EGS热储基于微震数据反演模化及其采热性能分析

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20180769

化工学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 69 ›› Issue (12): 5001-5010.DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20180769

EGS热储基于微震数据反演模化及其采热性能分析

李庭樑^1,2,3,4, 黄文博^1,2,3, 曹文炅^1,2,3, 蒋方明^1,2,3

1. 中国科学院广州能源研究所先进能源系统实验室, 广东广州 510640;
2. 中国科学院可再生能源重点实验室, 广东广州 510640;
3. 广东省新能源和可再生能源研究开发与应用重点实验室, 广东广州 510640;
4. 中国科学院大学, 北京 100049

收稿日期:2018-07-09 修回日期:2018-09-12 出版日期:2018-12-05 发布日期:2018-12-05
通讯作者: 蒋方明
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（41702256）；广东省自然科学基金项目（2017A030310328）；国家自然科学基金-广东省联合基金项目（U1401232）；广东省自然科学基金重大基础培育项目（2014A030308001）。

Inverse modeling of EGS heat reservoir based on micro-seismic data and analysis of its heat recovery performance

LI Tingliang^1,2,3,4, HUANG Wenbo^1,2,3, CAO Wenjiong^1,2,3, JIANG Fangming^1,2,3

1. Laboratory of Advanced Energy Systems, Guangzhou Institute of Energy Conversion, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, Guangdong, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Renewable Energy, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, Guangdong, China;
3. The Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of New and Renewable Energy, Guangzhou 510640, Guangdong, China;
4. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received:2018-07-09 Revised:2018-09-12 Online:2018-12-05 Published:2018-12-05
Supported by:
supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41702256), the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2017A030310328), the National Natural Science Foundation of China and Guangdong-Province Joint Project (U1401232) and the Key Scientific Development Project of Guangdong Province (2014A030308001).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

人工热储的特性对增强型地热系统（EGS）的性能具有决定性影响，正确还原人工热储的结构特征对EGS实际工程具有重要意义。结合Habanero EGS地质、微震数据等信息，重建出热储的渗透率与孔隙率的空间分布，进一步采用自主开发的三维动态模拟软件，对热储中的渗流场、温度场和EGS的采热曲线进行数值模拟，并将其结果与分块均质热储EGS进行比较，当流体循环流量为15 kg/s，EGS运行到第15年时，非均质热储EGS的采出温度比分块均质热储EGS低9.3℃，前者的累积热采出量比后者低3.7%，热储的非均质性会导致EGS采热性能显著下降。

关键词: 增强型地热系统, 微震数据, 热储重建, 数值模拟, 渗透率, 非均质性, 传热

Abstract:

The characteristics of artificial heat reservoir have a decisive influence on the performance of enhanced geothermal systems (EGS). Accurately modeling of the structural characteristics of artificial heat reservoir is of great significance to the actual engineering of EGS. In this paper, we combine Habanero EGS geological information, micro-seismic data and other information, and reconstruct the spatial distribution of heat reservoir permeability and porosity. Based on the reconstructed heat reservoir, with an in-house three-dimensional dynamic simulation software developed previously, we further simulate the EGS heat extraction process and obtain the seepage field, temperature field and EGS heat extraction curve. When the fluid circulation rate is 15 kg/s, the production temperature of EGS with heterogeneous heat reservoir is 9.3℃ lower than that of the EGS with regional-homogeneous reservoir after 15 years of operation, and the total extracted heat of the former is 3.7% lower than that of the latter. These results reveal that the heterogeneity of the heat reservoir causes a significant decrease in the heat extraction performance of EGS.

Key words: enhanced geothermal systems, micro-seismic data, heat reservoir reconstruction, numerical simulation, permeability, heterogeneity, heat transfer

中图分类号:

TK521

李庭樑, 黄文博, 曹文炅, 蒋方明. EGS热储基于微震数据反演模化及其采热性能分析[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(12): 5001-5010.

LI Tingliang, HUANG Wenbo, CAO Wenjiong, JIANG Fangming. Inverse modeling of EGS heat reservoir based on micro-seismic data and analysis of its heat recovery performance[J]. CIESC Journal, 2018, 69(12): 5001-5010.

参考文献 34

[1]	TESTER J W, ANDERSON B J, BATCHELOR A S, et al. The future of geothermal energy:impact of enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) on the United States in the 21st century[R]. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2006.
[2]	汪集旸, 胡圣标, 庞忠和, 等. 中国大陆干热岩地热资源潜力评估[J]. 科技导报, 2012, 30(32):25-31. WANG J Y, HU S B, PANG Z H, et al. Estimate of geothermal resources potential for hot dry rock in the continental area of China[D]. Science & Technology Review, 2012, 30(32):25-31.
[3]	许天福, 张延军, 曾昭发, 等. 增强型地热系统(干热岩)开发技术进展[J]. 科技导报, 2012, 30(32):42-45. XU T F, ZHANG Y J, ZENG Z F, et al. Technology progress in an enhanced geothermal system(hot dry rock)[J]. Science & Technology Review, 2012, 30(32):42-45.
[4]	蔺文静, 刘志明, 马峰, 等. 我国陆区干热岩资源潜力估算[J]. 地球学报, 2012, 33(5):807-811. LIN W J, LIU Z M, MA F, et al. An estimation of HDR resources in China's mainland[J]. Acta Geoscientica Sinica, 2012, 33(5):807-811.
[5]	郭剑, 陈继良, 曹文炅, 等. 增强型地热系统研究综述[J]. 电力建设, 2014, 35(4):10-24. GUO J, CHEN J L, CAO W J, et al. Research review on enhanced geothermal system[J]. Electric Power Construction, 2014, 35(4):10-24.
[6]	NORBECK J, MCCLURE M, HORNE R. Analysis of hydromechanical reservoir response during fluid circulation at the Fenton Hill Enhanced Geothermal System test site[C]//Proceedings of 38th New Zealand Geothermal Workshop. Auckland, New Zealand, 2016.
[7]	陆川, 王贵玲. 干热岩研究现状与展望[J]. 科技导报, 2015, 33(19):13-21. LU C, WANG G L. Current status and prospect of hot dry rock research[J]. Science & Technology Review, 2015, 33(19):13-21.
[8]	FOX D B, SUTTER D, BECKERS K F, et al. Sustainable heat farming:modeling extraction and recovery in discretely fractured geothermal reservoirs[J]. Geothermics, 2013, 46:42-54.
[9]	ZENG Y C, SU Z, WU N Y. Numerical simulation of heat production potential from hot dry rock by water circulating through two horizontal wells at Desert Peak geothermal field[J]. Energy, 2013, 56:92-107.
[10]	BATAILLÉ A, GENTHON P, RABINOWICZ M, et al. Modeling the coupling between free and forced convection in a vertical permeable slot:implications for the heat production of an Enhanced Geothermal System[J]. Geothermics, 2006, 35(5/6):654-682.
[11]	LUO F, XU R N, JIANG P X. Numerical investigation of fluid flow and heat transfer in a doublet enhanced geothermal system with CO2 as the working fluid (CO2-EGS)[J]. Energy, 2014, 64:307-322.
[12]	PRUESS K. Enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) using CO2 as working fluid-a novel approach for generating renewable energy with simultaneous sequestration of carbon[J]. Geothermics, 2006, 35(4):351-367.
[13]	李静岩, 刘中良, 周宇, 等. 热储上下岩层热补偿作用对CO2羽流地热系统性能的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(12):4526-4536. LI J Y, LIU Z L, ZHOU Y, et al. Influence of thermal compensation of geothermal reservoir rock formation on CO2 plume geothermal system performance[J]. CIESC Journal, 2017, 68(12):4526-4536.
[14]	CHEN D, WYBORN D. Habanero field tests in the Cooper Basin, Australia:a proof-of-concept for EGS[J]. Geothermal Resources Council Transactions, 2009, 33(1):159-164.
[15]	LLANOS E M, ZARROUK S J, HOGARTH R A. Simulation of the Habanero Enhanced Geothermal System (EGS), Australia[J]. Simulation, 2015, 19:25.
[16]	LLANOS E M, ZARROUK S J, HOGARTH R A. Numerical model of the Habanero geothermal reservoir, Australia[J]. Geothermics, 2015, 53:308-319.
[17]	VÖRÖS R, ROTHERT E. Simulation of the thermal drawdown for a circulation between Habanero# 1-Habanero# 3[R]. Technical Report GDY028, Geodynamics Ltd., 2009.
[18]	JIANG F, LUO L, CHEN J. A novel three-dimensional transient model for subsurface heat exchange in enhanced geothermal systems[J]. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 2013, 41:57-62.
[19]	MCMAHON A, BAISCH S. Case study of the seismicity associated with the stimulation of the Enhanced Geothermal System at Habanero, Australia[C]//Proceedings Australian Geothermal Energy Conferences 2013. Brisbane, Australia, 2013.
[20]	MCMAHON A, BAISCH S. Seismicity associated with the stimulation of the Enhanced Geothermal System at Habanero, Australia[C]//World Geothermal Congress 2015. Melbourne, Australia, 2015.
[21]	TEZUKA K, NⅡTSUMA H. Stress estimated using microseismic clusters and its relationship to the fracture system of the Hijiori hot dry rock reservoir[J]. Engineering Geology, 2000, 56(1/2):47-62.
[22]	SANJUAN B, PINAULT J L, ROSE P, et al. Tracer testing of the geothermal heat exchanger at Soultz-sous-Forêts (France) between 2000 and 2005[J]. Geothermics, 2006, 35(5/6):622-653.
[23]	AYLING B F, HOGARTH R A, ROSE P E. Tracer testing at the Habanero EGS site, central Australia[J]. Geothermics, 2016, 63:15-26.
[24]	JIANG F, CHEN J, HUANG W, et al. A three-dimensional transient model for EGS subsurface thermo-hydraulic process[J]. Energy, 2014, 72:300-310.
[25]	CHEN J, JIANG F. Designing multi-well layout for enhanced geothermal system to better exploit hot dry rock geothermal energy[J]. Renewable Energy, 2015, 74:37-48.
[26]	CAO W, HUANG W, JIANG F. A novel thermal-hydraulic-mechanical model for the enhanced geothermal system heat extraction[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2016, 100:661-671.
[27]	HUANG W, CAO W, GUO J, et al. An analytical method to determine the fluid-rock heat transfer rate in two-equation thermal model for EGS heat reservoir[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2017, 113:1281-1290.
[28]	HE L W, JIN Z H. A local thermal nonequilibrium poroelastic theory for fluid saturated porous media[J]. Journal of Thermal Stresses, 2010, 33(8):799-813.
[29]	ARBOGAST T, DOUGLAS JR J, HORNUNG U. Derivation of the double porosity model of single phase flow via homogenization theory[J]. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, 1990, 21(4):823-836.
[30]	LAI K H, CHEN J S, LIU C W, et al. Effect of permeability-porosity functions on simulated morphological evolution of a chemical dissolution front[J]. Hydrological Processes, 2014, 28(1):16-24.
[31]	ZANG A, OYE V, JOUSSET P, et al. Analysis of induced seismicity in geothermal reservoirs-an overview[J]. Geothermics, 2014, 52:6-21.
[32]	李宏, 海江, 田秀志. 雄胜高温岩体地热开发的数值计算进展[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2003, 22(6):965-968. LI H, HAI J, TIAN X Z. Progress on numerical modeling of geothermal extraction development for Ogachi hot dry rocks[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2003, 22(6):965-968.
[33]	SHAPIRO S A, HUENGES E, BORM G. Estimating the crust permeability from fluid-injection-induced seismic emission at the KTB site[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 1997, 131(2):F15-F18.
[34]	MONAGHAN J J. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics[J]. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 1992, 30(1):543-574.

EGS热储基于微震数据反演模化及其采热性能分析

Inverse modeling of EGS heat reservoir based on micro-seismic data and analysis of its heat recovery performance

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 34

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	叶展羽, 山訸, 徐震原. 用于太阳能蒸发的折纸式蒸发器性能仿真[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 132-140.
[2]	张双星, 刘舫辰, 张义飞, 杜文静. R-134a脉动热管相变蓄放热实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 165-171.
[3]	张义飞, 刘舫辰, 张双星, 杜文静. 超临界二氧化碳用印刷电路板式换热器性能分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 183-190.
[4]	陈爱强, 代艳奇, 刘悦, 刘斌, 吴翰铭. 基板温度对HFE7100液滴蒸发过程的影响研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 191-197.
[5]	刘明栖, 吴延鹏. 导光管直径和长度对传热影响的模拟分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 206-212.
[6]	王志国, 薛孟, 董芋双, 张田震, 秦晓凯, 韩强. 基于裂隙粗糙性表征方法的地热岩体热流耦合数值模拟与分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 223-234.
[7]	宋嘉豪, 王文. 斯特林发动机与高温热管耦合运行特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 287-294.
[8]	张思雨, 殷勇高, 贾鹏琦, 叶威. 双U型地埋管群跨季节蓄热特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 295-301.
[9]	晁京伟, 许嘉兴, 李廷贤. 基于无管束蒸发换热强化策略的吸附热池的供热性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 302-310.
[10]	程成, 段钟弟, 孙浩然, 胡海涛, 薛鸿祥. 表面微结构对析晶沉积特性影响的格子Boltzmann模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 74-86.
[11]	李艺彤, 郭航, 陈浩, 叶芳. 催化剂非均匀分布的质子交换膜燃料电池操作条件研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3831-3840.
[12]	王玉兵, 李杰, 詹宏波, 朱光亚, 张大林. R134a在菱形离散肋微小通道内的流动沸腾换热实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3797-3806.
[13]	李科, 文键, 忻碧平. 耦合蒸气冷却屏的真空多层绝热结构对液氢储罐自增压过程的影响机制研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3786-3796.
[14]	何松, 刘乔迈, 谢广烁, 王斯民, 肖娟. 高浓度水煤浆管道气膜减阻两相流模拟及代理辅助优化[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3766-3774.
[15]	齐聪, 丁子, 余杰, 汤茂清, 梁林. 基于选择吸收纳米薄膜的太阳能温差发电特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3921-3930.