MDEA与MEA脱碳反应动力学

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20151480

化工学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 67 ›› Issue (6): 2355-2362.DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20151480

• 催化、动力学与反应器 • 上一篇下一篇

MDEA与MEA脱碳反应动力学

唐建峰¹, 张国君¹, 史泽林¹, 黄彬¹, 王曰², 赵铭钰¹

1. 中国石油大学华东储运与建筑工程学院, 山东青岛 266580;
2. 中交煤气热力研究设计院有限公司, 辽宁沈阳 110000

收稿日期:2015-09-21 修回日期:2016-03-25 出版日期:2016-06-05 发布日期:2016-06-05
通讯作者: 唐建峰
基金资助:
天然气预处理用大型塔器研制(工信部联装[2014]495号);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(14CX05033A)。

Decarbonization reaction kinetics of MDEA and MEA

TANG Jianfeng¹, ZHANG Guojun¹, SHI Zelin¹, HUANG Bin¹, WANG Yue², ZHAO Mingyu¹

1. College of Pipeline and Civil Engineering, China University of Petroleum, Qingdao 266580, Shandong, China;
2. CCCC Gas & Heat Research and Design Institute Co., Ltd., Shenyang 110000, Liaoning, China

Received:2015-09-21 Revised:2016-03-25 Online:2016-06-05 Published:2016-06-05
Supported by:
supported by theDevelopment of Large Tower for Natural Gas Pretreatment ([2014] 495) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities Fund (14CX05033A).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

通过双模理论及反应釜吸收实验的方法,建立了胺液脱碳拟一级传质反应模型,并对其进行了实验验证。通过模型中的增强因子、二级反应速率常数及传质速率分析了伯胺MEA(乙醇胺)及叔胺MDEA(甲基二乙醇胺)的动力学特性,以此为基础进一步分析了MDEA+MEA混合胺液的交互作用、动力学特性,并得到了较优的胺液配比。研究结果表明:伯胺MEA的增强因子及传质速率数值大于叔胺MDEA,随着气液传质过程进行,传质速率逐渐减小;对于混合胺液,表观反应速率常数以及增强因子随着MEA浓度的增加以及温度的升高而逐渐增大;当总胺浓度为3mol·L^-1时,MDEA+MEA(2mol·L^-1+1mol·L^-1)的混合胺液增强因子数值为0.5,传质速率较大,为最优混合胺液配比。

关键词: 天然气, 脱碳, MDEA, MEA, 动力学, 传质

Abstract:

Based on the small reaction kettle experiment device, the data approximation could be adopt to establish the kinetics model by two-film theory. Then the reaction kinetics of amine solutions of MEA (monoethanolamine), MDEA (methyldiethanolamine) and both mixtures were analyzed by the model. The reaction kinetics models of MEA and MDEA, which was established by pseudo-first-order reaction, could forecast gas-liquid mass transfer performance of them well after experimental verification. The result showed that the interaction coefficient and mass transfer rate of MEA was higher than that of MDEA. The mass transfer rates decreased with the process of reaction. In addition, the apparent propagation rate constant and enhancement factor of mixed amine increased with the increasing temperature and the ratio of MEA. At last, it forecasted that the mixed amine of MDEA+MEA (2 mol·L^-1+1 mol·L^-1) had the better decarbonization performance, which had higher mass transfer rate with its enhancement factor of 0.5.

Key words: natural gas, decarbonization, MDEA, MEA, reaction kinetic, mass transfer

中图分类号:

TE644

唐建峰, 张国君, 史泽林, 黄彬, 王曰, 赵铭钰. MDEA与MEA脱碳反应动力学[J]. 化工学报, 2016, 67(6): 2355-2362.

TANG Jianfeng, ZHANG Guojun, SHI Zelin, HUANG Bin, WANG Yue, ZHAO Mingyu. Decarbonization reaction kinetics of MDEA and MEA[J]. CIESC Journal, 2016, 67(6): 2355-2362.

参考文献 22

[1]	冯叔初, 郭揆常, 等. 油气集输与矿场加工[M]. 东营: 中国石油大学出版社, 2006: 367-399. FENG S C, GUO K C, et al. Oil and Gas Gathering and Refinery Processing[M]. Dongying: China University of Petroleum Press, 2006: 367-399.
[2]	苏欣, 古小平, 范小霞. 天然气净化技术研究进展 [J]. 宁夏石油化工, 2005, (2): 1-5. SU X, GU X P, FAN X X. Review of natural gas purification process [J].Ningxia Petroleum and Chemical Industry, 2005, (2): 1-5.
[3]	王兰芝, 李桂明, 杨红健, 等. 天然气净化技术研究进展 [J]. 河南化工, 2006, (23): 11-13. WANG L Z, LI G M, YANG H J, et al. Research progress of natural gas purifying processes [J]. Henan Chemical Industry, 2006, (23): 11-13.
[4]	HANNA K P, ANDRZEJ C. Kinetics of CO2 desorption from aqueous N-methyldiethanolamine solutions [J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2011, 168(1): 367-375.
[5]	姜宁, 李春福, 王远江, 郭庆生. 天然气脱二氧化碳工艺方法综述 [J]. 化学工程与装备, 2011, (7): 147-150. JIANG N, LI C F, WANG Y J, GUO Q S. Review of removal processes for carbon dioxide from natural gas [J]. Chemical Engineering & Equipment, 2011, (7): 147-150.
[6]	HUGHE T P S P W, 徐正斌, YAN Y X. 二氧化碳脱除工艺优选 [J]. 国外油田工程, 2003, 19(1): 32-34. HUGHE T P S P W, XU Z B, YAN Y X. Optimization of carbon dioxide removal process [J]. Foreign Oilfield Engineering, 2003, 19(1): 32-34.
[7]	LEWIS W K, WHITMAN W G. Principles of gas absorption [J]. Ind. Eng. Chem., 1924, (16):12-15.
[8]	WHITMAN W G. The two-film theory of gas absorption [J]. Chem. Met. Engineering, 1923, 29(4):146-148.
[9]	HIGBIE R. The rate of absorption of pure gas into a still liquid during short period of exposure [J]. Trans. AIChE J., 1935, 31: 365-388.
[10]	DANCKWERTS P V. Significance of liquid-film coefficients in gas absorption [J]. Ind. Eng. Chem., 1951, 43: 1460-1467.
[11]	余国琮, 袁希钢. 化工计算传质学导论[M]. 天津: 天津大学出版社, 2011: 213-214. YU G Z, YUAN X G. Chemical Computational Mass-transfer [M]. Tianjin: Tianjin University Press, 2011: 213-214.
[12]	连之伟, 孙德兴. 热质交换原理与设备[M]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2011: 60-61. LIAN Z W, SUN D X. Calorific Value Exchange Principle and Equipment [M]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2011: 60-61.
[13]	仲伟龙. CO2化学吸收技术研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2008. ZHONG W L. Study on CO2 chemical absorption technology [D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2008.
[14]	宿辉, 崔琳. 二氧化碳的吸收方法及机理研究 [J]. 环境科学与管理, 2006, 31(8) : 79-80. SU H, CUI L. Research on absorption method and mechanism of carbon dioxide [J]. Environmental Science and Management, 2006, 31(8): 79-80.
[15]	王挹薇, 张成芳, 钦淑均. MDEA溶液吸收CO2动力学研究 [J]. 化工学报, 1991, (4): 466-474. WANG Y W, ZHANG C F, QIN S J. Dynamics research of mdea solution absorb CO2 [J]. Journal of Chemical Industry and Engineering(China), 1991, (4): 466-474.
[16]	Donaldson T L, Nguyen Y N. Carbon dioxide reaction kinetics and transport in aqueous amine membranes [J]. Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam., 1980, 19(3): 260-266.
[17]	程振民, 朱开宏, 袁渭康. 高等反应工程教程[M]. 上海: 华东理工大学出版社, 2010: 195-202. CHENG Z M, ZHU K H, YUAN W K. A Senior Course of Chemical Reaction Engineering on the Graduate Level[M]. Shanghai: East China University of Science and Technology, 2010: 195-202.
[18]	DANCKWERTS P V, MCNEIL K M. The absorption of carbon dioxide into aqueous amine solutions and the effects of catalysis [J]. Trans. Inst. Chem. Eng., 1967, 45: T32-T49.
[19]	刘应书, 魏广飞, 张辉. 填料吸收塔内乙醇胺溶液吸收CO2增强因子 [J]. 化工学报, 2014, 65(8): 3054-3061. LIU Y S, WEI G F, ZHANG H. Enhancement factor of CO2 absorption by ethanolamine aqueous solution in packed tower [J]. CIESC Journal, 2014, 65(8): 3054-3061.
[20]	CAPLOW M. Kinetics of carbamate formation and breakdown [J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1968, 90(24): 6795-6803.
[21]	LEWIS W K, WHITMAN W G. Principles of gas absorption [J]. Ind. Eng. Chem., 1924, (16):12-15.
[22]	付浩. 天然气脱酸胺液的筛选及配比优化研究[D]. 青岛: 中国石油大学(华东), 2014. FU H. Studies on screening formula of amine solution basing on MDEA for decarburizing of natural gas and optimizing the ratio [D]. Qingdao: China University of Petroleum, 2014.

MDEA与MEA脱碳反应动力学

Decarbonization reaction kinetics of MDEA and MEA

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 22

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	晁京伟, 许嘉兴, 李廷贤. 基于无管束蒸发换热强化策略的吸附热池的供热性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 302-310.
[2]	金正浩, 封立杰, 李舒宏. 氨水溶液交叉型再吸收式热泵的能量及分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 53-63.
[3]	程成, 段钟弟, 孙浩然, 胡海涛, 薛鸿祥. 表面微结构对析晶沉积特性影响的格子Boltzmann模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 74-86.
[4]	肖明堃, 杨光, 黄永华, 吴静怡. 浸没孔液氧气泡动力学数值研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 87-95.
[5]	毕丽森, 刘斌, 胡恒祥, 曾涛, 李卓睿, 宋健飞, 吴翰铭. 粗糙界面上纳米液滴蒸发模式的分子动力学研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 172-178.
[6]	于宏鑫, 邵双全. 水结晶过程的分子动力学模拟分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 250-258.
[7]	范孝雄, 郝丽芳, 范垂钢, 李松庚. LaMnO₃/生物炭催化剂低温NH₃-SCR催化脱硝性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3821-3830.
[8]	李艺彤, 郭航, 陈浩, 叶芳. 催化剂非均匀分布的质子交换膜燃料电池操作条件研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3831-3840.
[9]	郑佳丽, 李志会, 赵新强, 王延吉. 离子液体催化合成2-氰基呋喃反应动力学研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3708-3715.
[10]	汪林正, 陆俞冰, 张睿智, 罗永浩. 基于分子动力学模拟的VOCs热氧化特性分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3242-3255.
[11]	曾如宾, 沈中杰, 梁钦锋, 许建良, 代正华, 刘海峰. 基于分子动力学模拟的Fe₂O₃纳米颗粒烧结机制研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3353-3365.
[12]	李锦潼, 邱顺, 孙文寿. 煤浆法烟气脱硫中草酸和紫外线强化煤砷浸出过程[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3522-3532.
[13]	张瑞航, 曹潘, 杨锋, 李昆, 肖朋, 邓春, 刘蓓, 孙长宇, 陈光进. ZIF-8纳米流体天然气乙烷回收工艺的产品纯度关键影响因素分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3386-3393.
[14]	杨越, 张丹, 郑巨淦, 涂茂萍, 杨庆忠. NaCl水溶液喷射闪蒸-掺混蒸发的实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3279-3291.
[15]	张蒙蒙, 颜冬, 沈永峰, 李文翠. 电解液类型对双离子电池阴阳离子储存行为的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 3116-3126.