计及气泡诱导与剪切湍流的气泡破碎、湍流相间扩散及传质模型

doi:10.11949/0438-1157.20220465

化工学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 73 ›› Issue (6): 2573-2588.doi: 10.11949/0438-1157.20220465

计及气泡诱导与剪切湍流的气泡破碎、湍流相间扩散及传质模型

施炜斌^1,²(),龙姗姗²,杨晓钢²(),蔡心悦²

^1.华侨大学机电及自动化学院，福建厦门 361021
^2.宁波诺丁汉大学机械、材料与制造工程系，浙江宁波 315100

收稿日期:2022-03-31 修回日期:2022-05-18 出版日期:2022-06-05 发布日期:2022-06-30
通讯作者: 杨晓钢 E-mail:weibin.shi@hqu.edu.cn;Xiaogang.Yang@nottingham.edu.cn
作者简介:施炜斌（1991—），男，博士，讲师，weibin.shi@hqu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(91534118);福建省自然科学基金项目(2021J01296)

Bubble breakage, turbulence dispersion and mass transfer model considering the joint effects of bubble-induced turbulence and shear turbulence

Weibin SHI^1,²(),Shanshan LONG²,Xiaogang YANG²(),Xinyue CAI²

^1.College of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Huaqiao University, Xiamen 361021, Fujian, China
^2.Department of Mechanical, Materials and Manufacturing Engineering, University of Nottingham, Ningbo 315100, Zhejiang, China

Received:2022-03-31 Revised:2022-05-18 Published:2022-06-05 Online:2022-06-30
Contact: Xiaogang YANG E-mail:weibin.shi@hqu.edu.cn;Xiaogang.Yang@nottingham.edu.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

在以鼓泡塔为代表的气液鼓泡流动中，存在着气泡诱导湍流（BIT）和剪切湍流两种湍流机制，并且二者在不同的时间、空间范围内既相互竞争又共同作用。受制于BIT动能能谱的形式和特性不够完整清晰，过去的研究中关于BIT如何对气泡破碎聚并、相间作用力、相间传热传质等相间相互作用过程产生影响的结论比较模糊。因此，本文在具有波数κ^-3特性的BIT能谱的基础上，提出了在不同工况下考虑BIT与剪切湍流共同作用的研究思路。研究结果表明，考虑两种湍流机制的气泡破碎模型和湍流相间扩散模型对BIT在整体或局部占据不同程度主导地位的情况，都能很好地捕捉气液鼓泡流动的动力学特性，为进一步准确揭示气液相间传质过程的内在机理提供了基础。

关键词: 气泡, 湍流, 传质, 种群平衡, 大涡模拟, 气液两相流, 鼓泡塔

Abstract:

In the gas-liquid bubbling flow represented by the bubble column, there are two turbulence mechanisms, the bubble induced turbulence (BIT) and the shear turbulence, and they both compete and work together in different time and space ranges. There are uncertainties remain in how BIT affects the bubble breakage and coalescence, the interphase interaction forces and the mass transfer, due to the limited understanding of the BIT energy spectrum. Considering the joint effects of bubble-induced turbulence and shear turbulence, we proposed the bubble breakage model and the turbulence dispersion force model in dealing with the global or the local dominance of BIT. For different operating conditions, these models have performed well in capturing the dynamic behaviors of both the gas- and the liquid-phase, which offers fresh insights into understanding the mechanisms of the interphase mass transfer process in the gas-liquid bubbly flows.

Key words: bubble, turbulent flow, mass transfer, population balance, large eddy simulation, gas-liquid flow, bubble column

中图分类号:

TQ 021.1

施炜斌, 龙姗姗, 杨晓钢, 蔡心悦. 计及气泡诱导与剪切湍流的气泡破碎、湍流相间扩散及传质模型[J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(6): 2573-2588.

SHI Weibin, LONG Shanshan, YANG Xiaogang, CAI Xinyue. Bubble breakage, turbulence dispersion and mass transfer model considering the joint effects of bubble-induced turbulence and shear turbulence[J]. CIESC Journal, 2022, 73(6): 2573-2588.

图/表 15

表1

RSM湍流模型方程"

模型	方程
$ρ u i' u j' ˉ$ 输运方程	$? α l ρ l u i' u j' ˉ ? t + ? α l ρ l u k u i' u j' ˉ ? x k = ? ? x k α l μ l + μ t σ k ? u i' u j' ˉ ? x k + α l P i j + α l ? i j - 23 δ i j α l ρ l ε + α l S i j B I T$ (3)
湍动能产生项	$P i j = - ρ l u i' u k' ˉ ? u j ? x k + u j' u k' ˉ ? u i ? x k$ (4)
压力-应变项	$? i j = ? i j, 1 + ? i j, 2 + ? i j, 1 W + ? i j, 2 W = - C 1 ρ l ε k u i' u j' ˉ - 23 k δ i j - C 2 ρ l ε k P i j - 13 t r P δ i j - C 1 W ρ l ε k u k' u m' ˉ n k n m δ i j - 32 u k' u i' ˉ n k n j - 32 u k' u j' ˉ n k n i k 3 / 2 ε 1 C l y W 2 - C 2 W ? k m, 2 n k n m δ i j - 32 ? i k, 2 n k n j - 32 ? j k, 2 n k n i k 3 / 2 ε 1 C l y W 2$ (5)
湍流耗散率输运方程	$? α l ρ l ε ? t + ? ? x i α l ρ l ε u i = ? ? x j α l μ l + μ t σ ε ? ε ? x j + α l ρ l ε k C 1 ε u' i u' j ˉ ? u i ? x k - C 2 ε ε + α l S ε B I T$ (6)
湍动能	$k = 12 ∑ i = 1,2, 3 u i' u j'$ (7)

表1

表2

相间作用力模型方程"

作用力	方程
曳力	$M D = 34 C D d b ρ l α g u g - u l u g - u l$ (15)
升力	$M l i f t = C l ρ l α g u g - u l × ? × u l$ (16)
虚拟质量力	$M V M = C V M ρ l α g d u l d t l - d u g d t g$ (17)

表2

表3

气泡破碎模型方程的比较"

项目	Luo and Svendsen模型	考虑BIT的气泡破碎模型
能谱函数	$E κ = C κ ε 23 κ - 53$ $C κ ≈ 1.5$	$E κ = δ l C l ε 23 κ - 53 + δ b C b α g U s l i p ν κ - 3$ (29) $δ l$ 、 $δ b$ 为开关函数 $C l$ 、 $C b$ 取动态变化值
涡旋平均脉动速度	$u ˉ λ = β 12 ε λ 13$ $β ≈$ 2.0	$u ˉ λ = C λ 12 C b α g U s l i p ν λ$ (30)
湍流涡旋数密度	$f λ = C 3 1 - α λ 4$ $C 3 = 15 2 2 π 23 Γ 13 ≈ 0.822$	$f λ = C 3 1 - α λ 4$ (31) $C 3 = 12 π C λ 2 π 2$
涡旋-气泡碰撞概率密度函数	$ω B T d i, λ = C 4 1 - α n i ε d i 13 1 + ξ 2 d i ξ 113$ $C 4 = π 4 C 3 β 12 ≈ 0.923$	$ω B T d i, λ = C 4 1 - α n i 1 + ξ 2 d i ξ 3 C b α g U s l i p ν$ (32) $C 4 = π 4 C 3 C λ C b 12$
平均湍动能	$e ˉ d i, λ = π β 12 ρ l ε d i 23 d i 3 ξ 113$	$e ˉ d i, λ = π 12 C λ ρ l λ 5 C b α g U s l i p ν$ (33)
破碎速率	$Ω B d i ∶ d j = 0.923 1 - α$ × $n i ε d 2 13 ∫ ξ m i n 1 1 + ξ 2 ξ 113 e x p - 12 σ C f β ρ l ε 23 d i 53 ξ 113 d ξ$	$Ω B d i ∶ d j = 0.923 1 - α n i ε d 2 13$ × $∫ Λ d i 1 1 + ξ 2 ξ 113 e x p - 12 σ C f β ρ l ε 23 d i 53 ξ 113 d ξ + C 4 1 - α$ × (34) $n i C b α g U s l i p ν ∫ ξ m i n Λ d i 1 + ξ 2 ξ 3 e x p - 12 σ C f β ρ l C b α g U s l i p ν d i 3 ξ 5 d ξ$

表3

图1

表4

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

图10

图11

参考文献 47

1	Luo H A, Svendsen H F. Theoretical model for drop and bubble breakup in turbulent dispersions[J]. AIChE Journal, 1996, 42(5): 1225-1233.
2	Lehr F, Millies M, Mewes D. Bubble-size distributions and flow fields in bubble columns[J]. AIChE Journal, 2002, 48(11): 2426-2443.
3	Andersson R, Andersson B. Modeling the breakup of fluid particles in turbulent flows[J]. AIChE Journal, 2006, 52(6): 2031-2038.
4	Wang T F, Wang J F, Jin Y. A novel theoretical breakup kernel function for bubbles/droplets in a turbulent flow[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2003, 58(20): 4629-4637.
5	Han L C, Fu J, Li M, et al. A theoretical unsteady-state model for k_L of bubbles based on the framework of wide energy spectrum[J]. AIChE Journal, 2016, 62(4): 1007-1022.
6	Zhao H, Ge W. A theoretical bubble breakup model for slurry beds or three-phase fluidized beds under high pressure[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2007, 62(1/2): 109-115.
7	Liao Y X, Rzehak R, Lucas D, et al. Baseline closure model for dispersed bubbly flow: bubble coalescence and breakup[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2015, 122: 336-349.
8	Zhang X B, Yan W C, Luo Z H. Numerical simulation of local bubble size distribution in bubble columns operated at heterogeneous regime[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2021, 231: 116266.
9	Risso F, Roig V, Amoura Z, et al. Wake attenuation in large Reynolds number dispersed two-phase flows[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 2008, 366(1873): 2177-2190.
10	Mercado J M, Gómez D C, van Gils D, et al. On bubble clustering and energy spectra in pseudo-turbulence[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2010, 650: 287-306.
11	Riboux G, Risso F, Legendre D. Experimental characterization of the agitation generated by bubbles rising at high Reynolds number[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2010, 643: 509-539.
12	Mendez-Diaz S, Serrano-García J C, Zenit R, et al. Power spectral distributions of pseudo-turbulent bubbly flows[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2013, 25(4): 043303.
13	Prakash V N, Martínez Mercado J, van Wijngaarden L, et al. Energy spectra in turbulent bubbly flows[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2016, 791: 174-190.
14	Lance M, Bataille J. Turbulence in the liquid phase of a uniform bubbly air-water flow[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1991, 222: 95.
15	Roghair I, Mercado J M, van Sint Annaland M, et al. Energy spectra and bubble velocity distributions in pseudo-turbulence: numerical simulations vs. experiments[J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2011, 37(9): 1093-1098.
16	Riboux G, Legendre D, Risso F. A model of bubble-induced turbulence based on large-scale wake interactions[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2013, 719: 362-387.
17	Sommerfeld M, Muniz M, Reichardt T. On the importance of modelling bubble dynamics for point-mass numerical calculations of bubble columns[J]. Journal of Chemical Engineering of Japan, 2018, 51(4): 301-317.
18	Laviéville J, Mérigoux N, Guingo M, et al. A generalized turbulent dispersion model for bubbly flow numerical simulation in NEPTUNE_CFD[J]. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2017, 312: 284-293.
19	de Bertodano M A L. Two fluid model for two-phase turbulent jets[J]. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 1998, 179(1): 65-74.
20	Drew D. A turbulent dispersion model for particles or bubbles[J]. Journal of Engineering Mathematics, 2001, 41: 259-274.
21	Lucas D, Krepper E, Prasser H M. Prediction of radial gas profiles in vertical pipe flow on the basis of bubble size distribution[J]. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 2001, 40(3): 217-225.
22	Wang T F, Wang J F. Numerical simulations of gas-liquid mass transfer in bubble columns with a CFD-PBM coupled model[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2007, 62(24): 7107-7118.
23	Krishna R, van Baten J M. Mass transfer in bubble columns[J]. Catalysis Today, 2003, 79/80: 67-75.
24	Lamont J C, Scott D S. An eddy cell model of mass transfer into the surface of a turbulent liquid[J]. AIChE Journal, 1970, 16(4): 513-519.
25	Han L C, Luo H A, Liu Y J, et al. A multi-scale theoretical model for gas-liquid interface mass transfer based on the wide spectrum eddy contact concept[J]. AIChE Journal, 2011, 57(4): 886-896.
26	Parekh J, Rzehak R. Euler-Euler multiphase CFD-simulation with full Reynolds stress model and anisotropic bubble-induced turbulence[J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2018, 99: 231-245.
27	de Bertodano M L, Lee S J, Lahey R T, et al. The prediction of two-phase turbulence and phase distribution phenomena using a Reynolds stress model[J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 1990, 112(1): 107-113.
28	Shi W B, Yang X G, Sommerfeld M, et al. Modelling of mass transfer for gas-liquid two-phase flow in bubble column reactor with a bubble breakage model considering bubble-induced turbulence[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2019, 371: 470-485.
29	Shi W B, Yang X G, Sommerfeld M, et al. A modified bubble breakage and coalescence model accounting the effect of bubble-induced turbulence for CFD-PBM modelling of bubble column bubbly flows[J]. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, 2020, 105(4): 1197-1229.
30	Rzehak R, Krepper E. CFD modeling of bubble-induced turbulence[J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2013, 55: 138-155.
31	Rzehak R, Krepper E. Closure models for turbulent bubbly flows: a CFD study[J]. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2013, 265: 701-711.
32	Long S S, Yang J, Huang X B, et al. Large-eddy simulation of gas-liquid two-phase flow in a bubble column reactor using a modified sub-grid scale model with the consideration of bubble-eddy interaction[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2020, 161: 120240.
33	Clift R, Grace J R, Weber M E. Bubbles, Drops, and Particles [M]. New York: Academic Press, 1978.
34	Tomiyama A. Struggle with computational bubble dynamics [J]. New York: Multiphase Science and Technology, 1998, 10(4): 369-405.
35	Luo H. Coalescence, breakup and liuqid circulation in bubble column reactors [D]. Trondheim, Norway: Norwegian Institute of Technology, 1993.
36	Gemello L, Plais C, Augier F, et al. Hydrodynamics and bubble size in bubble columns: effects of contaminants and spargers[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2018, 184: 93-102.
37	Gemello L, Plais C, Augier F, et al. Population balance modelling of bubble columns under the heterogeneous flow regime[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2019, 372: 590-604.
38	Guan X P, Yang N. Bubble properties measurement in bubble columns: from homogeneous to heterogeneous regime[J]. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2017, 127: 103-112.
39	Burns A D, Frank T, Hamill I, et al. The favre averaged drag model for turbulent dispersion in Eulerian multi-phase flows[C]// 5th International Conference on Multiphase Flow, ICMF' 04. Yokohama, Japan: ICMF, 2004.
40	Chen P, Duduković M P, Sanyal J. Three-dimensional simulation of bubble column flows with bubble coalescence and breakup[J]. AIChE Journal, 2005, 51(3): 696-712.
41	Chen P, Sanyal J, Duduković M P. Numerical simulation of bubble columns flows: effect of different breakup and coalescence closures[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2005, 60(4): 1085-1101.
42	Zhang X B, Yan W C, Luo Z H. CFD-PBM simulation of bubble columns: sensitivity analysis of the nondrag forces[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2020, 59(41): 18674-18682.
43	Shi W B, Li G, Yang J, et al. CFD-PBM modelling of gas-liquid two-phase flow in bubble column reactors with an improved breakup kernel accounting for bubble shape variations[C]// Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Heat Transfer, Fluid Mechanics and Thermodynamics (HEFAT2017). Portoroz, Slovenia: HEFAT, 2017.
44	Shi W B, Yang J, Li G, et al. Computational fluid dynamics-population balance modeling of gas-liquid two-phase flow in bubble column reactors with an improved breakup kernel accounting for bubble shape variations[J]. Heat Transfer Engineering, 2020, 41(15/16): 1414-1430.
45	Pope S B. Turbulent Flows [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
46	Terasaka K, Hullmann D, Schumpe A. Mass transfer in bubble columns studied with an oxygen optode[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 1998, 53(17): 3181-3184.
47	Zhang H H, Guo K Y, Wang Y L, et al. Numerical simulations of the effect of liquid viscosity on gas-liquid mass transfer of a bubble column with a CFD-PBM coupled model[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2020, 161: 120229.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

Case	实验	塔径/m	高度/m	表观气速/(m/s)	静液位高度/m	测量高度/m	湍流模型	湍流扩散	破碎模型
Case 1	Gemello等^[36-37]	0.4	3.6	0.16	1.6	1.5	RSM	—	Luo and Sevndsen
Case 2	Gemello等^[36-37]	0.4	3.6	0.16	1.6	1.5	RSM	—	Luo and Sevndsen Ω_B’(d_i ∶d_j )=10Ω_B(d_i ∶d_j )
Case 3	Gemello等^[36-37]	0.4	3.6	0.16	1.6	1.5	RSM	—	式(34)
Case 4	Guan等^[38]	0.15	1.6	0.08	1.2	0.8	RSM	—	Luo and Sevndsen
Case 5	Guan等^[38]	0.15	1.6	0.08	1.2	0.8	RSM	—	式(34)
Case 6	Sommerfeld等^[17]	0.14	1.4	0.0029	0.65	0.325	LES	Burns等^[39]	—
Case 7	Sommerfeld等^[17]	0.14	1.4	0.0029	0.65	0.325	LES	式(43)	—

[1]	董鑫, 单永瑞, 刘易诺, 冯颖, 张建伟. 非牛顿流体气泡羽流涡特性数值模拟研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 1950-1964.
[2]	丁俊华, 俞树荣, 王世鹏, 洪先志, 包鑫, 丁雪兴. 多重效应下超高速干气密封流场模拟及密封性能试验[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 2088-2099.
[3]	王泽栋, 石至平, 刘丽艳. 考虑气泡非均匀耗散的矩形反应器声流场数值模拟及结构优化[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(5): 1965-1973.
[4]	王皓, 唐思扬, 钟山, 梁斌. MEA吸收CO₂富液解吸过程中固体颗粒表面的强化作用分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1539-1548.
[5]	许文烜, 江锦波, 彭新, 门日秀, 刘畅, 彭旭东. 宽速域三种典型型槽油气密封泄漏与成膜特性对比研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1660-1679.
[6]	张银宁, 王进卿, 冯致, 詹明秀, 徐旭, 张光学, 池作和. 升温条件下多孔介质内气泡的生长和聚并行为[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(4): 1509-1518.
[7]	贾露凡, 王艺颖, 董钰漫, 李沁园, 谢鑫, 苑昊, 孟涛. 微流控双水相贴壁液滴流动强化酶促反应研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1239-1246.
[8]	朱兵国, 何吉祥, 徐进良, 彭斌. 冷却条件下渐扩/渐缩管内超临界压力二氧化碳的传热特性[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1062-1072.
[9]	张伟政, 赵吉军, 马学忠, 张琦璇, 庞益祥, 张俊涛. 湍流效应对高速机械密封端面型槽冷却性能影响分析[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1228-1238.
[10]	钱志广, 樊越, 王世学, 岳利可, 王金山, 朱禹. 吹扫条件对PEMFC阻抗弛豫现象和低温启动的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1286-1293.
[11]	何洋, 高森虎, 吴青云, 张明理, 龙涛, 牛佩, 高景辉, 孟颖琪. 析湿工况下平直开缝翅片传热传质特性的数值研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(3): 1073-1081.
[12]	何万媛, 陈一宇, 朱春英, 付涛涛, 高习群, 马友光. 阵列凸起微通道内气液两相传质特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(2): 690-697.
[13]	白剑钊, 郭子轩, 王德武, 刘燕, 王若瑾, 唐猛, 张少峰. 摇摆对气液并流模式立体旋流筛板压降的影响研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(2): 707-720.
[14]	项星宇, 王忠东, 董艳鹏, 李守川, 朱春英, 马友光, 付涛涛. 微通道内屈服应力型流体的流变特性及多相流研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(2): 546-558.
[15]	盛林, 昌宇, 邓建, 骆广生. 阶梯式T型微通道内有序气泡群的形成和流动特性研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(1): 416-427.

计及气泡诱导与剪切湍流的气泡破碎、湍流相间扩散及传质模型

Bubble breakage, turbulence dispersion and mass transfer model considering the joint effects of bubble-induced turbulence and shear turbulence

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 15

参考文献 47

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0