全氟己酮抑制航空煤油燃烧实验及化学动力学研究

doi:10.11949/0438-1157.20211660

化工学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 73 ›› Issue (4): 1834-1844.DOI: 10.11949/0438-1157.20211660

• 过程安全 • 上一篇

全氟己酮抑制航空煤油燃烧实验及化学动力学研究

余彬彬¹(),蒋新生¹(),禹进²,蔡运雄¹,李玉玺¹,何东海¹,于佳佳³

^1.中国人民解放军陆军勤务学院油料系，重庆 401331
^2.重庆交通大学机电与车辆工程学院，重庆 400074
^3.重庆大学能源与动力工程学院，重庆 400044

收稿日期:2021-11-18 修回日期:2021-12-27 出版日期:2022-04-05 发布日期:2022-04-25
通讯作者: 蒋新生
作者简介:余彬彬（1990—），女，博士研究生，yubb19@sina.com
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目(2018YFC0809502-02);基础加强计划重点基础研究项目(2019-JCJQ-ZD-198-04);重庆市研究生科研创新项目(CYB20200);火灾与爆炸安全防护重庆市重点实验室开放基金项目(LQ21KFJJ04)

Experimental and chemical dynamics study on the inhibition of combustion of aviation kerosene by C₆F₁₂O

Binbin YU¹(),Xinsheng JIANG¹(),Jin YU²,Yunxiong CAI¹,Yuxi LI¹,Donghai HE¹,Jiajia YU³

^1.Department of Oil, Army Logistical University, Chongqing 401331, China
^2.School of Mechatronics & Automobile Engineering, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China
^3.School of Energy and Power Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China

Received:2021-11-18 Revised:2021-12-27 Online:2022-04-05 Published:2022-04-25
Contact: Xinsheng JIANG

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为了研究全氟己酮对航空煤油燃烧的抑制作用，将杯式燃烧器的燃烧方式由液面燃烧改为灯芯燃烧，解决了气体灭火剂灭火性能测试中较高闪点燃料难以点燃的问题。通过实验可知，随着空气中全氟己酮浓度的增加，航空煤油的燃烧经历了火焰先缓慢增高再迅速降低的过程，可见全氟己酮在不同浓度下对燃烧的作用存在由促进到抑制的转变。为深入探索这一转变的原因，基于化学动力学构建了1403个组分、7496个反应组成的全氟己酮抑制RP-3航空煤油燃烧机理并进行了验证。通过化学动力学分析可知全氟己酮在低温下对燃烧的抑制比在高温下的效果更好，全氟己酮在低浓度时温度升高导致抑制作用减弱主要是源于温度升高后，促进燃烧的反应提速幅度远大于其他反应；全氟己酮降低RP-3航煤燃烧温度的途径之一是通过热分解等吸热反应来实现的；随着全氟己酮浓度的增大，反应路径发生变化，使得H、O和OH自由基的生成量减少、消耗量大量增多，宏观上体现出全氟己酮作为燃料的促进燃烧的作用减弱、作为灭火剂抑制燃烧的作用增强。研究结果可为利用全氟己酮防控航空煤油火灾提供理论指导，为研制新型灭火剂提供参考。

关键词: 全氟己酮, 航空煤油, 杯式燃烧器, 化学反应, 动力学, 自由基

Abstract:

In order to study the inhibiting effect of C₆F₁₂O on the combustion of aviation kerosene, the combustion mode of cup burner is changed from liquid level combustion to wick combustion, which overcomes the difficulty of ignition in the fire extinguishing performance test of gas extinguishing agent due to the high flash point of aviation kerosene. It can be seen from the experiment that with the increase of the concentration of C₆F₁₂O in the air, the height of aviation kerosene flame experienced a process of slow increase and then rapid decrease. That means the effect of C₆F₁₂O on combustion changes from promotion to inhibition at different concentrations. In order to further explore the reason of that transformation, the mechanism of inhibiting RP-3 aviation kerosene combustion by C₆F₁₂O with 1403 species and 7496 reactions was constructed. According to the chemical kinetics analysis, the inhibition effect of C₆F₁₂O on combustion at low temperature is better than that at high temperature. The inhibition effect of C₆F₁₂O at low concentration increases mainly because the reaction rates of promoting combustions are much faster than other reactions after the temperature rising. One of the ways to reduce the combustion temperature of RP-3 aviation kerosene is through endothermic reactions such as thermal decomposition. And with the increase of the concentration of C₆F₁₂O, the reaction path changes, resulting in a decrease in the production of H, O and OH free radicals and a large increase in consumption, which macroscopically weakens the promotion effect of C₆F₁₂O on combustion as a fuel, and enhance the inhibition effect as an extinguishing agent. The results can provide theoretical guidance for the prevention and control of aviation kerosene fire by using C₆F₁₂O, and provide reference for the development of new extinguishing agent.

Key words: C₆F₁₂O, aviation kerosene, cup burner, chemical reaction, kinetics, radical

中图分类号:

X 937

余彬彬, 蒋新生, 禹进, 蔡运雄, 李玉玺, 何东海, 于佳佳. 全氟己酮抑制航空煤油燃烧实验及化学动力学研究[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(4): 1834-1844.

Binbin YU, Xinsheng JIANG, Jin YU, Yunxiong CAI, Yuxi LI, Donghai HE, Jiajia YU. Experimental and chemical dynamics study on the inhibition of combustion of aviation kerosene by C₆F₁₂O[J]. CIESC Journal, 2022, 73(4): 1834-1844.

图/表 3

参考文献 31

1	Leonard J T, Fulper C R, Darwin R, et al. Fire hazards of mixed fuels on the flight deck[R]. Washington, DC: Naval Research Lab, 1992.
2	张品. 哈龙替代型含氟灭火剂高温热解特性研究[D]. 南京: 南京理工大学, 2013.
	Zhang P. Study on the pyrolysis of the fluorine-containing fire extinguishing agents as halon alternatives[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Science and Technology, 2013.
3	Liu L, Du Z M, Zhang T W, et al. The inhibition/promotion effect of C₆F₁₂O added to a lithium-ion cell syngas premixed flame[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44(39): 22282-22300.
4	Gann R G. Fire suppression system performance of alternative agents in aircraft engine and dry bay laboratory simulations[R]. National Institute of Standards and Technology, 1995.
5	Hirst R, Booth K. Measurement of flame-extinguishing concentrations[J]. Fire Technology, 1977, 13(4): 296-315.
6	Pagliaro J L, Linteris G T, Sunderland P B, et al. Combustion inhibition and enhancement of premixed methane-air flames by halon replacements[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2015, 162(1): 41-49.
7	郑军林, 彭玉辉, 谢承利. BTP-氟化物复合气体灭火性能的试验[J]. 船海工程, 2016, 45(2): 69-73.
	Zheng J L, Peng Y H, Xie C L. Experimental study on fire extinguishing efficiency of BTP-fluoride[J]. Ship & Ocean Engineering, 2016, 45(2): 69-73.
8	赵洪海. 复合气体灭火剂协同灭火性能研究[J]. 消防科学与技术, 2017, 36(2): 233-237.
	Zhao H H. The study on synergism of binary gas fire suppressants[J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2017, 36(2): 233-237.
9	卢大勇, 陈涛, 周晓猛. 7FA临界灭火浓度的测定及7FA/BTP协同灭火作用研究[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2015, 15(4): 117-121.
	Lu D Y, Chen T, Zhou X M. On the determination of critical fire-stamping concentration of 7FA and the synergetic effect between 7FA and BTP in fire-suppression[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2015, 15(4): 117-121.
10	梁天水, 刘德智, 王永锦, 等. 全氟三乙胺和全氟己酮混合气体的灭火效果研究[J]. 化工学报, 2020, 71(7): 3387-3392.
	Liang T S, Liu D Z, Wang Y J, et al. Study on fire extinguishing efficiency of the mixtures of C₆F₁₂O and (C₂F₅)₃N[J]. CIESC Journal, 2020, 71(7): 3387-3392.
11	陈涛, 傅学成, 周晓猛. 氟化酮灭火剂灭火性能[J]. 燃烧科学与技术, 2016, 22(2): 167-172.
	Chen T, Fu X C, Zhou X M. Extinguishing property of dodecafluoro-2-methylpentan-3-one[J]. Journal of Combustion Science and Technology, 2016, 22(2): 167-172.
12	陈涛, 卢大勇, 胡成, 等. 全氟己酮灭火剂临界灭火浓度测试研究[J]. 消防科学与技术, 2015, 34(9): 1210-1214.
	Chen T, Lu D Y, Hu C, et al. Measurement of critical extinguishing concentration of dodecafluoro-2-methylpentan-3-one[J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2015, 34(9): 1210-1214.
13	陈涛, 胡成, 陈旸. 新型高沸点气体灭火剂灭航空煤油火性能[J]. 消防科学与技术, 2019, 38(12): 1726-1729.
	Chen T, Hu C, Chen Y. A study of extinguishing property of new gas extinguishing agent with high-boiling point on aviation kerosene fire[J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2019, 38(12): 1726-1729.
14	Linteris G T. Numerically predicted structure and burning velocity of premixed CO–Ar–O₂–H₂ flames inhibited by CF₃H[J]. Combustion and Flame, 1996, 107(1/2): 72-84.
15	L'espérance D, Williams B A, Fleming J W. Intermediate species profiles in low pressure premixed flames inhibited by fluoromethanes[J]. Combustion and Flame, 1999, 117(4): 709-731.
16	Zegers E J P, Williams B A, Fisher E M, et al. Suppression of nonpremixed flames by fluorinated ethanes and propanes[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2000, 121(3): 471-487.
17	Williams B A, L' espérance D M, Fleming J W. Intermediate species profiles in low-pressure methane/oxygen flames inhibited by 2-H heptafluoropropane: comparison of experimental data with kinetic modeling[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2000, 120(1/2): 160-172.
18	Hynes R G, Mackie J C, Masri A R. Sample probe measurements on a hydrogen-ethane-air-2-H-heptafluoropropane flame[J]. Energy & Fuels, 1999, 13(2): 485-492.
19	杜建科. 杯式燃烧器法灭火浓度测试技术研究进展[C]//2013中国消防协会科学技术年会. 北京, 2013.
	Du J K. Research progress of cup burner fire extinguishing concentration measurement technology[C]//2013 Annual Meeting of Science and Technology of China Fire Protection Association. Beijing, 2013.
20	Guo F, Hase W, Ozaki Y, et al. Experimental study on flammability limits of electrolyte solvents in lithium-ion batteries using a wick combustion method[J]. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 2019, 109: 109858.
21	Guo F, Ozaki Y, Nishimura K, et al. Experimental study on flame stability limits of lithium ion battery electrolyte solvents with organophosphorus compounds addition using a candle-like wick combustion system[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2019, 207: 63-70.
22	国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 气体灭火剂灭火性能测试方法: [S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2007.
	General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China, Standardization Administration of the People's Republic of China. Test method for extinguishing property of gaseous extinguishing agent: [S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2007.
23	Linteris G T, Babushok V I, Sunderland P B, et al. Unwanted combustion enhancement by C₆F₁₂O fire suppressant[J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2013, 34(2): 2683-2690.
24	Linteris G T, Pagliaro J L. Burning Velocity Measurements and Simulations for Understanding the Performance of Fire Suppressants in Aircraft - Letter Report Prepared for Meggitt[R]. Gaithersburg: National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2016.
25	Takahashi F, Katta V R, Babushok V I, et al. Numerical and experimental studies of extinguishment of cup-burner flames by C₆F₁₂O[J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2021, 38(3): 4645-4653.
26	Yu B B, Jiang X S, He D H, et al. Development of a chemical-kinetic mechanism of a four-component surrogate fuel for RP-3 kerosene[J]. ACS Omega, 2021, 6(36): 23485-23494.
27	刘宇, 曾文, 马洪安, 等. RP-3航空煤油3组分模拟替代燃料燃烧反应机理[J]. 航空动力学报, 2016, 31(9): 2055-2064.
	Liu Y, Zeng W, Ma H A, et al. Combustion reaction mechanism of three-component simulation surrogate fuel for RP-3 kerosene[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2016, 31(9): 2055-2064.
28	Xu W, Jiang Y, Ren X Y. Combustion promotion and extinction of premixed counterflow methane/air flames by C₆F₁₂O fire suppressant[J]. Journal of Fire Sciences, 2016, 34(4): 289-304.
29	Babrauskas V. Estimating large pool fire burning rates[J]. Fire Technology, 1983, 19(4): 251-261.
30	赵金龙, 田逢时, 赵利宏, 等. 航空煤油薄油层燃烧特性实验研究[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2020, 16(5): 129-135.
	Zhao J L, Tian F S, Zhao L H, et al. Experimental study on burning characteristics of thin-layer aviation kerosene[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2020, 16(5): 129-135.
31	Ren X Y, Jiang Y, Xu W. Numerical investigation of the chemical and physical effects of halogenated fire suppressants addition on methane–air mixtures[J]. Journal of Fire Sciences, 2016, 34(5): 416-430.

[1]	金正浩, 封立杰, 李舒宏. 氨水溶液交叉型再吸收式热泵的能量及分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 53-63.
[2]	程成, 段钟弟, 孙浩然, 胡海涛, 薛鸿祥. 表面微结构对析晶沉积特性影响的格子Boltzmann模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 74-86.
[3]	肖明堃, 杨光, 黄永华, 吴静怡. 浸没孔液氧气泡动力学数值研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 87-95.
[4]	毕丽森, 刘斌, 胡恒祥, 曾涛, 李卓睿, 宋健飞, 吴翰铭. 粗糙界面上纳米液滴蒸发模式的分子动力学研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 172-178.
[5]	于宏鑫, 邵双全. 水结晶过程的分子动力学模拟分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 250-258.
[6]	范孝雄, 郝丽芳, 范垂钢, 李松庚. LaMnO₃/生物炭催化剂低温NH₃-SCR催化脱硝性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3821-3830.
[7]	陈杰, 林永胜, 肖恺, 杨臣, 邱挺. 胆碱基碱性离子液体催化合成仲丁醇性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3716-3730.
[8]	郑佳丽, 李志会, 赵新强, 王延吉. 离子液体催化合成2-氰基呋喃反应动力学研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3708-3715.
[9]	汪林正, 陆俞冰, 张睿智, 罗永浩. 基于分子动力学模拟的VOCs热氧化特性分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3242-3255.
[10]	曾如宾, 沈中杰, 梁钦锋, 许建良, 代正华, 刘海峰. 基于分子动力学模拟的Fe₂O₃纳米颗粒烧结机制研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3353-3365.
[11]	李锦潼, 邱顺, 孙文寿. 煤浆法烟气脱硫中草酸和紫外线强化煤砷浸出过程[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3522-3532.
[12]	杨越, 张丹, 郑巨淦, 涂茂萍, 杨庆忠. NaCl水溶液喷射闪蒸-掺混蒸发的实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3279-3291.
[13]	张蒙蒙, 颜冬, 沈永峰, 李文翠. 电解液类型对双离子电池阴阳离子储存行为的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 3116-3126.
[14]	何宣志, 何永清, 闻桂叶, 焦凤. 磁液液滴颈部自相似破裂行为[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2889-2897.
[15]	何晓崐, 刘锐, 薛园, 左然. MOCVD生长AlN单晶薄膜的气相和表面化学反应综述[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2800-2813.

全氟己酮抑制航空煤油燃烧实验及化学动力学研究

Experimental and chemical dynamics study on the inhibition of combustion of aviation kerosene by C₆F₁₂O

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 3

参考文献 31

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

全氟己酮抑制航空煤油燃烧实验及化学动力学研究

Experimental and chemical dynamics study on the inhibition of combustion of aviation kerosene by C6F12O

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 3

参考文献 31

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

Experimental and chemical dynamics study on the inhibition of combustion of aviation kerosene by C₆F₁₂O