气液两相流界面多尺度问题可计算性研究进展

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0438-1157.2014.12.001

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 气液两相流复杂多变的界面结构在瞬态时间上具有宽广的空间尺度范围.界面多尺度问题涉及化工领域、核安全领域以及其他多个领域,其可计算性是当前国内外气液两相流领域的研究焦点之一.分析了欧拉体系下处理气液两相流相界面不连续性的两种基本模型以及湍流模拟方法对界面结构的影响.针对离散流界面尺度分布性和混合流界面跨尺度性两类多尺度问题,分析了可计算性研究面临的困境,将其归因于网格尺度的约束、几何及物理边界的缺失.重点归纳了混合流界面跨尺度性问题的计算方法以及典型应用.最后对气液两相流界面多尺度问题提出了应对策略及研究趋势,为此类问题研究提供有益的参考.

关键词: 气液两相流, 界面, 多尺度, 计算流体力学, 可计算性

Abstract: Gas-liquid two-phase flow has complex interface structures with a wide range of spatial scales in the transient time. The multi-scale interface problems are related to various fields, such as chemical engineering, nuclear safety, and so on. Computability of these problems is one of the research priorities. This paper analyzes basic models dealing with the discontinuity of phase interfaces in the Eulerian reference frame, and describes the influence relationship between turbulent simulation methods and interfaces. The difficulties of computability are analyzed for two types of multi-scale problems: scale distribution of interfaces in dispersed flows and cross-scale of interfaces in mixed flow. Two factors including the scale for computational grid and the loss of geometry and physical boundaries are concluded. The computing methods and typical applications in cross-scale of interfaces in mixed flow are summarized. The strategies and trends of the research on those multi-scale problems are proposed, providing useful guides for the research.

Key words: gas-liquid two-phase flow, interface, multi-scale, computational fluid dynamics, computability

中图分类号:

O359.1
O242

张文伟, 柯鹏, 杨春信, 周成龙. 气液两相流界面多尺度问题可计算性研究进展[J]. CIESC Journal, 2014, 65(12): 4645-4654.

ZHANG Wenwei, KE Peng, YANG Chunxin, ZHOU Chenglong. Progress of computability of multi-scale interface problems in gas-liquid two-phase flow[J]. , 2014, 65(12): 4645-4654.

参考文献 51

[1]	Štrubelj L, Tiselj I, Mavko B. Simulations of free surface flows with implementation of surface tension and interface sharpening in the two-fluid model [J]. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 2009, 30: 741-750
[2]	Tomiyama A, Zun I, Higaki H, Makino Y, Sakaguchi T. A three-dimensional particle tracking method for bubbly flow simulation [J]. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 1997, 175: 77-86
[3]	Annaland M V S, Deen N G, Kuipers J A M. Multi-Level modeling of dispersed gas-liquid two-phase flows//Bubbly Flows—Analysis, Modelling and Calculation [M]. Berlin:Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2004: 139-157
[4]	Darmana D, Deen N G, Kuipers J A M. Parallelization of an Euler-Lagrange model using mixed domain decomposition and a mirror domain technique: application to dispersed gas-liquid two-phase flow [J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2006, 220 (5): 216-248
[5]	Herrmann M. A parallel Eulerian interface tracking/Lagrangian point particle multi-scale coupling procedure [J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2010, 229: 745-759
[6]	Tomar G, Fuster D, Zaleski S, Popinet S. Multiscale simulations of primary atomization [J]. Computers and Fluid, 2010, 39 (10): 1864-1874
[7]	Ishii M, Mishima K. Two-fluid model and hydrodynamic constitutive relations [J]. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 1984, 82: 107-126
[8]	Wilkinson P M. Physical aspects and scale-up of high pressure bubble columns [D]. Netherlands: University of Groningen, 1991
[9]	Pohorecki R, Moniuk W, Bielski P, Sobieszuk P. Diameter of bubbles in bubble column reactors operating with organic liquids [J]. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2005, 83 (7): 827-832
[10]	Hirt C W, Nichols B D. Volume of fluid method for the dynamics of free boundaries [J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1981, 39: 201-225
[11]	Osher S, Sethian J. Fronts propagating with curvature-dependent speed: algorithms based on Hamilton-Jacobi formulations [J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1988, 79: 12-49
[12]	Bestion D. Applicability of two-phase CFD to nuclear reactor thermalhydraulics and elaboration of best practice guidelines [J]. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2012, 253: 311-321
[13]	Randolph A D, Larson M A. Theory of Particulate Processes [M]. New York: Academic Press, 1971
[14]	Lo S. Application of MUSIG model to bubbly flows [R]. British: AEA Technology, 1996
[15]	Frank T. Advances in computational fluid dynamics (CFD) of 3-dimensional gas-liquid multiphase flows//NAFEMS Seminar: Simulation of Complex Flows [C]. Wiesbaden, Germany, 2005
[16]	Krepper E, Lucas D, Prasser H M. On the modeling of bubbly flow in vertical pipes [J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2005, 235: 597-611
[17]	Yang N, Wu Z Y, Chen J H, Wang Y H, Li J H. Multi-scale analysis of gas-liquid interaction and CFD simulation of gas-liquid flow in bubble columns [J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2011, 66: 3212-3222
[18]	Yang N, Chen J H, Zhao H, Ge W, Li J H. Explorations on the multi-scale flow structure and stability condition in bubble columns [J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2007, 62: 6978-6991
[19]	Černe G, Petelin S, Tiselj I. Upgrade of the VOF method for the simulation of the dispersed flow//ASME Fluid Engineering Division Summer Meeting [C]. Boston, USA, 2000
[20]	Černe G, Petelin S, Tiselj I. Coupling of the interface tracking and the two-fluid models for the simulation of incompressible two-phase flow [J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2001, 171: 776-804
[21]	Puckett E G, Almgren A S, Bell J B, Marcus D L, Rider W J. A high order projection method for tracking fluid interfaces in variable density incompressible flows [J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1997, 130: 269-282
[22]	Tomiyama A, Shimada N. (N+2)-field modeling for bubbly flow simulation [J]. International Journal of Computational Fluid Dynamics, 2001, 9 (4): 418-426
[23]	Sou A, Hayashi K, Tomiyama A. A volume tracking method for multi-phase flow simulation//ASME Fluid Engineering Division Summer Meeting [C]. Houston, USA, 2005
[24]	Han J, Alajbegovic A. Simulation of multiphase flows in complex geometry using a hybrid method combining the multi-fluid and the volume-of-fluid (VOF) approaches//ASME Fluid Engineering Division Summer Meeting [C]. Montreal, Canada, 2002
[25]	Ubbink O. Numerical prediction of two fluid systems with sharp interfaces [D]. England: University of London, 1997
[26]	Masuda R, Nagaoka M. A coupled interface-capturing and multi-fluid model method for computing liquid jet from nozzle internal flow//International Conference on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems [C]. Kyoto, Japan, 2006
[27]	Youngs D L. Time-dependent multi-material flow with large fluid distortion//Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics [M]. New York: Academic Press, 1982
[28]	Yan K, Che D F. A coupled model for simulation of the gas-liquid two-phase flow with complex flow patterns [J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2010, 36: 333-348
[29]	Wardle K, Weller H. Hybrid multiphase CFD solver for coupled disperse segregated flows in liquid-liquid extraction [J]. International Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2013, 2013: 1-13
[30]	Weller H G. A new approach to VOF-based interface capturing methods for incompressible and compressible flow[R]. OpenCFD Ltd., 2008
[31]	Hoyt N C. The performance of passive cyclonic separators in microgravity [D]. USA: Case Western Reserve University, 2013
[32]	Minato A, Takamori K, Ishida N. An extended two-fluid model for interface behavior in gas-liquid two-phase flow//Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering [C]. Baltimore, MD, USA, 2000
[33]	Leonard B P. The ULTIMATE conservative difference scheme applied to unsteady one-dimensional advection [J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 1991, 88: 17-74
[34]	Muzaferija S, Peric M, Sames P, Schellin T. A two-fluid Navier-Stokes solver to simulate water entry//Proceedings of 22nd Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics [C]. Washington DC, USA, 1998
[35]	Štrubelj L, Tiselj I. Two-fluid model with interface sharpening [J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2010, 85: 575-590
[36]	Olsson E, Kreiss G. A conservative Level Set method for two-phase flow [J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2005, 210: 225-246
[37]	Egorov Y. Contact condensation in stratified steam-water flow [R]. Germany: EU/FP5 ECORA Project, 2004
[38]	Schmidtke M, Lucas D. CFD approaches for modelling bubble entrainment by an impinging jet [J]. Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations, 2009, 2009: 1-12
[39]	Höhne T, Vallée C. Experiments and numerical simulations of horizontal two-phase flow regimes using an interfacial area density model [J]. Journal of Computational Multiphase Flows, 2010, 2 (3): 131-143
[40]	Yoon H Y, Cho H K, Lee J R, Park I K, Jeong J J. Multi-scale thermal-hydraulic analysis of PWRS using the CUPID code [J]. Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 2012, 44 (8): 831-846
[41]	Kondo S, Tobita Y, Morita K, Brear D J, Kamiyama K, Yamano H, Fujita S, Maschek W, Fischer E A, Kiefhaber E, Buckel G, Hesselschwerdt E, Coste P, Pigny S. Current status and validation of the SIMMER-III LMFR safety analysis code//Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering [C]. Kyoto, Japan, 1999
[42]	Tentner A. Computational fluid dynamics modeling of two-phase flow topologies in a boiling water reactor fuel assembly//Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering [C]. Orlando, USA, 2008
[43]	Hänsch S, Lucas D, Krepper E, Höhne T. A multi-field two-fluid concept for transitions between different scales of interfacial structures [J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2012, 47: 171-182
[44]	Laviéville J, Coste P. Numerical modeling of liquid-gas stratified flows using two phase eulerian approach//Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Finite Volumes for Complex Applications [C]. Aussois, France, 2008
[45]	Coste P. A large interface model for two-phase CFD [J]. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2013, 255: 38-50
[46]	Yan K, Che D F. Hydrodynamic and mass transfer characteristics of slug flow in a vertical pipe with and without dispersed small bubbles [J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2011, 37: 299-325
[47]	Nagayoshi T, Minato A, Misawa M, Suzuki A, Kuroda M, Ichikawa N. Simulation of multi-dimensional heterogeneous and intermittent two-phase flow by using an extended two-fluid model [J]. Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, 2003, 40 (10): 827-83
[48]	Coste P, Laviéville J, Pouvreau J, Baudry C, Guingo M, Douce A. Validation of the large interface method of NEPTUNE_CFD 1.0.8 for pressurized thermal shock (PTS) applications//CFD4NRS-3 [C]. Washington DC, USA, 2010
[49]	Bonetto F, Lahey R T. An experimental study on air carry-under due to a plunging liquid jet [J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 1993, 19: 281-294
[50]	Iguchi M, Okita K, Yamamoto F. Mean velocity and turbulence characteristics of water flow in the bubble dispersion region induced by plunging water jet [J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 1998, 24 (4): 523-537
[51]	Bartosiewicz Y, Seynhaeve J M, Vallée C, Laviéville J. Modeling free surface flows relevant to a PTS scenario: comparison between experimental data and three RANS based CFD-codes. Comments on the CFD-experiment integration and best practice guideline [J]. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2010, 240 (9): 2375-2381