓翔, 郭庆华, 于广锁, 王辅臣. 多喷嘴对置式气化炉内颗粒挥发分火焰可视化研究[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(3): 1275-1282.
[9]	贾亚宾, 郑旭, 高凯, 关军, 魏翩, 祁冰, 郑慧研. 某高校既有建筑室内人员相关VOCs目标污染物的实测分析[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(S1): 411-416.
[10]	李剑, 蒲舸, 陈家善, 刘啟文. 常见钠盐的高温挥发特性及热解机理[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(8): 3452-3459.
[11]	梅振飞, 陈明, 陈德珍, 洪鎏, 胡雨燕. 垃圾热解-挥发分重整过程中基于产物导向的催化剂选择[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(8): 3104-3112.
[12]	赫帅, 郭凤, 康国俊, 余剑, 任雪峰, 许光文. 络合-溶剂热法制备钯基催化剂及其催化氧化间二甲苯性能[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(3): 937-943.
[13]	邹潺, 王春波, 郭辉, 王贺飞. 燃煤过程中砷的赋存形态及其挥发特性[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(4): 1670-1677.
[14]	芮泽宝, 杨晓庆, 陈俊妃, 纪红兵. 光热协同催化净化挥发性有机物的研究进展及展望[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(12): 4947-4958.
[15]	姚创, 刘晖, 罗晓栋, 岳建雄, 李诗瑶, 陈大志. 华南地区低有机质污泥碱性厌氧产酸(VFAs)性能机理与菌群分析[J]. 化工学报, 2016, 67(4): 1565-1571.