朝下沟槽结构表面池沸腾换热

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20160015

化工学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 67 ›› Issue (9): 3559-3565.DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20160015

朝下沟槽结构表面池沸腾换热

钟达文, 孟继安, 李志信

清华大学航天航空学院, 工程热物理研究所, 北京 100084

收稿日期:2016-01-06 修回日期:2016-05-31 出版日期:2016-09-05 发布日期:2016-09-05
通讯作者: 孟继安
基金资助:
大型先进压水堆核电站重大专项子课题项目（2011ZX06004-008）；国家重点基础研究发展计划项目（2013CB228301）。

Saturated pool boiling from downward facing structured surfaces with grooves

ZHONG Dawen, MENG Ji'an, LI Zhixin

Institutes of Engineering Thermal Physics, School of Aerospace Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China

Received:2016-01-06 Revised:2016-05-31 Online:2016-09-05 Published:2016-09-05
Supported by:
supported by the National Science and Technology Major Project of China (2011ZX06004-008) and the National Basic Research Program of China (2013CB228301).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

核电站熔融物堆内滞留技术是一项关键的严重事故应对策略，该策略已被核电站广泛采用。为增强核电站压力容器下封头外表面的沸腾换热能力，实验研究了常压下朝下沟槽结构表面的池沸腾换热，测量了倾角5°、30°、45°、60°和90°下热通量随壁面过热度的变化，获得了相应倾角下的临界热通量（CHF）。与光表面相比，朝下沟槽结构表面的CHF可提高65%～90%。实验观察发现，在高热通量下朝下沟槽结构表面气泡运动形态存在蒸汽膜和波浪蒸汽层两种结构。分析表明，沸腾换热显著增强、临界热通量大幅提高的原因是沟槽结构大幅增加了换热面积同时还明显改善了表面的润湿性。

关键词: 传热, 表面, 相变, 气泡, 临界热通量, 倾角

Abstract:

In-vessel retention is a key severe accident management strategy now widely adopted by some nuclear power plants. The saturated pool boiling heat transfer coefficients and critical heat flux (CHF) were measured from downward facing structured surface with grooves in deionized water to enhance the CHF. The orientations were 5°, 30°, 45°, 60° and 90° (vertical). The results showed that the nucleate boiling heat transfer coefficients and the local CHF for structured surface with grooves were consistently higher than those for plain surface. Compared with plain surface, the CHF increase could reach 65%-90% for structured surface. The vapor blanket and wavy vapor layer bubble structures with different CHF trigger mechanisms on the downward facing surface at high heat fluxes were observed on structured surface. The enhancement of the local CHF and the nucleate boiling heat transfer coefficients was mainly due to the significantly increase of heat transfer area and the grooves that effectively improve surface wettability.

Key words: heat transfer, surface, phase change, bubble, critical heat flux, orientation

中图分类号:

TQ026.4

钟达文, 孟继安, 李志信. 朝下沟槽结构表面池沸腾换热[J]. 化工学报, 2016, 67(9): 3559-3565.

ZHONG Dawen, MENG Ji'an, LI Zhixin. Saturated pool boiling from downward facing structured surfaces with grooves[J]. CIESC Journal, 2016, 67(9): 3559-3565.

参考文献 20

[1]	HENRY R E, FAUSKE H K. External cooling of a reactor vessel under severe accident conditions[J]. Nucl. Eng. Des., 1993, 139(1):31-43.
[2]	REMPE J L, SUH K Y, CHEUNG F B, et al. In-vessel retention-recent efforts and future needs[C]//Proceedings of the Sixth International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Thermal Hydraulics, Operations and Safety. Nara, Japan, 2004, Paper ID N6P045.
[3]	REMPE J L, SUH K Y, CHEUNG F B, et al. Insights from investigations of in-vessel retention for high powered reactors[C]//Proceedings, 11th International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Reactor Thermal-Hydraulics. Avignon, France, 2005, Paper No. 271.
[4]	REMPE J L, SUH K Y, CHEUNG F B, et al. In-vessel retention strategy for high power reactors final report[R]. INEEL/EXT-04-02561, Idaho National Laboratory Report, 2005.
[5]	VISHNEV I P. Effect of orienting the hot surface with respect to the gravitational field on the critical nucleate boiling of a liquid[J]. Journal of Engineering Physics, 1973, 24(1):43-48.
[6]	EL-GENK M S, GUO Z. Transient boiling from inclined and downward-facing surfaces in a saturated pool[J]. Int. J. Ref., 1993, 16(6):414-422.
[7]	BRUSSTAR M J, MERTE J H, KELLER R B, et al. Effects of heater surface orientation on the critical heat flux (Ⅰ):An experimental evaluation of models for subcooled pool boiling[J]. Int. J. Heat Mass Trans., 1997, 40(17):4007-4019.
[8]	KIM J, SUH K. One-dimensional critical heat flux concerning surface orientation and gap size effects[J]. Nucl. Eng. Des., 2003, 226(3):277-292.
[9]	ROUGE S. SULTAN test facility for large-scale vessel coolability in natural convection at low pressure[J]. Nucl. Eng. Des.,1997, 169(1/2/3):185-195.
[10]	THEOFANOUS T G, SYRI S. The coolability limits of a reactor pressure vessel lower head[J]. Nucl. Eng. Des., 1997, 169(1):59-76.
[11]	THEOFANOUS T G, TU J P, SALMASSI T, et al. Quantification of limits to coolability in ULPU-2000 configuration:CRSS-02.05.3[R/OL]. Santa Barbara:Center for Risk Studies and Safety University of California, 2002. http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML0216/ML021620559.pdf.
[12]	CHU T Y, BAINBRIDGE B L, SIMPSON R B, et al. Ex-vessel boiling experiments:laboratory- and reactor-scale testing of the flooded cavity concept for in-vessel core retention (Ⅰ):Observation of quenching of downward-facing surfaces[J]. Nucl. Eng. Des.,1997, 169(1/2/3):77-88.
[13]	CHU T Y, BENTZ J H, SLEZAK S E, et al. Ex-vessel boiling experiments:laboratory-and reactor-scale testing of the flooded cavity concept for in-vessel core retention (Ⅱ):Reactor-scale boiling experiments of the flooded cavity concept for in-vessel core retention[J]. Nucl. Eng. Des., 1997, 169(1/2/3):89-99.
[14]	HADDAD K H. An experimental and theoretical study of two-phase boundary layer flow on the outside of curved downward-facing surfaces[D]. PA:Pennsylvania State University, 1996.
[15]	YANG J, DIZON M B, CHEUNG F B, et al. CHF enhancement by vessel coating for external reactor vessel cooling[J]. Nucl. Eng. Des., 2006, 236(10):1089-1098.
[16]	NOH S W, SUH K Y. Critical heat flux in various inclined rectangular straight surface channels[J]. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci., 2014, 52:1-11.
[17]	NOH S W, SUH K Y. Critical heat flux for APR1400 lower head vessel during a severe accident[J]. Nucl. Eng. Des., 2013, 258:116-129.
[18]	ZHONG D W, MENG J A, LI Z X, et al. Critical heat flux for downward-facing saturated pool boiling on pin fin surfaces[J]. Int. J. Heat Mass Trans., 2015, 87:201-211.
[19]	HOWARD A H, MUDAWAR I. Orientation effects on pool boiling critical heat flux (CHF) and modeling of CHF for near-vertical surfaces[J]. Int. J. Heat Mass Trans., 1999, 42(9):1665-1688.
[20]	KIM Y H, KIM S J, KIM J J, et al. Visualization of boiling phenomena in inclined rectangular gap[J]. Int. J. Mul. Flow, 2005, 31(5):618-642.

朝下沟槽结构表面池沸腾换热

Saturated pool boiling from downward facing structured surfaces with grooves

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 20

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	晁京伟, 许嘉兴, 李廷贤. 基于无管束蒸发换热强化策略的吸附热池的供热性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 302-310.
[2]	程成, 段钟弟, 孙浩然, 胡海涛, 薛鸿祥. 表面微结构对析晶沉积特性影响的格子Boltzmann模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 74-86.
[3]	肖明堃, 杨光, 黄永华, 吴静怡. 浸没孔液氧气泡动力学数值研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 87-95.
[4]	吴馨, 龚建英, 靳龙, 王宇涛, 黄睿宁. 超声波激励下铝板表面液滴群输运特性的研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 104-112.
[5]	邵苛苛, 宋孟杰, 江正勇, 张旋, 张龙, 高润淼, 甄泽康. 水平方向上冰中受陷气泡形成和分布实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 161-164.
[6]	张双星, 刘舫辰, 张义飞, 杜文静. R-134a脉动热管相变蓄放热实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 165-171.
[7]	张义飞, 刘舫辰, 张双星, 杜文静. 超临界二氧化碳用印刷电路板式换热器性能分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 183-190.
[8]	陈爱强, 代艳奇, 刘悦, 刘斌, 吴翰铭. 基板温度对HFE7100液滴蒸发过程的影响研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 191-197.
[9]	刘明栖, 吴延鹏. 导光管直径和长度对传热影响的模拟分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 206-212.
[10]	王志国, 薛孟, 董芋双, 张田震, 秦晓凯, 韩强. 基于裂隙粗糙性表征方法的地热岩体热流耦合数值模拟与分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 223-234.
[11]	江河, 袁俊飞, 王林, 邢谷雨. 均流腔结构对微细通道内相变流动特性影响的实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 235-244.
[12]	吴延鹏, 刘乾隆, 田东民, 陈凤君. 相变材料与热管耦合的电子器件热管理研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 25-31.
[13]	李艺彤, 郭航, 陈浩, 叶芳. 催化剂非均匀分布的质子交换膜燃料电池操作条件研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3831-3840.
[14]	王玉兵, 李杰, 詹宏波, 朱光亚, 张大林. R134a在菱形离散肋微小通道内的流动沸腾换热实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3797-3806.
[15]	袁佳琦, 刘政, 黄锐, 张乐福, 贺登辉. 泡状入流条件下旋流泵能量转换特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3807-3820.