乙醇荷电喷雾对冲燃烧的火焰特性

doi:10.11949/0438-1157.20190599

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

研究液体燃料雾化燃烧的火焰特性，有助于理解整个燃烧的变化过程。基于对冲火焰结构，以无水乙醇为燃料，设计了乙醇荷电喷雾对冲燃烧装置。通过对喷雾和火焰进行拍摄，并对火焰温度进行测量，得到了不同燃料流量下的喷雾形态、火焰形态和火焰温度变化，探讨了不同当量比、应变率对火焰形态和温度的影响规律。结果表明：随着乙醇流量的增加，喷雾的雾化核心区域和卫星区域的分界逐渐消失，当乙醇流量增加到13 ml/h时，喷雾出现液柱。当量比小于1时火焰保持稳定，当量比大于1时火焰出现振荡，火焰的无量纲直径随当量比的增加呈减小趋势。随着应变率的增大，火焰的无量纲直径减小，温度降低。

关键词: 气液两相流, 燃料, 乙醇, 荷电喷雾, 对冲火焰, 喷雾形态, 火焰特性

Abstract:

Studying the flame characteristics of liquid fuel atomized combustion helps to understand the entire combustion process. A new counter-flow combustor based on the technology of electro-spraying was designed. Experiment studies on electro-spraying shape and flame characteristics were carried out using alcohol as fuel. The primary focus is paid on the effects of strain rate and equivalent ratio on flame characteristics at different fuel flow rate, including flame temperatures and dimensionless diameter of the flame. The results show the boundary between atomized core regions and satellite regions of the spray gradually disappears when increasing alcohol flow rate, the liquid column of spray appears when fuel flow rate arrives 13 ml/h. The flame remains stable when the equivalent ratio is less than 1 but oscillates when the equivalent ratio is more than 1, dimensionless diameter of the flame decreases with increasing equivalent ratio. As the strain rate increases, the dimensionless diameter of the flame and the temperature decrease.

Key words: gas-liquid flow, fuel, alcohol, electro-spraying, counter-flow flame, spray shape, flame characteristics

中图分类号:

TK 16

叶宏程, 甘云华, 江政纬, 罗燕来. 乙醇荷电喷雾对冲燃烧的火焰特性[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(12): 4787-4794.

Hongcheng YE, Yunhua GAN, Zhengwei JIANG, Yanlai LUO. Flame characteristics of alcohol electro-spraying in counter-flow combustor[J]. CIESC Journal, 2019, 70(12): 4787-4794.

图/表 8

图1 实验系统

Fig.1 Experimental system

表1 实验误差

Table 1 Experimental uncertainties

参数	误差
q_f/(ml/h)	±2%
V/kV	±1%
q_o/(ml/h)	±1%
T/K	±3%
L/mm	±0.02 mm

图2 锥射流模式下的喷雾形态

Fig.2 Electro-spraying shape at cone jet mode

图3 火焰形态(qf=15 ml/h; a=13 s-1; Φ=0.8)

Fig.3 Flame shape(qf=15 ml/h; a=13 s-1; Φ=0.8)

图4 火焰的无量纲直径θ随当量比Φ的变化曲线(a=3.9 s-1)

Fig.4 Dimensionless diameter of flame varying with equivalent ratio(a=3.9 s-1)

图5 火焰的无量纲直径θ随应变率a的变化曲线(Φ=0.6)

Fig.5 Dimensionless diameter of flame varying with strain rate (Φ=0.6)

图6 火焰温度T随当量比Φ的变化曲线(a=3.9 s-1)

Fig.6 Flame temperatures varying with equivalent ratio(a=3.9 s-1)

图7 火焰温度T随应变率a的变化曲线(Φ=0.6)

Fig.7 Flame temperatures varying with strain rate(Φ=0.6)

参考文献 32

1	Maruta K. Micro and mesoscale combustion[J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2011, 33(1): 125-150.
2	Ong B C, Kamarudin S K, Basri S. Direct liquid fuel cells: a review[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(15): 10142-10157.
3	Zhang X, Pan L, Wang L, et al. Review on synthesis and properties of high-energy-density liquid fuels: hydrocarbons, nanofluids and energetic ionic liquids[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2017, 180: 95-125.
4	刘红, 何阳, 蔡畅, 等. 乙醇和正丁醇添加剂对喷雾冷却的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(1): 65-71.
	Liu H, He Y, Cai C, et al. Influence of ethanol and n-butanol additives on spray cooling[J]. CIESC Journal, 2019, 70(1): 65-71.
5	Ju Y, Maruta K. Microscale combustion: technology development and fundamental research[J]. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2011, 37(6): 669-715.
6	Linne M A, Paciaroni M, Berrocal E, et al. Ballistic imaging of liquid breakup processes in dense sprays[J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2009, 32(2): 2147-2161.
7	Akinyemi O S, Jiang L. Development and combustion characterization of a novel twin-fluid fuel injector in a swirl-stabilized gas turbine burner operating on straight vegetable oil[J]. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 2019, 102: 279-290.
8	Jaworek A, Lackowski M, Krupa A, et al. Electrostatic interaction of free EHD jets[J]. Experiments in Fluids, 2006, 40(4): 568-576.
9	王贞涛, 闻建龙, 王晓英, 等. 高压静电液体雾化技术[J]. 高电压技术, 2008, 34(5): 1067-1072.
	Wang Z T, Wen J L, Wang X Y, et al. High voltage electrostatic spray[J]. High Voltage Engineering, 2008, 34(5): 1067-1072.
10	Yi T. Laser diagnostics of an evaporating electrospray[J]. Experiments in Fluids, 2014, 55(1): 1642.
11	张军. 液液静电雾化特性[J]. 化工学报, 2009, 60(3): 620-626.
	Zhang J. Characteristics of liquid-liquid electrostatic spray[J]. CIESC Journal, 2009, 60(3): 620-626.
12	Gan Y H, Zhang X, Li H G, et al. Effect of a ring electrode on the cone-jet characteristics of ethanol in small-scale electro-spraying combustors[J]. Journal of Aerosol Science, 2016, 98: 15-29.
13	Gan Y H, Zhang X, Li H G, et al. The atomization current and droplet size of ethanol in two different small-scale electro-spraying systems[J]. Journal of Electrostatics, 2017, 87: 228-235.
14	Kyritsis D C, Guerrero-Arias I, Roychoudhury S, et al. Mesoscale power generation by a catalytic combustor using electrosprayed liquid hydrocarbons[J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2002, 29(1): 965-972.
15	Deng W, Klemic J F, Li X, et al. Liquid fuel microcombustor using microfabricated multiplexed electrospray sources[J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2007, 31(2): 2239-2246.
16	甘云华, 佟洋, 罗智斌. 乙醇在微尺度单电极燃烧器内的雾化与燃烧[J]. 化工学报, 2015, 66(11): 4597-4602.
	Gan Y H, Tong Y, Luo Z B. Electro-spraying and combustion of alcohol in micro-combustor with single electrode[J]. CIESC Journal, 2015, 66(11): 4597-4602.
17	Mikami M, Maeda Y, Matsui K, et al. Combustion of gaseous and liquid fuels in meso-scale tubes with wire mesh[J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2013, 34(2): 3387-3394.
18	Niemann U, Seshadri K, Williams F A. Accuracies of laminar counterflow flame experiments[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2015, 162(4): 1540-1549.
19	Berta P, Aggarwal S K, Puri I K. An experimental and numerical investigation of n-heptane/air counterflow partially premixed flames and emission of NO_x and PAH species[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2006, 145(4): 740-764.
20	Lefkowitz J K, Won S H, Fenard Y, et al. Uncertainty assessment of species measurements in acetone counterflow diffusion flames[J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2013, 34(1): 813-820.
21	赵黛青, 杨浩林, 鲁冠军, 等. 甲烷/富氧扩散火焰燃烧区域的分层特性研究[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2006, 27(S2): 131-134.
	Zhao D Q, Yang H L, Lu G J, et al. Research of stratification characteristics of methane/oxygen-enriched diffusion flame[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2006, 27(S2): 131-134.
22	Reuter C B, Won S H, Ju Y. Flame structure and ignition limit of partially premixed cool flames in a counterflow burner[J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2017, 36(1): 1513-1522.
23	Ribert G, Zong N, Yang V, et al. Counterflow diffusion flames of general fluids: oxygen/hydrogen mixtures[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2008, 154(3): 319-330.
24	Shih H Y, Hsu J R, Lin Y H. Computed flammability limits of opposed-jet H₂/CO syngas diffusion flames[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2014, 39(7): 3459-3468.
25	Watanabe H, Kurose R, Hwang S M, et al. Characteristics of flamelets in spray flames formed in a laminar counterflow[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2007, 148(4): 234-248.
26	Kee R J, Yamashita K, Zhu H, et al. The effects of liquid-fuel thermophysical properties, carrier-gas composition, and pressure, on strained opposed-flow non-premixed flames[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2011, 158(6): 1129-1139.
27	Chen G, Gomez A. Counterflow diffusion flames of quasi-monodisperse electrostatic sprays[J]. Symposium (International) on Combustion, 1992, 24(1): 1531-1539.
28	甘云华, 李海鸽, 张夏, 等. 组合电极小型燃烧器的电学及雾化特性研究[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2017, 37(8): 162-171.
	Gan Y H, Li H G, Zhang X, et al. Study on the electrical and spraying characteristics of small-scale combustor with combined electrodes[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2017, 37(8): 162-171.
29	Berta P, Puri I K, Aggarwal S K. Structure of partially premixed n-heptane–air counterflow flames[J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2005, 30(1): 447-453.
30	Gibbons M J, Robinson A J. Heat transfer characteristics of single cone-jet electrosprays[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2017, 113: 70-83.
31	Gan Y H, Tong Y, Ju Y, et al. Experimental study on electro-spraying and combustion characteristics in meso-scale combustors[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2017, 131: 10-17.
32	Sung C J, Liu J B, Law C K. Structural response of counterflow diffusion flames to strain rate variations[J]. Combustion and Flame, 1995, 102(4): 481-492.

[1]	江河, 袁俊飞, 王林, 邢谷雨. 均流腔结构对微细通道内相变流动特性影响的实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 235-244.
[2]	李艺彤, 郭航, 陈浩, 叶芳. 催化剂非均匀分布的质子交换膜燃料电池操作条件研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3831-3840.
[3]	陈哲文, 魏俊杰, 张玉明. 超临界水煤气化耦合SOFC发电系统集成及其能量转化机制[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3888-3902.
[4]	袁佳琦, 刘政, 黄锐, 张乐福, 贺登辉. 泡状入流条件下旋流泵能量转换特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3807-3820.
[5]	邢雷, 苗春雨, 蒋明虎, 赵立新, 李新亚. 井下微型气液旋流分离器优化设计与性能分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3394-3406.
[6]	高燕, 伍鹏, 尚超, 胡泽君, 陈晓东. 基于双流体喷嘴的磁性琼脂糖微球的制备及其蛋白吸附性能探究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3457-3471.
[7]	高金明, 郭玉娇, 鄂承林, 卢春喜. 一种封闭罩内顺流多旋臂气液分离器的分离特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2957-2966.
[8]	刘起超, 周云龙, 陈聪. 起伏振动垂直上升管气液两相流截面含气率分析与计算[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2391-2403.
[9]	江锦波, 彭新, 许文烜, 门日秀, 刘畅, 彭旭东. 泵出型螺旋槽油气密封泄漏特性及参数影响研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(6): 2538-2554.
[10]	董鑫, 单永瑞, 刘易诺, 冯颖, 张建伟. 非牛顿流体气泡羽流涡特性数值模拟研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 1950-1964.
[11]	许文烜, 江锦波, 彭新, 门日秀, 刘畅, 彭旭东. 宽速域三种典型型槽油气密封泄漏与成膜特性对比研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1660-1679.
[12]	罗来明, 张劲, 郭志斌, 王海宁, 卢善富, 相艳. 1~5 kW高温聚合物电解质膜燃料电池堆的理论模拟与组装测试[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1724-1734.
[13]	包嘉靖, 别洪飞, 王子威, 肖睿, 刘冬, 吴石亮. 正庚烷对冲扩散火焰中添加长链醚类对碳烟前体生成特性的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1680-1692.
[14]	钱志广, 樊越, 王世学, 岳利可, 王金山, 朱禹. 吹扫条件对PEMFC阻抗弛豫现象和低温启动的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1286-1293.
[15]	何金峰, 李秀珍, 寇建耀, 陶庭杰, 余灿, 刘欢, 陈永元, 赵豪健, 江大好, 李小年. 乙醇制高级醇有序介孔氧化铝负载铜基催化剂研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1082-1091.