煤“一步法”制天然气催化剂

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0438-1157.2014.08.020

化工学报 ›› 2014, Vol. 65 ›› Issue (8): 2988-2996.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0438-1157.2014.08.020

• 催化、动力学与反应器 • 上一篇下一篇

煤“一步法”制天然气催化剂

白少峰¹, 郭庆杰¹, 徐秀峰²

1 青岛科技大学化工学院清洁化工过程山东省高校重点实验室, 山东青岛 266042;
2 烟台大学应用催化研究所, 山东烟台 264005

收稿日期:2013-10-30 修回日期:2014-01-30 出版日期:2014-08-05 发布日期:2014-08-05
通讯作者: 郭庆杰
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（21276129）；山东省自然科学杰出青年基金项目（JQ200904）。

Catalyst for one-step production of synthetic natural gas from coal

BAI Shaofeng¹, GUO Qingjie¹, XU Xiufeng²

1 Key Laboratory of Clean Chemical Processing of Shandong Province, School of Chemical Engineering, Qingdao University of Science & Technology, Qingdao 266042, Shandong, China;
2 Institute of Applied Catalysis, Yantai University, Yantai 264005, Shandong, China

Received:2013-10-30 Revised:2014-01-30 Online:2014-08-05 Published:2014-08-05
Supported by:
supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21276129) and the Natural Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars of Shandong Province (JQ200904).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在固定床反应器中，以水蒸气为气化介质，考察了“一步法”煤制天然气K-Fe甲烷化催化剂的催化活性及稳定性，研究了反应动力学，并且考察了不同煤种对煤催化甲烷化的影响。在650℃、2 MPa下，K15Fe10Ca5对于煤气化及甲烷化均具有良好催化活性。XRD分析表明，活性组分K与Fe之间相互作用，形成的K₆Fe₂O₅促进了煤气化及甲烷化反应。Ca助剂的引入抑制了活性组分与煤中矿物质的结合，同时吸收了煤焦释放出的含硫气体，提高了催化剂的活性。在5次循环实验过程中，CH₄产率保持稳定，表明催化剂有较高的稳定性。修正随机孔模型很好地描述了K15Fe10Ca5催化神木煤焦甲烷化的行为，其中界面反应为控制步骤。煤中挥发分、灰分及含硫量等因素都会影响最终的产率。

关键词: 煤化工, 固定床, 催化剂, 天然气, 反应动力学

Abstract: An investigation into catalyst was conducted for one-step production of synthetic natural gas from coal in a fixed bed reactor using steam as gasification medium. The reactivity and stability of K-Fe catalyst in multi-cycles, as well as the kinetics model of methanation process and the effect of different coals on methanation, were studied. K15Fe10Ca5 catalyst showed significantly better activity in the coal gasification and methanation reactions at 650℃ and 2 MPa. Furthermore, X-ray diffraction data indicated that some highly active materials, such as K₆Fe₂O₅ were formed by interaction of active components and enhanced reactivity. With the addition of calcium promoter, combination of active components and minerals in coal was prevented and the sulfur in coal could be fixed effectively. In multi-cycle experiments, CH₄ yield remained stable. The methanation mechanism of Shenmu-coal with K15Fe10Ca5 could be described by the modified random pore model proposed, suggesting that interfacial reaction was the control step. The final yield was affected by volatile matter, ash content, and sulfur content.

Key words: coal chemical industry, fixed bed, catalyst, natural gas, reaction kinetics

中图分类号:

TQ546
TK16

白少峰, 郭庆杰, 徐秀峰. 煤“一步法”制天然气催化剂[J]. 化工学报, 2014, 65(8): 2988-2996.

BAI Shaofeng, GUO Qingjie, XU Xiufeng. Catalyst for one-step production of synthetic natural gas from coal[J]. CIESC Journal, 2014, 65(8): 2988-2996.

参考文献 25

[1]	Kopyscinski J, Schildhauer T J, Biollaz S. Production of synthetic natural gas (SNG) from coal and dry biomass-a technology review from 1950 to 2009 [J]. Fuel, 2010, 89 (8): 1763-1783
[2]	Hirsch R L, Gallagher J E, Lessard R R, Wesslhoft R D. Catalytic coal gasification: an emerging technology [J]. Science, 1982, 215 (4529): 121-127
[3]	Hayhoe K, Kheshgi H S, Jain A K, Wuebbles D J. Substitution of natural gas for coal: climatic effect of utility sector emissions [J]. Climatic Change, 2002, 54 (1): 107-139
[4]	van Heek K H. Progress of coal science in the 20th century [J]. Fuel, 2000, 79 (1): 1-26
[5]	Wen W Y. Mechanisms of alkali metal catalysis in the gasification of coal, char or graphite[J]. Catalysis Reviews-Science and Engineering, 1980, 22 (1): 1-28
[6]	Davis B H. Fischer-Tropsch synthesis: current mechanism and futuristic needs [J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2001, 71 (1): 157-166
[7]	Kustov A L, Frey A M, Larsen K E, Johannessen T, Norskov J K, Christensen C H. CO methanation over supported bimetallic Ni-Fe catalysts: from computational studies towards catalyst optimization [J]. Applied Catalysis A: General, 2007, 320: 98-104
[8]	Sheth A C, Sastry C, Yeboah Y D, Xu Y, Agarwal P. Catalytic gasification of coal using eutectic salts: reaction kinetics for hydrogasification using binary and ternary eutectic catalysts [J]. Fuel, 2004, 83 (4/5): 557-572
[9]	Nahas N C. Conversion of petroleum residua to methane[P]: US, 6955695. 2005-10-18
[10]	Carrazza J, Tysoe W T, Heinemann H, Somorjai G A. Gasification of graphite with steam below 900 K catalyzed by a mixture of potassium hydroxide and transition metal oxide [J]. Journal of Catalysis, 1985, 96 (1): 234-241
[11]	Zhang J Q, Young D J. Coking and dusting of Fe-Ni alloys in CO-H2-H2O gas mixtures [J]. Oxidation of Metals, 2008, 70 (3/4): 189-211
[12]	Ngantsoue-Hoc W, Zhang Y, O'Brien R J, Luo M, Davis B H. Fischer-Tropsch synthesis: activity and selectivity for Group I alkali promoted iron-based catalysts[J]. Applied Catalysis A: General, 2002, 236 (1): 77-89
[13]	Hippo E J, Tandon D. Low temperature steam-coal gasification catalysts [J]. Papers-American Chemical Society Division Fuel Chemistry, 1996, 41: 216-220
[14]	Ohtsuka Y, Arai T, Takasaki S, Tsubouchi N. Fischer-Tropsch synthesis with cobalt catalysts supported on mesoporous silica for efficient production of diesel fuel fraction [J]. Energy and Fuels, 2003, 17 (4): 804-809
[15]	Koh K K, Nahas N C, Pennington R E, Vemon L W. Integrated catalytic gasification process [P]: US, 4094650. 1978-06-13
[16]	Gieg L M, Duncan K E, Suflita J M. Bioenergy production via microbial conversion of residual oil to natural gas [J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2008, 74 (10): 3022-3029
[17]	Nahas N C. Catalytic steam gasification of petroleum coke to methane [P]: US, 8114176. 2012-02-14
[18]	Wang Chong, Wang Qingxia, Sun Xinde, Xu Longya. CO hydrogenation to light alkenes over Mn/Fe catalysts prepared by coprecipitation and sol-gel methods [J]. Catalysis Letters, 2005, 105 (1/2): 93-101
[19]	Zielke C W, Lebowitz H E, Struck R T, Gorin E. Sulfur removal during combustion of solid fuels in a fluidized bed of dolomite [J]. Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association, 1970, 20 (3): 164-169
[20]	Nishiyama Y. Catalytic gasification of coals-features and possibilities [J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 1991, 29 (1): 31-42
[21]	Wang Li (王黎), Zhang Zhantao (张占涛), Zhang Li (张丽). Study on modified random pore model of catalytic coal char gasification [J]. Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University (西安交通大学学报), 2006, 40 (3): 319-325
[22]	Matsuoka K, Akiho H, Xu W C, Gupta R, Wall T F, Tomita A. The physical character of coal char formed during rapid pyrolysis at high pressure [J]. Fuel, 2005, 84 (1): 63-69
[23]	Bayarsaikhan B, Hayashi J I, Shimada T, Sathe C, Li C Z, Tsutsumi A, Chiba T. Kinetics of steam gasification of nascent char from rapid pyrolysis of a Victorian brown coal [J]. Fuel, 2005, 84 (12): 1612-1621
[24]	Xu Zhengang, Liu Guohai, Yu Yongnian. Shrinking core model of catalytic coal gasification [J]. Journal of Chemical Engineering, 1988, 39 (4): 488-494
[25]	Berguerand N, Lyngfelt A. Design and operation of a 10kWth chemical-looping combustor for solid fuels-testing with South African coal [J]. Fuel, 2008, 87 (12): 2713-2726

煤“一步法”制天然气催化剂

Catalyst for one-step production of synthetic natural gas from coal

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 25

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	程成, 段钟弟, 孙浩然, 胡海涛, 薛鸿祥. 表面微结构对析晶沉积特性影响的格子Boltzmann模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 74-86.
[2]	李艺彤, 郭航, 陈浩, 叶芳. 催化剂非均匀分布的质子交换膜燃料电池操作条件研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3831-3840.
[3]	杨学金, 杨金涛, 宁平, 王访, 宋晓双, 贾丽娟, 冯嘉予. 剧毒气体PH₃的干法净化技术研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3742-3755.
[4]	陈杰, 林永胜, 肖恺, 杨臣, 邱挺. 胆碱基碱性离子液体催化合成仲丁醇性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3716-3730.
[5]	盛冰纯, 于建国, 林森. 铝基锂吸附剂分离高钠型地下卤水锂资源过程研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3375-3385.
[6]	张瑞航, 曹潘, 杨锋, 李昆, 肖朋, 邓春, 刘蓓, 孙长宇, 陈光进. ZIF-8纳米流体天然气乙烷回收工艺的产品纯度关键影响因素分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3386-3393.
[7]	杨菲菲, 赵世熙, 周维, 倪中海. Sn掺杂的In₂O₃催化CO₂选择性加氢制甲醇[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3366-3374.
[8]	李凯旋, 谭伟, 张曼玉, 徐志豪, 王旭裕, 纪红兵. 富含零价钴活性位点的钴氮碳/活性炭设计及甲醛催化氧化应用研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3342-3352.
[9]	杨欣, 彭啸, 薛凯茹, 苏梦威, 吴燕. 分子印迹-TiO₂光电催化降解增溶PHE废水性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3564-3571.
[10]	汪林正, 陆俞冰, 张睿智, 罗永浩. 基于分子动力学模拟的VOCs热氧化特性分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3242-3255.
[11]	张蒙蒙, 颜冬, 沈永峰, 李文翠. 电解液类型对双离子电池阴阳离子储存行为的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 3116-3126.
[12]	余娅洁, 李静茹, 周树锋, 李清彪, 詹国武. 基于天然生物模板构建纳米材料及集成催化剂研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2735-2752.
[13]	李盼, 马俊洋, 陈志豪, 王丽, 郭耘. Ru/α-MnO₂催化剂形貌对NH₃-SCO反应性能的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2908-2918.
[14]	涂玉明, 邵高燕, 陈健杰, 刘凤, 田世超, 周智勇, 任钟旗. 钙基催化剂的设计合成及应用研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2717-2734.
[15]	张琦钰, 高利军, 苏宇航, 马晓博, 王翊丞, 张亚婷, 胡超. 碳基催化材料在电化学还原二氧化碳中的研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2753-2772.