新型格栅支撑有序堆积床内流动传热数值研究

doi:10.11949/0438-1157.20200488

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

颗粒堆积床作为反应器和分离器等的重要组成广泛应用于实际化学工业生产中。基于传统的有序堆积结构，提出了一种新型格栅支撑有序堆积结构，通过采用新型格栅支撑结构可以快速构建有序颗粒堆积床，其中包括格栅支撑简单立方、格栅支撑体心立方、格栅支撑疏松面心立方和格栅支撑密实面心立方颗粒堆积结构。对4种颗粒堆积单元通道内的流动换热进行模拟研究后发现，不同堆积形式的格栅支撑颗粒堆积床流动换热性能不同；在相同的面心立方堆积形式下，使用不同的格栅支撑结构，其流动传热也有明显差异；与传统有序堆积结构相比，在换热相差不多的情况下，格栅支撑有序堆积结构的压降减小，所以其综合换热效率有明显提升。

关键词: 填充床, 格栅支撑, 流动, 传热, 数值模拟

Abstract:

Packed beds of particles are widely used in chemical industrial production as core units of fixed bed reactors, dryers, filters and other equipment. Based on traditional structured packed beds, this paper proposes some novel grille-support structured packed beds. The novel grille-support packed beds can be quickly constructed by using the new grille, including grille-support simple cubic (G-SC), grille-support body center cubic (G-BCC), grille-support loose face center cubic (G-LFCC) and grille-support compact face center cubic (G-CFCC) packing. In this paper, the flow and heat transfer characteristics of grille-support structured packed beds are numerically studied. Results show that, the packed beds with different packing forms have diverse flow and heat transfer performance. Under the same face center cubic packing form, the flow and heat transfer could be also significantly different with disparate grilles. It is also revealed that, compared with the traditional structured packed bed, the pressure drop of the grille-support structured packed bed is reduced while the heat transfer coefficient is similar, so the overall heat transfer efficiency is notably improved.

Key words: packed bed, grille-support, flow, heat transfer, numerical simulation

中图分类号:

TK 124

张尚, 杨剑, 王秋旺. 新型格栅支撑有序堆积床内流动传热数值研究[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(S2): 24-31.

Shang ZHANG, Jian YANG, Qiuwang WANG. Numerical study on fluid flow and heat transfer in grille-support structured packed beds[J]. CIESC Journal, 2020, 71(S2): 24-31.

图/表 12

图1 格栅支撑密实面心立方堆积（G-CFCC）及其格栅平板

Fig.1 Schematic diagram of grille-support structured packed bed of G-CFCC and grille plate

图2 格栅支撑有序堆积单元物理模型

Fig.2 Different packed cells of grille-support structured packed beds

表1 格栅支撑有序堆积单元物理模型几何参数

Table 1 Geometry parameters for physical models

堆积形式	s/mm	w/mm	h/mm	δ/mm	D₁/mm	D₂/mm	?	d_p/mm
G-SC	12.1	12.1	12.1	0.4	9.6	—	0.458	12
G-BCC	13.8	13.8	15.2	0.4	9.6	—	0.391	12
G-LFCC	20.0	20.0	15.2	0.4	9.6	—	0.397	12
G-CFCC	17.6	17.6	17.6	0.4	9.6	7.2	0.337	12

图3 格栅支撑颗粒有序堆积物理模型

Fig.3 Different packed channels

图4 格栅支撑简单立方堆积的1/4单元通道计算模型

Fig.4 Physical model of computational domain used for the simulation

图5 流动换热校核

Fig.5 Validation of pressure drop and Nusselt number

图6 计算网格无关性验证

Fig.6 Meshing independence validation

图7 格栅支撑有序堆积通道内流线分布（v=1 m/s）

Fig.7 Local streamline distributions in different grille-support packed beds (v=1 m/s)

图8 不同格栅支撑有序堆积通道内的流动阻力特性

Fig.8 Variations of pressure drops and friction factors for different packing forms

表2 阻力系数和换热关联式常数

Table 2 Predicted values of correlation constant

堆积模型	?	c₁	c₂	a₁	a₂	n
SC^[8]	0.477	163.46	0.74	1.73	0.2	0.7
BCC^[8]	0.321	160	0.61	2.1	0.46	0.63
FCC^[8]	0.260	174	0.615	1.8	0.54	0.67
G-SC	0.458	246.05	0.38	1.3	0.10	0.78
G-BCC	0.391	223.56	0.36	2.5	0.13	0.80
G-LFCC	0.397	193.72	0.3	2.6	0.16	0.77
G-CFCC	0.337	344.92	0.45	3.0	0.24	0.77

图9 颗粒表面Nusselt数随Reynolds数变化关系

Fig.9 Comparison of Nusselt number in different packed beds

图10 不同格栅支撑有序堆积综合传热系数

Fig.10 Variations of overall heat transfer efficiency for different packed beds

参考文献 18

1	Dixon A G, Taskin M E, Nijemeisland M, et al. CFD method to couple three-dimensional transport and reaction inside catalyst particles to the fixed bed flow field [J]. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 2010, 49(19): 9012-9025.
2	Peng H, Dong H H, Ling X. Thermal investigation of PCM-based high temperature thermal energy storage in packed bed [J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2014, 81: 420-427.
3	Zhu Q B, Xuan Y M. Pore scale numerical simulation of heat transfer and flow in porous volumetric solar receivers [J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2017, 120: 150-159.
4	Calis H P A, Nijenhuis J, Paikert B C, et al. CFD modelling and experimental validation of pressure drop and flow profile in a novel structured catalytic reactor packing [J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2001, 56(4): 1713-1720.
5	Guo X Y, Dai R. Numerical simulation of flow and heat transfer in a random packed bed [J]. Particuology, 2010, 8(3): 293-299.
6	Gorman J M, Zheng A, Sparrow E M. Bounding wall effects on fluid flow and pressure drop through packed beds of spheres [J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2019, 373: 519-530.
7	Kim M H, Lim H S, Lee W J. Computational fluid dynamics assessment of the local hot core temperature in a pebble-bed type very high temperature reactor [J]. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2009, 131(1): 012905.
8	Yang J, Wang Q W, Zeng M, et al. Computational study of forced convective heat transfer in structured packed beds with spherical or ellipsoidal particles [J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2010, 65(2): 726-738.
9	Yang J, Wang J, Bu S S, et al. Experimental analysis of forced convective heat transfer in novel structured packed beds of particles [J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2012, 71(13): 126-137.
10	Crevacore E, Tosco T, Sethi R, et al. Recirculation zones induce non-Fickian transport in three-dimensional periodic porous media [J]. Physical Review E, 2016, 94(5): 053118.
11	Romkes S J P, Dautzenberg F M, van den Bleek C M, et al. CFD modelling and experimental validation of particle-to-fluid mass and heat transfer in a packed bed at very low channel to particle diameter ratio [J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2003, 96(1/2/3): 3-13.
12	Wang J Y, Yang J, Cheng Z L, et al. Experimental and numerical study on pressure drop and heat transfer performance of grille-sphere composite structured packed bed [J]. Applied Energy, 2018, 227: 719-730.
13	Hu Y X, Wang J Y, Yang J, et al. Experimental study of forced convective heat transfer in grille-particle composite packed beds [J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2019, 129: 103-112.
14	Seguin D, Montillet A, Comiti J. Experimental characterisation of flow regimes in various porous media (I): Limit of laminar flow regime [J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 1998, 53(21): 3751-3761.
15	Bu S S, Yang J, Dong Q T, et al. Experimental study of transition flow in packed beds of spheres with different particle sizes based on electrochemical microelectrodes measurement [J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2014, 73(2): 1525-1532.
16	Dixon A G, Nijemeisland M, Stitt E H. Packed tubular reactor modeling and catalyst design using computational fluid dynamics [J]. Advances in Chemical Engineering, 2006, 31: 307-389.
17	Ergun S. Fluid flow through packed columns [J]. Chemical Engineering Progress, 1952, 48(2): 89-94.
18	Wakao N, Kagei S N. Heat and mass transfer in packed beds [J]. AIChE Journal, 1983, 1(2): 193-199.

[1]	周绍华, 詹飞龙, 丁国良, 张浩, 邵艳坡, 刘艳涛, 郜哲明. 短管节流阀内流动噪声的实验研究及降噪措施[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 113-121.
[2]	叶展羽, 山訸, 徐震原. 用于太阳能蒸发的折纸式蒸发器性能仿真[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 132-140.
[3]	张双星, 刘舫辰, 张义飞, 杜文静. R-134a脉动热管相变蓄放热实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 165-171.
[4]	张义飞, 刘舫辰, 张双星, 杜文静. 超临界二氧化碳用印刷电路板式换热器性能分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 183-190.
[5]	陈爱强, 代艳奇, 刘悦, 刘斌, 吴翰铭. 基板温度对HFE7100液滴蒸发过程的影响研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 191-197.
[6]	刘明栖, 吴延鹏. 导光管直径和长度对传热影响的模拟分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 206-212.
[7]	王志国, 薛孟, 董芋双, 张田震, 秦晓凯, 韩强. 基于裂隙粗糙性表征方法的地热岩体热流耦合数值模拟与分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 223-234.
[8]	宋嘉豪, 王文. 斯特林发动机与高温热管耦合运行特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 287-294.
[9]	张思雨, 殷勇高, 贾鹏琦, 叶威. 双U型地埋管群跨季节蓄热特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 295-301.
[10]	晁京伟, 许嘉兴, 李廷贤. 基于无管束蒸发换热强化策略的吸附热池的供热性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 302-310.
[11]	程成, 段钟弟, 孙浩然, 胡海涛, 薛鸿祥. 表面微结构对析晶沉积特性影响的格子Boltzmann模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 74-86.
[12]	宋瑞涛, 王派, 王云鹏, 李敏霞, 党超镔, 陈振国, 童欢, 周佳琦. 二氧化碳直接蒸发冰场排管内流动沸腾换热数值模拟分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 96-103.
[13]	李艺彤, 郭航, 陈浩, 叶芳. 催化剂非均匀分布的质子交换膜燃料电池操作条件研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3831-3840.
[14]	王玉兵, 李杰, 詹宏波, 朱光亚, 张大林. R134a在菱形离散肋微小通道内的流动沸腾换热实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3797-3806.
[15]	李科, 文键, 忻碧平. 耦合蒸气冷却屏的真空多层绝热结构对液氢储罐自增压过程的影响机制研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3786-3796.