基于简化反应机理的甲烷-空气爆炸增厚火焰大涡模拟

doi:10.11949/0438-1157.20210843

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

基于简化的单步反应机理，采用增厚火焰模型开展了管道内甲烷-空气爆炸大涡模拟，分析了Légier （TF1）与Durand （TF2）提出的两种火焰探测函数对模拟结果的影响。结果表明，大涡模拟能够精确预测管道内火焰传播过程中出现的郁金香形状与形成特征时间。尽管两种探测函数的火焰传播速度与超压的大涡模拟结果与实验基本一致，但TF2预测值更加精确。火焰探测函数对效率因子变化基本上没有影响，TF1对火焰的增厚效应要强于TF2。

关键词: 甲烷, 爆炸, 增厚火焰, 数值模拟, 火焰速度与压力

Abstract:

Based on the simplified single-step reaction mechanism, this paper uses the thickened flame model to carry out the large eddy simulation of the methane-air explosion in the pipeline, and analyzes the influence of the two flame detection functions proposed by Légier (TF1) and Durand (TF2) on the simulation results. The results show that LES can accurately predict the tulip shaped flame and the corresponding characterize time during the flame propagation process. Although the flame speed and pressure predicted by the two flame sensors are basically consistent with the experimental results, the predicted value of TF2 is more accurate. The efficiency function is not affected by the flame sensor. In general, the flame thickening is more pronounced with TF1.

Key words: methane, explosions, thickening flame, numerical simulation, flame speed and pressure

中图分类号:

X 932

郑凯, 蒋军成, 邢志祥, 吴凡, 吴洁, 余明高. 基于简化反应机理的甲烷-空气爆炸增厚火焰大涡模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(11): 5867-5874.

Kai ZHENG, Juncheng JIANG, Zhixiang XING, Fan WU, Jie WU, Minggao YU. Large eddy simulation on methane-air explosion using thickened flame model coupled with reduced reaction mechanism[J]. CIESC Journal, 2021, 72(11): 5867-5874.

图/表 6

表1 反应机理的速率常数

Table 1 Rate constants for the one step mechanism

A/(m³?kmol^-1?s^-1)	$n C H 4$	$n O 2$	$E a$ /(J?mol^-1)
3.478505×10⁸	1.0	0.5	8.368×10⁷

表1 反应机理的速率常数

Table 1 Rate constants for the one step mechanism

A/(m³?kmol^-1?s^-1)	$n C H 4$	$n O 2$	$E a$ /(J?mol^-1)
3.478505×10⁸	1.0	0.5	8.368×10⁷

图1 郁金香火焰形成过程中不同时刻的温度二维切片

Fig.1 2D-slices of the temperature field at different instants during the tulip shaped flame formation

图2 TF1中不同时刻的温度三维等值面和二维切片流场结构

Fig.2 3D iso-surface by temperature of 1200 K and flow field with TF1 at different instants

图3 火焰传播速度随时间的变化

Fig.3 The time curves of flame speed

图4 超压随时间的变化

Fig.4 The time curves of pressure

图5 火焰传播约39 ms时刻Ω、F、Ξ与Ξ×F分布二维切片

Fig.5 Instantaneous 2D-slices of Ω, F, Ξ and Ξ×F at instant about 39 ms

参考文献 33

1	Kundu S, Zanganeh J, Moghtaderi B. A review on understanding explosions from methane-air mixture[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2016, 40: 507-523.
2	李玉星, 尹渊博, 王雅真, 等. 甲烷爆炸对建筑物内外压力场分布的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(11): 5337-5351.
	Li Y X, Yin Y B, Wang Y Z, et al. Effect of methane explosion on distribution of pressure field inside and outside buildings[J]. CIESC Journal, 2020, 71(11): 5337-5351.
3	时高龙, 温小萍, 王发辉, 等. 预混气体爆炸火焰与压力的耦合振荡特性[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(7): 2811-2818.
	Shi G L, Wen X P, Wang F H, et al. Coupling oscillation characteristics of premixed gas explosion flame and pressure[J]. CIESC Journal, 2019, 70(7): 2811-2818.
4	Wen X P, Yu M G, Liu Z C, et al. Large eddy simulation of methane-air deflagration in an obstructed chamber using different combustion models[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2012, 25(4): 730-738.
5	刘冲, 杜扬, 李国庆, 等. 狭长密闭空间内油气爆炸火焰特性大涡模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(12): 5348-5358.
	Liu C, Du Y, Li G Q, et al. Large eddy simulation of gasoline-air mixture explosion in closed narrow-long space[J]. CIESC Journal, 2018, 69(12): 5348-5358.
6	李蒙, 杜扬, 李国庆, 等. 含90°直角弯管结构受限空间油气泄压爆炸实验与大涡模拟研究[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(12): 5370-5378.
	Li M, Du Y, Li G Q, et al. Experimental and large eddy simulation study on gasoline-air mixture explosions in semi-confined pipe with 90° right-angle bend[J]. CIESC Journal, 2018, 69(12): 5370-5378.
7	Boger M, Veynante D, Boughanem H, et al. Direct numerical simulation analysis of flame surface density concept for large eddy simulation of turbulent premixed combustion[J]. Symposium (International) on Combustion, 1998, 27(1): 917-925.
8	O'Rourke P J, Bracco F V. Two scaling transformations for the numerical computation of multidimensional unsteady laminar flames[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1979, 33(2): 185-203.
9	Butler T D, O'Rourke P J. A numerical method for two dimensional unsteady reacting flows[J]. Symposium (International) on Combustion, 1977, 16(1): 1503-1515.
10	Kerstein A R, Ashurst W T, Williams F A. Field equation for interface propagation in an unsteady homogeneous flow field[J]. Physical Review A, General Physics, 1988, 37(7): 2728-2731.
11	Smiljanovski V, Moser V, Klein R. A capturing - tracking hybrid scheme for deflagration discontinuities[J]. Combustion Theory and Modelling, 1997, 1(2): 183-215.
12	Colin O, Ducros F, Veynante D, et al. A thickened flame model for large eddy simulations of turbulent premixed combustion[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2000, 12(7): 1843-1863.
13	Legier J P, Poinsot T, Veynante D. Dynamically thickened flame LES model for premixed and non-premixed turbulent combustion[J]. Proceedings of the Summer Program, Centre for Turbulence Research, 2000, 12: 157-168.
14	Selle L, Lartigue G, Poinsot T, et al. Compressible large eddy simulation of turbulent combustion in complex geometry on unstructured meshes[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2004, 137(4): 489-505.
15	Wang G, Boileau M, Veynante D. Implementation of a dynamic thickened flame model for large eddy simulations of turbulent premixed combustion[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2011, 158(11): 2199-2213.
16	张科, 尚明涛, 罗坤, 等. 基于动态全增厚火焰模型对甲烷/空气非预混燃烧的大涡模拟[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2012, 33(10): 1823-1826.
	Zhang K, Shang M T, Luo K, et al. Large-eddy simulation of methane/air non-premixed combustion using dynamically full thickened flame model[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2012, 33(10): 1823-1826.
17	Guo S L, Wang J H, Wei X T, et al. Numerical simulation of premixed combustion using the modified dynamic thickened flame model coupled with multi-step reaction mechanism[J]. Fuel, 2018, 233: 346-353.
18	Di Sarli V, Di Benedetto A, Russo G. Sub-grid scale combustion models for large eddy simulation of unsteady premixed flame propagation around obstacles[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2010, 180(1/2/3): 71-78.
19	Xiao H H, Makarov D, Sun J H, et al. Experimental and numerical investigation of premixed flame propagation with distorted tulip shape in a closed duct[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2012, 159(4): 1523-1538.
20	Bi M S, Dong C J, Zhou Y H. Numerical simulation of premixed methane-air deflagration in large L/D closed pipes[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2012, 40: 337-342.
21	Johansen C, Ciccarelli G. Modeling the initial flame acceleration in an obstructed channel using large eddy simulation[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2013, 26(4): 571-585.
22	Zheng K, Yu M G, Zheng L G, et al. Comparative study of the propagation of methane/air and hydrogen/air flames in a duct using large eddy simulation[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2018, 120: 45-56.
23	Yu S, Navarro-Martinez S. Modelling of deflagration to detonation transition using flame thickening[J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2015, 35(2): 1955-1961.
24	Emami S, Mazaheri K, Shamooni A, et al. LES of flame acceleration and DDT in hydrogen-air mixture using artificially thickened flame approach and detailed chemical kinetics[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2015, 40(23): 7395-7408.
25	Volpiani P S, Schmitt T, Vermorel O, et al. Large eddy simulation of explosion deflagrating flames using a dynamic wrinkling formulation[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2017, 186: 17-31.
26	Clanet C, Searby G. On the “tulip flame” phenomenon[J]. Combustion and Flame, 1996, 105(1/2): 225-238.
27	Durand L, Polifke W. Implementation of the thickened flame model for large eddy simulation of turbulent premixed combustion in a commercial solver[C]//Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2007: Power for Land, Sea, and Air. Montreal, Canada., 2009: 869-878.
28	Zimont V L, Lipatnikov A N. A numerical model of premixed turbulent combustion of gases[J]. Chem. Phys. Rep., 1995, 14(7): 993-1025.
29	Versteeg H, Malalasekera W. An Introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics: the Finite Volume Method[M]. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 2007.
30	Lilly D K. A proposed modification of the Germano subgrid-scale closure method[J]. Physics of Fluids A: Fluid Dynamics, 1992, 4(3): 633-635.
31	Sutherland W. The viscosity of gases and molecular force[J]. Philos. Mag., 1893, 36(223): 507-531.
32	Zheng K, Yu M G, Zheng L G, et al. Experimental study on premixed flame propagation of hydrogen/methane/air deflagration in closed ducts[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(8): 5426-5438.
33	Bychkov V, Akkerman V, Fru G, et al. Flame acceleration in the early stages of burning in tubes[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2007, 150(4): 263-276.

[1]	宋嘉豪, 王文. 斯特林发动机与高温热管耦合运行特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 287-294.
[2]	张思雨, 殷勇高, 贾鹏琦, 叶威. 双U型地埋管群跨季节蓄热特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 295-301.
[3]	叶展羽, 山訸, 徐震原. 用于太阳能蒸发的折纸式蒸发器性能仿真[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 132-140.
[4]	张义飞, 刘舫辰, 张双星, 杜文静. 超临界二氧化碳用印刷电路板式换热器性能分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 183-190.
[5]	王志国, 薛孟, 董芋双, 张田震, 秦晓凯, 韩强. 基于裂隙粗糙性表征方法的地热岩体热流耦合数值模拟与分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 223-234.
[6]	何松, 刘乔迈, 谢广烁, 王斯民, 肖娟. 高浓度水煤浆管道气膜减阻两相流模拟及代理辅助优化[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3766-3774.
[7]	邢雷, 苗春雨, 蒋明虎, 赵立新, 李新亚. 井下微型气液旋流分离器优化设计与性能分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3394-3406.
[8]	李珍宝, 李超, 王虎, 王绍瑞, 黎泉. MPP抑制铝镁合金粉尘爆炸微观机理研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3608-3614.
[9]	程小松, 殷勇高, 车春文. 不同工质在溶液除湿真空再生系统中的性能对比[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3494-3501.
[10]	刘文竹, 云和明, 王宝雪, 胡明哲, 仲崇龙. 基于场协同和耗散的微通道拓扑优化研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3329-3341.
[11]	洪瑞, 袁宝强, 杜文静. 垂直上升管内超临界二氧化碳传热恶化机理分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3309-3319.
[12]	杨克, 贾岳, 纪虹, 邢志祥, 蒋军成. 垃圾焚烧飞灰对瓦斯爆炸压力及火焰传播的抑制作用及机理研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3597-3607.
[13]	韩晨, 司徒友珉, 朱斌, 许建良, 郭晓镭, 刘海峰. 协同处理废液的多喷嘴粉煤气化炉内反应流动研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3266-3278.
[14]	牛超, 沈胜强, 杨艳, 潘泊年, 李熠桥. 甲烷BOG喷射器流动过程计算与性能分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2858-2868.
[15]	黄可欣, 李彤, 李桉琦, 林梅. 加装旋转叶轮T型通道流场的模态分解[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2848-2857.