双回流变压吸附高效分离CO/H2制备高纯H2和CO

doi:10.11949/0438-1157.20240535

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

双回流（DR）变压吸附（PSA）工艺具有不受压力比影响的优势，有望突破传统PSA的热力学限制同时获得两种高纯气体。基于两塔四步DR PSA工艺，分别考察了活性炭（AC）、13X和5A分子筛复合吸附剂以及Cu（Ⅰ）/AC单吸附剂的分离效果，实现了同时制备高纯H₂和CO产品。利用Aspen Adsorption模拟平台开发了一个由质量、动量和能量平衡方程组成的非等温吸附模型，并通过固定床吸附实验验证了模型的可靠性。结果表明，AC、13X和5A分子筛复合吸附剂的DR PSA工艺分离效率欠佳，但表现出更强的CO解吸能力；而单独以Cu（Ⅰ）/AC为吸附剂，可以显著提升分离效率，即以CO/H₂=0.5/0.5（体积比）合成气为原料，获得纯度>99.999%的H₂产品，其中CO含量<0.20 ml/m³，收率达96.69%；同时CO产品纯度>97.00%，收率达99.16%。增大轻、重组分回流比可以进一步提高H₂和CO产品气的纯度。

关键词: 双回流, 变压吸附, 一氧化碳, Cu（Ⅰ）/AC, 数值模拟

Abstract:

Double reflux (DR) pressure swing adsorption (PSA) process has the advantage of not being affected by pressure ratio, and is expected to break through the thermodynamic limitations of traditional pressure swing adsorption (PSA) to obtain two high-purity gases at the same time. In this work, based on the two-bed four-step DR PSA process, we investigated the separation effects of activated carbon (AC), 13X and 5A molecular sieve composite adsorbents, and Cu(Ⅰ)/AC single adsorbent, achieving the simultaneous preparation of high-purity H₂ and CO products. A non-isothermal adsorption model consisting of mass, momentum and energy balance equations was developed using the Aspen Adsorption simulation platform, and its reliability was verified through fixed-bed adsorption experiments. The results demonstrated that the DR PSA process with AC, 13X, and 5A molecular sieve composite adsorbents exhibited unsatisfactory separation efficiency, but exhibited stronger CO desorption ability; using Cu(Ⅰ)/AC alone as the adsorbent can significantly enhance the separation efficiency, that is, using CO/H₂=0.5/0.5 (volume ratio) synthesis gas as the raw material, H₂ product with a purity of >99.999% could be obtained, the CO content is <0.20 ml/m³, and the yield is 96.69%. At the same time, the purity of CO product attains >97.00%, and the yield reaches 99.16%. Increasing the reflux ratio of light and heavy components could further improve the purity of H₂ and CO product gases, respectively.

Key words: dual-reflux, pressure swing adsorption, carbon monoxide, Cu(Ⅰ)/AC, numerical simulation

中图分类号:

TQ 028.1

郭强, 肇启东, 肖永厚. 双回流变压吸附高效分离CO/H₂制备高纯H₂和CO[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(11): 4298-4308.

Qiang GUO, Qidong ZHAO, Yonghou XIAO. Preparation of high-purity H₂ and CO by efficient separation of CO/H₂ using dual-reflux pressure swing adsorption process[J]. CIESC Journal, 2024, 75(11): 4298-4308.

图/表 17

图1 CO中试穿透实验装置示意图

Fig.1 Schematic diagram of pilot CO adsorption breakthrough experimental device

表1 吸附床的性质和操作条件

Table 1 Properties of the adsorption bed and operating conditions

Parameters	AC/13X/5A	Cu(Ⅰ)/AC
height of adsorbent layer/m	0.50/0.50/0.80	2.0
diameter of adsorbent layer/m	0.13	0.20
thickness of bed wall	0.0050	0.0020
inter-particle voidage	0.43/0.35/0.35	0.35
intra-particle voidage	0.61/0.65/0.65	0.33
bulk solid density of adsorbent/ (kg/m³)	708.00/851.29/715.70	625.00
adsorbent particle radius/mm	2.0	1.4
feed gas pressure/bar	5.0	5.0
feed flow rate/(L/min)	33.33	33.33

图2 各组分在AC、13X、5A和Cu(Ⅰ)/AC上的吸附等温线拟合曲线

Fig.2 Fitting curves of adsorption isotherms for each component over AC, 13X, 5A and Cu(Ⅰ)/AC

表2 DR PSA模型中使用的方程

Table 2 The equations used in DR PSA model

Model equation	Expression	Equation
mass balance	$- ε b D a x, i ∂ 2 c i ∂ z 2 + ε b ∂ v g c i ∂ z + ε b + 1 - ε b ε p ∂ c i ∂ t + ρ s 1 - ε b ∂ q i ∂ t = 0$	(1)
energy balance	gas phase $- ε b k g ∂ 2 T g ∂ z 2 + C v g v g ρ g ∂ T g ∂ z + ε b C v g ρ g ∂ T g ∂ t + P ∂ v g ∂ z + h f a p T g - T s + 4 h w T g - T 0 D b = 0$	(2)
	solid phase $- k s ∂ 2 T s ∂ z 2 + C p s ρ s ∂ T s ∂ t + ρ s ∑ i = 1 n C p a, i q i ∂ T s ∂ t + ρ s ∑ i = 1 n ∆ H i ∂ q i ∂ t - h f a p T g - T s = 0$	(3)
	bed wall $k w ∂ 2 T w ∂ z 2 + C p w ρ w ∂ T w ∂ t - h w 4 D b D b + W t 2 - D b 2 T g - T w + h a m b 4 D b + W t 2 D b + W t 2 - D b 2 T w - T a m b = 0$	(4)
	$N u f = 2 + 1.1 P r 1 / 3 R e 0.6$	(5)
	$N u w = 12.5 + 0.048 R e$	(6)
	$N u 0 = 0.1 R a 1 / 3$	(7)
momentum balance	$- ∂ p ∂ z = 150 μ 1 - ε b 2 ε b 3 2 r p ψ 2 v g + 1.75 1 - ε b 2 r p ψ ε b 3 ρ g v g v g$	(8)
LDF	$∂ q i ∂ t = k L D F, i (q i * - q i)$	(9)
LDF	$k L D F, i = 15 D p, i R p 2$	(10)
ideal gas law	$p V i = n i R T$	(11)

表2 DR PSA模型中使用的方程

Table 2 The equations used in DR PSA model

Model equation	Expression	Equation
mass balance	$- ε b D a x, i ∂ 2 c i ∂ z 2 + ε b ∂ v g c i ∂ z + ε b + 1 - ε b ε p ∂ c i ∂ t + ρ s 1 - ε b ∂ q i ∂ t = 0$	(1)
energy balance	gas phase $- ε b k g ∂ 2 T g ∂ z 2 + C v g v g ρ g ∂ T g ∂ z + ε b C v g ρ g ∂ T g ∂ t + P ∂ v g ∂ z + h f a p T g - T s + 4 h w T g - T 0 D b = 0$	(2)
	solid phase $- k s ∂ 2 T s ∂ z 2 + C p s ρ s ∂ T s ∂ t + ρ s ∑ i = 1 n C p a, i q i ∂ T s ∂ t + ρ s ∑ i = 1 n ∆ H i ∂ q i ∂ t - h f a p T g - T s = 0$	(3)
	bed wall $k w ∂ 2 T w ∂ z 2 + C p w ρ w ∂ T w ∂ t - h w 4 D b D b + W t 2 - D b 2 T g - T w + h a m b 4 D b + W t 2 D b + W t 2 - D b 2 T w - T a m b = 0$	(4)
	$N u f = 2 + 1.1 P r 1 / 3 R e 0.6$	(5)
	$N u w = 12.5 + 0.048 R e$	(6)
	$N u 0 = 0.1 R a 1 / 3$	(7)
momentum balance	$- ∂ p ∂ z = 150 μ 1 - ε b 2 ε b 3 2 r p ψ 2 v g + 1.75 1 - ε b 2 r p ψ ε b 3 ρ g v g v g$	(8)
LDF	$∂ q i ∂ t = k L D F, i (q i * - q i)$	(9)
LDF	$k L D F, i = 15 D p, i R p 2$	(10)
ideal gas law	$p V i = n i R T$	(11)

表3 AC、13X和5A的扩展型Langmuir吸附模型拟合参数

Table 3 Fitting parameters of extended Langmuir adsorption models for AC， 13X and 5A

Adsorbent	Parameters	H₂	Ar	CO
AC	Q_m/(mmol/g)	10.68	7.00	6.82
	b₀/bar^-1	2.16×10^-5	1.76×10^-4	9.05×10^-6
	ΔH/(kJ/mol)	-12.84	-13.53	-22.58
13X	Q_m/(mmol/g)	6.50	4.41	3.18
	b₀/bar^-1	1.33×10^-4	2.92×10^-4	8.49×10^-5
	ΔH/(kJ/mol)	-8.00	-11.00	-21.00
5A	Q_m/(mmol/g)	1.15	4.24	2.24
	b₀/bar^-1	2.82×10^-4	1.67×10^-4	6.14×10^-6
	ΔH/(kJ/mol)	-9.23	-13.30	-29.77

表4 Cu（Ⅰ）/AC的扩展型Langmuir吸附模型拟合参数

Table 4 Fitting parameters of extended Langmuir adsorption model for Cu（Ⅰ）/AC

Parameters	H₂	Ar	CO	CH₄	N₂	CO₂
Q_m/(mmol/g)	38.87	6.56	2.00	3.23	7.18	5.38
b₀/bar^-1	1.0×10^-5	1.8×10^-4	1.0×10^-5	5.0×10^-5	1.9×10^-5	7.5×10^-6
ΔH/(kJ/mol)	-8.50	-13.74	-31.45	-20.60	-15.87	-26.83

图3 在Aspen Adsorption平台上构建的DR PSA模型图

Fig.3 Constructed DR PSA model based on the Aspen Adsorption platform

图4 DR PSA工艺半个周期的流程示意图

Fig.4 Schematic diagram of the DR PSA process for half a cycle

表5 DR PSA工艺循环时间

Table 5 Cycle time of DR PSA process

Bed	Duration/s
Bed	100	20	100	20
1	AD	VU	PU	PR
2	PU	PR	AD	VU

图5 不同平衡气对CO穿透曲线的影响

Fig.5 The influence of different equilibrium gases on CO breakthrough curves

图6 一个循环周期内床层压力与温度分布

Fig.6 Pressure and temperature distribution across the bed within one cycle

图7 一个循环周期内各步骤结束后AC、13X和5A复合吸附剂和Cu(Ⅰ)/AC吸附床内CO轴向浓度分布

Fig.7 Axial concentration distribution of CO in AC, 13X and 5A composite adsorbent and Cu(Ⅰ)/AC adsorption beds after each step within a cycle

图8 不同轻重回流比对产品气纯度的影响（AC、13X和5A分子筛复合吸附剂和Cu(Ⅰ)/AC单吸附剂床）

Fig.8 The influence of different light to heavy reflux ratios on the purity of product gas on AC, 13X and 5A composite and Cu(Ⅰ)/AC adsorbents

图9 不同轻重回流比对AD步骤结束后轴向CO负载量的影响

Fig.9 The effect of different light to heavy reflux ratios on axial CO loading amounts after AD step

图10 不同进料气浓度对Cu(Ⅰ)/AC床产品气纯度的影响

Fig.10 The influence of different feed gas concentrations on the purity of product gas in Cu(Ⅰ)/AC adsorbent bed

图11 多组分竞争吸附条件下H2/CO/CO2/CH4/N2合成气各循环步骤结束时的固相浓度分布

Fig.11 Solid phase concentration distribution at the end of each cycle of H2/CO/CO2/CH4/N2 synthesis gas under multi-component competitive adsorption conditions

图12 不同进料位置对AD步骤结束后各组分固相浓度分布的影响

Fig.12 Effects of different feed positions on the solid phase concentration distribution of each component after AD step

参考文献 30

1	Chen Y, Lin J, Li L, et al. Local structure of Pt species dictates remarkable performance on Pt/Al₂O₃ for preferential oxidation of CO in H₂ [J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2021, 282: 119588.
2	陈健, 姬存民, 卜令兵. 碳中和背景下工业副产气制氢技术研究与应用[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(3): 1479-1486.
	Chen J, Ji C M, Bu L B. Research and application of hydrogen production technology from industrial by-product gas under the background of carbon neutrality[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2022, 41(3): 1479-1486.
3	Yang S H, Xiao Y H, Zhang W Y, et al. Facile preparation of Cu(Ⅰ)/5A via one-step impregnation with highly dispersed CuCl in ethanol single solvent toward selective adsorption of CO from H₂ stream[J]. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2022, 10(48): 15958-15967.
4	Kim A R, Yoon T U, Kim S I, et al. Creating high CO/CO₂ selectivity and large CO working capacity through facile loading of Cu(Ⅰ) species into an iron-based mesoporous metal-organic framework[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2018, 348: 135-142.
5	Yin Y, Wen Z H, Shi L, et al. Cuprous/vanadium sites on MIL-101 for selective CO adsorption from gas mixtures with superior stability[J]. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2019, 7(13): 11284-11292.
6	Guo Q, Qiao Y, Xiao Y H, et al. Synthesis of hydrophobic CuCl/LaA modified by butyltrichlorosilane towards enhanced CO adsorption under humid environment[J]. Applied Surface Science, 2024, 659: 159882.
7	Ahmad W, Chan F L, Chaffee A L, et al. Dimethoxymethane production via catalytic hydrogenation of carbon monoxide in methanol media[J]. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2020, 8(4): 2081-2092.
8	Xue C L, Hao W M, Cheng W P, et al. Effects of pore size distribution of activated carbon (AC) on CuCl dispersion and CO adsorption for CuCl/AC adsorbent[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2019, 375: 122049.
9	Ahad N, de Klerk A. Fischer-Tropsch acid water processing by Kolbe electrolysis[J]. Fuel, 2018, 211: 415-419.
10	Zhang J, Wang L, Wu Z Y, et al. Mesoporous Co-Al oxide nanosheets as highly efficient catalysts for CO oxidation[J]. AIChE Journal, 2020, 66(5): e16923.
11	Rubaiee S. High sour natural gas dehydration treatment through low temperature technique: process simulation, modeling and optimization[J]. Chemosphere, 2023, 320: 138076.
12	Cheng X, Liao Y, Lei Z, et al. Multi-scale design of MOF-based membrane separation for CO₂/CH₄ mixture via integration of molecular simulation, machine learning and process modeling and simulation[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2023, 672: 121430.
13	Feyzbar-Khalkhali-Nejad F, Hassani E, Rashti A, et al. Adsorption-based CO removal: principles and materials[J]. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2021, 9(4): 105317.
14	肖永厚, 肖红岩, 李本源, 等. 基于Aspen Adsorption的氦气/甲烷吸附分离过程模拟优化[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(7): 2556-2563.
	Xiao Y H, Xiao H Y, Li B Y, et al. Optimization of helium/methane adsorption separation process based on Aspen Adsorption simulation[J]. CIESC Journal, 2019, 70(7): 2556-2563.
15	Hu G P, May E F, Li K G. We commercialized a methane capture technology in ten years—Here's how[J]. Nature, 2022, 604: 242-245.
16	尚华, 白洪灏, 刘佳奇, 等. CH₄-N₂在自支撑颗粒型Silicalite-1上的吸附分离及PSA模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(5): 2088-2098.
	Shang H, Bai H H, Liu J Q, et al. PSA simulation and adsorption separation of CH₄-N₂ by self-supporting pellets Silicalite-1[J]. CIESC Journal, 2020, 71(5): 2088-2098.
17	Li Y X, Jin M M, Shi S, et al. Adjusting accommodation microenvironment for Cu⁺ to enhance oxidation inhibition for thiophene capture[J]. AIChE Journal, 2021, 67(10): e17368.
18	Du S J, Wang X J, Huang J W, et al. Ultramicroporous carbons featuring sub-Ångstrom tunable apertures for the selective separation of light hydrocarbon[J]. AIChE Journal, 2021, 67(9): e17285.
19	Li C L, Wang J, Wang Z F, et al. Understanding the vacuum autoreduction behavior of Cu species in CuCl/NaY adsorbent for CO/N₂ separation[J]. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 2024, 365: 112904.
20	Zhang N N, Xiao J S, Bénard P, et al. Single- and double-bed pressure swing adsorption processes for H₂/CO syngas separation[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44(48): 26405-26418.
21	Oh H, Lee S, Beum H T, et al. CO recovery from blast furnace gas by vacuum pressure swing adsorption process: experimental and simulation approach[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022, 346: 131062.
22	Zhou Y, Shen Y H, Fu Q, et al. CO enrichment from low-concentration syngas by a layered-bed VPSA process[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2017, 56(23): 6741-6754.
23	Li D D, Zhou Y, Shen Y H, et al. Experiment and simulation for separating CO₂/N₂ by dual-reflux pressure swing adsorption process[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2016, 297: 315-324.
24	Weh R, Xiao G K, Ashraful Islam M, et al. Upgrading sub-quality natural gas by dual reflux-pressure swing adsorption using activated carbon and ionic liquidic zeolite[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2020, 392: 123753.
25	Zhang Y C, Saleman T L H, Li G, et al. Non-isothermal numerical simulations of dual reflux pressure swing adsorption cycles for separating N₂ +CH₄ [J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2016, 292: 366-381.
26	Weh R, Xiao G K, Sadeghi Pouya E, et al. Helium recovery and purification by dual reflux pressure swing adsorption[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2022, 288: 120603.
27	汪亚燕, 田彩霞, 丁兆阳, 等. 基于双回流变压吸附工艺的空气分离模拟及分析[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(10): 4002-4011.
	Wang Y Y, Tian C X, Ding Z Y, et al. Simulation and analysis of dual-reflux pressure swing adsorption for air separation[J]. CIESC Journal, 2019, 70(10): 4002-4011.
28	Zhang C, Shen Y H, Zhang D H, et al. Vacuum pressure swing adsorption for producing fuel cell grade hydrogen from IGCC[J]. Energy, 2022, 257: 124715.
29	Park Y, Ju Y, Park D, et al. Adsorption equilibria and kinetics of six pure gases on pelletized zeolite 13X up to 1.0 MPa: CO₂, CO, N₂, CH₄, Ar and H₂ [J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2016, 292: 348-365.
30	Golmakani A, Ali Nabavi S, Manović V. Production of negative-emission biomethane by twin double-bed pressure swing adsorption with tail gas sequestration[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2021, 408: 127312.

[1]	任冠宇, 张义飞, 李新泽, 杜文静. 翼型印刷电路板式换热器流动传热特性数值研究[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(S1): 108-117.
[2]	杨勇, 祖子轩, 李煜坤, 王东亮, 范宗良, 周怀荣. T型圆柱形微通道内CO₂碱液吸收数值模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(S1): 135-142.
[3]	黄俊豪, 庞克亮, 孙方远, 刘福军, 谷致远, 韩龙, 段衍泉, 冯妍卉. 干熄炉料钟结构对焦炭布料粒径均匀度影响的模拟研究[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(S1): 158-169.
[4]	董新宇, 边龙飞, 杨怡怡, 张宇轩, 刘璐, 王腾. 冷却条件下倾斜上升管S-CO₂流动与传热特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(S1): 195-205.
[5]	郭骐瑞, 任丽媛, 陈康, 黄翔宇, 马卫华, 肖乐勤, 周伟良. 用于HTPB推进剂浆料的静态混合管数值模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(S1): 206-216.
[6]	李匡奚, 于佩潜, 王江云, 魏浩然, 郑志刚, 冯留海. 微气泡旋流气浮装置内流动分析与结构优化[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(S1): 223-234.
[7]	汪张洲, 唐天琪, 夏嘉俊, 何玉荣. 基于复合相变材料的电池热管理性能模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(S1): 329-338.
[8]	胡俭, 姜静华, 范生军, 刘建浩, 邹海江, 蔡皖龙, 王沣浩. 中深层U型地埋管换热器取热特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(S1): 76-84.
[9]	李舒月, 王欢, 周少强, 毛志宏, 张永民, 王军武, 吴秀花. 基于CPFD方法的U₃O₈氢还原流化床反应器数值模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(9): 3133-3151.
[10]	陈巨辉, 苏潼, 李丹, 陈立伟, 吕文生, 孟凡奇. 翅形扰流片作用下的微通道换热特性[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(9): 3122-3132.
[11]	豆少军, 郝亮. PEMFC催化层耦合气体电荷传输过程的介观模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(8): 3002-3010.
[12]	钱啸宇, 阮璇, 李水清. 外加电场下电介质颗粒层结构重构与悬浮[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(8): 2756-2762.
[13]	朱子良, 王爽, 姜宇昂, 林梅, 王秋旺. 欧拉-拉格朗日迭代固-液相变算法[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(8): 2763-2776.
[14]	邓爱明, 何玉荣, 唐天琪, 胡彦伟. 导流板对喷雾流化床内颗粒生长过程影响的模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(8): 2787-2799.
[15]	金虎, 杨帆, 戴梦瑶. 基于格子Boltzmann方法的液滴在圆柱壁面上运动过程研究[J]. 化工学报, 2024, 75(8): 2897-2908.

双回流变压吸附高效分离CO/H₂制备高纯H₂和CO

Preparation of high-purity H₂ and CO by efficient separation of CO/H₂ using dual-reflux pressure swing adsorption process

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 17

参考文献 30

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价