基于热重-质谱联用的煤粉富氧燃烧动力学及污染物生成特性

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20171038

化工学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 69 ›› Issue (1): 523-530.DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20171038

• 能源和环境工程 • 上一篇

基于热重-质谱联用的煤粉富氧燃烧动力学及污染物生成特性

刘倩, 钟文琪, 苏伟, 贲昊玺

能源热转换及其过程测控教育部重点实验室, 东南大学能源与环境学院, 江苏南京 210096

收稿日期:2017-08-01 修回日期:2017-09-13 出版日期:2018-01-05 发布日期:2018-01-05
通讯作者: 钟文琪
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目（2016YFB0600802）；国家自然科学基金项目（51676039）。

Oxy-coal combustion kinetics and formation characteristics of pollutants based on TG-MS analysis

LIU Qian, ZHONG Wenqi, SU Wei, BEN Haoxi

Key Laboratory of Energy Thermal Conversion and Control of Ministry of Education, School of Energy and Environment, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, Jiangsu, China

Received:2017-08-01 Revised:2017-09-13 Online:2018-01-05 Published:2018-01-05
Contact: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20171038
Supported by:
supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFB0600802) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51676039).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

富氧燃烧是最具工业化前景的燃烧中碳捕集技术之一，为更深入掌握煤粉富氧燃烧的着火模式和污染物生成特性，本文构建了热重-质谱联用实验系统，以烟煤和无烟煤标准煤样为对象，针对3个不同的氧气体积分数：21%、30%和50%，研究了O₂/Ar和O₂/CO₂气氛下煤粉的富氧燃烧特性。结果表明，O₂/CO₂气氛下煤粉着火温度和燃尽温度均降低，燃烧速率提高，燃烧时间缩短；两种煤粉在O₂/Ar气氛下的燃烧都属于非均相着火，而富氧燃烧都属于均相着火模式；氧气体积分数在30%以上时，无烟煤O₂/CO₂燃烧的表观活化能明显低于O₂/Ar气氛，在相同工况下烟煤的表观活化能均低于无烟煤；O₂/CO₂气氛促进了CO和挥发分NO的逸出，生成温度均低于O₂/Ar气氛，CO会对NO起到还原作用。

关键词: 煤燃烧, 富氧燃烧, 动力学, 污染物, 热重-质谱联用

Abstract:

Oxy-fuel combustion is one of the most promising CO₂ capture technologies. The oxygen-enriched combustion of pulverized coal was simulated in a thermogravimetric analyzer coupled with a mass spectrometry (TG-MS) in order to understand the ignition model and the generation characteristics of pollutants during combustion. Bituminous and anthracite standard coals were selected as the samples. The tests were done with oxygen volume fractions of 21%, 30% and 50% with two kinds of atmospheres (O₂/Ar and O₂/CO₂). In the O₂/CO₂ atmosphere, both of the ignition temperature and burnout temperature were lower, the combustion rate was improved, the combustion time was shortened, and the combustion performance was much better. Based on the TG/DTG curves, the ignition models of pulverized coal were judged. It was showed that the heterogeneous ignition of pulverized coal happened in O₂/Ar atmosphere, while the homogeneous ignition occurred in O₂/CO₂ atmosphere. Also, the activation energy and pre-exponential factor of coal combustion were calculated by Coats-Redfern method. When the oxygen volume fraction was above 30%, the apparent activation energy of the anthracite coal combustion in O₂/CO₂ atmosphere was significantly lower than that in O₂/Ar atmosphere, indicating an obvious improvement in reactivity. In the same reaction conditions, the activation energy of bituminous coal was lower than that of anthracite coal, and the former was more prone to ignition and combustion, showing better combustion performance. In the atmosphere of O₂/CO₂, the generation of CO and volatile-NO was promoted, and the formation temperature was lower than in O₂/Ar atmosphere. Meanwhile, the abundant CO would lead to NO reduction reaction.

Key words: coal combustion, oxy-fuel combustion, kinetics, pollutants, TG-MS

中图分类号:

TK16

刘倩, 钟文琪, 苏伟, 贲昊玺. 基于热重-质谱联用的煤粉富氧燃烧动力学及污染物生成特性[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(1): 523-530.

LIU Qian, ZHONG Wenqi, SU Wei, BEN Haoxi. Oxy-coal combustion kinetics and formation characteristics of pollutants based on TG-MS analysis[J]. CIESC Journal, 2018, 69(1): 523-530.

参考文献 30

[1]	BP statistical review of world energy[R]. 2017.
[2]	郑楚光, 赵永椿, 郭欣. 中国富氧燃烧技术研发进展[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2014, 34(23):3856-3864. ZHENG C G, ZHAO Y C, GUO X. Research and development of oxy-fuel combustion in China[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2014, 34(23):3856-3864.
[3]	WALL T, STANGER R, SANTOS S.Demonstrations of coal-fired oxy-fuel technology for carbon capture and storage and issues with commercial deployment[J].International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2011, 5(S1):S5-S15.
[4]	EHSAN A A, AHNET Y. A study on the effects of catalysts on pyrolysis and combustion characteristics of Turkish lignite in oxy-fuel conditions[J]. Fuel, 2014, 115:841-849.
[5]	WANG B, SUN L, SU S. Char structural evolution during pyrolysis and its influence on combustion reactivity in air and oxy-fuel conditions[J]. Energy & Fuel, 2012, 26:1565-1574.
[6]	LIU X W, XU M H, SI J P, et al. Effect of sodium on the structure and reactivity of the chars formed under N2 and CO2 atmospheres[J]. Energy & Fuel, 2012, 26:185-192.
[7]	SMART J P, RILEY G S. On the effects of firing semi-anthracite and bituminous coal under oxy-fuel firing conditions[J]. Fuel, 2011, 90:2812-2816.
[8]	GIL M V, RIAZA J, ALVAREZ L, et al. Oxy-fuel combustion kinetics and morphology of coal chars obtained in N2 and CO2 atmospheres in an entrained flow reactor[J]. Applied Energy, 2011, 91:67-74.
[9]	OBRAS-LOSCERTALES M L, RUFAS A. Effects of temperature and flue gas recycle on the SO2 and NOx emissions in an oxy-fuel fluidized bed combustor[J]. Energy Procedia, 2013, 37:1275-1282.
[10]	LUPIANEZ C, GUEDEA I, BOLEA I, et al. Experimental study of SO2 and NOx emissions in fluidized bed oxy-fuel combustion[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2012, 106:587-594.
[11]	ARIAS B, PEVIDA C, RUBIERA F, et al. Effect of biomass blending on coal ignition and burnout during oxy-fuel combustion[J]. Fuel, 2008, 87:2753-2759.
[12]	周志军, 姜旭东, 周俊虎, 等. 煤粉富氧燃烧着火模式判断和动力学参数分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2012, 46(3):482-488. ZHOU Z J, JIANG X D, ZHOU J H, et al. Ignition model and kinetic parameters analysis of oxygen-enriched combustion of pulverized coal[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Engineering Science), 2012, 46(3):482-488.
[13]	雷鸣, 王春波, 王松岭, 等. 煤粉热解特性对其富氧气氛下着火机理的影响[J]. 燃烧科学与技术, 2012, 18(3):260-264. LEI M, WANG C B, WANG S L, et al. Effect of pyrolysis characteristics of pulverized coal on the ignition mechanism of oxy-fuel combustion[J]. Journal of Combustion Science and Technology, 2012, 18(3):260-264.
[14]	STADLER H, CHRIST D, HABERMEHL M, et al. Experimental investigation of NOx emissions in oxycoal combustion[J]. Fuel, 2011, 90(4):1604-1611.
[15]	于岩, 阎维平, 刘彦丰, 等. O2/CO2气氛下O2, CO对NO排放特性影响的实验研究[J]. 华北电力大学学报, 2004, 31(2):28-31. YU Y, YAN W P, LIU Y F, et al. Experimental investigation on effect of O2, CO concentrations on NO emission in O2/CO2 combustion[J]. Journal of North China Electric Power University, 2004, 31(2):28-31.
[16]	陈传敏, 赵长遂, 庞克亮, 等. O2/CO2气氛下燃煤过程中NOx排放特性实验研究[J]. 东南大学学报(自然科学版), 2005, 35(5):738-741. CHEN C M, ZHAO C S, PANG K L, et al. Experimental study on NOx emission from coal combustion under O2/CO2 atmosphere[J]. Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science Edition), 2005, 35(5):738-741.
[17]	CROISET E, THAMBIMUTHU K V. NOx and SO2 emissions from O2/CO2 recycle coal combustion[J]. Fuel, 2001, 80(14):2117-2121.
[18]	LIU H, OKAZAKI K. Simultaneous easy CO2 recovery and drastic reduction of SOx and NOx in O2/CO2 coal combustion with heat recirculation[J]. Fuel, 2003, 82(11):1427-1436.
[19]	KANDASAMY J, MUSTAFA V K, ISKENDER G. Thermogravimetric and mass spectrometric (TG-MS) analysis and kinetics of coal-biomass blends[J]. Renewable Energy, 2017, 101:293-300.
[20]	KANDASAMY J, MUSTAFA V K, ISKENDER G. Pyrolysis, combustion and gasification studies of different sized coal particles using TGA-MS[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2017, 125:1446-1455.
[21]	GAO Y, TAHMASEBI A, DOU J, et al. Combustion characteristics and air pollutant formation during oxy-fuel co-combustion of microalgae and lignite[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2016, 207:276-284.
[22]	OTERO M, SÁNCHEZ M E, GÓMEZ X. Co-firing of coal and manure biomass:a TG-MS approach[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2011, 102:8304-8309.
[23]	YU D, CHEN M, WEI Y, et al. An assessment on co-combustion characteristics of Chinese lignite and eucalyptus bark with TG-MS technique[J]. Powder Technology, 2016, 294:463-471.
[24]	李帅帅, 王学斌, 刘梓晗, 等. O2/CO2气氛下碳烟氧化的反应动力学研究[J]. 动力工程学报, 2017, 37(8):673-678. LI S S, WANG X B, LIU Z H, et al. Study on reaction kinetics of soot oxidation in O2/CO2 atmosphere[J]. Journal of Chinese Society of Powder Engineering, 2017, 37(8):673-678.
[25]	孙学信. 燃煤锅炉燃烧试验技术与方法[M]. 北京:中国电力出版社, 2002:59-82. SUN X X. Technology and Methods of Combustion Experiments for Coal-Fired Boilers[M]. Beijing:China Electric Power Press, 2002:59-82.
[26]	ESSENHIGH R H, MISRA M K, SHAW D W.Ignition of coal particles:a review[J]. Combustion and Flame, 1989, 77(1):3-30.
[27]	ENGIN B, ATAKÜL H. Air and oxy-fuel combustion kinetics of low rank lignites[J/OL]. Journal of the Energy Institute, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joei.2016.11.004.
[28]	SMART J P, O'NIONS P, RILEY G S. Radiation and convective heat transfer, and burnout in oxy-coal combustion[J]. Fuel, 2010, 89:2468-2476.
[29]	LI D, LIU X, FENG Y, et al. Effects of oxidant distribution mode and burner configuration on oxy-fuel combustion characteristics in a 600 MWe utility boiler[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2017, 124:781-794.
[30]	RATHNAM R K, ELLIOTT L K, WALL T, et al. Differences in reactivity of pulverized coal in air (O2/N2) and oxy-fuel (O2/CO2) conditions[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2009, 90:797-802.

基于热重-质谱联用的煤粉富氧燃烧动力学及污染物生成特性

Oxy-coal combustion kinetics and formation characteristics of pollutants based on TG-MS analysis

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 30

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	毕丽森, 刘斌, 胡恒祥, 曾涛, 李卓睿, 宋健飞, 吴翰铭. 粗糙界面上纳米液滴蒸发模式的分子动力学研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 172-178.
[2]	于宏鑫, 邵双全. 水结晶过程的分子动力学模拟分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 250-258.
[3]	金正浩, 封立杰, 李舒宏. 氨水溶液交叉型再吸收式热泵的能量及分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 53-63.
[4]	程成, 段钟弟, 孙浩然, 胡海涛, 薛鸿祥. 表面微结构对析晶沉积特性影响的格子Boltzmann模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 74-86.
[5]	肖明堃, 杨光, 黄永华, 吴静怡. 浸没孔液氧气泡动力学数值研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 87-95.
[6]	范孝雄, 郝丽芳, 范垂钢, 李松庚. LaMnO₃/生物炭催化剂低温NH₃-SCR催化脱硝性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3821-3830.
[7]	郑佳丽, 李志会, 赵新强, 王延吉. 离子液体催化合成2-氰基呋喃反应动力学研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3708-3715.
[8]	汪林正, 陆俞冰, 张睿智, 罗永浩. 基于分子动力学模拟的VOCs热氧化特性分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3242-3255.
[9]	吕龙义, 及文博, 韩沐达, 李伟光, 高文芳, 刘晓阳, 孙丽, 王鹏飞, 任芝军, 张光明. 铁基导电材料强化厌氧去除卤代有机污染物：研究进展及未来展望[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3193-3202.
[10]	曾如宾, 沈中杰, 梁钦锋, 许建良, 代正华, 刘海峰. 基于分子动力学模拟的Fe₂O₃纳米颗粒烧结机制研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3353-3365.
[11]	李锦潼, 邱顺, 孙文寿. 煤浆法烟气脱硫中草酸和紫外线强化煤砷浸出过程[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3522-3532.
[12]	杨越, 张丹, 郑巨淦, 涂茂萍, 杨庆忠. NaCl水溶液喷射闪蒸-掺混蒸发的实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3279-3291.
[13]	张蒙蒙, 颜冬, 沈永峰, 李文翠. 电解液类型对双离子电池阴阳离子储存行为的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 3116-3126.
[14]	何宣志, 何永清, 闻桂叶, 焦凤. 磁液液滴颈部自相似破裂行为[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2889-2897.
[15]	王光宇, 张锴, 张凯华, 张东柯. 微波加热干燥煤泥热质传递及其能耗特性分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2382-2390.