固/液界面纳米气泡形成及稳定性研究进展

doi:10.11949/0438-1157.20210062

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

固/液界面上形成界面纳米气泡（SNBs），广泛存在于电催化、流体输送、矿物浮选等领域中，并影响各个过程的效率，因此明确其形成及稳定机理对过程调控具有重要意义。首先从实验观察和模拟计算两个角度，对纳米气泡的研究方法进行探讨，综述了不同气体类型、固体界面性质、液相添加剂下纳米气泡的形成规律。由于目前纳米气泡形成后的稳定性尚不十分明确，主要总结了现阶段广为接受的接触线钉扎稳定机制，并分析了该领域的研究现状。此外，考虑到离子液体作为重要的化工溶剂，概述了该体系中微纳气泡的相关研究。最后简要对未来工作进行了展望，以期为离子液体体系中纳米气泡的研究提供新思路。

关键词: 纳米气泡, 气体, 界面, 添加剂, 稳定性, 离子液体

Abstract:

The behavior of surface nanobubbles (SNBs) form at the solid/liquid interface is widely found in industrial fields such as electrocatalysis, fluid transport, and mineral flotation, which can affect the efficiency of the processes in these fields. So, it is essential to regulate the process of bubble formation, in which the clarification of their formation and stabilization mechanisms were required. Here, this article described the research methodologies of nanobubbles formed from both experimental and computational perspectives, discussed the regular pattern of nanobubbles formation under gas types, solid interface properties, and liquid phase additives. Since the stability of nanobubbles after formation is not very clear at present, this article integrated the widely accepted stabilization mechanism of contact line pinning to show the current status of this research area. In addition, considering ionic liquids as important chemical solvents, this article provided an overview of the research on micro-nano bubble formation in ionic-liquid-system. Finally, this review concluded with a prospect of the future, and this article was expected to provide new insights for the study of nanobubbles in ionic-liquid-system.

Key words: nanobubbles, gas, interface, additive, stability, ionic liquids

中图分类号:

TQ 530.11

王宗旭,李紫欣,白璐,董海峰,张香平. 固/液界面纳米气泡形成及稳定性研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2021, 72(7): 3466-3477.

WANG Zongxu,LI Zixin,BAI Lu,DONG Haifeng,ZHANG Xiangping. Formation and stability of nanobubble at solid/liquid interface[J]. CIESC Journal, 2021, 72(7): 3466-3477.

图/表 2

图1 扫描电化学池显微镜生成单个H2纳米气泡图示[39]

Fig.1 Illustration of a single hydrogen nanobubble generated under a scanning electrochemical cell microscope[39]

图2 液相中纳米气泡成核类型及能量图示[64](a)平面上的非均质成核;(b)球形纳米颗粒上的非均质成核;(c)均质成核(红色线)、平面上的非均质成核(黑色线)、球形纳米颗粒上的非均质成核(蓝色线)

Fig.2 Nucleation type and energy diagram of nanobubbles in liquid phase[64](a) Heterogeneous nucleation on the plane; (b) Heterogeneous nucleation on spherical nanoparticles; (c) Homogeneous nucleation (red line), heterogeneous nucleation on the plane (black line), heterogeneous nucleation on spherical nanoparticles (blue line)

参考文献 93

1	Zhang X, Winnik F M. Preface to the nanobubbles special issue[J]. Langmuir, 2016, 32(43): 11071.
2	张雪花, 胡钧. 固液界面纳米气泡的研究进展[J]. 化学进展, 2004, 16(5): 673-681.
	Zhang X H, Hu J. Nanobubbles at the solid/water interface[J]. Progress in Chemistry, 2004, 16(5): 673-681.
3	Attard P, Moody M P, Tyrrell J W G. Nanobubbles: the big picture[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2002, 314(1/2/3/4): 696-705.
4	Chan C U, Ohl C D. Total-internal-reflection-fluorescence microscopy for the study of nanobubble dynamics[J]. Physical Review Letters, 2012, 109(17): 174501.
5	Alheshibri M, Qian J, Jehannin M, et al. A history of nanobubbles[J]. Langmuir, 2016, 32(43): 11086-11100.
6	Zou J, Zhang H, Guo Z, et al. Surface nanobubbles nucleate liquid boiling[J]. Langmuir, 2018, 34(46): 14096-14101.
7	Ke S, Xiao W, Quan N N, et al. Formation and stability of bulk nanobubbles in different solutions[J]. Langmuir, 2019, 35(15): 5250-5256.
8	Zhang X H, Maeda N. Interfacial gaseous states on crystalline surfaces[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2011, 115(3): 736-743.
9	Zhang Y, Zhao L, Deng S, et al. Effect of nanobubble evolution on hydrate process: a review[J]. Journal of Thermal Science, 2019, 28(5): 948-961.
10	Angulo A, van der Linde P, Gardeniers H, et al. Influence of bubbles on the energy conversion efficiency of electrochemical reactors[J]. Joule, 2020, 4(3): 555-579.
11	Hu H B, Wang D Z, Ren F, et al. A comparative analysis of the effective and local slip lengths for liquid flows over a trapped nanobubble[J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2018, 104: 166-173.
12	Wang Y F, Pan Z C, Luo X M, et al. Effect of nanobubbles on adsorption of sodium oleate on calcite surface[J]. Minerals Engineering, 2019, 133: 127-137.
13	Azevedo A, Oliveira H, Rubio J. Bulk nanobubbles in the mineral and environmental areas: updating research and applications[J]. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 2019, 271: 101992.
14	Calgaroto S, Wilberg K Q, Rubio J. On the nanobubbles interfacial properties and future applications in flotation[J]. Minerals Engineering, 2014, 60: 33-40.
15	Kalacheva A V, Medvedev V A, Serkov A T. Continuous deaeration of spinning solutions of polyacrylonitrile in dimethyl acetamide[J]. Fibre Chemistry, 2001, 33(1): 9-11.
16	王丽娟, 党晓波, 郑桂宁. 碳纤维原丝纺丝液脱单、脱泡工艺及装置技术研究[J]. 合成纤维, 2017, 46(11): 16-19.
	Wang L J, Dang X B, Zheng G N. Study on the process and device of de-monomer and de-bubble of carbon fiber precursor spinning solution[J]. Synthetic Fiber in China, 2017, 46(11): 16-19.
17	Pereiro I, Fomitcheva K A, Petrini L, et al. Nip the bubble in the bud: a guide to avoid gas nucleation in microfluidics[J]. Lab on a Chip, 2019, 19(14): 2296-2314.
18	Fatemi N, Dong Z Y, van Gerven T, et al. Microbubbles as heterogeneous nucleation sites for crystallization in continuous microfluidic devices[J]. Langmuir, 2019, 35(1): 60-69.
19	Zhu J, An H, Alheshibri M, et al. Cleaning with bulk nanobubbles[J]. Langmuir, 2016, 32(43): 11203-11211.
20	Etchepare R, Azevedo A, Calgaroto S, et al. Removal of ferric hydroxide by flotation with micro and nanobubbles[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2017, 184: 347-353.
21	Cho S H, Kim J Y, Chun J H, et al. Ultrasonic formation of nanobubbles and their zeta-potentials in aqueous electrolyte and surfactant solutions[J]. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2005, 269(1/2/3): 28-34.
22	Postnikov A V, Uvarov I V, Penkov N V, et al. Collective behavior of bulk nanobubbles produced by alternating polarity electrolysis[J]. Nanoscale, 2018, 10(1): 428-435.
23	Yang J W, Duan J M, Fornasiero D, et al. Very small bubble formation at the solid-water interface[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2003, 107(25): 6139-6147.
24	Li D Y, Qi L T, Liu Y B, et al. Study on the formation and properties of trapped nanobubbles and surface nanobubbles by spontaneous and temperature difference methods[J]. Langmuir, 2019, 35(37): 12035-12041.
25	Lou S T, Ouyang Z Q, Zhang Y, et al. Nanobubbles on solid surface imaged by atomic force microscopy[J]. Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B: Microelectronics and Nanometer Structures, 2000, 18(5): 2573.
26	Walczyk W, Schönherr H. Closer look at the effect of AFM imaging conditions on the apparent dimensions of surface nanobubbles[J]. Langmuir, 2013, 29(2): 620-632.
27	Teshima H, Takahashi K, Takata Y, et al. Wettability of AFM tip influences the profile of interfacial nanobubbles[J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 2018, 123(5): 054303.
28	Kundu P, Liu S Y, Chen F R, et al. In-situ generation of highly stable, sub 10-nm oxygen nanobubbles in liquid environmental tem[C]//2016 IEEE 29th International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS). Shanghai, China, 2016: 133-136.
29	Chen J, Zhou K, Wang Y, et al. Measuring the activation energy barrier for the nucleation of single nanosized vapor bubbles[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019, 116(26): 12678-12683.
30	Lemay S G. Noise as data: nucleation of electrochemically generated nanobubbles[J]. ACS Nano, 2019, 13(6): 6141-6144.
31	Luo L, White H S. Electrogeneration of single nanobubbles at sub-50-nm-radius platinum nanodisk electrodes[J]. Langmuir, 2013, 29(35): 11169-11175.
32	Chen Q J, Luo L, Faraji H, et al. Electrochemical measurements of single H₂ nanobubble nucleation and stability at Pt nanoelectrodes[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 2014, 5(20): 3539-3544.
33	Chen Q J, Wiedenroth H S, German S R, et al. Electrochemical nucleation of stable N₂ nanobubbles at Pt nanoelectrodes[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2015, 137(37): 12064-12069.
34	Ren H, German S R, Edwards M A, et al. Electrochemical generation of individual O₂ nanobubbles via H₂O₂ oxidation[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 2017, 8(11): 2450-2454.
35	Ren H, Edwards M A, Wang Y F, et al. Electrochemically controlled nucleation of single CO₂ nanobubbles via formate oxidation at Pt nanoelectrodes[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 2020, 11(4): 1291-1296.
36	German S R, Edwards M A, Ren H, et al. Critical nuclei size, rate, and activation energy of H₂ gas nucleation[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2018, 140(11): 4047-4053.
37	Soto Á M, German S R, Ren H, et al. The nucleation rate of single O₂ nanobubbles at Pt nanoelectrodes[J]. Langmuir, 2018, 34(25): 7309-7318.
38	Bentley C L, Edmondson J, Meloni G N, et al. Nanoscale electrochemical mapping[J]. Analytical Chemistry, 2019, 91(1): 84-108.
39	Wang Y F, Gordon E, Ren H. Mapping the nucleation of H₂ bubbles on polycrystalline Pt via scanning electrochemical cell microscopy[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 2019, 10(14): 3887-3892.
40	Che Z, Theodorakis P E. Formation, dissolution and properties of surface nanobubbles [J]. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2017, 487: 123-129.
41	Liu Y W, Zhang X R. Molecular dynamics simulation of nanobubble nucleation on rough surfaces[J]. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 2017, 146(16): 164704.
42	Xiao Q X, Liu Y W, Guo Z J, et al. Solvent exchange leading to nanobubble nucleation: a molecular dynamics study[J]. Langmuir, 2017, 33(32): 8090-8096.
43	Liu Y W, Edwards M A, German S R, et al. The dynamic steady state of an electrochemically generated nanobubble[J]. Langmuir, 2017, 33(8): 1845-1853.
44	Liu H B, Pan L M, Wen J. Numerical simulation of hydrogen bubble growth at an electrode surface[J]. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2016, 94(1): 192-199.
45	Wu C J, Chu K C, Sheng Y J, et al. Sliding dynamic behavior of a nanobubble on a surface[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2017, 121(33): 17932-17940.
46	Liu Y W, Zhang X R. Nanobubble stability induced by contact line pinning[J]. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 2013, 138(1): 014706.
47	Okitsu K, Suzuki T, Takenaka N, et al. Acoustic multibubble cavitation in water: a new aspect of the effect of a rare gas atmosphere on bubble temperature and its relevance to sonochemistry[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2006, 110(41): 20081-20084.
48	Brotchie A, Statham T, Zhou M F, et al. Acoustic bubble sizes, coalescence, and sonochemical activity in aqueous electrolyte solutions saturated with different gases[J]. Langmuir, 2010, 26(15): 12690-12695.
49	van Limbeek M A J, Seddon J R T. Surface nanobubbles as a function of gas type[J]. Langmuir, 2011, 27(14): 8694-8699.
50	Yang J W, Duan J M, Fornasiero D, et al. Kinetics of CO₂ nanobubble formation at the solid/water interface[J]. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2007, 9(48): 6327.
51	Fang C K, Ko H C, Yang C W, et al. Nucleation processes of nanobubbles at a solid/water interface[J]. Sci. Rep., 2016, 6: 24651.
52	Hasan M N, Rabbi K F, Mukut K M, et al. Nano scale dynamics of bubble nucleation in confined liquid subjected to rapid cooling: effect of solid-liquid interfacial wettability[C]// 7th Bsme International Conference on Thermal Engineering. Dhaka, Bangladesh, 2017.
53	Ye Y M, Klimchuk S, Shang M W, et al. Acoustic bubble suppression by constructing a hydrophilic coating on HDPE surface[J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2019, 11(18): 16944-16950.
54	Faber M S, Dziedzic R, Lukowski M A, et al. High-performance electrocatalysis using metallic cobalt pyrite (CoS₂) micro- and nanostructures[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2014, 136(28): 10053-10061.
55	Lu Z Y, Zhu W, Yu X Y, et al. Ultrahigh hydrogen evolution performance of under-water“superaerophobic”MoS₂ nanostructured electrodes[J]. Advanced Materials, 2014, 26(17): 2683-2687.
56	Chen Q J, Ranaweera R, Luo L. Hydrogen bubble formation at hydrogen-insertion electrodes[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2018, 122(27): 15421-15426.
57	German S R, Edwards M A, Chen Q J, et al. Electrochemistry of single nanobubbles. Estimating the critical size of bubble-forming nuclei for gas-evolving electrode reactions[J]. Faraday Discussions, 2016, 193: 223-240.
58	Rooze J, Rebrov E V, Schouten J C, et al. Dissolved gas and ultrasonic cavitation — a review[J]. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 2013, 20(1): 1-11.
59	Xiao W, Zhao Y L, Yang J, et al. Effect of sodium oleate on the adsorption morphology and mechanism of nanobubbles on the mica surface[J]. Langmuir, 2019, 35(28): 9239-9245.
60	Yasui K, Tuziuti T, Izu N, et al. Is surface tension reduced by nanobubbles (ultrafine bubbles) generated by cavitation?[J]. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 2019, 52: 13-18.
61	Ashokkumar M, Hodnett M, Zeqiri B, et al. Acoustic emission spectra from 515 kHz cavitation in aqueous solutions containing surface-active solutes[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2007, 129(8): 2250-2258.
62	Lee J, Kentish S, Ashokkumar M. Effect of surfactants on the rate of growth of an air bubble by rectified diffusion[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2005, 109(30): 14595-14598.
63	Fernández D, Maurer P, Martine M, et al. Bubble formation at a gas-evolving microelectrode[J]. Langmuir, 2014, 30(43): 13065-13074.
64	Fatemi N, Devos C, de Cordt G, et al. Effect of sodium dodecyl sulfate on the continuous crystallization in microfluidic devices using microbubbles[J]. Chemical Engineering & Technology, 2019, 42(10): 2105-2112.
65	Zhang M M, Seddon J R T. Nanobubble-nanoparticle interactions in bulk solutions[J]. Langmuir, 2016, 32(43): 11280-11286.
66	Xiao W, Wang X X, Zhou L M, et al. Influence of mixing and nanosolids on the formation of nanobubbles[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2019, 123(1): 317-323.
67	Olszok V, Rivas-Botero J, Wollmann A, et al. Particle-induced nanobubble generation for material-selective nanoparticle flotation[J]. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2020, 592: 124576.
68	Borkent B M, Dammer S M, Schönherr H, et al. Superstability of surface nanobubbles[J]. Physical Review Letters, 2007, 98(20): 204502.
69	Seddon J R, Kooij E S, Poelsema B, et al. Surface bubble nucleation stability[J]. Physical Review Letters, 2011, 106(5): 056101.
70	Sun Y J, Xie G Y, Peng Y L, et al. Stability theories of nanobubbles at solid-liquid interface: a review[J]. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2016, 495: 176-186.
71	Das S, Snoeijer J H, Lohse D. Effect of impurities in description of surface nanobubbles[J]. Physical Review E, Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 2010, 82(5): 056310.
72	Guo Z J, Wang X, Zhang X R. Stability of surface nanobubbles without contact line pinning[J]. Langmuir, 2019, 35(25): 8482-8489.
73	Uchida T, Liu S, Enari M, et al. Effect of NaCl on the lifetime of micro- and nanobubbles[J]. Nanomaterials, 2016, 6(2): E31.
74	Meegoda J N, Hewage S A, Batagoda J H. Application of the diffused double layer theory to nanobubbles[J]. Langmuir, 2019, 35(37): 12100-12112.
75	Zhang H G, Guo Z J, Zhang X R. Surface enrichment of ions leads to the stability of bulk nanobubbles[J]. Soft Matter, 2020, 16(23): 5470-5477.
76	Zhang X H, Chan D Y C, Wang D Y, et al. Stability of interfacial nanobubbles[J]. Langmuir, 2013, 29(4): 1017-1023.
77	Liu Y, Wang J, Zhang X, et al. Contact line pinning and the relationship between nanobubbles and substrates[J]. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 2014, 140(5): 054705.
78	Liu Y W, Zhang X R. A unified mechanism for the stability of surface nanobubbles: contact line pinning and supersaturation[J]. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 2014, 141(13): 134702.
79	Lohse D, Zhang X H. Pinning and gas oversaturation imply stable single surface nanobubbles[J]. Physical Review E, 2015, 91(3): 031003.
80	Shin D, Park J B, Kim Y J, et al. Growth dynamics and gas transport mechanism of nanobubbles in graphene liquid cells[J]. Nature Communications, 2015, 6: 6068.
81	Wang Y F, Luo X M, Qin W Q, et al. New insights into the contact angle and formation process of nanobubbles based on line tension and pinning[J]. Applied Surface Science, 2019, 481: 1585-1594.
82	German S R, Chen Q J, Edwards M A, et al. Electrochemical measurement of hydrogen and nitrogen nanobubble lifetimes at Pt nanoelectrodes[J]. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2016, 163(4): H3160-H3166.
83	Chen Q J, Liu Y W, Edwards M A, et al. Nitrogen bubbles at Pt nanoelectrodes in a nonaqueous medium: oscillating behavior and geometry of critical nuclei[J]. Analytical Chemistry, 2020, 92(9): 6408-6414.
84	Shang D W, Zhang X P, Zeng S J, et al. Protic ionic liquid [Bim][NTf2] with strong hydrogen bond donating ability for highly efficient ammonia absorption[J]. Green Chemistry, 2017, 19(4): 937-945.
85	Feng J P, Zeng S J, Feng J Q, et al. CO₂ electroreduction in ionic liquids: a review[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemistry, 2018, 36(10): 961-970.
86	王均凤, 聂毅, 王斌琦, 等. 离子液体法再生纤维素纤维制造技术及发展趋势[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(10): 3836-3846.
	Wang J F, Nie Y, Wang B Q, et al. Manufacturing technology and development direction on regenerated cellulose fibers using ionic liquids[J]. CIESC Journal, 2019, 70(10): 3836-3846.
87	Taylor S F R, Brittle S A, Desai P, et al. Factors affecting bubble size in ionic liquids[J]. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2017, 19(22): 14306-14318.
88	Qin K, Wang K, Luo R, et al. Dispersion of supercritical carbon dioxide to [Emim][BF₄] with a T-junction tubing connector[J]. Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification, 2018, 127: 58-64.
89	张香平, 曾少娟, 冯佳奇, 等. CO₂化工: 离子微环境调控的CO₂绿色高效转化[J]. 中国科学: 化学, 2020, 50(2): 282-298.
	Zhang X P, Zeng S J, Feng J Q, et al. CO₂ chemical engineering: CO₂ green conversion enhanced by ionic liquid microhabitat[J]. Scientia Sinica (Chimica), 2020, 50(2): 282-298.
90	Feng J P, Zeng S J, Liu H Z, et al. Insights into carbon dioxide electroreduction in ionic liquids: carbon dioxide activation and selectivity tailored by ionic microhabitat[J]. ChemSusChem, 2018, 11(18): 3191-3197.
91	Zhao X, Ranaweera R, Luo L. Highly efficient hydrogen evolution of platinum via tuning the interfacial dissolved-gas concentration[J]. Chemical Communications, 2019, 55(10): 1378-1381.
92	Chew E K, Lee K Y, Lau E V. The role of carbon chain length in the attachment between microbubbles and aqueous solutions of ionic liquid[J]. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2017, 506: 452-459.
93	冯建朋, 张香平, 尚大伟, 等. 离子液体中电化学还原CO₂研究评述与展望[J]. 化工学报, 2018, 69(1): 69-75.
	Feng J P, Zhang X P, Shang D W, et al. Review and prospect of CO₂ electro-reduction in ionic liquids[J]. CIESC Journal, 2018, 69(1): 69-75.

[1]	周晓庆, 李春煜, 杨光, 蔡爱峰, 吴静怡. 液滴撞击不同曲率过冷波纹面结冰动力学行为及机理研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 141-153.
[2]	毕丽森, 刘斌, 胡恒祥, 曾涛, 李卓睿, 宋健飞, 吴翰铭. 粗糙界面上纳米液滴蒸发模式的分子动力学研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 172-178.
[3]	江河, 袁俊飞, 王林, 邢谷雨. 均流腔结构对微细通道内相变流动特性影响的实验研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 235-244.
[4]	王琪, 张斌, 张晓昕, 武虎建, 战海涛, 王涛. 氯铝酸-三乙胺离子液体/P₂O₅催化合成伊索克酸和2-乙基蒽醌[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 245-249.
[5]	金伟其, 吴月荣, 王霞, 李力, 裘溯, 袁盼, 王铭赫. 化工园区工业气体泄漏气云红外成像检测技术与国产化装备进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(S1): 32-44.
[6]	米泽豪, 花儿. 基于DFT和COSMO-RS理论研究多元胺型离子液体吸收SO₂气体[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3681-3696.
[7]	车睿敏, 郑文秋, 王小宇, 李鑫, 许凤. 基于离子液体的纤维素均相加工研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3615-3627.
[8]	陈美思, 陈威达, 李鑫垚, 李尚予, 吴有庭, 张锋, 张志炳. 硅基离子液体微颗粒强化气体捕集与转化的研究进展[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3628-3639.
[9]	程业品, 胡达清, 徐奕莎, 刘华彦, 卢晗锋, 崔国凯. 离子液体基低共熔溶剂在转化CO₂中的应用[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3640-3653.
[10]	王俐智, 杭钱程, 郑叶玲, 丁延, 陈家继, 叶青, 李进龙. 离子液体萃取剂萃取精馏分离丙酸甲酯+甲醇共沸物[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3731-3741.
[11]	陈杰, 林永胜, 肖恺, 杨臣, 邱挺. 胆碱基碱性离子液体催化合成仲丁醇性能研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3716-3730.
[12]	陆俊凤, 孙怀宇, 王艳磊, 何宏艳. 离子液体界面极化及其调控氢键性质的分子机理[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3665-3680.
[13]	郑佳丽, 李志会, 赵新强, 王延吉. 离子液体催化合成2-氰基呋喃反应动力学研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3708-3715.
[14]	宋明昊, 赵霏, 刘淑晴, 李国选, 杨声, 雷志刚. 离子液体脱除模拟油中挥发酚的多尺度模拟与研究[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3654-3664.
[15]	杨绍旗, 赵淑蘅, 陈伦刚, 王晨光, 胡建军, 周清, 马隆龙. Raney镍-质子型离子液体体系催化木质素平台分子加氢脱氧制备烷烃[J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(9): 3697-3707.