基于CCDM的流态化制冰的多相流动与传热特性

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20141338

化工学报 ›› 2015, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (4): 1272-1281.DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20141338

基于CCDM的流态化制冰的多相流动与传热特性

梁坤峰¹, 阮春蕾¹, 王林¹, 袁竹林²

1. 河南科技大学制冷与空调技术研究所, 河南洛阳 471003;
2. 东南大学能源与环境学院, 江苏南京 210096

收稿日期:2014-09-01 修回日期:2014-12-26 出版日期:2015-04-05 发布日期:2015-04-05
通讯作者: 梁坤峰
作者简介:梁坤峰(1975-),男,博士,副教授。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(U1304521)。

Multiphase flow and heat transfer characteristics of fluidization ice-making based on combined continuum and discrete model

LIANG Kunfeng¹, RUAN Chunlei¹, WANG Lin¹, YUAN Zhulin²

1. Research Institute of Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Technology, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang 471003, Henan, China;
2. School of Energy and Environment, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, Jiangsu, China

Received:2014-09-01 Revised:2014-12-26 Online:2015-04-05 Published:2015-04-05
Supported by:
supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1304521).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

流态化制冰是一种新型的直接接触式动态制冰方式,通过建立联合连续和离散模型的CCDM(combined continuum and discrete model)全耦合模型,采用一种非结构网格颗粒搜索法,计算了流态化制冰过程所涉及的颗粒-流体多相系统的流动和传热特性。结果表明:基于CCDM模型计算出的结果与实验数据有较好的一致性,模型的准确度高;冻结程度关键值的提出,简化了颗粒间碰撞模型的判断和颗粒相表面传热量的等效计算;颗粒间的碰撞、聚并对颗粒粒径的作用,会进一步影响颗粒的运动速度、停留时间以及轴向浓度分布的变化,难以忽略其对于流态化制冰过程的多相流动与换热特性的影响。

关键词: 多相流, 流态化, 传热, 颗粒流, CCDM, 碰撞聚并, 制冰

Abstract:

A direct contact dynamic type of fluidization ice-making technique was proposed. Through building a two-way couple model of combined continuum and discrete model (CCDM) and using a unstructured grid search method, the flow and heat transfer characteristics of fluid-particle multiphase about the process of fluidization ice-making were calculated and discussed. The data calculated based on CCDM were in agreement with experimental data, and the model accuracy was validated. A definition of particle freezing degree was presented as a simplification criterion of choosing particles collision model and equivalent calculating particle surface heat transfer. The effect of particles collision and coalescence on particle size further changed the velocity, residence time and axial density distribution of particles, which could not be ignored in studying multiphase flow and heat transfer characteristics of fluidization ice-making process.

Key words: multiphase flow, fluidization, heat transfer, granular flow, CCDM, collision and coalescence, ice-making

中图分类号:

TB61⁺1

梁坤峰, 阮春蕾, 王林, 袁竹林. 基于CCDM的流态化制冰的多相流动与传热特性[J]. 化工学报, 2015, 66(4): 1272-1281.

LIANG Kunfeng, RUAN Chunlei, WANG Lin, YUAN Zhulin. Multiphase flow and heat transfer characteristics of fluidization ice-making based on combined continuum and discrete model[J]. CIESC Journal, 2015, 66(4): 1272-1281.

参考文献 22

[1]	Zheng Keqing (郑克晴), Zhang Xuejun (张学军), Tian Xinjian (田新建), et al. Heat transfer performance of a single air bubble in direct contact ice slurry generator [J]. CIESC Journal (化工学报), 2010, 61 (S2): 58-61
[2]	Peng Zhengbiao, Yuan Zhulin, Liang Kunfeng, et al. Ice slurry formation in a cocurrent liquid-liquid flow [J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2008, 16 (4): 552-557
[3]	Li Hongchang, Li Yaoming, Gao Fang, et al. CFD-DEM simulation of material motion in air-and-screen cleaning device [J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2012, 88: 111-119
[4]	Kevin F Malone, Bao H Xu, Michael Fairweather. The combined-continuum-and-discrete-model (CCDM) for simulation of liquid-particle flows [J]. Computer Aided Chemical Engineering, 2006, 21: 227-232
[5]	Chu K W, Wang B, Xu D L, et al. CFD-DEM simulation of the gas-solid flow in a cyclone separator [J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2011, 66 (5): 834-847
[6]	Liu Xiangjun (刘向军), Shi Lei (石磊), Xu Xuchang (徐旭常). Activities of dense particle-gas two-phase flow modeling in Eulerian-Lagrangian approach [J]. Chinese Journal of Computational Mechanics (计算力学学报), 2007, 24 (2):166-172
[7]	Tsuji Y, Tanaka T. Cluster patterns in circulating fluidized beds predicted by numerical simulation (discrete particle model versus two-fluid model) [J]. Powder Technology, 1998, 95 (3): 254-264
[8]	Swasdisevi T, Tanthapanichakoon W, Charinpanitkul T, et al. Prediction of gas-particle dynamics and heat transfer in a two-dimensional spouted bed [J]. Advanced Powder Technology, 2005, 16 (3): 275-293
[9]	Li J T, Mason D J, Mujumdar A S. A numerical study of heat transfer mechanisms in gas-solids flows through pipes using a coupled CFD and DEM model [J]. Drying Technology, 2003, 21: 1839-1866
[10]	Zhou H, Flamant G, Gauthier D. DEM-LES of coal combustion in a bubbling fluidized bed (Ⅰ): Gas-particle turbulent flow structure [J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2004, 59 (20): 4193-4203
[11]	Malone K F, Xu B H. Particle-scale simulation of heat transfer in liquid-fluidized beds [J]. Powder Technology, 2008, 184 (2): 189-204
[12]	Felice R D. The voidage function for fluid-particle interaction systems [J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 1994, 20 (1): 153-159
[13]	Oesterle B, Dinh T B. Experiments on the lift of a spinning sphere in a range of intermediate Reynolds numbers [J]. Experiments in Fluids, 1998, 25: 16-22
[14]	Tsuji Y, Morikawa Y, Mizuno O. Experimental-measurement of the Magnus force on a rotating sphere at low Reynolds numbers [J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering Transactions of the ASME, 1985, 107: 484-488
[15]	Cai X L, Wallis G B. A more general cell model for added-mass in two-phase flow [J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 1994, 49 (10): 1631-1638
[16]	Haid M. Correlations for the prediction of heat transfer to liquid-solid fluidized beds [J]. Chemical Engineering and Processing, 1997, 36 (2): 143-147
[17]	Bremford D J, Müller-Steinhagen H, Duffy G G. Heat transfer to kraft black liquor in a liquid-solid fluidized bed [J]. Heat Transfer Engineering, 2000, 21: 57-69
[18]	Agarwal P K. Transport phenomena in multi-particle systems (Ⅱ): Particle-fluid heat and mass transfer [J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 1988, 43 (9): 2501-2510
[19]	Joseph G G, Zenit R, Hunt M L, et al. Particle-wall collisions in a viscous fluid [J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2001, 433: 329-346
[20]	Gondret P, Lance M, Petit L. Bouncing motion of spherical particles in fluids [J]. Physics of Fluids, 2002, 14 (2): 643-652
[21]	Cai Jie (蔡杰), Yuan Zhulin (袁竹林). Numerical simulation on solids fraction distribution in straw burned circulating fluidized beds [J].Proceedings of the CSEE (中国电机工程学报), 2007, 27 (20): 71-75
[22]	Peng Zhengbiao (彭正标). Experiment and modeling of ice slurry production in liquid-liquid calculating fluidization [D]. Nanjing: Southeast University, 2009

基于CCDM的流态化制冰的多相流动与传热特性

Multiphase flow and heat transfer characteristics of fluidization ice-making based on combined continuum and discrete model

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 22

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	晁京伟, 许嘉兴, 李廷贤. 基于无管束蒸发换热强化策略的吸附热池的供热性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 302-310.
[2]	程成, 段钟弟, 孙浩然, 胡海涛, 薛鸿祥. 表面微结构对析晶沉积特性影响的格子Boltzmann模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 74-86.
[3]	宋瑞涛, 王派, 王云鹏, 李敏霞, 党超镔, 陈振国, 童欢, 周佳琦. 二氧化碳直接蒸发冰场排管内流动沸腾换热数值模拟分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 96-103.
[4]	张双星, 刘舫辰, 张义飞, 杜文静. R-134a脉动热管相变蓄放热实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 165-171.
[5]	张义飞, 刘舫辰, 张双星, 杜文静. 超临界二氧化碳用印刷电路板式换热器性能分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 183-190.
[6]	陈爱强, 代艳奇, 刘悦, 刘斌, 吴翰铭. 基板温度对HFE7100液滴蒸发过程的影响研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 191-197.
[7]	刘明栖, 吴延鹏. 导光管直径和长度对传热影响的模拟分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 206-212.
[8]	王志国, 薛孟, 董芋双, 张田震, 秦晓凯, 韩强. 基于裂隙粗糙性表征方法的地热岩体热流耦合数值模拟与分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 223-234.
[9]	李艺彤, 郭航, 陈浩, 叶芳. 催化剂非均匀分布的质子交换膜燃料电池操作条件研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3831-3840.
[10]	王玉兵, 李杰, 詹宏波, 朱光亚, 张大林. R134a在菱形离散肋微小通道内的流动沸腾换热实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3797-3806.
[11]	李科, 文键, 忻碧平. 耦合蒸气冷却屏的真空多层绝热结构对液氢储罐自增压过程的影响机制研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3786-3796.
[12]	齐聪, 丁子, 余杰, 汤茂清, 梁林. 基于选择吸收纳米薄膜的太阳能温差发电特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3921-3930.
[13]	杨越, 张丹, 郑巨淦, 涂茂萍, 杨庆忠. NaCl水溶液喷射闪蒸-掺混蒸发的实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3279-3291.
[14]	陈天华, 刘兆轩, 韩群, 张程宾, 李文明. 喷雾冷却换热强化研究进展及影响因素[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3149-3170.
[15]	洪瑞, 袁宝强, 杜文静. 垂直上升管内超临界二氧化碳传热恶化机理分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3309-3319.