泡沫铜强化甲烷水合物生成动力学实验研究

doi:10.11949/0438-1157.20210662

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

提高水合物生成速率和储气密度对天然气水合物技术应用非常重要。将三种孔密度的泡沫铜（CF）分别浸入十二烷基硫酸钠（SDS）溶液中构建水合储气强化体系，在高压静态反应釜中研究泡沫金属对甲烷水合物生成动力学特性。实验结果表明，泡沫铜骨架能为水合物生成提供充足的结晶点，同时可作为水合物生长过程水合热迁移的“高速公路”。甲烷水合物在SDS/CF体系中可快速生成，最大水合储气速率分布在19.24~21.04 mmol·mol^-1·min^-1之间，其中添加15 PPI泡沫铜的SDS溶液储气量最高（139 mmol·mol^-1），且达到最大储气量90%所用时间最短（10.1 min）。在6.0~8.0 MPa压力下，相比SDS溶液，添加15 PPI泡沫铜的SDS溶液储气量提高了8.8%~35.6%，储气速率提高了4.7%~40.4%；特别在压力为5.0 MPa时，该孔密度SDS/CF体系储气量甚至比SDS溶液增加13倍，储气速率增加16倍。

关键词: 泡沫铜, 甲烷水合物, 生成, 动力学, 强化

Abstract:

Increasing hydrate formation rate and gas storage density is very important for the application of natural gas hydrate storage and transportation technology. Three pieces of copper foam (CF) with different pore density herein were immersed in sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) solution to build a gas storage enhancement system, and to study on the kinetic characteristics of the formation of methane hydrate by metal foam in a high-pressure static reactor. The research results showed that the copper foam framework can provide sufficient crystallization points for the formation of hydrates, at the same time, it can be used as a “highway” for hydration heat transfer during hydrate growth. Methane hydrate can be quickly formed in SDS/CF system, the maximum hydration gas storage rate is between 19.24—21.04 mmol·mol^-1·min^-1, the gas storage capacity of the SDS solution with 15 PPI copper foam was the highest (139 mmol·mol^-1), and it takes the shortest time to reach 90% of the maximum gas storage capacity (10.1 min). Under the pressure of 6.0—8.0 MPa, compared with SDS solution, the gas storage capacity of SDS solution with 15 PPI CF increased by 8.8%—35.6%, and the gas storage rates increased by 4.7%—40.4%. When the pressure is 5.0 MPa, the gas storage capacity of the pore density SDS/CF system is even increased by 13 times than that of the SDS solution, and the gas storage rate is increased by 16 times.

Key words: copper foam, methane hydrate, formation, kinetics, enhancement

中图分类号:

TE 89

裴俊华, 杨亮, 汪鑫, 胡晗, 刘道平. 泡沫铜强化甲烷水合物生成动力学实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(11): 5751-5760.

Junhua PEI, Liang YANG, Xin WANG, Han HU, Daoping LIU. Experimental study on kinetics of methane hydrate formation enhanced by copper foam[J]. CIESC Journal, 2021, 72(11): 5751-5760.

图/表 10

图1 不同孔密度泡沫铜样品

Fig.1 Copper foam samples with different pore densities

图2 水合储气实验装置

Fig.2 Experimental apparatus for gas storage in the hydrate

图3 SDS溶液填充泡沫铜体系水合储甲烷过程温压变化(P = 8.0 MPa, T = 274.15 K)

Fig.3 Variation of temperature and pressure during hydration and methane storage of copper foam system with different pore density filled with SDS solution

图4 SDS溶液及其填充泡沫铜体系储气过程中储气量和储气速率变化（P=8.0 MPa, T=274.15 K）

Fig.4 Changes in gas storage capacity and gas storage rate of SDS solution and its filled with copper foam system during gas storage

表1 所有水合储气实验结果

Table 1 Experimental results of all gas storage

Hydrate systems	P/MPa	t_in/min	C_s,max/(mmol·mol^-1)	R_s,max/(mmol·mol^-1·min^-1)	t₉₀/min
0.05% SDS + 5 PPI CF	8.0	52.1	129.1	19.24	61.4
0.05% SDS + 15 PPI CF	8.0	1.5	139.0	20.73	10.1
0.05% SDS + 30 PPI CF	8.0	68.8	131.8	21.04	77.5
0.05% SDS + 15 PPI CF	7.0	39.5	135.7	19.57	52.1
0.05% SDS + 15 PPI CF	6.0	49.4	133.2	15.00	74.6
0.05% SDS + 15 PPI CF	5.0	63.8	129.5	11.58	77.2
0.05% SDS	8.0	73.5	127.8	14.77	85.3
0.05% SDS	7.0	58.6	122.8	15.14	81.7
0.05% SDS	6.0	84.3	98.2	14.32	104.2
0.05% SDS	5.0	—	9.0	0.68	—

图5 甲烷水合物在SDS溶液及其填充泡沫铜体系中t90

Fig.5 t90 of methane hydrate in SDS solution and its filled copper foam system

图6 15 PPI泡沫铜扫描电镜图

Fig.6 Scanning electron microscope of copper foam (15 PPI)

图7 SDS溶液填充泡沫铜体系中水合物生成实物图

Fig.7 Physical images of hydrate growth in a copper foam system filled with SDS solution

图8 变压力下甲烷水合物在SDS/CF和SDS体系中生成动力学

Fig.8 Kinetics of methane hydrate formation in SDS/CF and SDS systems under variable pressure

图9 SDS/CF和SDS体系中水合物最大储气量(a)和最大储气速率(b)

Fig.9 Maximum gas storage capacity (a) and maximum gas storage rates (b) of hydrate in SDS/CF and SDS systems

参考文献 36

1	Koh C A, Sloan E D. Natural gas hydrates: recent advances and challenges in energy and environmental applications[J]. AIChE Journal, 2007, 53(7): 1636-1643.
2	陈光进, 孙长宇, 马庆兰. 气体水合物科学与技术[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2008:6-8.
	Chen G J, Sun C Y, Ma Q L. Gas Hydrate Science and Technology[M]. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2008:6-8.
3	Veluswamy H P, Kumar A, Seo Y, et al. A review of solidified natural gas (SNG) technology for gas storage via clathrate hydrates[J]. Applied Energy, 2018, 216: 262-285.
4	Yang M J, Zhao J, Zheng J N, et al. Hydrate reformation characteristics in natural gas hydrate dissociation process: a review[J]. Applied Energy, 2019, 256: 113878.
5	Zhong D L, Lu Y Y, Sun D J, et al. Performance evaluation of methane separation from coal mine gas by gas hydrate formation in a stirred reactor and in a fixed bed of silica sand[J]. Fuel, 2015, 143: 586-594.
6	Xiao P, Yang X M, Sun C Y, et al. Enhancing methane hydrate formation in bulk water using vertical reciprocating impact[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2018, 336: 649-658.
7	Fujita S, Watanabe K, Mori Y H. Clathrate-hydrate formation by water spraying onto a porous metal plate exuding a hydrophobic liquid coolant[J]. AIChE Journal, 2009, 55(4): 1056-1064.
8	Yamamura K, Fukuzaki J I, Mori Y H. Clathrate hydrate formation using liquid jets impinging on each other: an observational study using paired water jets or water and methylcyclohexane jets[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2011, 66(9): 1844-1858.
9	Partoon B, Sabil K M, Lau K K, et al. Production of gas hydrate in a semi-batch spray reactor process as a means for separation of carbon dioxide from methane[J]. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2018, 138: 168-175.
10	Li C J, Huang T. Simulation of gas bubbles with gas hydrates rising in deep water[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2016, 112: 16-24.
11	Fu W Q, Wang Z Y, Sun B J, et al. A mass transfer model for hydrate formation in bubbly flow considering bubble-bubble interactions and bubble-hydrate particle interactions[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2018, 127: 611-621.
12	Zhao J F, Wang B, Sum A K. Dynamics of hydrate formation and deposition under pseudo multiphase flow[J]. AIChE Journal, 2017, 63(9): 4136-4146.
13	Mali G A, Chapoy A, Tohidi B. Investigation into the effect of subcooling on the kinetics of hydrate formation[J]. The Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics, 2018, 117: 91-96.
14	李文昭, 潘振, 马贵阳, 等. 表面活性剂吸附对促进甲烷水合物生成效果的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(4): 1542-1549.
	Li W Z, Pan Z, Ma G Y, et al. Promotion effects of surfactant adsorption on formation of methane hydrates[J]. CIESC Journal, 2017, 68(4): 1542-1549.
15	丁家祥, 史伶俐, 申小冬, 等. SDS对甲烷水合物生成动力学和微观结构的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2017, 68(12): 4802-4808.
	Ding J X, Shi L L, Shen X D, et al. SDS effect on formation kinetics and microstructure of methane hydrate[J]. CIESC Journal, 2017, 68(12): 4802-4808.
16	Naeiji P, Varaminian F. Kinetic study of carbon dioxide hydrate formation by thermal analysis in the presence of two surfactants: sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and lauryl alcohol ethoxylate (LAE)[J]. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 2018, 254: 120-129.
17	Wang F, Song Y M, Liu G Q, et al. Rapid methane hydrate formation promoted by Ag&SDS-coated nanospheres for energy storage[J]. Applied Energy, 2018, 213: 227-234.
18	Al-Sowadi A, Roosta H, Dashti A, et al. The effects of SDS, SLES and THF on the growth rate, kinetic behaviors and energy consumption during ethylene hydrate formation process[J]. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 2019, 294: 111608.
19	Zhong Y, Rogers R E. Surfactant effects on gas hydrate formation[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2000, 55(19): 4175-4187.
20	Ganji H, Manteghian M, Sadaghiani zadeh K, et al. Effect of different surfactants on methane hydrate formation rate, stability and storage capacity[J]. Fuel, 2007, 86(3): 434-441.
21	Shi C R, Chai F Y, Yang M J, et al. Enhance methane hydrate formation using fungus confining sodium dodecyl sulfate solutions for methane storage[J]. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 2021, 333: 116020.
22	Okutani K, Kuwabara Y, Mori Y H. Surfactant effects on hydrate formation in an unstirred gas/liquid system: amendments to the previous study using HFC-32 and sodium dodecyl sulfate[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2007, 62(14): 3858-3860.
23	Gupta A, Lachance J, Sloan E D, et al. Measurements of methane hydrate heat of dissociation using high pressure differential scanning calorimetry[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2008, 63(24): 5848-5853.
24	Liu N, Zhu H Q, Zhou J L, et al. Molecular dynamics simulations on formation of CO₂ hydrate in the presence of metal particles[J]. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 2021, 331: 115793.
25	Patel H E, Das S K, Sundararajan T, et al. Thermal conductivities of naked and monolayer protected metal nanoparticle based nanofluids: manifestation of anomalous enhancement and chemical effects[J]. Applied Physics Letters, 2003, 83(14): 2931-2933.
26	Najibi H, Mirzaee Shayegan M, Heidary H. Experimental investigation of methane hydrate formation in the presence of copper oxide nanoparticles and SDS[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2015, 23: 315-323.
27	Mohammadi M, Haghtalab A, Fakhroueian Z. Experimental study and thermodynamic modeling of CO₂ gas hydrate formation in presence of zinc oxide nanoparticles[J]. The Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics, 2016, 96: 24-33.
28	Liu G Q, Wang F, Luo S J, et al. Enhanced methane hydrate formation with SDS-coated Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles as promoters[J]. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 2017, 230: 315-321.
29	Lu Y Y, Ge B B, Zhong D L. Investigation of using graphite nanofluids to promote methane hydrate formation: application to solidified natural gas storage[J]. Energy, 2020, 199: 117424.
30	Liu N, Chen L T, Liu C X, et al. Experimental study of carbon dioxide hydrate formation in the presence of graphene oxide[J]. Energy, 2020, 211: 118994.
31	Xie Y M, Guo K H, Liang D Q, et al. Gas hydrate growth morphology outside of horizontal heat transfer tube[J]. Journal of Crystal Growth, 2005, 276(1/2): 253-264.
32	Yang L, Liu Z Z, Liu D P, et al. Enhanced natural gas hydrates formation in the suspension with metal particles and fibers[J]. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 2020, 301: 112410.
33	Lee J, Shin C, Lee Y. Experimental investigation to improve the storage potentials of gas hydrate under the unstirring condition[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2010, 24(2): 1129-1134.
34	Bhattacharya A, Calmidi V V, Mahajan R L. Thermophysical properties of high porosity metal foams[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2002, 45(5): 1017-1031.
35	Li T X, Wu D L, He F, et al. Experimental investigation on copper foam/hydrated salt composite phase change material for thermal energy storage[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2017, 115: 148-157.
36	Redlich O, Kwong J N S. On the thermodynamics of solutions(Ⅴ): An equation of state. Fugacities of gaseous solutions[J]. Chemical Reviews, 1949, 44(1): 233-244.

[1]	金正浩, 封立杰, 李舒宏. 氨水溶液交叉型再吸收式热泵的能量及分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 53-63.
[2]	程成, 段钟弟, 孙浩然, 胡海涛, 薛鸿祥. 表面微结构对析晶沉积特性影响的格子Boltzmann模拟[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 74-86.
[3]	肖明堃, 杨光, 黄永华, 吴静怡. 浸没孔液氧气泡动力学数值研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 87-95.
[4]	张双星, 刘舫辰, 张义飞, 杜文静. R-134a脉动热管相变蓄放热实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 165-171.
[5]	毕丽森, 刘斌, 胡恒祥, 曾涛, 李卓睿, 宋健飞, 吴翰铭. 粗糙界面上纳米液滴蒸发模式的分子动力学研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 172-178.
[6]	于宏鑫, 邵双全. 水结晶过程的分子动力学模拟分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 250-258.
[7]	范孝雄, 郝丽芳, 范垂钢, 李松庚. LaMnO₃/生物炭催化剂低温NH₃-SCR催化脱硝性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3821-3830.
[8]	郑佳丽, 李志会, 赵新强, 王延吉. 离子液体催化合成2-氰基呋喃反应动力学研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3708-3715.
[9]	诸程瑛, 王振雷. 基于改进深度强化学习的乙烯裂解炉操作优化[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3429-3437.
[10]	汪林正, 陆俞冰, 张睿智, 罗永浩. 基于分子动力学模拟的VOCs热氧化特性分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3242-3255.
[11]	曾如宾, 沈中杰, 梁钦锋, 许建良, 代正华, 刘海峰. 基于分子动力学模拟的Fe₂O₃纳米颗粒烧结机制研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3353-3365.
[12]	李锦潼, 邱顺, 孙文寿. 煤浆法烟气脱硫中草酸和紫外线强化煤砷浸出过程[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3522-3532.
[13]	杨越, 张丹, 郑巨淦, 涂茂萍, 杨庆忠. NaCl水溶液喷射闪蒸-掺混蒸发的实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(8): 3279-3291.
[14]	张贲, 王松柏, 魏子亚, 郝婷婷, 马学虎, 温荣福. 超亲水多孔金属结构驱动的毛细液膜冷凝及传热强化[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2824-2835.
[15]	王海, 林宏, 王晨, 许浩洁, 左磊, 王军锋. 高压静电场强化多孔介质表面沸腾传热特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(7): 2869-2879.