Fe3O4 NPs类芬顿预处理对活性污泥法处理阿莫西林废水的影响

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20180624

化工学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 69 ›› Issue (12): 5237-5245.DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20180624

Fe₃O₄ NPs类芬顿预处理对活性污泥法处理阿莫西林废水的影响

宿程远^1,2, 郑鹏¹, 廖黎明¹, 邓秋金¹, 陈孟林¹, 黄智¹

1. 广西师范大学岩溶生态与环境变化研究广西高校重点实验室, 广西桂林 541004;
2. 广西师范大学环境与资源学院, 广西桂林 541004

收稿日期:2018-06-07 修回日期:2018-08-02 出版日期:2018-12-05 发布日期:2018-12-05
通讯作者: 宿程远
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（51641803）；广西自然科学基金项目（2017GXNSFAA198277）；岩溶生态与环境变化研究广西高校重点实验室资助项目（YRHJ16Z007）。

Influence of Fe₃O₄ NPs heterogeneous Fenton-like pre-treatment on activated sludge technology for treatment amoxicillin wastewater

SU Chengyuan^1,2, ZHENG Peng¹, LIAO Liming¹, DENG Qiujin¹, CHEN Menglin¹, HUANG Zhi¹

1. University Key Laboratory of Karst Ecology and Environmental Change of Guangxi, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin 541004, Guangxi, China;
2. School of Environment and Resources, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin 541004, Guangxi, China

Received:2018-06-07 Revised:2018-08-02 Online:2018-12-05 Published:2018-12-05
Supported by:
supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51641803), the Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi (2017GXNSFAA198277) and the University Key Laboratory of Karst Ecology and Environmental Change of Guangxi Province (Guangxi Normal University) (YRHJ16Z007).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

以阿莫西林为研究对象，探讨了其经不同程度磁性纳米铁（Fe₃O₄ NPs）多相类芬顿预处理后对活性污泥理化特性及其微生物群落结构的影响。结果表明，随着预处理程度（未经预处理、经40% H₂O₂预处理和经60% H₂O₂预处理）的升高，活性污泥对废水COD平均去除率由81.5%升高到89.1%，氨氮平均去除率由86.2%升高到95.6%，同时活性污泥中蛋白酶的含量由0.13 mg·g^-1升高到0.19 mg·g^-1。且随着阿莫西林预处理程度的升高，活性污泥溶性微生物产物（SMP）的三维荧光光谱（EEM）中可见光区类腐殖酸与类富里酸的吸收峰强度逐渐减小，表明活性污泥活性良好。对于微生物群落分布而言，在未经预处理、经40% H₂O₂、经60% H₂O₂预处理的条件下，变形菌门所占比例分别为73..81%、84.08%和77.08%，同时厚壁菌门所占比例为0.6%、0.82%与0.78%。变形菌门为优势菌种，诸多固氮细菌与聚磷菌属于变形菌门；而厚壁菌门可利用水解酶来分解蛋白质与糖类，两者所占比例的升高，为废水中污染物的高效去除提供了保障。

关键词: 阿莫西林, 类芬顿预处理, 活性, 需氧, 氧化

Abstract:

Amoxicillin was used as the research object to investigate the effects of heterogeneous Fenton-like pre-treatment on the physicochemical properties and microbial community structure of activated sludge after different degrees of magnetic nano-iron (Fe₃O₄ NPs). The results showed that with increasing the pre-treatment degrees (without pre-treatment, with 40% H₂O₂ and 60% H₂O₂), the average COD removal rate increased from 81.5% to 89.1%, and the average ammonia nitrogen removal rate increased from 86.2% to 95.6% by the activated sludge. Meanwhile, the protease content increased from 0.13 mg·g^-1 to 0.19 mg·g^-1 in the activated sludge. With the increase of pre-treatment degrees, three-dimensional excitation emission matrix (EEM) spectra demonstrated that the absorption peaks of the fulvic acids and humic acids in the visible region were gradually decreased in the soluble microbial products (SMP) of the activated sludge. It was showed that the activated sludge had good activity. In addition, the abundance of Proteobacteria was 73.81%, 84.08%, 77.08%, and the abundance of Firmicutes was 0.6%, 0.82%, 0.78% at without pre-treatment, with 40% H₂O₂ and 60% H₂O₂ pre-treatment condition, respectively. Proteobacteria was the dominant bacteria species. Many nitrogen-fixing bacteria and phosphorus-accumulating bacteria belong to Proteobacteria. Meanwhile, Firmicutes could use hydrolytic enzymes to degrade proteins and sugars. The increase of the proportion of Proteobacteria and Firmicutes had provided a guarantee for the efficient removal of pollutants in the wastewater.

Key words: amoxicilli, Fenton-like pre-treatment, reactivity, aerobic, oxidation

中图分类号:

X703.1

宿程远, 郑鹏, 廖黎明, 邓秋金, 陈孟林, 黄智. Fe₃O₄ NPs类芬顿预处理对活性污泥法处理阿莫西林废水的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(12): 5237-5245.

SU Chengyuan, ZHENG Peng, LIAO Liming, DENG Qiujin, CHEN Menglin, HUANG Zhi. Influence of Fe₃O₄ NPs heterogeneous Fenton-like pre-treatment on activated sludge technology for treatment amoxicillin wastewater[J]. CIESC Journal, 2018, 69(12): 5237-5245.

参考文献 30

[1]	张昱, 唐妹, 田哲, 等. 制药废水中抗生素的去除技术研究进展[J]. 环境工程学报, 2018, 12(1):1-14. ZHANG Y, TANG M, TIAN Z, et al. Research progress of removal technology of antibiotics from antibiotic production wastewater[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2018, 12(1):1-14.
[2]	NOVO A, MANAIA C M. Factors influencing antibiotic resistance burden in municipal wastewater treatment plants[J]. Applied Microbiology & Biotechnology, 2010, 87(3):1157-1166.
[3]	黄宏, 李圆杏, 杨红伟. 水环境中抗生素的光降解研究进展[J]. 环境化学, 2013, 10(7):1335-1341. HUANG H, LI Y X, YANG H W. Research progress on photodegradation of antibiotics in aqueous solution[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2013, 10(7):1335-1341.
[4]	蒋胜韬, 祝建中, 管玉江, 等. Si-FeOOH/H2O2类芬顿降解盐酸四环素废水的效能及其机理[J]. 化工学报, 2015, 66(10):4244-4251. JIANG S T, ZHU J Z, GUAN Y J, et al. Degradation and mechanism of tetracycline hydrochloride in wastewater by Si-FeOOH/H2O2 Fenton-like[J]. CIESC Journal, 2015, 66(10):4244-4251.
[5]	LEE Y, VON G U. Oxidative transformation of micropollutants during municipal wastewater treatment:comparison of kinetic aspects of selective (chlorine, chlorine dioxide, ferrate Ⅵ, and ozone) and non-selective oxidants (hydroxyl radical)[J]. Water Research, 2010, 44(2):555-566.
[6]	YI Q, GAO Y, ZHANG H, et al. Establishment of a pretreatment method for tetracycline production wastewater using enhanced hydrolysis[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2016, 300(15):139-145.
[7]	MITCHELL S M, ULLMAN J L, TEEL A L, et al. pH and temperature effects on the hydrolysis of three β-lactam antibiotics:ampicillin, cefalotin and cefoxitin[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2014, 466(1):547-555.
[8]	MITCHELL S M, ULLMAN J L, TEEL A L, et al. Hydrolysis of amphenicol and macrolide antibiotics:chloramphenicol, florfenicol, spiramycin, and tylosin[J]. Chemosphere, 2015, 134(9):504-511.
[9]	孙怡, 于利亮, 黄浩斌, 等. 高级氧化技术处理难降解有机废水的研发趋势及实用化进展[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(5):1743-1756. SUN Y, YU L L, HUANG H B, et al. Research trend and practical development of advanced oxidation process on degradation of recalcitrant organic wastewater[J]. CIESC Journal, 2017, 68(5):1743-1756.
[10]	任健, 马宏瑞, 马炜宁, 等. Fe/C微电解-Fenton氧化-混凝沉淀-生化法处理抗生素废水的试验研究[J]. 水处理技术, 2011, 37(3):84-87. REN J, MA H R, MA W N, et al. Study of the treatment of antibiotic wastewater with ferric-carbon microelectrolysis-Fenton oxidation-coagulation sedimentation-biological process[J]. Technology of Water Treatment, 2011, 37(3):84-87.
[11]	ELMOLLA E S, CHAUDHURI M. The feasibility of using combined Fenton-SBR for antibiotic wastewater treatment[J]. Desalination, 2012, 285(3):14-21.
[12]	MARTINEZ F, MOLINA R, RODIGUEZ I, et al. Techno-economical assessment of coupling Fenton/biological processes for the treatment of a pharmaceutical wastewater[J]. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2018, 6(1):485-494.
[13]	GAO Y, GAN H, ZHANG G, et al. Visible light assisted Fenton-like degradation of rhodamine B and 4-nitrophenol solutions with a stable poly-hydroxyl-iron/sepiolite catalyst[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2013, 217(1):221-230.
[14]	LAN H, WANG A, LIU R, et al. Heterogeneous photo-Fenton degradation of acid red B over Fe2O3 supported on activated carbon fiber[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2015, 285(21):167-172.
[15]	CHEN F, XIE S, HUANG X, et al. Ionothermal synthesis of Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles as efficient heterogeneous Fenton-like catalysts for degradation of organic pollutants with H2O2[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2016, 322(15):152-162.
[16]	BORUAH P K, SHARMA B, KARBHAL I, et al. Ammonia-modified graphene sheets decorated with magnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles for the photocatalytic and photo-Fenton degradation of phenolic compounds under sunlight irradiation[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2016, 325(5):90-100.
[17]	KALANTARY R R, FARZADKIA M, KERMANI M, et al. Heterogeneous electro-Fenton process by nano-Fe3O4 for catalytic degradation of amoxicillin:process optimization using response surface methodology[J]. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2018, 6(4):4644-4652.
[18]	ELMOLLA E S, CHAUDHURI M. Combined photo-Fenton-SBR process for antibiotic wastewater treatment[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2011, 192(3):1418-1426.
[19]	ZHU L, ZHOU J, LV M, et al. Specific component comparison of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) in flocs and granular sludge using EEM and SDS-PAGE[J]. Chemosphere, 2015, 121(5):26-32.
[20]	WANG Z P, ZHANG T. Characterization of soluble microbial products (SMP) under stressful conditions[J]. Water Research, 2010, 44(18):5499-5509.
[21]	BADDAM R, REDDY G B, RACZKOWSKI C, et al. Activity of soil enzymes in constructed wetlands treated with swine wastewater[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2016, 91(6):24-30.
[22]	GUO X L, GU J, GAO H, et al. Effects of Cu on metabolisms and enzyme activities of microbial communities in the process of composting[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2012, 108(4):140-148.
[23]	HAO L P, BIZE A, CONTEAU D, et al. New insights into the key microbial phylotypes of anaerobic sludge digesters under different operational conditions[J]. Water Research, 2016, 102(10):158-169.
[24]	胡红伟, 李吕木, 钱坤, 等. 发酵菌剂接种量对堆肥理化性质和有关酶活的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2013, 32(6):1261-1270. HU H W, LI L M, QIAN K, et al. Effect of doses of fermentation inoculum on physico-chemical properties and related enzymic activities during the composting process[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2013, 32(6):1261-1270.
[25]	周昌琴, 孔秀琴, 陈磊, 等. PESA对高钙废水中污泥酶活性的影响[J]. 环境工程学报, 2017, 11(4):2212-2218. ZHOU C Q, KONG X Q, CHEN L, et al. Effect of calcium and PESA on enzyme activities in activated sludge[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2017, 11(4):2212-2218.
[26]	王静, 黄申斌, 江敏, 等. 抗生素类污染物对活性污泥酶活的影响研究[J]. 环境污染与防治, 2011, 33(12):27-32. WANG J, HUANG S B, JIANG M, et al. Effect of antibiotics pollutants on enzyme activities in activated sludge[J]. Environmental Pollution & Control, 2017, 11(4):2212-2218.
[27]	刘文龙, 彭永臻, 苗圆圆, 等. 好氧饥饿对膨胀污泥硝化性能及污泥特性的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2015, 66(3):1142-1149. LIU W L, PENG Y Z, MIAO Y Y, et al. Effects of aerobic starvation on nitrification performance and sludge characteristics of bulking sludge[J]. CIESC Journal, 2015, 66(3):1142-1149.
[28]	ZHANG W J, CAO B D, WANG D S, et al. Influence of wastewater sludge treatment using combined peroxyacetic acid oxidation and inorganic coagulants re-flocculation on characteristics of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS)[J]. Water Research, 2016, 88(1):728-739.
[29]	LENZ S, BOHM K, OTTNER R, et al. Determination of leachate compounds relevant for landfill aftercare using FT-IR spectroscopy[J]. Waste Management, 2016, 55(9):321-329.
[30]	YANG Z H, XU R, ZHANG Y, et al. Characterization of extracellular polymeric substances and microbial diversity in anaerobic co-digestion reactor treated sewage sludge with fat, oil, grease[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2016, 212(1):164-173.

Fe₃O₄ NPs类芬顿预处理对活性污泥法处理阿莫西林废水的影响

Influence of Fe₃O₄ NPs heterogeneous Fenton-like pre-treatment on activated sludge technology for treatment amoxicillin wastewater

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 30

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	胡超, 董玉明, 张伟, 张红玲, 周鹏, 徐红彬. 浓硫酸活化五氧化二钒制备高浓度全钒液流电池正极电解液[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 338-345.
[2]	宋瑞涛, 王派, 王云鹏, 李敏霞, 党超镔, 陈振国, 童欢, 周佳琦. 二氧化碳直接蒸发冰场排管内流动沸腾换热数值模拟分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 96-103.
[3]	张义飞, 刘舫辰, 张双星, 杜文静. 超临界二氧化碳用印刷电路板式换热器性能分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 183-190.
[4]	范孝雄, 郝丽芳, 范垂钢, 李松庚. LaMnO₃/生物炭催化剂低温NH₃-SCR催化脱硝性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3821-3830.
[5]	杨百玉, 寇悦, 姜峻韬, 詹亚力, 王庆宏, 陈春茂. 炼化碱渣湿式氧化预处理过程DOM的化学转化特征[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3912-3920.
[6]	米泽豪, 花儿. 基于DFT和COSMO-RS理论研究多元胺型离子液体吸收SO₂气体[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3681-3696.
[7]	陈美思, 陈威达, 李鑫垚, 李尚予, 吴有庭, 张锋, 张志炳. 硅基离子液体微颗粒强化气体捕集与转化的研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3628-3639.
[8]	程业品, 胡达清, 徐奕莎, 刘华彦, 卢晗锋, 崔国凯. 离子液体基低共熔溶剂在转化CO₂中的应用[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3640-3653.
[9]	陈哲文, 魏俊杰, 张玉明. 超临界水煤气化耦合SOFC发电系统集成及其能量转化机制[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3888-3902.
[10]	杨学金, 杨金涛, 宁平, 王访, 宋晓双, 贾丽娟, 冯嘉予. 剧毒气体PH₃的干法净化技术研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3742-3755.
[11]	孟令玎, 崇汝青, 孙菲雪, 孟子晖, 刘文芳. 改性聚乙烯膜和氧化硅固定化碳酸酐酶[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3472-3484.
[12]	杨欣, 彭啸, 薛凯茹, 苏梦威, 吴燕. 分子印迹-TiO₂光电催化降解增溶PHE废水性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3564-3571.
[13]	汪林正, 陆俞冰, 张睿智, 罗永浩. 基于分子动力学模拟的VOCs热氧化特性分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3242-3255.
[14]	吕龙义, 及文博, 韩沐达, 李伟光, 高文芳, 刘晓阳, 孙丽, 王鹏飞, 任芝军, 张光明. 铁基导电材料强化厌氧去除卤代有机污染物：研究进展及未来展望[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3193-3202.
[15]	李锦潼, 邱顺, 孙文寿. 煤浆法烟气脱硫中草酸和紫外线强化煤砷浸出过程[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3522-3532.