煤与油页岩热预处理特性及对热解的影响

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20170534

化工学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 68 ›› Issue (10): 3892-3899.DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20170534

煤与油页岩热预处理特性及对热解的影响

武荣成¹, 许世佩¹, 许光文²

1 中国科学院过程工程研究所多相复杂系统国家重点实验室, 北京 100190;
2 沈阳化工大学能源与化工产业化技术研究院, 辽宁沈阳 110142

收稿日期:2017-05-02 修回日期:2017-09-02 出版日期:2017-10-05 发布日期:2017-10-05
通讯作者: 武荣成,rwu@ipe.ac.cn
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目（2016YFB0600404）；多相重点实验室基金项目（MPCS-2015-A-06）；中科院战略先导专项（XDA07010100）。

Thermal pretreatment characteristics of coal and oil shale and its effect on pyrolysis products

WU Rongcheng¹, XU Shipei¹, XU Guangwen²

1 State Key Laboratory of Multi-phase Complex Systems, Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China;
2 Institute of Industrial Chemistry and Energy Technology, Shenyang University of Chemical Technology, Shenyang 110142, Liaoning, China

Received:2017-05-02 Revised:2017-09-02 Online:2017-10-05 Published:2017-10-05
Supported by:
supported by National Key R&D Program of China(2016YFB0600404), the Fund of State Key Laboratory of Multiphase Complex Systems (MPCS-2015-A-06) and the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDA07010100).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

对比研究了神木煤和桦甸油页岩在150~400℃热预处理时的孔隙变化和挥发分析出规律以及热预处理对后续慢速升温热解反应产物的影响。结果表明，热预处理显著增加了油页岩的孔隙结构，其比表面积提高4倍、孔体积提高5倍以上，而神木煤的孔隙结构则减少了，特别是孔径大于1 nm的孔体积减少了近60%、比表面积减少了近80%，而其1 nm以下的孔则相对稳定，孔体积和比表面积分别只减少了10%左右。低于400℃时热预处理过程中除脱去吸附水外，其他挥发分也有一定析出，并以CO₂为主，另有少量CO，但挥发分总失重量不超过5%。固定床慢速升温热解研究表明，经热预处理后，油页岩的油产率最高提高了22.7%，而水和气的产率则相应降低，气体中CH₄增加而H₂降低。热预处理对煤的热解油产率影响不明显，但热解水产率降低而热解气产率增加且其中CH₄增多而H₂降少。

关键词: 油页岩, 煤, 热预处理, 热解

Abstract:

The pore change and the volatile matter release of Shenmu coal and Huadian oil shale during thermal pretreatment at 150-400℃ were investigated.The effect of the pretreatment on the successive slow pyrolysis of the coal and oil shale was studied.The results showed that,after the thermal pretreatment,the pore structure of oil shale significantly increased and the specific surface area increased by more than 4 times and pore volume increased by more than 5 times.In contrast,the pore structure of Shenmu coal significantly reduced,in particular,for the pore larger than 1 nm,its pore volume reduced by nearly 60% and the surface area reduced by nearly 80%.However,the pore below 1 nm is relatively stable,and the pore volume and specific surface area reduced by only about 10%.When the thermal pretreatment temperature is below 400℃,in addition to the removal of adsorbed water,other volatile components,mainly CO₂,and a small amount of CO,also were released,but the total mass loss caused by volatile release is not more than 5%.The slow pyrolysis experiments with a fixed bed reactor showed that,after the thermal pretreatment,the oil yield of oil shale increased by 22.7%,the yield of water and gas products reduced,and the content of H₂ in the gas decreased while CH₄ increased.The thermal pretreatment had no obvious influence on the oil yield of coal pyrolysis,while increased the yield of the gas product and CH₄ content in the gas and decreased H₂ content.

Key words: oil shale, coal, thermal pretreatment, pyrolysis

中图分类号:

TE662
TE664

武荣成, 许世佩, 许光文. 煤与油页岩热预处理特性及对热解的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(10): 3892-3899.

WU Rongcheng, XU Shipei, XU Guangwen. Thermal pretreatment characteristics of coal and oil shale and its effect on pyrolysis products[J]. CIESC Journal, 2017, 68(10): 3892-3899.

参考文献 31

[1]	张秋民, 关裙, 何德民. 几种典型的油页岩干馏技术[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2006, 36(6):1019-1026. ZHANG Q M, GUAN J, HE D M. Typical technologies for oil shale retorting[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2006, 36(6):1019-1026.
[2]	高健. 世界各国油页岩干馏技术简介[J]. 煤炭加工与综合应用, 2003, (2):44-46. GAO J. Brief introduction of oil shale retorting technology in the world[J]. Coal Processing & Comprehensive Utilization, 2003, (2):44-46.
[3]	马国君, 戴和武. 神木煤回转炉热解实验研究[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 1994, 22(11):37-39. MA G J, DAI H W. Experimental study on pyrolysis of Shenmu coal with rotary furnace[J]. Coal Science & Technology, 1994, 22(11):37-39.
[4]	张勇奇. 低变质煤热解技术分析[J]. 化学工业, 2012, 30(3):23-25. ZHANG Y Q. Analysis on metamorphism of coal pyrolysis technolog[J]. Chemical Industry, 2012, 30(3):23-25.
[5]	韩峰, 张衍国, 蒙爱红, 等. 煤的低温干馏工艺及开发[J]. 煤炭转化, 2014, 37(3):90-96. HAN F, ZHANG Y G, MENG A H, et al. Review and development of coal low temperature pyrolytic technologies[J]. Coal Conversion, 2014, 37(3):90-96.
[6]	GRAFF R A, BRANDES S D. Modification of coal by subcritical steam-pyrolysis and extration yields[J]. Energy Fuels, 1987, 1(1):84-88.
[7]	RASHID KHAN M, CHEN W, SUUBERG E. Influence of steam pretreatment on coal composition and devolatilization[J]. Energy Fuels, 1989, 3(2):223-230.
[8]	ZENG C, FAVAS G, WU H W, et al. Effects of pretreatment in steam on the pyrolysis behavior of Loy Yang brown coal[J]. Energy Fuels, 2006, 20(1):281-286.
[9]	ZENG C, CLAYTON S, WU H W, et al. Effects of dewatering on the pyrolysis and gasification reactivity of Victorian brown coal[J]. Energy Fuels, 2007, 21(2):399-404.
[10]	ZENG C, WU H, HAYASHI J J, et al. Effects of thermal pretreatment in helium on the pyrolysis behaviour of Loy Yang brown coal[J]. Fuel, 2005, 84(12/13):1586-1592.
[11]	MIURA K, MAE K. A new coal flash pyrolysis method utilizing effective radical transfer from solvent to coal[J]. Energy Fuels, 1991, 5(2):340-346.
[12]	HAYASHI J, MATSUO Y, KUSAKABE K, et al. Effect of light heat treatment on pyrolysis reactivity of brown coal[J]. Energy & Fuels, 1995, 9(2):284-289
[13]	董鹏伟, 岳君容, 高士秋, 等. 热预处理影响褐煤热解行为研究[J]. 燃料化学学报, 2012, 40(8):897-905. DONG P W, YUE J R, GAO S Q, et al. Influence of thermal pretreatment on pyrolysis of lignite[J]. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology, 2012, 40(8):897-905.
[14]	孙佰仲, 王擎, 李少华, 等. 桦甸油页岩及半焦孔结构的特性分析[J]. 动力工程, 2008, 28(1):163-167. SUN B Z, WANG Q, LI S H, et al. Analysis of specific area and porous structure of oil shale and semi coke[J]. Journal of Power Engineering, 2008, 28(1):163-167.
[15]	赵世永, 吴沛沛, 李鑫, 等. 神府煤中低温热解前后表面官能团和孔隙变化规律的研究[J]. 煤炭工程, 2015, 47(12):114-117. ZHAO S Y, WU P P, LI X, et al. Study on variation law of surface functional groups and pore of Shenfu coal after low-middle temperature pyrolysis[J]. Coal Engineering, 2015, 47(12):114-117.
[16]	王毅, 赵阳升, 冯增朝. 长焰煤热解过程中孔隙结构演化特征研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2010, 29(9):1859-1866. WANG Y, ZHAO Y S, FENG Z C. Study of evolution characteristics of pore structure during flame coal pyrolysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2010, 29(9):1859-1866.
[17]	吴诗勇, 顾菁, 李莉, 等. 高温下快速和慢速热解神府煤焦的理化性质[J]. 煤炭学报, 2006, 31(4):492-496. WU S Y, GU Q, LI L, et al. Physical and chemical properties of slow and rapid heating chars at elevated temperatures[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2006, 31(4):492-496.
[18]	刘辉, 吴少华, 孙锐, 等. 快速热解褐煤焦的比表面积及孔隙结构[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2005, 25(12):86-90. LIU H, WU S H, SUN R, et al. Specific area and pore structure of lignite char under the condition of fast pyrolysis[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2005, 25(12):86-90.
[19]	李兴龙, 许慎启, 周志杰, 等. 热解条件对淮南煤焦孔隙结构的影响[J]. 煤炭转化, 2009, (4):8-12. LI X L, XU S Q, ZHOU Z J, et al. Effect of pyrolysis condition on pore structure of Huainan coal char[J]. Coal Conversion, 2009, (4):8-12.
[20]	王明敏, 张建胜, 张守玉, 等. 热解条件对煤焦比表面积及孔隙分布的影响[J]. 煤炭学报, 2008, 33(1):71-79. WANG M M, ZHANG J S, ZHANG S Y, et al. Effect of pyrolysis conditions on the char surface area and pore distribution[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2008, 33(1):71-79.
[21]	SAIF T, LIN Q Y, BRANKO B, et al. Microstructural imaging and characterization of oil shale before and after pyrolysis[J]. Fuel, 2017, 197:562-574.
[22]	BAI J R, WANG Q, JIAO G J. Study on the pore structure of oil shale during low-temperature pyrolysis[J]. Energy Procedia, 2012, 17:1689-1696.
[23]	WANG X L, HE R, CHEN Y L. Evolution of porous fractal properties during coal devolatilization[J]. Fuel, 2008, 87:878-884.
[24]	YU Y M, LIANG W G, HU Y Q, et al. Study of micropores development in lean coal with temperature[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 2012, 51:91-96.
[25]	BAI F T, SUN Y H, LIU Y M, et al. Evaluation of the porous structure of Huadian oil shale during pyrolysis using multiple approaches[J]. Fuel, 2017, 187:1-8.
[26]	PAN L W, DAI F Q, HUANG J N, et al. Study of the effect of mineral matters on the thermal decomposition of Jimsar oil shale using TG-MS[J]. Thermochimica Acta, 2016, 627/628/629:31-38.
[27]	柏静儒, 林卫生, 潘朔, 等. 油页岩低温热解过程中轻质气体的析出特性[J]. 化工学报, 2015, 66(3):1104-1110. BAI J R, LIN W S, PAN S, et al. Characteristics of light gases evolution during oil shale pyrolysis[J]. CIESC Journal, 2015, 66(3):1104-1110.
[28]	ARENILLAS A, RUBIERA F, PIS J J. Simultaneous hermogravimetric-mass spectrometric study on the pyrolysis behaviour of different rank coals[J]. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 1999, 50(1):31-46.
[29]	HAN F, MENG A H, LI Q H, et al. Thermal decomposition and evolved gas analysis (TG-MS) of lignite coals from Southwest China[J]. Journal of the Energy Institute, 2016, 89(1):94-100.
[30]	KARABAKAN A, YÜRÜM Y. Effect of the mineral matrix in the reactions of oil shales(Ⅰ):Pyrolysis reactions of Turkish Göynük and US Green River oil shales[J]. Fuel, 1998, 77(12):1303-1309.
[31]	YAN J W, JIANG X M, HAN X X, et al. A TG-FTIR investigation to the catalytic effect of mineral matrix in oil shale on the pyrolysis and combustion of kerogen[J]. Fuel, 2013, 104(2):307-317.

煤与油页岩热预处理特性及对热解的影响

Thermal pretreatment characteristics of coal and oil shale and its effect on pyrolysis products

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 31

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	陈哲文, 魏俊杰, 张玉明. 超临界水煤气化耦合SOFC发电系统集成及其能量转化机制[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3888-3902.
[2]	赵佳佳, 田世祥, 李鹏, 谢洪高. SiO₂-H₂O纳米流体强化煤尘润湿性的微观机理研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3931-3945.
[3]	吴雷, 刘姣, 李长聪, 周军, 叶干, 刘田田, 朱瑞玉, 张秋利, 宋永辉. 低阶粉煤催化微波热解制备含碳纳米管的高附加值改性兰炭末[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3956-3967.
[4]	何松, 刘乔迈, 谢广烁, 王斯民, 肖娟. 高浓度水煤浆管道气膜减阻两相流模拟及代理辅助优化[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3766-3774.
[5]	韩晨, 司徒友珉, 朱斌, 许建良, 郭晓镭, 刘海峰. 协同处理废液的多喷嘴粉煤气化炉内反应流动研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3266-3278.
[6]	倪文翔, 赵京, 李博, 魏小林, 吴东垠, 刘迪, 王强. 转炉煤气全干法显热回收工艺中余热锅炉积灰特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3485-3493.
[7]	康超, 乔金鹏, 杨胜超, 彭超, 付元鹏, 刘斌, 刘建荣, Aleksandrova Tatiana, 段晨龙. 煤矸石中有价关键金属活化提取研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2783-2799.
[8]	杨峥豪, 何臻, 常玉龙, 靳紫恒, 江霞. 生物质快速热解下行式流化床反应器研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2249-2263.
[9]	王光宇, 张锴, 张凯华, 张东柯. 微波加热干燥煤泥热质传递及其能耗特性分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2382-2390.
[10]	黄磊, 孔令学, 白进, 李怀柱, 郭振兴, 白宗庆, 李平, 李文. 油页岩添加对准东高钠煤灰熔融行为影响的研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 2123-2135.
[11]	衣思敏, 马亚丽, 刘伟强, 张金帅, 岳岩, 郑强, 贾松岩, 李雪. 微晶菱镁矿蒸氨及水化动力学研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1578-1586.
[12]	白天昊, 王晓雯, 杨梦滋, 段新伟, 米杰, 武蒙蒙. 类水滑石衍生锌基氧化物高温煤气脱硫过程中COS释放行为及其抑制研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1772-1780.
[13]	王倩, 李神勇, 康帅, 庞薇, 郝龙龙, 秦身钧. 粉煤灰分质高效利用预处理技术的研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1010-1032.
[14]	陈瑞哲, 程磊磊, 顾菁, 袁浩然, 陈勇. 纤维增强树脂复合材料化学回收技术研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 981-994.
[15]	彭晓婉, 郭笑楠, 邓春, 刘蓓, 孙长宇, 陈光进. ZIF-8浆液法分离CH₄/N₂的双吸收-吸附塔工艺流程建模与模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(2): 784-795.