1kW SOFC-CHP系统用催化燃烧耦合蒸汽重整反应器的实验研究

doi:10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20150926

化工学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 67 ›› Issue (2): 557-562.DOI: 10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20150926

• 催化、动力学与反应器 • 上一篇下一篇

1kW SOFC-CHP系统用催化燃烧耦合蒸汽重整反应器的实验研究

张莉, 邢耀华, 钟杰, 徐宏, 曹军

华东理工大学机械与动力工程学院, 化学工程联合国家重点实验室, 上海 200237

收稿日期:2015-06-15 修回日期:2015-11-09 出版日期:2016-02-05 发布日期:2016-02-05
通讯作者: 张莉
基金资助:
中国石化科技开发项目支持。

Experimental study on reactor integrating catalytic combustion and steam reforming for 1 kW SOFC-CHP

ZHANG Li, XING Yaohua, ZHONG Jie, XU Hong, CAO Jun

State Key Laboratory of Chemical Engineering, School of Mechanical and Power Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China

Received:2015-06-15 Revised:2015-11-09 Online:2016-02-05 Published:2016-02-05
Supported by:
supported by the China Petrochemical Science and Technology Exploitation Project.

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

针对1 kW 固体氧化物燃料电池热电联供(SOFC-CHP)系统开发了集成催化燃烧、换热及蒸汽重整的反应器,搭建了性能评价系统,系统研究了燃烧侧气体组分及工艺参数对该反应器性能的影响规律。实验结果表明:在反应器燃烧侧气体入口温度为300℃、空燃比为10:1、电堆燃料利用率为65%、水碳比为3 的条件下,重整侧转化率达到73.6%,重整尾气中H₂ 含量为67.5%。电堆燃料利用率对重整反应转化效率影响较大,其值大于80%时,采用尾气燃烧的余热回收方式无法有效为蒸汽重整提供所需热量。在150~350℃范围内,降低燃烧侧气体入口温度对重整反应效率影响较小,建议采用尾气先换热再进行催化燃烧的流程设计,保证重整效率的前提下可有效提升系统热效率。空燃比的降低可小幅度提升重整效率,在保证电堆反应温度稳定的前提下,适当降低空燃比可减少空气压缩机的功耗,从而提升整个系统的效率。研究成果对SOFC-CHP 系统的优化和整体效率提升具有指导意义。

关键词: 催化燃烧, 蒸汽重整, 反应器, 热电联供, 传热, 燃料电池

Abstract:

A reactor integrating catalytic combustion, heat exchange and steam reforming was developed for a 1 kW solid oxide fuel cell-combined heating and power system (SOFC-CHP). Experiments were carried out to investigate the effect of combustion gas components and process parameters on properties of the reactor. The results showed that methane conversion rate was 73.6% and hydrogen concentration in the exhaust gas was 67.5% under operating conditions at the inlet temperature of combustion gas of 300℃, air-fuel ratio of 10:1, fuel utilization of stacks of 65% and water-carbon ratio of 3:1. Fuel utilization of the SOFC stacks had significant effect on methane conversion. Waste heat recovery from the exhaust gas combustion cannot provide enough heat for methane steam reforming when the fuel utilization was greater than 80%. Reduction of the inlet temperature of combustion gas had slight effect on methane conversion in the range of 150-350℃. Thus, it was recommended that the heat exchange can be firstly conducted before catalytic combustion to improve heat efficiency without obvious change to reforming reaction efficiency. Reduction of air-fuel ratio under the premise of ensuring the efficiency of reforming can decrease power consumption of the compressor and increase the system efficiency. This achievements can provide guidance to the increase of the whole system efficiency and optimum design of SOFC-CHP.

Key words: catalytic combustion, steam reforming, reactor, combined heating and power, heat transfer, fuel cells

中图分类号:

TK11⁺4

张莉, 邢耀华, 钟杰, 徐宏, 曹军. 1kW SOFC-CHP系统用催化燃烧耦合蒸汽重整反应器的实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2016, 67(2): 557-562.

ZHANG Li, XING Yaohua, ZHONG Jie, XU Hong, CAO Jun. Experimental study on reactor integrating catalytic combustion and steam reforming for 1 kW SOFC-CHP[J]. CIESC Journal, 2016, 67(2): 557-562.

参考文献 20

[1]	LEMONS R A. Fuel cells for transportation[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 1990, 29(2):251-264.
[2]	STEELE B C, HEINZEL A. Materials for fuel-cell technologies[J]. Nature, 2001, 414(6861):345-352.
[3]	YEN T H, HONG W T, TSAI Y C, et al. Experimental investigation of 1 kW solid oxide fuel cell system with a natural gas reformer and an exhaust gas burner[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2010, 195(5):1454-1462.
[4]	李永峰, 董新法, 林维明. 固体氧化物燃料电池的现状和未来[J]. 电源技术, 2002, 26(6):462-465. DOI:10.3969/j.issn. 1002-087X. 2002.06.018. LI Y F, DONG X F, LIN W M. State-of-art and future of solid oxide fuel cell[J]. Chinese Journal of Power Sources, 2002, 26(6):462-465. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-087X.2002.06.018.
[5]	RAMASWAMY R C, RAMACHANDRAN P A, DUDUKOVI? M P. Coupling exothermic and endothermic reactions in adiabatic reactors[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2008, 63(6):1654-1667.
[6]	WANG F, ZHOU J, WANG G Q. Transport characteristic study of methane steam reforming coupling methane catalytic combustion for hydrogen production[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2012, 37(17):13013-13021.
[7]	LEE C B, LEE S W, LEE D W, et al. Hydrogen production from methane steam reforming in combustion heat assisted novel micro-channel reactor with catalytic stacking[J]. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 2013, 52(39):14049-14054.
[8]	RYI S K, PARK J S, CHO S H, et al. Novel micro fuel processor for PEMFCs with heat generation by catalytic combustion[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2005, 113(1):47-53.
[9]	漆波, 李隆键, 彭川, 等. 平板微反应器中甲烷蒸气重整与甲烷催化燃烧的耦合分析[J]. 化学反应工程与工艺, 2008, 24(3):272-276. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7631.2008.03.015. QI B, LI L J, PENG C, et al. Numerical analysis of coupling of methane catalytic combustion and steam reforming in a plate micro-reactor[J]. Chemical Reaction Engineering and Technology, 2008, 24(3), 272-276. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7631.2008.03.015.
[10]	梅红. 金属基整体式催化剂与反应器的传递及反应特性[D]. 北京:北京化工大学, 2007. MEI H. Transfer and reactive performances of metallic based monolithic catalysts and reactors[D]. Beijing:Beijing University of Chemical Technology, 2007.
[11]	彭昂. kW级燃料电池热电联产系统中天然气重整制氢体系的研究[D]. 广州:华南理工大学, 2011. PENG A. Hydrogen production from nature gas for fuel cell based micro-CHP system[D]. Guangzhou:South China University of Technology, 2011.
[12]	PATEL K S, SUNOL A K. Modeling and simulation of methane steam reforming in a thermally coupled membrane reactor[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2007, 32(13):2344-2358.
[13]	RYI S K, PARK J S, SONG H C, et al. Fast start-up of micro-channel fuel processor integrated with an igniter for hydrogen combustion[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2006, 161(2):1234-1240.
[14]	YU S, HONG D, LEE Y, et al. Development of a catalytic combustor for a stationary fuel cell power generation system[J]. Renewable Energy, 2010, 35(5):1083-1090.
[15]	VENKATARAMAN K, WANAT E C, SCHMIDT L D. Steam reforming of methane and water-gas shift in catalytic wall reactors[J]. AIChE Journal, 2003, 49(5):1277-1284.
[16]	ROBBINS F A, ZHU H Y, JACKSON G S. Transient modeling of combined catalytic combustion/CH4 steam reforming[J]. Catalysis Today, 2003, 83(1):141-156.
[17]	ZANFIR M, GAVRIILIDIS A. Influence of flow arrangement in catalytic plate reactors for methane steam reforming[J]. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2004, 82(2):252-258.
[18]	KOLIOS G, GLOCKLER B, GRITSCH A, et al. Heat-integrated reactor concepts for hydrogen production by methane steam reforming[J]. Fuel Cells, 2005, 5(1):52-65.
[19]	KANG S, LEE K, YU S, et al. Development of a coupled reactor with a catalytic combustor and steam reformer for a 5 kW solid oxide fuel cell system[J]. Applied Energy, 2014, 114:114-123.
[20]	CHANG T G, LEE S M, AHN K Y, et al. An experimental study on the reaction characteristics of a coupled reactor with a catalytic combustor and a steam reformer for SOFC systems[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2012, 37(4):3234-3241.

1kW SOFC-CHP系统用催化燃烧耦合蒸汽重整反应器的实验研究

Experimental study on reactor integrating catalytic combustion and steam reforming for 1 kW SOFC-CHP

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 20

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张双星, 刘舫辰, 张义飞, 杜文静. R-134a脉动热管相变蓄放热实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 165-171.
[2]	张义飞, 刘舫辰, 张双星, 杜文静. 超临界二氧化碳用印刷电路板式换热器性能分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 183-190.
[3]	陈爱强, 代艳奇, 刘悦, 刘斌, 吴翰铭. 基板温度对HFE7100液滴蒸发过程的影响研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 191-197.
[4]	刘明栖, 吴延鹏. 导光管直径和长度对传热影响的模拟分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 206-212.
[5]	王志国, 薛孟, 董芋双, 张田震, 秦晓凯, 韩强. 基于裂隙粗糙性表征方法的地热岩体热流耦合数值模拟与分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 223-234.
[6]	晁京伟, 许嘉兴, 李廷贤. 基于无管束蒸发换热强化策略的吸附热池的供热性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 302-310.
[7]	程成, 段钟弟, 孙浩然, 胡海涛, 薛鸿祥. 表面微结构对析晶沉积特性影响的格子Boltzmann模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 74-86.
[8]	李艺彤, 郭航, 陈浩, 叶芳. 催化剂非均匀分布的质子交换膜燃料电池操作条件研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3831-3840.
[9]	王玉兵, 李杰, 詹宏波, 朱光亚, 张大林. R134a在菱形离散肋微小通道内的流动沸腾换热实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3797-3806.
[10]	陈哲文, 魏俊杰, 张玉明. 超临界水煤气化耦合SOFC发电系统集成及其能量转化机制[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3888-3902.
[11]	齐聪, 丁子, 余杰, 汤茂清, 梁林. 基于选择吸收纳米薄膜的太阳能温差发电特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3921-3930.
[12]	李科, 文键, 忻碧平. 耦合蒸气冷却屏的真空多层绝热结构对液氢储罐自增压过程的影响机制研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3786-3796.
[13]	陈天华, 刘兆轩, 韩群, 张程宾, 李文明. 喷雾冷却换热强化研究进展及影响因素[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3149-3170.
[14]	杨越, 张丹, 郑巨淦, 涂茂萍, 杨庆忠. NaCl水溶液喷射闪蒸-掺混蒸发的实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3279-3291.
[15]	郑玉圆, 葛志伟, 韩翔宇, 王亮, 陈海生. 中高温钙基材料热化学储热的研究进展与展望[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3171-3192.