基于代理模型的含盐废水多级纳滤系统的过程优化设计

doi:10.11949/0438-1157.20200722

化工学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 72 ›› Issue (3): 1400-1408.DOI: 10.11949/0438-1157.20200722

基于代理模型的含盐废水多级纳滤系统的过程优化设计

陆至彬¹(),谢星²,鲁思达²,何畅^3,⁴(),张冰剑^3,⁴,陈清林^3,⁴

^1.中山大学材料科学与工程学院，广东广州 510275
^2.西安航天源动力工程有限公司，陕西西安 710000
^3.中山大学化学工程与技术学院，广东珠海 519082
^4.广东省石化过程节能工程技术研究中心，广东广州 510275

收稿日期:2020-06-08 修回日期:2020-09-01 出版日期:2021-03-05 发布日期:2021-03-05
通讯作者: 何畅
作者简介:陆至彬(1998—)，男，硕士研究生，luzhb6@mail2.sysu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(51776228);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(20lgpy01)

Surrogate model-based optimal design of multi-stage nanofiltration separation system for saline wastewater

LU Zhibin¹(),XIE Xing²,LU Sida²,HE Chang^3,⁴(),ZHANG Bingjian^3,⁴,CHEN Qinglin^3,⁴

^1.School of Materials Science and Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, Guangdong, China
^2.Xi’an Aerospace Yuan Dongli Engineering Co. , Ltd. , Xi’an 710000, Shanxi, China
^3.School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai 519082, Guangdong, China
^4.Guangdong Engineering Center for Petrochemical Energy Conservation, Guangzhou 510275, Guangdong, China

Received:2020-06-08 Revised:2020-09-01 Online:2021-03-05 Published:2021-03-05
Contact: HE Chang

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

基于道南细孔-介电DSPM-DE模型，开展了工业含盐废水多级纳滤分离系统的代理模型构建与优化研究。首先，利用高维模型表征的数学建模方法，构建与原有纳滤理论模型有高拟合度的高精度代理模型。基于此代理模型，进一步构建膜法分盐工艺中的多级纳滤分离的数学优化模型，并以分离单位质量NaCl的比能耗为优化目标，讨论在给定设计参数的条件下进料液中[Cl^-]/[ $S O 4 2 -$ ]的变化对不同级数纳滤系统的分盐性能及最优操作条件的影响。优化结果显示，进料[Cl^-]/[ $S O 4 2 -$ ]的增加有利于提高NaCl总回收率和降低分盐比能耗。在相同的纳滤膜投资成本下，双级系统在降低能耗方面更胜一筹，与单级系统相比最高可节能5.84%。

关键词: 废水, 纳滤, 分盐, 代理模型, 比能耗, 优化, 节能

Abstract:

Based on Donnan steric pore model with dielectric exclusion (DSPM-DE), this work develops a surrogate model for the multi-stage nanofiltration separation of industrial saline wastewater. Firstly, a high-fidelity surrogate model with a high fitting degree is established to describe the DSPM-DE-based nanofiltration process via high dimensional model representation. On this basis, we construct the optimization model of multi-stage nanofiltration separation for minimizing the specific energy consumption (SEC) of unit NaCl separated. The impacts of the changing feed ratio [Cl^-]/[ $S O 4 2 -$ ] on the separation performance and optimal operating conditions of the nanofiltration system are investigated under the given design parameters. The results indicate that an increased feed ratio [Cl^-]/[ $S O 4 2 -$ ] is beneficial to improve the total recovery of NaCl and to reduce the SEC. Under the same investment cost of nanofiltration membranes, the two-stage system is superior in reducing energy consumption, and can save up to 5.84% compared with the single-stage system.

Key words: wastewater, nanofiltration, salts separation, surrogate model, specific energy consumption, optimization, energy saving

中图分类号:

陆至彬, 谢星, 鲁思达, 何畅, 张冰剑, 陈清林. 基于代理模型的含盐废水多级纳滤系统的过程优化设计[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(3): 1400-1408.

LU Zhibin, XIE Xing, LU Sida, HE Chang, ZHANG Bingjian, CHEN Qinglin. Surrogate model-based optimal design of multi-stage nanofiltration separation system for saline wastewater[J]. CIESC Journal, 2021, 72(3): 1400-1408.

图/表 13

图1 纳滤膜压力容器结构示意图

Fig.1 Structural diagram of the pressure vessel of nanofiltration

图2 多级纳滤过程示意图

Fig.2 Flow diagram of multi-stage nanofiltration system

表1 纳滤传质模拟模型的关键参数

Table 1 Key parameters of the mass transfer model for nanofiltration

Parameter		Unit	Value	Ref.
NF270 properties	S_m	m²	37.16	[26]
	r_pore	nm	0.43	[13]
	?x_e	μm	1.5
	ε_pore	—	42.4	[27]
	X_d	mol/m³	fitting	[12]
Other parameters	temperature, T	K	298
	D_i_,∞( $S O 4 2 -$ /Cl^-/Na⁺)×10⁹	m²/s	1.065/2.031/1.344	[28]
	r_i( $S O 4 2 -$ /Cl^-/Na⁺)	nm	0.231/0.121/0.184	[29]
	ε_b	—	80.4	[16]

表1 纳滤传质模拟模型的关键参数

Table 1 Key parameters of the mass transfer model for nanofiltration

Parameter		Unit	Value	Ref.
NF270 properties	S_m	m²	37.16	[26]
	r_pore	nm	0.43	[13]
	?x_e	μm	1.5
	ε_pore	—	42.4	[27]
	X_d	mol/m³	fitting	[12]
Other parameters	temperature, T	K	298
	D_i_,∞( $S O 4 2 -$ /Cl^-/Na⁺)×10⁹	m²/s	1.065/2.031/1.344	[28]
	r_i( $S O 4 2 -$ /Cl^-/Na⁺)	nm	0.231/0.121/0.184	[29]
	ε_b	—	80.4	[16]

表2 优化模型的关键参数和约束条件

Table 2 Key parameters and constraints used in optimization process

Parameter	Unit	Value	Ref.
minimum element pressure drop, ?P_drop	bar	0.05
maximum element water recovery, r_e	—	15%	ROSA
maximum applied pressure per element, ?P_e	bar	41	[26]
maximum element feed flow rate, $Q e i n$	m³/h	13.85	ROSA
number of elements in each pressure vessel, Ne	—	4
fluid viscosity, μ	Pa?s	0.936×10^-3	Aspen Plus
high pressure pump efficiency, η_hp	—	0.75	[23]
booster pump efficiency, η_bp	—	0.57	[23]
circulating pump efficiency, η_cp	—	0.8	[23]
energy recovery device efficiency, η_ERD	—	0.9	[23]
total feed rate of waste water, Q_f	m³/h	400
pipeline fluid pressure, P₁	bar	2.0	[23]

表2 优化模型的关键参数和约束条件

Table 2 Key parameters and constraints used in optimization process

Parameter	Unit	Value	Ref.
minimum element pressure drop, ?P_drop	bar	0.05
maximum element water recovery, r_e	—	15%	ROSA
maximum applied pressure per element, ?P_e	bar	41	[26]
maximum element feed flow rate, $Q e i n$	m³/h	13.85	ROSA
number of elements in each pressure vessel, Ne	—	4
fluid viscosity, μ	Pa?s	0.936×10^-3	Aspen Plus
high pressure pump efficiency, η_hp	—	0.75	[23]
booster pump efficiency, η_bp	—	0.57	[23]
circulating pump efficiency, η_cp	—	0.8	[23]
energy recovery device efficiency, η_ERD	—	0.9	[23]
total feed rate of waste water, Q_f	m³/h	400
pipeline fluid pressure, P₁	bar	2.0	[23]

图3 不同水通量下对应的DSPM-DE模型模拟值与实验值的比较(进料浓度：SO42- 80 mol/m3，Cl- 180 mol/m3)

Fig.3 Comparison of simulation data by DSPM-DE model and experiment data under various water fluxes (feed concentration: SO42- 80 mol/m3, Cl- 180 mol/m3)

表3 透过液SO42-浓度代理模型一阶系数

Table 3 First order coefficients of surrogate model for SO42- concentration in permeate

$A α, θ S O 4 2 -$	θ=1	θ=2
α=1	-0.014436	0.022249
α=1	-0.011062	0.002860
α=3	—	—
α=4	-0.012763	0.003062

表3 透过液SO42-浓度代理模型一阶系数

Table 3 First order coefficients of surrogate model for SO42- concentration in permeate

$A α, θ S O 4 2 -$	θ=1	θ=2
α=1	-0.014436	0.022249
α=1	-0.011062	0.002860
α=3	—	—
α=4	-0.012763	0.003062

表4 透过液SO42-浓度代理模型二阶系数

Table 4 Second order coefficients of surrogate model for SO42- concentration in permeate

$B α, β, θ, ω S O 4 2 -$	θ=1, ω=1	θ=1, ω=2	θ=2, ω=1	θ=2, ω=2
α=1, β=2	0.027319	-0.000168	-0.000341	0.000047
α=1, β=3	—	—	-0.002461	0.000884
α=1, β=4	0.011366	-0.002616	-0.004330	0.000888
α=2, β=3	—	—	-0.000704	0.000175
α=2, β=4	0.008873	-0.002153	0.006755	-0.001389
α=3, β=4	—	—	-0.033619	0.007160

表4 透过液SO42-浓度代理模型二阶系数

Table 4 Second order coefficients of surrogate model for SO42- concentration in permeate

$B α, β, θ, ω S O 4 2 -$	θ=1, ω=1	θ=1, ω=2	θ=2, ω=1	θ=2, ω=2
α=1, β=2	0.027319	-0.000168	-0.000341	0.000047
α=1, β=3	—	—	-0.002461	0.000884
α=1, β=4	0.011366	-0.002616	-0.004330	0.000888
α=2, β=3	—	—	-0.000704	0.000175
α=2, β=4	0.008873	-0.002153	0.006755	-0.001389
α=3, β=4	—	—	-0.033619	0.007160

表5 透过液Cl-浓度代理模型一阶系数

Table 5 First order coefficients of surrogate model for Cl- concentration in permeate

$A α, θ C l -$	θ=1	θ=2
α=1	21.073186	-3.237781
α=2	82.290331	7.929830
α=3	—	—
α=4	-11.560941	2.654041

表5 透过液Cl-浓度代理模型一阶系数

Table 5 First order coefficients of surrogate model for Cl- concentration in permeate

$A α, θ C l -$	θ=1	θ=2
α=1	21.073186	-3.237781
α=2	82.290331	7.929830
α=3	—	—
α=4	-11.560941	2.654041

表6 透过液Cl-浓度代理模型二阶系数

Table 6 Second order coefficients of surrogate model for Cl- concentration in permeate

$B α, β, θ, ω C l -$	θ=1, ω=1	θ=1, ω=2	θ=2, ω=1	θ=2, ω=2
α=1, β=2	9.617871	0.110605	0.163656	-0.031836
α=1, β=3	—	—	1.071423	-0.169995
α=1, β=4	-9.937840	1.888694	2.622338	-0.449131
α=2, β=3	—	—	-2.578999	0.374763
α=2, β=4	-45.992975	8.506330	4.323250	-1.123688
α=3, β=4	—	—	-9.240002	1.694438

表6 透过液Cl-浓度代理模型二阶系数

Table 6 Second order coefficients of surrogate model for Cl- concentration in permeate

$B α, β, θ, ω C l -$	θ=1, ω=1	θ=1, ω=2	θ=2, ω=1	θ=2, ω=2
α=1, β=2	9.617871	0.110605	0.163656	-0.031836
α=1, β=3	—	—	1.071423	-0.169995
α=1, β=4	-9.937840	1.888694	2.622338	-0.449131
α=2, β=3	—	—	-2.578999	0.374763
α=2, β=4	-45.992975	8.506330	4.323250	-1.123688
α=3, β=4	—	—	-9.240002	1.694438

图4 HDMR预测值与DSPM-DE纳滤模型模拟值的比较

Fig.4 Comparison of results obtained by HDMR and DSPM-DE models

图5 不同级数下最优分盐比能耗随[Cl-]/[SO42-]变化曲线

Fig.5 The optimal SECs in different stage with varied [Cl-]/[SO42-]

图6 不同级数下各级单元的最优操作压力随[Cl-]/[SO42-]变化曲线

Fig.6 The optimal unit operating pressures in different stage with varied [Cl-]/[SO42-] (s1, s2, s3 represent the first, second and third unit of system)

图7 不同级数下NaCl总回收率随[Cl-]/[SO42-]变化曲线

Fig.7 The overall recovery of NaCl in different stage with varied [Cl2-]/[SO42-]

参考文献 24

24	Wang S H, Kang L W, Zhang B J, et al. Energy minimization in hybrid desalination system of reverse osmosis and pressure retarded osmosis[J]. CIESC Journal, 2019, 70(2): 617-624.
25	Wang S H, Zhu Q P, He C, et al. Model-based optimization and comparative analysis of open-loop and closed-loop RO-PRO desalination systems[J]. Desalination, 2018, 446: 83-93.
26	DuPont de Nemours, Inc. DOW FilmTec™ NF270-400/34i[EB/OL]. [2020-03-30]. .
27	Oatley D L, Llenas L, Pérez R, et al. Review of the dielectric properties of nanofiltration membranes and verification of the single oriented layer approximation[J]. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 2012, 173: 1-11.
28	Déon S, Dutournié P, Limousy L, et al. Transport of salt mixtures through nanofiltration membranes: numerical identification of electric and dielectric contributions[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2009, 69(3): 225-233.
29	Oatley D L, Llenas L, Aljohani N H M, et al. Investigation of the dielectric properties of nanofiltration membranes[J]. Desalination, 2013, 315: 100-106.
30	Escoda A, Déon S, Fievet P. Assessment of dielectric contribution in the modeling of multi-ionic transport through nanofiltration membranes[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2011, 378(1/2): 214-223.
31	Li K, Ma W C, Han H J, et al. Selective recovery of salt from coal gasification brine by nanofiltration membranes[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2018, 223: 306-313.
32	Kim J E, Phuntsho S, Chekli L, et al. Environmental and economic assessment of hybrid FO-RO/NF system with selected inorganic draw solutes for the treatment of mine impaired water[J]. Desalination, 2018, 429: 96-104.
33	DuPont de Nemours, Inc. What is the MWCO of FilmTec™ NF90 and NF270 reverse osmosis elements[EB/OL]. [2020-03-30]. .
1	Huang L, Wang D, He C L, et al. Industrial wastewater desalination under uncertainty in coal-chemical eco-industrial parks[J]. Resources Conservation and Recycling, 2019, 145: 370-378.
2	Zhu Q P, Zhang B J, Chen Q L, et al. Optimal synthesis of water networks for addressing high-concentration wastewater in coal-based chemical plants[J]. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2017, 5(11): 10792-10805.
3	刘晓鹏. 煤化工浓盐水蒸发结晶分离工业盐的实验研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2017.
	Liu X P. Research on the experiment of separating industrial salt from coal chemical brine by evaporation and crystallization[D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2017.
4	韩洪军, 李琨, 徐春艳, 等. 现代煤化工废水近零排放技术难点及展望[J]. 工业水处理, 2019, 39(8): 1-5.
	Han H, Li K, Xu C, et al. Status and prospects of near zero discharge technology for modern coal chemical industry wastewater[J]. Industrial Water Treatment, 2019, 39(8): 1-5.
5	熊日华, 何灿, 马瑞, 等. 高盐废水分盐结晶工艺及其技术经济分析[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2018, 46(9): 37-43.
	Xiong R, He C, Ma R, et al. Process introduction and techno-economic analysis on pure salt recovery crystallization for high salinity wastewater[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2018, 46(9): 37-43.
6	Déon S, Dutournié P, Bourseau P. Modeling nanofiltration with Nernst-Planck approach and polarization layer[J]. AIChE Journal, 2007, 53(8): 1952-1969.
7	Déon S, Dutournié P, Limousy L, et al. The two-dimensional pore and polarization transport model to describe mixtures separation by nanofiltration: model validation[J]. AIChE Journal, 2011, 57(4): 985-995.
8	Ortiz-Albo P, Ibañez R, Urtiaga A, et al. Phenomenological prediction of desalination brines nanofiltration through the indirect determination of zeta potential[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2019, 210: 746-753.
9	Mohammad A W, Teow Y H, Ang W L, et al. Nanofiltration membranes review: recent advances and future prospects[J]. Desalination, 2015, 356: 226-254.
10	Bowen W R, Welfoot J S. Modelling the performance of membrane nanofiltration—critical assessment and model development[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2002, 57(7): 1121-1137.
11	Geraldes V, Brites Alves A M. Computer program for simulation of mass transport in nanofiltration membranes[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2008, 321(2): 172-182.
12	Pérez-González A, Ibáñez R, Gómez P, et al. Nanofiltration separation of polyvalent and monovalent anions in desalination brines[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2015, 473: 16-27.
13	Roy Y, Sharqawy M H, Lienhard J H. Modeling of flat-sheet and spiral-wound nanofiltration configurations and its application in seawater nanofiltration[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2015, 493: 360-372.
14	Roy Y, Warsinger D M, Lienhard J H. Effect of temperature on ion transport in nanofiltration membranes: diffusion, convection and electromigration[J]. Desalination, 2017, 420: 241-257.
15	Roy Y, Lienhard J H V. Factors contributing to the change in permeate quality upon temperature variation in nanofiltration[J]. Desalination, 2019, 455: 58-70.
16	Labban O, Chong T H, Lienhard J H V. Design and modeling of novel low-pressure nanofiltration hollow fiber modules for water softening and desalination pretreatment[J]. Desalination, 2018, 439: 58-72.
17	Labban O, Liu C, Chong T H, et al. Fundamentals of low-pressure nanofiltration: membrane characterization, modeling, and understanding the multi-ionic interactions in water softening[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2017, 521: 18-32.
18	Roy Y. Modeling nanofiltration for large scale desalination applications[D]. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2015.
19	Bonner R, Germishuizen C, Franzsen S. Prediction of nanofiltration rejection performance in brackish water reverse osmosis brine treatment processes[J]. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 2019, 32: 100900.
20	Pan M, Sikorski J, Akroyd J, et al. Design technologies for eco-industrial parks: from unit operations to processes, plants and industrial networks[J]. Applied Energy, 2016, 175: 305-323.
21	DuPont de Nemours, Inc. FILMTEC™ reverse osmosis membranes technical manual[EB/OL]. [2020-03-30]. .
22	Karuppiah R, Bury S J, Vazquez A, et al. Optimal design of reverse osmosis-based water treatment systems[J]. AIChE Journal, 2012, 58(9): 2758-2769.
23	Ghobeity A, Mitsos A. Optimal time-dependent operation of seawater reverse osmosis[J]. Desalination, 2010, 263(1/2/3): 76-88.
24	王沈晗, 康仑巍, 张冰剑, 等. 反渗透和压力延迟渗透耦合脱盐系统的能效优化研究[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(2): 617-624.

[1]	高润淼, 宋孟杰, 高恩元, 张龙, 张旋, 邵苛苛, 甄泽康, 江正勇. 冷链装备制冷剂相关温室气体减排研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 1-7.
[2]	吴延鹏, 刘乾隆, 田东民, 陈凤君. 相变材料与热管耦合的电子器件热管理研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 25-31.
[3]	杨欣, 王文, 徐凯, 马凡华. 高压氢气加注过程中温度特征仿真分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 280-286.
[4]	杨百玉, 寇悦, 姜峻韬, 詹亚力, 王庆宏, 陈春茂. 炼化碱渣湿式氧化预处理过程DOM的化学转化特征[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3912-3920.
[5]	何松, 刘乔迈, 谢广烁, 王斯民, 肖娟. 高浓度水煤浆管道气膜减阻两相流模拟及代理辅助优化[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3766-3774.
[6]	陈哲文, 魏俊杰, 张玉明. 超临界水煤气化耦合SOFC发电系统集成及其能量转化机制[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3888-3902.
[7]	齐聪, 丁子, 余杰, 汤茂清, 梁林. 基于选择吸收纳米薄膜的太阳能温差发电特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3921-3930.
[8]	邢雷, 苗春雨, 蒋明虎, 赵立新, 李新亚. 井下微型气液旋流分离器优化设计与性能分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3394-3406.
[9]	杨欣, 彭啸, 薛凯茹, 苏梦威, 吴燕. 分子印迹-TiO₂光电催化降解增溶PHE废水性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3564-3571.
[10]	张曼铮, 肖猛, 闫沛伟, 苗政, 徐进良, 纪献兵. 危废焚烧处理耦合有机朗肯循环系统工质筛选与热力学优化[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3502-3512.
[11]	诸程瑛, 王振雷. 基于改进深度强化学习的乙烯裂解炉操作优化[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3429-3437.
[12]	陈国泽, 卫东, 郭倩, 向志平. 负载跟踪状态下的铝空气电池堆最优功率点优化方法[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3533-3542.
[13]	刘文竹, 云和明, 王宝雪, 胡明哲, 仲崇龙. 基于场协同和耗散的微通道拓扑优化研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3329-3341.
[14]	文兆伦, 李沛睿, 张忠林, 杜晓, 侯起旺, 刘叶刚, 郝晓刚, 官国清. 基于自热再生的隔壁塔深冷空分工艺设计及优化[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2988-2998.
[15]	吴文涛, 褚良永, 张玲洁, 谭伟民, 沈丽明, 暴宁钟. 腰果酚生物基自愈合微胶囊的高效制备工艺研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 3103-3115.

基于代理模型的含盐废水多级纳滤系统的过程优化设计

Surrogate model-based optimal design of multi-stage nanofiltration separation system for saline wastewater

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 13

参考文献 24

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价