CeO2表面氧化转移FCC烟气中SO2的反应过程

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20160272

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为提高Ce基脱硫助剂对石油加工过程中流化催化裂化（FCC）烟气深度脱硫效果，采用实验与密度泛函理论（DFT）探究了SO₂、O₂在CeO₂表面的反应过程。通过60℃、200℃反应温度下SO₂、O₂与CeO₂的反应，对反应前后CeO₂样品的XRD、IR、XPS谱图比较分析，探索S、Ce的价态变化和相对含量转变规律，从而推测SO₂可能的反应路径。基于密度泛函理论模拟构造了O₂单分子和SO₂、O₂双分子在CeO₂（111）和MgAl₂O₄（111）O空位表面可能产生的吸附构型；利用LST/QST方法搜索SO₂氧化反应过程，计算各步反应能垒。结果表明CeO₂（111）相比MgAl₂O₄（111）具有更好的SO₂催化效果，其中CeO₂在反应中起到了晶格O传递作用，并进一步推断SO₃的脱附过程是整个反应的速率控制步骤。

关键词: 石油, FCC烟气深度脱硫, XPS, 分子模拟, 吸附, 晶格O传递, 速控步骤

Abstract:

To improve efficiency of Ce-based desulfurization agent in deep desulfurization of flue gas in fluid catalytic cracking(FCC) petroleum processing, reaction mechanism of SO₂ and O₂ over CeO₂ surface were investigated in both experiments and calculations by density functional theory(DFT). SO₂ removal from simulated flue gas with O₂ presence was carried out over CeO₂ under 60℃ and 200℃. CeO₂ characterization before and after desulfurization by XRD, IR and XPS was used to study changes in valence and relative amount of S and Ce as well as to explore possible oxidative reaction path of SO₂. Models of monomolecular O₂ adsorption and bimolecular O₂ and SO₂ adsorption on O-deficient CeO₂(111) and MgAl₂O₄(111) were established from DFT simulation. SO₂ oxidation and energy barriers of each reaction step were calculated using LST/QST method. Results indicated that CeO₂(111) had better catalytic effect for SO₂ desulfurization than MgAl₂O₄(111) and CeO₂ could transport lattice oxygen in oxidation with SO₃ desorption as rate-control step.

Key words: petroleum, FCC flue gas deep desulfurization, XPS, molecular simulation, adsorption, lattice oxygen transport, rate-control step

中图分类号:

TE991.1

刘逸锋, 沈本贤, 皮志鹏, 陈华, 赵基钢. CeO₂表面氧化转移FCC烟气中SO₂的反应过程[J]. 化工学报, 2016, 67(12): 5015-5023.

LIU Yifeng, SHEN Benxian, PI Zhipeng, CHEN Hua, ZHAO Jigang. Oxidation transferring mechanism of SO₂ in FCC flue gas over CeO₂ surface[J]. CIESC Journal, 2016, 67(12): 5015-5023.

参考文献 28

[1]	王磊, 沈本贤, 徐亚荣. 连续式FCC柴油萃取-光催化氧化深度脱硫[J]. 化工学报, 2008, 59(12):3085-3089. WANG L, SHEN B X, XU Y R. Continuous deep desulfurization technology by extraction-photocatalytic oxidation for FCC diesel fuel[J]. Journal of Chemical Industry and Engineering(China), 2008, 59(12):3085-3089.
[2]	MA Y Z, TAO M, ZHANG X, et al. Hazard of H2S and SO2 contents in coalbed gas and natural gas[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2008, 82(10):1408-1415.
[3]	程军委. 降低硫磺回收装置烟气中SO2浓度措施的探讨[J]. 石油化工设计, 2014, 31(2):57-59. CHENG J W. A discussion of SO2 reduction methods in flue gas from sulfur recovery unit[J]. Petrochemical Design, 2014, 31(2):57-59.
[4]	高巍, 于心玉, 赵建忠, 等. 金属离子对MgAlX复合氧化物类FCC硫转移剂性能的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2013, 64(4):1438-1443. GAO W, YU X Y, ZHAO J Z, et al. Effect of metal element in MgAlX complex oxides on its FCC sulfur transfer catalyst performance[J]. CIESC Journal, 2013, 64(4):1438-1443.
[5]	康海涛. FCC再生烟气SOx转移剂的研究[D]. 济南:山东大学, 2012. KANG H T. Study of SOx transfer additives applied in FCC units[D]. Jinan:Shandong University, 2012.
[6]	JIN S, JOHN A K. Catalytic SOx abatement:the role of magnesium aluminate spinel in the removal of SOx from fluid catalytic cracking flue gas[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 1988, 27(8):1356-1360.
[7]	李宝硕. 流化催化裂化再生烟气硫转移剂的研究[D]. 济南:山东大学, 2014. LI B S. Study of SOx transfer additives applied in fluid catalytic cracking units[D]. Jinan:Shandong University, 2014.
[8]	BOUSSANT Y, CABODI I, MARLIN S. Fused grains of oxides comprising Al, Ti and Mg and ceramic products comprising such grains:US8715807[P]. 2014-06-05.
[9]	PI Z, SHEN B, ZHAO J, et al. CuO, CeO2 modified Mg-Al spinel for removal of SO2 from FCC flue gas[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2015, 54(43):10622-10628.
[10]	PI Z. Cu/Ce Modified catalyst additive for removal of SO2 from FCC flue gas[J]. Petroleum Processing and Petrochemicals, 2016, 47(2):65-68.
[11]	FLOUTY R, ABI-AAD E, SIFFERT S, et al. Formation of cereous sulphate phase upon interaction of SO2 with ceria at room temperature[J]. Journal of Thermal Analysis & Calorimetry, 2003, 73(3):727-734.
[12]	MIKHAIL Y S, KALINKIN A V, PASHIS A V, et al. Interaction of Al2O3 and CeO2 surfaces with SO2 and SO2+O2 studied by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy[J]. Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2005, 109(23):11712-11719.
[13]	STACCHIOLA D J, SENANAYAKE S D, PING L, et al. Fundamental studies of well-defined surfaces of mixed-metal oxides:special properties of MO(x)/TiO2(110)(M=V, Ru, Ce, or W)[J]. Chemical Reviews, 2013, 113(6):4373-4390.
[14]	朱仁发, 李承烈. FCC再生烟气的脱硫助剂研究进展[J].化工进展, 2000, 19(3):22-24. ZHU R F, LI C L. The research progress of De-SOx additives in FCC flue gas[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2000, 19(3):22-24.
[15]	LUO J J, ZHA G S, WANG K K, et al. Research progress of origin of ferromagnetic in nanoparticle CeO2[J]. Advances in Condensed Matter Physics, 2013, 1(2):1-4.
[16]	蒋仕宇, 滕波涛, 鲁继青, 等. 甲醛在CeO2(111)表面吸附的密度泛函理论研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2008, 24(11):2025-2031. JIANG S Y, TENG B T, LU J Q, et al. A density functional theory of formaldehyde adsorption on CeO2(111) surface[J]. Acta Physico.-Chimica. Sinica, 2008, 24(11):2025-2031.
[17]	KOZLOV S M, NEYMAN K M. O vacancies on steps on the CeO2(111) surface[J]. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2014, 16(17):7823-7829.
[18]	MURGIDA G E, GANDUGLIA-PIROVANO M V. Evidence for subsurface ordering of oxygen vacancies on the reduced CeO2(111) surface using density-functional and statistical calculations[J]. Physical Review Letters, 2013, 110(24):246101-1-246101-5.
[19]	王清高, 杨宗献, 危书义. 水分子和二氧化铈(111)表面相互作用的DFT+U研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2009, 25(12):2513-2518. WANG Q G, YANG Z X, WEI S Y. DFT+U study on the interaction of water molecule and ceria(111) surface[J]. Acta Physico.-Chimica. Sinica, 2009, 25(12):2513-2518.
[20]	XIE J Q, HU W, WANG Y. Preparation of CeO2 nanoparticle by the method of reserve microemulsion and characterization of the nanoparticle[J]. Journal of Functional Materials, 2007, 38(A06):2093-2095.
[21]	KANTCHEVA M, CAYIRTEPE I, NAYDENOV A, et al. FT-IR spectroscopic investigation of the effect of SO2 on the SCR of NOx with propene over ZrO2-Nb2O5 catalyst[J]. Catalysis Today, 2011, 176(1):437-440.
[22]	LONG R Q, YANG R T. FTIR and kinetic studies of the mechanism of Fe3+-exchanged TiO2-pillared clay catalyst for selective catalytic reduction of NO with ammonia[J]. Journal of Catalysis, 2000, 190(1):22-31.
[23]	DOSUMOV K, POPOVA N M, UMBETKALIEV A K, et al. IR spectroscopic and thermal desorption studies of the interaction of the SO2+O2 mixture with the 9% Ni-Cu-Cr/2% Ce/(θ+α)-Al2O3 catalyst[J]. Russian Journal of Physical Chemistry, 2012, 86(10):1609-1613.
[24]	韩伟, 林仁存, 谢兆雄, 等. CeO2乙苯脱氢催化剂的XRD、XPS研究[J]. 厦门大学学报(自然科学版), 2008, 47(5):701-704. HAN W, LIN R C, XIE Z X, et al. The XRD, XPS study on CeO2 ethylbenzene dehydrogenation catalyst[J]. Journal of Xiamen University(Nature Science), 2008, 47(5):701-704.
[25]	FERRIZZ R M, GORTE R J, VOHS J M. TPD and XPS investigation of the interaction of SO2 with model ceria catalysts[J]. Catalysis Letters, 2002, 82(1):123-129.
[26]	刘亚明, 束航, 徐齐胜, 等. SCR脱硝过程中SO2催化氧化的原位红外研究[J]. 燃料化学学报, 2015, 43(8):1018-1024. LIU Y M, SHU H, XU Q S, et al. FT-IR study of the catalytic oxidation of SO2 during the process of selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH3 over commercial catalysts[J]. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology, 2015, 43(8):1018-1024.
[27]	LIU Y, CEN W, WU Z, et al. SO2 Poisoning structures and the effects on pure and Mn doped CeO2:a first principles investigation[J]. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2012, 116(43):22930-22937.
[28]	李俊. SO2、NO2在金属表面吸附和分解的密度泛函研究[D]. 重庆:西南大学, 2011. LI J. DFT study on the adsorption and decomposition of SO2 and NO2 on metal surface[D]. Chongqing:Southwest University, 2011.

CeO₂表面氧化转移FCC烟气中SO₂的反应过程

Oxidation transferring mechanism of SO₂ in FCC flue gas over CeO₂ surface

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 28

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	晁京伟, 许嘉兴, 李廷贤. 基于无管束蒸发换热强化策略的吸附热池的供热性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 302-310.
[2]	宋明昊, 赵霏, 刘淑晴, 李国选, 杨声, 雷志刚. 离子液体脱除模拟油中挥发酚的多尺度模拟与研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3654-3664.
[3]	杨学金, 杨金涛, 宁平, 王访, 宋晓双, 贾丽娟, 冯嘉予. 剧毒气体PH₃的干法净化技术研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3742-3755.
[4]	胡建波, 刘洪超, 胡齐, 黄美英, 宋先雨, 赵双良. 有机笼跨细胞膜易位行为的分子动力学模拟研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3756-3765.
[5]	赵佳佳, 田世祥, 李鹏, 谢洪高. SiO₂-H₂O纳米流体强化煤尘润湿性的微观机理研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3931-3945.
[6]	林典, 江国梅, 徐秀彬, 赵波, 刘冬梅, 吴旭. 硅基类液防原油黏附涂层的研制及其减阻性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3438-3445.
[7]	刘爽, 张霖宙, 许志明, 赵锁奇. 渣油及其组分黏度的分子层次组成关联研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3226-3241.
[8]	高燕, 伍鹏, 尚超, 胡泽君, 陈晓东. 基于双流体喷嘴的磁性琼脂糖微球的制备及其蛋白吸附性能探究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3457-3471.
[9]	汪林正, 陆俞冰, 张睿智, 罗永浩. 基于分子动力学模拟的VOCs热氧化特性分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3242-3255.
[10]	盛冰纯, 于建国, 林森. 铝基锂吸附剂分离高钠型地下卤水锂资源过程研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3375-3385.
[11]	张瑞航, 曹潘, 杨锋, 李昆, 肖朋, 邓春, 刘蓓, 孙长宇, 陈光进. ZIF-8纳米流体天然气乙烷回收工艺的产品纯度关键影响因素分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3386-3393.
[12]	陈吉, 洪泽, 雷昭, 凌强, 赵志刚, 彭陈辉, 崔平. 基于分子动力学的焦炭溶损反应及其机理研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2935-2946.
[13]	董明, 徐进良, 刘广林. 超临界水非均质特性分子动力学研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2836-2847.
[14]	王杰, 丘晓琳, 赵烨, 刘鑫洋, 韩忠强, 许雍, 蒋文瀚. 聚电解质静电沉积改性PHBV抗氧化膜的制备与性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 3068-3078.
[15]	王新悦, 王俊杰, 曹思贤, 王翠, 李灵坤, 吴宏宇, 韩静, 吴昊. 玻璃内包材界面修饰对机械应力诱导的单克隆抗体聚集体形成的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2580-2588.